Curt Doolittle

Source: Original Site Post

  • Pull the Veil from Your Mind

    —“Far away in Ukraine, he suggests to disaffected men in the West that _they_ should start a civil war, (he’s the “ideas guy” you see), but using that word requires courage. Instead, he hides behind romantic words like “revolution”, as if war is some beautiful poem. … He’s a snake. … I followed him for years, recommended him to others to follow, even learned a few things I still hold dear as concepts. But the veil dropped once or twice and it was revealed how he uses his intelligence in a corrupting way.”— Phil@Readomain.com @readomain

    [H]ere, in the USA, taking care of an ailing parent rather than putting her in a home, he shows up to fight in virginia, educates others one how our civilization was undermined, writes a reformation of the constitution to restore and preserve it, works within the law – until then. I’m a revolutionary. In the tradition of the founders and their constitution, the british constitution, the common law, the european development of rule of law of common law, the germanic law, and the western indo european law of the ancients and their predecessors. I pull from your face, your rhetoric, and your mind, the veil of ignorance, error, bias, and wishful thinking – that there is any solution possible other than the same revolution each of our ancestors has used to restore freedom, liberty, and sovereignty – and their fruits. I never wore such a veil over my mind. You were just terrified when I pulled the veil from yours. So man up, show up, fight, and win.

  • But I’m Not Creating a Popular Political Movement I’m Creating a Revolution and A Body of Law

    BUT I’M NOT CREATING A POPULAR POLITICAL MOVEMENT I’M CREATING A REVOLUTION AND A BODY OF LAW (and frankly y’all got nobody else at all other than me with anything to offer.)

    —“Curt: Don’t you realize that what you are trying to do is start a political movement? P must be a political movement if it’s ever going to get off the ground. You can talk all you want about it being the final conclusion to logic and science. You know what? That and $4 will get you a cup from Starbucks. I would personally like to see some P principles in our constitution. But it ain’t gonna happen if you don’t build constituencies. And the number one group that could be in your corner is conservative Christians. But that isn’t going to happen because you are too dogmatic about the folly of Christianity. I am offering you some advice. Delete all negative references to Christianity in your writings. Stop telling Christians they are foolish, failures, weak, arrogant, disobedient and wasting their time believing in the fake man in the sky. You are trying to build a political movement (herd) whether you choose to admit it or not. Who is going to be followers of the P movement? Marxists? Socialists? Antifa? The leftist academic elitists? The deep state? The parasitic democrats dependent on government transfer payments, single mothers, millions of recent immigrants, the AOC & Bernie millennials? No. It’s Euro Americans of which a huge number are Christian. And you’re going to piss them off. You are NOT going to gain any traction by alienating what should be your core constituency. You can be self-righteous in your P dogma and lose. Or you can try to win by forging alliances with those who can help you move forward. Choose wisely.”— Herod Bedford

    Go to my twitter page. What does the pinned tweet say? Here. I’m going to post it below for you. My response is that instead you stop making excuses for the truth in order to burying your head in the sand using faith as an excuse. You can never have a theocracy. You can only have trifunctionalism, or you can disappear from this earth. Truth and Law vs Wisdom and Faith. I’m not looking for a majority, any more than were the founders. I’m looking for 1% or less of the population that will fight to restore the constitution and our civilization without pandering to anyone, whether christian, or fascist, or marxist-socialist-postmodernist-feminist, or anything in between – we are made from rule of law and christianity, fascism, liberalism, and leftism are all privileged cults of fantasy that are possible because the few – the very few – were willing to pick up, carry arms, sally forth, and fight to preserve them despite cowards like you. Either your civilization and its operating system of law comes first, or you are an enemy of our people. If your faith is before your people, or you are the enemy of our people. if it comes before our law, our people, and our civilization then you are the enemy of your people. Your privilege of faith is due to our civilization, and our law, and the truth within our law that you deny in order to maintain your faith. Christian self congratulatory delusions are only possible, as is judaism, because real men fight for the law to have the freedom to provide you with that self indulgence. The few strong, reciprocal, and brave, do not need the approval of the many weak, irreciprocal, and cowardly. So grow up, man up, shut up, and fight for our law. Because the survival of your faith is predicated on it.

