Curt Doolittle

Source: Original Site Post

  • @PNN TRIGGER EVENT. LET’S GO

    @PNN

    TRIGGER EVENT. LET’S GO.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-24 03:42:10 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/103190818340028970

  • An Indictmnet: 6 – Sentencing

    Part 999 – Sentencing

    Our Threat to Our Enemy, the Enemy of Mankind, Our Promise, and Our Warranty, Under Our Law

    “Under the Natural Law, if you counter these words, with false promise, baiting into hazard, pilpul or sophism, fiction or fictionalism, critique or undermining, and thereby attempt other than reciprocal resolution of our differences, and restitution for your crimes, and in doing so, impose and further harm us, or by consequence impose further harm mankind, by any “display, word or deed”, public or private, we have universal, natural and moral license to shame, silence, punish, disenfranchise, ostracize, imprison, enserf, enslave, kill, kill with prejudice (pain), you and your relations whether genetic, social, religious, economic, or political, in identical collective punishment, in defense against those who would imitate you, for failure to insure us against you and yours. This is the eternal the judgment of our ancient law, the natural law of man, the physical laws of the universe, and the many gods whose names we give them – above which there is no other.”

    Our Proposition

    Whether kin, kith, or alien; We can separate, prosper, and speciate as we did before the age of sail. We will preserve your few cities as free cities, for the non-conforming to our civilization religions and laws, but you must remain within them. We will deport and repatriate or exterminate any invaders outside of them. We will silence your lying by display word and deed, and you may create whatever truthfully organized polity you desire, as long as it is stated truthfully in the natural law. Or We can war, conquer, and rule you – a politicide We can war, defeat, and exterminate enough of you – a politicide, and fratricide We can war, defeat, and exterminate all of you – a politicide, fratricide, and ethnocide Never has an empire been more fragile, and never has the world been more fragile, and it is you who through your undermining of our empires have brought about this fragility. However, you fail to understand, that an immigrant city is but a furnace for in which even the slightest interruption of information, money, power, water, heat, fuel,  food, and transportation, burns the bodies within it, without mercy, though contagious ignition. Those whom you have baited with your false promise will be the first to consume you. There are no conditions under which you will survive other than by separation in compromise.  So convert, integrate, abandon your life, culture, law, religion, civilization, of organized crime, and obey the natural law of reciprocity – or leave. Or die. Mankind cannot suffer another dark age of feminine, Semitic deceit, decline, and dysgenia caused by the folly of undomesticated females, weak men, and the underclasses who rebelling against the forces of nature and the poor choices of themselves and their ancestors. The Muslims owe us one billion dead and five civilizations of the Semitic dark age. the jews owe us one hundred million dead in this century, millions of the dead of the Semitic dark age, and the suffering of ignorance, superstition, poverty, and disease of those who suffered under the lies of the jews for the past two thousand years. You undermined our ancestors for trying to raise you out of a life of organized crime in a criminal religion, economy, and culture – and we tolerated you too much.  After our self-restoration, we have once again freed you under the presumption of our abandonment of a civilization of organized crime, a religion of organized crime, a law of organized crime, and a culture of organized crime. We taught you Aristotelianism. We gave you freedom under our natural laws. We gave you access to the franchise. We gave you access to office. And once again, you resorted immediately to a life, culture, religion, and civilization of organized crime, and undermined our people through your false promise and lies. Our ancestors sought to deport you. later ancestors sought to deport all of you from Europe forever.  Later ancestors restored your homeland to attract you rather than deport you. but you remain for one reason only: the value of perpetuating your civilization, religion, law, culture, and life of organized crime using baiting into moral-hazard under the pretense of morally plausible deniability, to destroy all human civilization and to return it to desert sands, of a desert god, who for any other people is indistinguishable from death itself. So in response we will increase the scope of our laws, lower our tolerance for their violation, and outlaw every possible means of baiting humans into hazard, every gain from doing so, end most possibilities of doing so through de-financialization, warranty of speech, and even the slightest suggestion of undermining, and impose the harshest possible We shall prosper and continue the race to Drag mankind into godhood. May your gods, if you have them, have mercy upon you. Because we will not. And in honesty, we hope you refuse. By refusing, you grant us moral license for Prosecution with Prejudice – and there are many among us from whom only your pain and suffering is sufficient restitution for your crimes – crimes against us, against our ancestors, against those who have been, against those who might have been, against those who might yet be, against those whose civilizations you have destroyed,  against  humanity, and against the billions of dead  you have planted in a field, whose seeds feed have given fruit to our fury. This is your indictment, our prosecution, our case, and our judgment under the physical laws of nature, the natural laws of man, and the ancient laws of our people.

    Guilt

    ( … plausible deniability when ignorant, not when convicted and informed )

    Punishments

    Europeans Women Jews Muslims Hindus Severity of Breach

    Resistance

    ( .. ) ( …. ) Disapproval is punishable by  …. Resistance is punishable by extra judicial field prosecution, Opposition is punishable by ….  

  • An Indictmnet: 6 – Sentencing

    Part 999 – Sentencing

    Our Threat to Our Enemy, the Enemy of Mankind, Our Promise, and Our Warranty, Under Our Law

    “Under the Natural Law, if you counter these words, with false promise, baiting into hazard, pilpul or sophism, fiction or fictionalism, critique or undermining, and thereby attempt other than reciprocal resolution of our differences, and restitution for your crimes, and in doing so, impose and further harm us, or by consequence impose further harm mankind, by any “display, word or deed”, public or private, we have universal, natural and moral license to shame, silence, punish, disenfranchise, ostracize, imprison, enserf, enslave, kill, kill with prejudice (pain), you and your relations whether genetic, social, religious, economic, or political, in identical collective punishment, in defense against those who would imitate you, for failure to insure us against you and yours. This is the eternal the judgment of our ancient law, the natural law of man, the physical laws of the universe, and the many gods whose names we give them – above which there is no other.”

    Our Proposition

    Whether kin, kith, or alien; We can separate, prosper, and speciate as we did before the age of sail. We will preserve your few cities as free cities, for the non-conforming to our civilization religions and laws, but you must remain within them. We will deport and repatriate or exterminate any invaders outside of them. We will silence your lying by display word and deed, and you may create whatever truthfully organized polity you desire, as long as it is stated truthfully in the natural law. Or We can war, conquer, and rule you – a politicide We can war, defeat, and exterminate enough of you – a politicide, and fratricide We can war, defeat, and exterminate all of you – a politicide, fratricide, and ethnocide Never has an empire been more fragile, and never has the world been more fragile, and it is you who through your undermining of our empires have brought about this fragility. However, you fail to understand, that an immigrant city is but a furnace for in which even the slightest interruption of information, money, power, water, heat, fuel,  food, and transportation, burns the bodies within it, without mercy, though contagious ignition. Those whom you have baited with your false promise will be the first to consume you. There are no conditions under which you will survive other than by separation in compromise.  So convert, integrate, abandon your life, culture, law, religion, civilization, of organized crime, and obey the natural law of reciprocity – or leave. Or die. Mankind cannot suffer another dark age of feminine, Semitic deceit, decline, and dysgenia caused by the folly of undomesticated females, weak men, and the underclasses who rebelling against the forces of nature and the poor choices of themselves and their ancestors. The Muslims owe us one billion dead and five civilizations of the Semitic dark age. the jews owe us one hundred million dead in this century, millions of the dead of the Semitic dark age, and the suffering of ignorance, superstition, poverty, and disease of those who suffered under the lies of the jews for the past two thousand years. You undermined our ancestors for trying to raise you out of a life of organized crime in a criminal religion, economy, and culture – and we tolerated you too much.  After our self-restoration, we have once again freed you under the presumption of our abandonment of a civilization of organized crime, a religion of organized crime, a law of organized crime, and a culture of organized crime. We taught you Aristotelianism. We gave you freedom under our natural laws. We gave you access to the franchise. We gave you access to office. And once again, you resorted immediately to a life, culture, religion, and civilization of organized crime, and undermined our people through your false promise and lies. Our ancestors sought to deport you. later ancestors sought to deport all of you from Europe forever.  Later ancestors restored your homeland to attract you rather than deport you. but you remain for one reason only: the value of perpetuating your civilization, religion, law, culture, and life of organized crime using baiting into moral-hazard under the pretense of morally plausible deniability, to destroy all human civilization and to return it to desert sands, of a desert god, who for any other people is indistinguishable from death itself. So in response we will increase the scope of our laws, lower our tolerance for their violation, and outlaw every possible means of baiting humans into hazard, every gain from doing so, end most possibilities of doing so through de-financialization, warranty of speech, and even the slightest suggestion of undermining, and impose the harshest possible We shall prosper and continue the race to Drag mankind into godhood. May your gods, if you have them, have mercy upon you. Because we will not. And in honesty, we hope you refuse. By refusing, you grant us moral license for Prosecution with Prejudice – and there are many among us from whom only your pain and suffering is sufficient restitution for your crimes – crimes against us, against our ancestors, against those who have been, against those who might have been, against those who might yet be, against those whose civilizations you have destroyed,  against  humanity, and against the billions of dead  you have planted in a field, whose seeds feed have given fruit to our fury. This is your indictment, our prosecution, our case, and our judgment under the physical laws of nature, the natural laws of man, and the ancient laws of our people.

    Guilt

    ( … plausible deniability when ignorant, not when convicted and informed )

    Punishments

    Europeans Women Jews Muslims Hindus Severity of Breach

    Resistance

    ( .. ) ( …. ) Disapproval is punishable by  …. Resistance is punishable by extra judicial field prosecution, Opposition is punishable by ….  

  • @rasterman Dylan has disappeared. His stuff is archived. But the channel’s gone.

    @rasterman

    Dylan has disappeared. His stuff is archived. But the channel’s gone.
    I still know Josh but haven’t touched with him in a while.
    I still spend time with Joel. Joel has potential. We’ll see where he goes.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-21 00:48:49 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/103173149810326712

  • Norms

    Manners Ethics Morals Traditions Holidays

    The Problem of Habituation (state, monopoly) vs Reason (spectrum, markets)

    MORALITY DOESN’T SCALE. The reason we need a Sun Tzu a Machiavelli, and a Doolittle, is because we are civilized and moral people and do not grasp the limit beyond which the immoral is necessary for group success. Conversely, the reason for Jewish and Muslim success in undermining, weakening, conquest, destruction by consumption, and failure of creating a civilization of their own as a growing, going concern, is their immorality. In other words. Law may be a moral discipline, but war by genetic, informational, financial, economic, and military means is not a moral discipline. You cannot simply, like a pet, learn habits, without reason. Because other people do not learn moral habits. They learn immoral habits and call them ‘good’. We live in an era of SCALE. The world, the universe, the very large and the very small. Our minds evolved to habituate almost everything and reason only when necessary. But we live in an era where reason is always necessary. ANd this is why democracy fails. Not enough of us have knowledge. Not enough skill, and far too few of us reason, and fewer still who reason across time. Most of us are still semi-domesticated, well trained animals. That does not mean that like the herd we must tolerate being led to slaughter.  

    Absolute Morality?