  • But I’m Not Creating a Popular Political Movement I’m Creating a Revolution and A Body of Law

    BUT I’M NOT CREATING A POPULAR POLITICAL MOVEMENT I’M CREATING A REVOLUTION AND A BODY OF LAW (and frankly y’all got nobody else at all other than me with anything to offer.)

    —“Curt: Don’t you realize that what you are trying to do is start a political movement? P must be a political movement if it’s ever going to get off the ground. You can talk all you want about it being the final conclusion to logic and science. You know what? That and $4 will get you a cup from Starbucks. I would personally like to see some P principles in our constitution. But it ain’t gonna happen if you don’t build constituencies. And the number one group that could be in your corner is conservative Christians. But that isn’t going to happen because you are too dogmatic about the folly of Christianity. I am offering you some advice. Delete all negative references to Christianity in your writings. Stop telling Christians they are foolish, failures, weak, arrogant, disobedient and wasting their time believing in the fake man in the sky. You are trying to build a political movement (herd) whether you choose to admit it or not. Who is going to be followers of the P movement? Marxists? Socialists? Antifa? The leftist academic elitists? The deep state? The parasitic democrats dependent on government transfer payments, single mothers, millions of recent immigrants, the AOC & Bernie millennials? No. It’s Euro Americans of which a huge number are Christian. And you’re going to piss them off. You are NOT going to gain any traction by alienating what should be your core constituency. You can be self-righteous in your P dogma and lose. Or you can try to win by forging alliances with those who can help you move forward. Choose wisely.”— Herod Bedford

    Go to my twitter page. What does the pinned tweet say? Here. I’m going to post it below for you. My response is that instead you stop making excuses for the truth in order to burying your head in the sand using faith as an excuse. You can never have a theocracy. You can only have trifunctionalism, or you can disappear from this earth. Truth and Law vs Wisdom and Faith. I’m not looking for a majority, any more than were the founders. I’m looking for 1% or less of the population that will fight to restore the constitution and our civilization without pandering to anyone, whether christian, or fascist, or marxist-socialist-postmodernist-feminist, or anything in between – we are made from rule of law and christianity, fascism, liberalism, and leftism are all privileged cults of fantasy that are possible because the few – the very few – were willing to pick up, carry arms, sally forth, and fight to preserve them despite cowards like you. Either your civilization and its operating system of law comes first, or you are an enemy of our people. If your faith is before your people, or you are the enemy of our people. if it comes before our law, our people, and our civilization then you are the enemy of your people. Your privilege of faith is due to our civilization, and our law, and the truth within our law that you deny in order to maintain your faith. Christian self congratulatory delusions are only possible, as is judaism, because real men fight for the law to have the freedom to provide you with that self indulgence. The few strong, reciprocal, and brave, do not need the approval of the many weak, irreciprocal, and cowardly. So grow up, man up, shut up, and fight for our law. Because the survival of your faith is predicated on it.

  • Religion and Conspiracy Theory Share the Same Error of Feminine Cognition: Imputation of Intent

    (possibly important)

    —“Pattern recognition isn’t the problem, it’s the “imputing conscious intent” where none exists or cannot be demonstrated.”— (Daniel and others)

    [W]hy? Bias of brain and subsequent consciousness to think through an empathic lens rather than a systemic and material lens. The herd bias of empathy when grazing vs the pack bias of systems when hunting. The masculine brain sees systems where the feminine brain sees intentions. There is a place for religion and it is a necessary place for the mammal inside. DEBT: Where worship means demonstration of appreciation for inheritance: debt. – Nature worship (debt) – Kin and Ancestor worship (debt) – Gods, demigods, heroes and saints worship (debt) CAPITALIZATION: And training in mindfulness: – Action: Heroism – achievement (cost) – Reason: stoicism – self authoring (cost) – Experience: epicureanism – community building (cost) REWARD: And the Ritual of the Feast – building community. – The Gathering, The Fire, The Call (reward) – The Parable, The Oath, the Testimony (reward) – The Sacrifice, The Feast, The Thanks (reward) – The Celebration (festival), The Sport(competition), The Dispersal (rest) (reward) RULES: There are three sets of laws evident in the structure of the universe whether those laws were made by structural consequence, the design of divinity, or the hand of god. – The laws of nature. (physical limits) – The natural law of Sovereignty and Reciprocity (personal limits) … – With the christian law of love improving upon natural law – The evolutionary law of transcendence of man into gods. (political limits) Grow up, Man up, Shut up, Show up. And win.