    Morality is as absolute as mathematics. Everything else is not morality but competitive strategy: contractual variations upon objective morality. Just as all law is as absolute as mathematics but all legislation contractual variation (or command). Cooperation evolved after individual survival. For cooperation to be rational it must be mutually beneficial. For it to be mutually beneficial it must be (in the aggregate) non-parasitic.  We raise our children, demonstrate kin selection with kin, and we cooperate with non-kin, and we compete with those with whom we do not cooperate. The conflation of morality with strategy and law with command is a long-standing problem in rational philosophy. The Natural Law and Morality are identical but Group Strategy and Group Contract are merely utilitarian. Morality is absolute. Norms are not necessarily moral. Norms are merely tactics. Legislation, Regulation is not necessarily (and rarely) lawful (under Natural Law). As such, we can measure whether some cultures are more moral than others, by measuring the degree of suppression of parasitism (free-riding) that is suppressed by law and norm. So not only is morality absolute, but the relative moral content of different cultures is absolute. That this difference determines economic velocity, and economic velocity affords us greater morality (if we choose it) is the more interesting area of inquiry.

  • Norms

    Manners Ethics Morals Traditions Holidays

    The Problem of Habituation (state, monopoly) vs Reason (spectrum, markets)

    MORALITY DOESN’T SCALE. The reason we need a Sun Tzu a Machiavelli, and a Doolittle, is because we are civilized and moral people and do not grasp the limit beyond which the immoral is necessary for group success. Conversely, the reason for Jewish and Muslim success in undermining, weakening, conquest, destruction by consumption, and failure of creating a civilization of their own as a growing, going concern, is their immorality. In other words. Law may be a moral discipline, but war by genetic, informational, financial, economic, and military means is not a moral discipline. You cannot simply, like a pet, learn habits, without reason. Because other people do not learn moral habits. They learn immoral habits and call them ‘good’. We live in an era of SCALE. The world, the universe, the very large and the very small. Our minds evolved to habituate almost everything and reason only when necessary. But we live in an era where reason is always necessary. ANd this is why democracy fails. Not enough of us have knowledge. Not enough skill, and far too few of us reason, and fewer still who reason across time. Most of us are still semi-domesticated, well trained animals. That does not mean that like the herd we must tolerate being led to slaughter.  

    Absolute Morality?

    Morality is as absolute as mathematics. Everything else is not morality but competitive strategy: contractual variations upon objective morality. Just as all law is as absolute as mathematics but all legislation contractual variation (or command). Cooperation evolved after individual survival. For cooperation to be rational it must be mutually beneficial. For it to be mutually beneficial it must be (in the aggregate) non-parasitic.  We raise our children, demonstrate kin selection with kin, and we cooperate with non-kin, and we compete with those with whom we do not cooperate. The conflation of morality with strategy and law with command is a long-standing problem in rational philosophy. The Natural Law and Morality are identical but Group Strategy and Group Contract are merely utilitarian. Morality is absolute. Norms are not necessarily moral. Norms are merely tactics. Legislation, Regulation is not necessarily (and rarely) lawful (under Natural Law). As such, we can measure whether some cultures are more moral than others, by measuring the degree of suppression of parasitism (free-riding) that is suppressed by law and norm. So not only is morality absolute, but the relative moral content of different cultures is absolute. That this difference determines economic velocity, and economic velocity affords us greater morality (if we choose it) is the more interesting area of inquiry.

  • Education – Production of Agency

    The Production of Agency

    —“To be of a sound mind for logical reasoning requires control of emotions. This control of the emotions begins with control over the body. Control of the body is obtained by fitness: stresses, trial, and error. The sequence by which we develop our agency is physical>emotional>mental.”— John Mattison

    AGENCY, VIA POSITIVA AND VIA NEGATIVA Again, whether we are talking the existing definition in social science, or my extended definition in natural law, Agency refers to the absence of impediment, the same way that truth refers to the absence of falsehood. We do not know what the unknown impediments and falsehoods consists of we only know that they are removable. As such: One can grant authority (permission in your stead). One can delegate (assign tasks and responsibilities). One can educate (remove ignorance) One can physically emotionally and mentally train (give discipline) One can discover (produce new knowledge with which to educate) One can remove impediments (govern or rule) So again, via positiva the sculptor constructs (justifies) with clay, or via negativa removes (criticizes) the stone. The scientist via positiva creates an opportunity for knowledge( hypothesis), and via negativa performs criticism (theory), then submits it to the market for further testing (survival) Just as via positive the abrahamist (sophist) via positiva constructs an excuse (Lies) with Pilpul to cause a moral hazard, or via negativa evades (Lies ) with Critique to destroy a moral good. The truth is created by a market competition between via positiva and via negativa. A sophism is created by the avoidance of market competition in both the real (physical) and ideal (imaginary) worlds. WHAT KIND OF IMPEDIMENTS? Well, we don’t know what future limitations we might encounter, but we are impeded (limited) in mental capacity, mindfulness, knowledge, physical ability, resources, time, social, political, our physical world, and the laws of nature. So imagination, thought, independence from emotions, impulses and biases, knowledge, models of knowledge, the rate of knowledge accumulated, physical size, strength, speed, perception, health, cellular degeneration, biological composition, energy, physical resources, time, limits of imposed upon us by others, and the limits of controlling of others, and the limited abilities of others, and the limitations of the environment and the physical universe.

    Sun Tzu’s Art of War, Machiavelli’s Prince are Works of Agency

    There is only one book in world literature that is an equal to the western canon, and that is the art of war – although the european works of Machiavelli, are more advanced, the universal applicability of the first of all does it best. It is an essay in the amoral (not immoral). We spend so much time in moral mind, we leave ourselves open to defeat. So, he retrains us to think objectively rather than morally. It is not a book about war. It is a book by which we restore agency, lost in the training of our norms. Machiavelli provides the same advice more directly in The Prince and his Art of War: morality has no place in war or its preparation. The norms ‘untrain us’ to succeed in war. Hence all men must be trained in both war of the amoral, and commerce and cooperation of the moral. P IS A CORE EDUCATIONAL CURRICULUM I make a lot of mistakes. We all do. I don’t make many errors. (in business I’ve made two). In my thought-work, I don’t know of any … yet. And you needn’t either. P is very powerful. At least, it is very powerful if you are intellectually honest. Conversely, if we teach P like math, reading, grammar, and writing, we will end up with intellectually honest people because it will be so damned difficult to get away with intellectual dishonesty. P is the only known inoculation against Abrahamism, and the universal human pursuit of parasitism by ignorance, error, bias, wishful thinking, suggestion, obscurantism, fictionalism, and deceit. Manners of non-imposition Ethics of non-imposition Morals of non-imposition Morality by Exchange. Positive Morality by Forbearance Extraordinary Morality by Investment Ultimate Morality by Sacrifice CURRICULUM Fitness(Self), Sport(Competition), Policing(Commons), Warfighting(Victory) Reading, Fairy Tales, Myths, Heroic Literature (criminal literature) Writing, Grammars(logics), Rhetoric (speech), Argument (persuasion), Debate, Acting (presenting), Manners, Ethics, Morals, The Natural Law, Customer Service, Negotiation, Contract, Common Law, Politics, War. Geographic History, Human History, Civilizational History, Art history, Biographical history, Economic history, military and political history, (and Criminal History) Arithmetic, Mathematics, Algebra, Geometry, Trigonometry, Pre Calc, Calculus, Linear Algebra, Statistics. Money, Accounting, Banking, Credit, Finance, Micro Economics, Entrepreneurial Economics, National Economics Human Scale Physics, Macro Physics, Micro Physics, Chemistry, Biochemistry, Genetics, Biology, Brain, Ecology Construction, Engineering, Programming, Chemical Engineering, Medicine, Genetics, Cognitive Science, Operations, Algorithms, functional programming, object-oriented programming, services programming,   Every Boy a Prince, and Every Girl a Princess.

  • Education – Production of Agency

    The Production of Agency

    —“To be of a sound mind for logical reasoning requires control of emotions. This control of the emotions begins with control over the body. Control of the body is obtained by fitness: stresses, trial, and error. The sequence by which we develop our agency is physical>emotional>mental.”— John Mattison

    AGENCY, VIA POSITIVA AND VIA NEGATIVA Again, whether we are talking the existing definition in social science, or my extended definition in natural law, Agency refers to the absence of impediment, the same way that truth refers to the absence of falsehood. We do not know what the unknown impediments and falsehoods consists of we only know that they are removable. As such: One can grant authority (permission in your stead). One can delegate (assign tasks and responsibilities). One can educate (remove ignorance) One can physically emotionally and mentally train (give discipline) One can discover (produce new knowledge with which to educate) One can remove impediments (govern or rule) So again, via positiva the sculptor constructs (justifies) with clay, or via negativa removes (criticizes) the stone. The scientist via positiva creates an opportunity for knowledge( hypothesis), and via negativa performs criticism (theory), then submits it to the market for further testing (survival) Just as via positive the abrahamist (sophist) via positiva constructs an excuse (Lies) with Pilpul to cause a moral hazard, or via negativa evades (Lies ) with Critique to destroy a moral good. The truth is created by a market competition between via positiva and via negativa. A sophism is created by the avoidance of market competition in both the real (physical) and ideal (imaginary) worlds. WHAT KIND OF IMPEDIMENTS? Well, we don’t know what future limitations we might encounter, but we are impeded (limited) in mental capacity, mindfulness, knowledge, physical ability, resources, time, social, political, our physical world, and the laws of nature. So imagination, thought, independence from emotions, impulses and biases, knowledge, models of knowledge, the rate of knowledge accumulated, physical size, strength, speed, perception, health, cellular degeneration, biological composition, energy, physical resources, time, limits of imposed upon us by others, and the limits of controlling of others, and the limited abilities of others, and the limitations of the environment and the physical universe.