  • Religion and Conspiracy Theory Share the Same Error of Feminine Cognition: Imputation of Intent

    (possibly important)

    —“Pattern recognition isn’t the problem, it’s the “imputing conscious intent” where none exists or cannot be demonstrated.”— (Daniel and others)

    [W]hy? Bias of brain and subsequent consciousness to think through an empathic lens rather than a systemic and material lens. The herd bias of empathy when grazing vs the pack bias of systems when hunting. The masculine brain sees systems where the feminine brain sees intentions. There is a place for religion and it is a necessary place for the mammal inside. DEBT: Where worship means demonstration of appreciation for inheritance: debt. – Nature worship (debt) – Kin and Ancestor worship (debt) – Gods, demigods, heroes and saints worship (debt) CAPITALIZATION: And training in mindfulness: – Action: Heroism – achievement (cost) – Reason: stoicism – self authoring (cost) – Experience: epicureanism – community building (cost) REWARD: And the Ritual of the Feast – building community. – The Gathering, The Fire, The Call (reward) – The Parable, The Oath, the Testimony (reward) – The Sacrifice, The Feast, The Thanks (reward) – The Celebration (festival), The Sport(competition), The Dispersal (rest) (reward) RULES: There are three sets of laws evident in the structure of the universe whether those laws were made by structural consequence, the design of divinity, or the hand of god. – The laws of nature. (physical limits) – The natural law of Sovereignty and Reciprocity (personal limits) … – With the christian law of love improving upon natural law – The evolutionary law of transcendence of man into gods. (political limits) Grow up, Man up, Shut up, Show up. And win.

  • Schmachtenberger

    —“Curt I do agree you and Daniel Schmachtenberger are coming at things from different angles but I think if you two sat down for a weekend you would see existential gains for both of your goals, he’s the yin to your yang and an absolute genius. Also the number of unwitting Red Pills Weinstein drops is an added bonus.”— George from Youtube.

    [I] don’t disagree with Daniel Schmachtenberger on much of anything. Just the opposite. He uses more of the inspirational new age west coast language, and I use prosecutorial scientific economic and legal language. He’s a great example of the via positiva just as I am of the via-negativa. I re-recorded podcast #0002 and removed his name from it, and added more on math and physics. But my criticism in the podcast stands. Every (((leftist))) intellectual whines and complains and undermines because they are cognitively female, and demonstrate female cognition with undermining seeking, GSRRM, Magical Thinking, lack of creativity in solution provision, demand for consensus building and monopoly authority as a substitute for system-thinking and incentives, and demanding ‘real men do something’, as if they would do a better job when in charge when exactly the opposite happens when they are in charge – which is why the Jewish and Muslim leaderships always fail to crate stable high trust societies no matter what they do, and produce decline and collapse wherever they go. If you can’t write a body of policy changes, a project plan, contracts, shareholder agreements, a body of law, and a constitution to make a society function you’re just talking smack – because that is the hierarchy of algorithms that produce not a simulation but the operating system of the real world that we live in. You must program a computer via positiva, because it cannot imagine, or predict, and so cannot choose without those instructions. But you must program humanity via negativa because it can imagine, predict, and choose – which is why humans can adapt and computers can’t. And while both a computer and a human are amoral, the computer cannot choose between morality and immorality. The human can. And the purpose of our manners, ethics morals, norms, traditions, institutions and laws is to rase the cost of the immoral choices so that only moral choices remain. But we all test that limit at every opportunity.