    Sun Tzu’s Art of War, Machiavelli’s Prince are Works of Agency

    There is only one book in world literature that is an equal to the western canon, and that is the art of war – although the european works of Machiavelli, are more advanced, the universal applicability of the first of all does it best. It is an essay in the amoral (not immoral). We spend so much time in moral mind, we leave ourselves open to defeat. So, he retrains us to think objectively rather than morally. It is not a book about war. It is a book by which we restore agency, lost in the training of our norms. Machiavelli provides the same advice more directly in The Prince and his Art of War: morality has no place in war or its preparation. The norms ‘untrain us’ to succeed in war. Hence all men must be trained in both war of the amoral, and commerce and cooperation of the moral. P IS A CORE EDUCATIONAL CURRICULUM I make a lot of mistakes. We all do. I don’t make many errors. (in business I’ve made two). In my thought-work, I don’t know of any … yet. And you needn’t either. P is very powerful. At least, it is very powerful if you are intellectually honest. Conversely, if we teach P like math, reading, grammar, and writing, we will end up with intellectually honest people because it will be so damned difficult to get away with intellectual dishonesty. P is the only known inoculation against Abrahamism, and the universal human pursuit of parasitism by ignorance, error, bias, wishful thinking, suggestion, obscurantism, fictionalism, and deceit. Manners of non-imposition Ethics of non-imposition Morals of non-imposition Morality by Exchange. Positive Morality by Forbearance Extraordinary Morality by Investment Ultimate Morality by Sacrifice CURRICULUM Fitness(Self), Sport(Competition), Policing(Commons), Warfighting(Victory) Reading, Fairy Tales, Myths, Heroic Literature (criminal literature) Writing, Grammars(logics), Rhetoric (speech), Argument (persuasion), Debate, Acting (presenting), Manners, Ethics, Morals, The Natural Law, Customer Service, Negotiation, Contract, Common Law, Politics, War. Geographic History, Human History, Civilizational History, Art history, Biographical history, Economic history, military and political history, (and Criminal History) Arithmetic, Mathematics, Algebra, Geometry, Trigonometry, Pre Calc, Calculus, Linear Algebra, Statistics. Money, Accounting, Banking, Credit, Finance, Micro Economics, Entrepreneurial Economics, National Economics Human Scale Physics, Macro Physics, Micro Physics, Chemistry, Biochemistry, Genetics, Biology, Brain, Ecology Construction, Engineering, Programming, Chemical Engineering, Medicine, Genetics, Cognitive Science, Operations, Algorithms, functional programming, object-oriented programming, services programming,   Every Boy a Prince, and Every Girl a Princess.

  • Government

    Is the State Moral?

    The state enforces order (cooperation) sufficient to deny competitors access to the territory, resources, people, their production, and networks of productivity and trade. And to deny internal inhibitors to the income necessary to pay for it. It does this by suppressing local rent-seeking, corruption, and transaction costs, and centralizing these returns as ‘taxation’, where the concentration of that income can be devoted to the production of commons and the multipliers produced by such commons. this creates opportunity for centralized corruption and alliance with the state against the people, but without exception, the returns on state vs non-state are obvious: non-state’s cannot and do not exist. Even those claimed by ‘libertarians’ are just borderlands defended by states or empires, investing in settlement by permissiveness we translate as liberty. Since settlers provide claims to a territory which can be defended by arms, because in fact, they are investing in that territory, and reciprocity is the only international natural law that we can observe. We defend what we invest in. The only means of policing the state that we know of is rule-of-law through the courts of universal standing in matters both private and common.We have had this revoked by the state during the modern period, and we’ve been disintermediated from the courts as our means of defense. Democracy can never control anything other than voting an oligarchy into or out of office. Its insufficient for policy or defense because representatives are not required to state terms of contract before they enter office. So with democracy, disintermediation from the courts the only remaining method of insurance of sovereignty, liberty, freedom, and reciprocity is the militia and revolt. So the state must and can collect fees for defense, and the courts. It cannot compete unless it can collect fees for investment in the commons. Paying such people richly if small in number reduces their chances of corruption. But allowing them to buy votes through redistribution; and provides finance and internationals (large scale) with access to rents, rather than locals whose rents were suppressed (small scale), merely shifting the problem from many distributed rent-seekers to fewer larger centralized rent-seekers. This would appear to be a null trade, but it’s not, since the suppression of local corruption and rent-seeking provides the economic velocity that makes finance and internationals possible. So we must simply repeat the process of using the courts and the law to suppress new, larger organizations of rent-seekers and corruption. And this process never ends. Man invents. So men will invent new means of rents and corruption, and other men will use the market for the suppression of parasitism that we call the courts and the law to stop them. In this sense, the (positive ) market for goods, services, and information is the one we are most aware of. We are somewhat aware of the government (not state) as a market for commons. But of equal import is the (negative) market for the suppression of ir-reciprocity whether in the market for consumption (goods services information) or the market for multipliers (commons) we call government. Technically speaking the ‘state’ consists of the assets of the polity and the law its regulator, and the government a means of producing commons. Where commons include the state and its holdings and the means of defense whether military, judicial or sheriff. Collectively the government and the state also provide the services of an insurer of last resort. The problem is maintaining its role as the insurer, investor, and resolver of disputes, while not allowing the public to demand redistributions that limit their responsibility rather than insurance that retains it.

    WHAT PEOPLE MEAN BY TRUST IN THEIR GOVERNMENT

    In the political context, when people are expressing in their government, it only refers to three factors: (a) the framing of the debate by the media, academy, state complex, (b) the orderliness or at least comprehensibility of the patterns of speech and (c) the current levels of anxiety over the future. In other words, the academy, state, media, create demand by generation of conflict, just as diversity of race, ethnicity, and class generates conflict, just as ideological competition creates conflict. The state generates conflcit for ATTENTION which gets them POWER. Trust is a synonym for predictability over time.  

    Monarchy

    Monarchy (which is a purely Christian european order, in which kings are crowned by the church, as an insurer of their fitness), has been limited by traditional (indo european then germanic law) of individual sovereignty, interpersonal reciprocity, truthful testimony, promise, and contract.

    Russian Tzars had dictatorial power, European monarchs did not. Roman and Greek did not. The rest of the world has some version of chieftain, headman, ruler, but they do not have traditional european law of tort, trespass, property, or what we call natural law. As far as I know we had the optimum form of government evolve in England, with a strong monarchy, a strong parliament as a jury negotiating the monarchy’s requests for money and policy, a house of industry (lords) as a supreme court, and a church for matters of family and society not matters of state. Unfortunately, the church did not reform itself into a benevolent house government of natural law, nor did the state force it to, because the malinvestment by the church in it’s supernatural dogma was impossible to overcome. And so we both failed to add a house of ‘the family’ for labor and the underclasses, ad the church fell out of public policy. This resulted in parliaments and houses of government eventually subject to mob (underclass) rule and the frauds, sophists, and pseudoscientists who made those classes false promises. If we maintained houses for the classes, and one for women, then we would be able to conduct trades (parliament = parley-ment = parley = negotiating conflicts) between the classes and genders rather than conduct all-out propaganda wars in public in an attempt to get the most ignorant to side with one class or the other. As far as I can tell, a monarchy hiring and firing aristocracy to rule the state under that natural law, traditional law, indo-european law of trespass, tort, property, combined with Christian tolerance and charity) is the optimum form of government. My opinion is that we need only retain voting by direct vote, by economic contribution, when the monarchy wishes to raise taxes (revenues), and that those revenues be directed to stated purposes, not under discretion of the monarchy, and then some constant portion of revenues left to the monarchy to use at its discretion for the development of high commons (beautiful things). And so, we will now either add houses or lose participatory government altogether – as predicted.

    Taxation

    The fact that we tax tradesmen and members of bureaucracies at the same rate is counter-progressive (regressive). If you’re going to tax progressively (effectively a sales tax on market participation), employment in or as Laborers, Tradesmen, Professionals, Small Medium Businesses, Industries, Government should be taxed progressively. However the single most detrimental policies have been: (a) inter temporal redistribution and risk propagation (which is incalculable) rather than the Singapore/Texas model of forced savings and redistribution into personal health and retirement accounts (which is calculable – and reinvest-able). (b) The redistribution of middle class reproduction to the underclasses due to (i) inability to self segregate, thereby forcing families to ‘buy their way’ into expensive neighborhoods and schools at the cost of increased female labor, and decreased rates of reproduction. (b) the taxation and burning of reproduction by the middle class to redistribute reproduction to the lower classes (that should either be sterilized or limited to one child.) Because ‘white people’ can live extremely well in high trust high quality well maintained commons by purely voluntary labor, it is possible for ‘whites’ to spend very little on redistribution and commons production, and also work less if they can isolate themselves from less advanced (domesticated) groups. There is zero reason, other than interest rates on home and auto, and the need to buy overpriced housing in overpriced neighborhoods, for more than 10% overhead of GDP. White westerners with small arms, required service, some artillery and nuclear weapons can build extremely low cost per capita high quality commons simply because IT IS IN OUR NATURE. Heterogeneity (diversity) has destroyed western civilization. We let pandora out of her box when we allowed women to vote without first limiting the damage that they could do once loosed in the polity by compensating for their dysgenic impulses. Civilization occured because of paternalism: the use of competition and capital to limit the reproductive damage done by women’s intuitions.  

    Deep States and How to Deal with Them

    Asking forgiveness for analytic exposition in advance….. THE HIERARCHY OF MODELS: 1) Michels-ian View (Evolutionary): Deep state – a deterministic and necessary consequence of all human orders, because of the value and need for synthesis of information and provision of decidability necessary to concentrate forces of coercion (persuasion) – necessities that cannot be rectified. 2) Economists View (Systematizing): Deep state – a conspiracy of common interests – interests that must be rectified by the correct incentives. 3) Common Folk’s view (Intentional-izing): Deep state – a deliberate conspiracy of common interests – indicating immoral people with immoral interests that must be punished or replaced. 4) Ancient Folk’s View (anthropomorphism): The gods intend it so…. We are the Victims of the vicissitudes of the gods, and nothing can be done except to fight or submit to them. THEORIES 1) The Chinese Proposition: the state is the most profitable and important industry and should be run as an industry, by the best people, selected from the best universities, and professionally trained with increasing responsibility from the local to the regional to the national level. 2) Fukuyama’s Theory: (German Model) That the professionalization of a bureaucracy prior to democracy, under continental law will create a deep state that uses prior restraint, and serves the public interest out of tradition and self interest. 3) The Anglo Saxon Theory (Classical Liberalism): That patronage leadership of the bureaucracies should provide a means of correcting and cleansing the bureaucracies. But as Fukuyama has shown, this leads to the opposite effect. 4) The American Theory (minimalism): the only means of preventing endemic corruption, and providing maximum quality of goods services and information is maximum privatization of all services despite the resistance by the bureaucracy (monopoly). 5) The Science: States that produce monopoly services as investor of last resort (or monopoly investor in the commons) can produce industries, and retreat into the german, anglo saxon, or american theory depending upon the degree of trust in the judiciary to resolve disputes between the citizenry and the service organizations. In other words, the problem is the degree of trust and trustworthiness present in the culture – which in and of itself is created by those courts. GENERAL LAWS: 1) Iron Law of Oligarchy : oligarchies whether formal, patronage, kin, ‘specialized knowledge’, or ‘social networks” will evolve because decisions that concentrate resources (forces of coercion) cannot be created otherwise, and the organization cannot survive competition. 2) “Cthulu Swims Left”: any organization without a formal logic (law) to bind it, will exploit all opportunities for discretion to expand to the point of maximum rent seeking – until met by shock which it lacks the free resources to use in re-creating incentives necessary to reorganize under the new conditions. 3) Law of Maximizing of Rents: All organizations whether public or private will seek to maximize rents while providing the minimum returns to customers, creditors, and investors that customers, creditors, and investors will tolerate. THE SCIENCE Either we implement a strictly constructed, exceptionless, constitution of natural law (reciprocity) requiring markets in every aspect of life (association, cooperation, reproduction, production, production of commons (government), production of polities) with universal standing, universal application (rule of law), an insurer of last resort (Singapore Model), or we will continue (as we have) to deliver a private economy for association and reproduction, a mixed economy for the production of goods, services, and information, and a majoritarian monopoly economy, for the provision of commons whether goods, services, and information, and an absolute monopoly for insurer of last resort. You can evolve a population through rule of law, if you can evolve a court through rule of law, but you cannot evolve a court through rule of law, if your system of law is discretionary rather than one of rule of law. In other words, it is not possible to produce a non-discretionary rule of law, and therefore a government of low corruption, unless you produce first a law that is not open to interpretation and ‘fudging’. All societies require a system of government equal to their degree of imposition of rule of law. The problem is demographics, the percentage of people in a legally bound economy (the size of the middle class). As such we should expect to see small homogenous societies with strong rule of law and heavy redistribution on one end, and large heterogeneous societies with heavy corruption on the other. And that is what we see.