  • Schmachtenberger

    —“Curt I do agree you and Daniel Schmachtenberger are coming at things from different angles but I think if you two sat down for a weekend you would see existential gains for both of your goals, he’s the yin to your yang and an absolute genius. Also the number of unwitting Red Pills Weinstein drops is an added bonus.”— George from Youtube.

    [I] don’t disagree with Daniel Schmachtenberger on much of anything. Just the opposite. He uses more of the inspirational new age west coast language, and I use prosecutorial scientific economic and legal language. He’s a great example of the via positiva just as I am of the via-negativa. I re-recorded podcast #0002 and removed his name from it, and added more on math and physics. But my criticism in the podcast stands. Every (((leftist))) intellectual whines and complains and undermines because they are cognitively female, and demonstrate female cognition with undermining seeking, GSRRM, Magical Thinking, lack of creativity in solution provision, demand for consensus building and monopoly authority as a substitute for system-thinking and incentives, and demanding ‘real men do something’, as if they would do a better job when in charge when exactly the opposite happens when they are in charge – which is why the Jewish and Muslim leaderships always fail to crate stable high trust societies no matter what they do, and produce decline and collapse wherever they go. If you can’t write a body of policy changes, a project plan, contracts, shareholder agreements, a body of law, and a constitution to make a society function you’re just talking smack – because that is the hierarchy of algorithms that produce not a simulation but the operating system of the real world that we live in. You must program a computer via positiva, because it cannot imagine, or predict, and so cannot choose without those instructions. But you must program humanity via negativa because it can imagine, predict, and choose – which is why humans can adapt and computers can’t. And while both a computer and a human are amoral, the computer cannot choose between morality and immorality. The human can. And the purpose of our manners, ethics morals, norms, traditions, institutions and laws is to rase the cost of the immoral choices so that only moral choices remain. But we all test that limit at every opportunity.

  • The Only Test of Your Ideas Is Law

    (natural law is to human sciences, as mathematics is to physical sciences)

    [I]f you can’t write a body of policy changes, a project plan, contracts, shareholder agreements, a body of law, and a constitution to make a society function you’re just talking smack – because that is the hierarchy of algorithms that produce not a simulation but the operating system of the real world that we live in. You must program a computer via positiva, because it cannot imagine, or predict, and so cannot choose without those instructions. But you must program humanity via negativa because it can imagine, predict, and choose – which is why humans can adapt and computers can’t. And while both a computer and a human are amoral, the computer cannot choose between morality and immorality. The human can. And the purpose of our manners, ethics morals, norms, traditions, institutions and laws is to rase the cost of the immoral choices so that only moral choices remain. But we all test that limit at every opportunity.

  • The Only Test of Your Ideas Is Law

    (natural law is to human sciences, as mathematics is to physical sciences)

    [I]f you can’t write a body of policy changes, a project plan, contracts, shareholder agreements, a body of law, and a constitution to make a society function you’re just talking smack – because that is the hierarchy of algorithms that produce not a simulation but the operating system of the real world that we live in. You must program a computer via positiva, because it cannot imagine, or predict, and so cannot choose without those instructions. But you must program humanity via negativa because it can imagine, predict, and choose – which is why humans can adapt and computers can’t. And while both a computer and a human are amoral, the computer cannot choose between morality and immorality. The human can. And the purpose of our manners, ethics morals, norms, traditions, institutions and laws is to rase the cost of the immoral choices so that only moral choices remain. But we all test that limit at every opportunity.

  • The Lesson of Comparative Civilizations

    [S]o, what is the lesson we learn from our study of history? That european peoples are able to evolve genetically, culturally, economically, technologically, faster than all other peoples because of our traditions of sovereignty, reciprocity, truth, duty, excellence, heroism, rule of law and jury, and markets in all aspects of life, where the market for suppression of parasitism we call the law, and the market for reciprocity in the production of goods, services, and information, evolve as rapidly as possible, thereby advancing productive innovations in each others interests, and suppression innovations in parasitism against others interests, in exchange for softly suppresses the rates of reproduction of the underclasses, thereby allowing us to divert proceeds of our production to the commons and the higher returns for all from those commons, the most important of which are truth before face, trust, economic and innovative velocity, and the prosperity, joy, and peace of mind that results from it.