  • Government

    Is the State Moral?

    The state enforces order (cooperation) sufficient to deny competitors access to the territory, resources, people, their production, and networks of productivity and trade. And to deny internal inhibitors to the income necessary to pay for it. It does this by suppressing local rent-seeking, corruption, and transaction costs, and centralizing these returns as ‘taxation’, where the concentration of that income can be devoted to the production of commons and the multipliers produced by such commons. this creates opportunity for centralized corruption and alliance with the state against the people, but without exception, the returns on state vs non-state are obvious: non-state’s cannot and do not exist. Even those claimed by ‘libertarians’ are just borderlands defended by states or empires, investing in settlement by permissiveness we translate as liberty. Since settlers provide claims to a territory which can be defended by arms, because in fact, they are investing in that territory, and reciprocity is the only international natural law that we can observe. We defend what we invest in. The only means of policing the state that we know of is rule-of-law through the courts of universal standing in matters both private and common.We have had this revoked by the state during the modern period, and we’ve been disintermediated from the courts as our means of defense. Democracy can never control anything other than voting an oligarchy into or out of office. Its insufficient for policy or defense because representatives are not required to state terms of contract before they enter office. So with democracy, disintermediation from the courts the only remaining method of insurance of sovereignty, liberty, freedom, and reciprocity is the militia and revolt. So the state must and can collect fees for defense, and the courts. It cannot compete unless it can collect fees for investment in the commons. Paying such people richly if small in number reduces their chances of corruption. But allowing them to buy votes through redistribution; and provides finance and internationals (large scale) with access to rents, rather than locals whose rents were suppressed (small scale), merely shifting the problem from many distributed rent-seekers to fewer larger centralized rent-seekers. This would appear to be a null trade, but it’s not, since the suppression of local corruption and rent-seeking provides the economic velocity that makes finance and internationals possible. So we must simply repeat the process of using the courts and the law to suppress new, larger organizations of rent-seekers and corruption. And this process never ends. Man invents. So men will invent new means of rents and corruption, and other men will use the market for the suppression of parasitism that we call the courts and the law to stop them. In this sense, the (positive ) market for goods, services, and information is the one we are most aware of. We are somewhat aware of the government (not state) as a market for commons. But of equal import is the (negative) market for the suppression of ir-reciprocity whether in the market for consumption (goods services information) or the market for multipliers (commons) we call government. Technically speaking the ‘state’ consists of the assets of the polity and the law its regulator, and the government a means of producing commons. Where commons include the state and its holdings and the means of defense whether military, judicial or sheriff. Collectively the government and the state also provide the services of an insurer of last resort. The problem is maintaining its role as the insurer, investor, and resolver of disputes, while not allowing the public to demand redistributions that limit their responsibility rather than insurance that retains it.

    WHAT PEOPLE MEAN BY TRUST IN THEIR GOVERNMENT

    In the political context, when people are expressing in their government, it only refers to three factors: (a) the framing of the debate by the media, academy, state complex, (b) the orderliness or at least comprehensibility of the patterns of speech and (c) the current levels of anxiety over the future. In other words, the academy, state, media, create demand by generation of conflict, just as diversity of race, ethnicity, and class generates conflict, just as ideological competition creates conflict. The state generates conflcit for ATTENTION which gets them POWER. Trust is a synonym for predictability over time.  

    Monarchy

    Monarchy (which is a purely Christian european order, in which kings are crowned by the church, as an insurer of their fitness), has been limited by traditional (indo european then germanic law) of individual sovereignty, interpersonal reciprocity, truthful testimony, promise, and contract.

    Russian Tzars had dictatorial power, European monarchs did not. Roman and Greek did not. The rest of the world has some version of chieftain, headman, ruler, but they do not have traditional european law of tort, trespass, property, or what we call natural law. As far as I know we had the optimum form of government evolve in England, with a strong monarchy, a strong parliament as a jury negotiating the monarchy’s requests for money and policy, a house of industry (lords) as a supreme court, and a church for matters of family and society not matters of state. Unfortunately, the church did not reform itself into a benevolent house government of natural law, nor did the state force it to, because the malinvestment by the church in it’s supernatural dogma was impossible to overcome. And so we both failed to add a house of ‘the family’ for labor and the underclasses, ad the church fell out of public policy. This resulted in parliaments and houses of government eventually subject to mob (underclass) rule and the frauds, sophists, and pseudoscientists who made those classes false promises. If we maintained houses for the classes, and one for women, then we would be able to conduct trades (parliament = parley-ment = parley = negotiating conflicts) between the classes and genders rather than conduct all-out propaganda wars in public in an attempt to get the most ignorant to side with one class or the other. As far as I can tell, a monarchy hiring and firing aristocracy to rule the state under that natural law, traditional law, indo-european law of trespass, tort, property, combined with Christian tolerance and charity) is the optimum form of government. My opinion is that we need only retain voting by direct vote, by economic contribution, when the monarchy wishes to raise taxes (revenues), and that those revenues be directed to stated purposes, not under discretion of the monarchy, and then some constant portion of revenues left to the monarchy to use at its discretion for the development of high commons (beautiful things). And so, we will now either add houses or lose participatory government altogether – as predicted.

    Taxation

    The fact that we tax tradesmen and members of bureaucracies at the same rate is counter-progressive (regressive). If you’re going to tax progressively (effectively a sales tax on market participation), employment in or as Laborers, Tradesmen, Professionals, Small Medium Businesses, Industries, Government should be taxed progressively. However the single most detrimental policies have been: (a) inter temporal redistribution and risk propagation (which is incalculable) rather than the Singapore/Texas model of forced savings and redistribution into personal health and retirement accounts (which is calculable – and reinvest-able). (b) The redistribution of middle class reproduction to the underclasses due to (i) inability to self segregate, thereby forcing families to ‘buy their way’ into expensive neighborhoods and schools at the cost of increased female labor, and decreased rates of reproduction. (b) the taxation and burning of reproduction by the middle class to redistribute reproduction to the lower classes (that should either be sterilized or limited to one child.) Because ‘white people’ can live extremely well in high trust high quality well maintained commons by purely voluntary labor, it is possible for ‘whites’ to spend very little on redistribution and commons production, and also work less if they can isolate themselves from less advanced (domesticated) groups. There is zero reason, other than interest rates on home and auto, and the need to buy overpriced housing in overpriced neighborhoods, for more than 10% overhead of GDP. White westerners with small arms, required service, some artillery and nuclear weapons can build extremely low cost per capita high quality commons simply because IT IS IN OUR NATURE. Heterogeneity (diversity) has destroyed western civilization. We let pandora out of her box when we allowed women to vote without first limiting the damage that they could do once loosed in the polity by compensating for their dysgenic impulses. Civilization occured because of paternalism: the use of competition and capital to limit the reproductive damage done by women’s intuitions.  

    Deep States and How to Deal with Them

    Asking forgiveness for analytic exposition in advance….. THE HIERARCHY OF MODELS: 1) Michels-ian View (Evolutionary): Deep state – a deterministic and necessary consequence of all human orders, because of the value and need for synthesis of information and provision of decidability necessary to concentrate forces of coercion (persuasion) – necessities that cannot be rectified. 2) Economists View (Systematizing): Deep state – a conspiracy of common interests – interests that must be rectified by the correct incentives. 3) Common Folk’s view (Intentional-izing): Deep state – a deliberate conspiracy of common interests – indicating immoral people with immoral interests that must be punished or replaced. 4) Ancient Folk’s View (anthropomorphism): The gods intend it so…. We are the Victims of the vicissitudes of the gods, and nothing can be done except to fight or submit to them. THEORIES 1) The Chinese Proposition: the state is the most profitable and important industry and should be run as an industry, by the best people, selected from the best universities, and professionally trained with increasing responsibility from the local to the regional to the national level. 2) Fukuyama’s Theory: (German Model) That the professionalization of a bureaucracy prior to democracy, under continental law will create a deep state that uses prior restraint, and serves the public interest out of tradition and self interest. 3) The Anglo Saxon Theory (Classical Liberalism): That patronage leadership of the bureaucracies should provide a means of correcting and cleansing the bureaucracies. But as Fukuyama has shown, this leads to the opposite effect. 4) The American Theory (minimalism): the only means of preventing endemic corruption, and providing maximum quality of goods services and information is maximum privatization of all services despite the resistance by the bureaucracy (monopoly). 5) The Science: States that produce monopoly services as investor of last resort (or monopoly investor in the commons) can produce industries, and retreat into the german, anglo saxon, or american theory depending upon the degree of trust in the judiciary to resolve disputes between the citizenry and the service organizations. In other words, the problem is the degree of trust and trustworthiness present in the culture – which in and of itself is created by those courts. GENERAL LAWS: 1) Iron Law of Oligarchy : oligarchies whether formal, patronage, kin, ‘specialized knowledge’, or ‘social networks” will evolve because decisions that concentrate resources (forces of coercion) cannot be created otherwise, and the organization cannot survive competition. 2) “Cthulu Swims Left”: any organization without a formal logic (law) to bind it, will exploit all opportunities for discretion to expand to the point of maximum rent seeking – until met by shock which it lacks the free resources to use in re-creating incentives necessary to reorganize under the new conditions. 3) Law of Maximizing of Rents: All organizations whether public or private will seek to maximize rents while providing the minimum returns to customers, creditors, and investors that customers, creditors, and investors will tolerate. THE SCIENCE Either we implement a strictly constructed, exceptionless, constitution of natural law (reciprocity) requiring markets in every aspect of life (association, cooperation, reproduction, production, production of commons (government), production of polities) with universal standing, universal application (rule of law), an insurer of last resort (Singapore Model), or we will continue (as we have) to deliver a private economy for association and reproduction, a mixed economy for the production of goods, services, and information, and a majoritarian monopoly economy, for the provision of commons whether goods, services, and information, and an absolute monopoly for insurer of last resort. You can evolve a population through rule of law, if you can evolve a court through rule of law, but you cannot evolve a court through rule of law, if your system of law is discretionary rather than one of rule of law. In other words, it is not possible to produce a non-discretionary rule of law, and therefore a government of low corruption, unless you produce first a law that is not open to interpretation and ‘fudging’. All societies require a system of government equal to their degree of imposition of rule of law. The problem is demographics, the percentage of people in a legally bound economy (the size of the middle class). As such we should expect to see small homogenous societies with strong rule of law and heavy redistribution on one end, and large heterogeneous societies with heavy corruption on the other. And that is what we see.