Curt Doolittle

Source: Original Site Post

  • If you mean every man a…

    Apr 10, 2020, 8:29 AM

    —“Maybe we need to get rid of priestesses and instill Roman patriarchy throughout society. Oh wait, pagans always moan that was a bad thing.”—Rik Storey

    [I] don’t know what that means but if you mean every man a student and teacher, son and father, laborer and craftsman, soldier and warrior, sheriff and judge, legislator and sovereign, then (a) that’s pagan, and (b) that’s a good thing. 😉 The difference is the means by which we organize into those roles: Familial, Religious, Educational, Legal, or Military. We forge the individual using the furnace of the group.

  • Nation vs State vs Country

    NATION VS STATE VS COUNTRY Most common errors conflate nation (people), country (territory) and state (government) because the ‘natural’ order is that these are the same: a body of people, the territory they live in and the government they defend and operate it with. HUMAN GROUP individual > family > clan > tribe > nation > race > man HUMAN RULES norms (manners, morals, ethics) > laws > institutions, traditions > arts > myths > religions. TERRITORY Farm > village > town > city > county – province > country > state > federation (capital) > empire (core state, and capital) > civilization. ORGANIZATION father > pater familia (extended family or clan) > headman or chieftain (tribe of clans) > king(kingdom) of tribes > monarch(monarchy under christianity) > state (corporation over all) > federation (of states) > empire (heterogeneous states) > civilization. LEADERSHIP individual > family or clan > oligarchy (group) > democracy (most)

  • Nation vs State vs Country

    NATION VS STATE VS COUNTRY Most common errors conflate nation (people), country (territory) and state (government) because the ‘natural’ order is that these are the same: a body of people, the territory they live in and the government they defend and operate it with. HUMAN GROUP individual > family > clan > tribe > nation > race > man HUMAN RULES norms (manners, morals, ethics) > laws > institutions, traditions > arts > myths > religions. TERRITORY Farm > village > town > city > county – province > country > state > federation (capital) > empire (core state, and capital) > civilization. ORGANIZATION father > pater familia (extended family or clan) > headman or chieftain (tribe of clans) > king(kingdom) of tribes > monarch(monarchy under christianity) > state (corporation over all) > federation (of states) > empire (heterogeneous states) > civilization. LEADERSHIP individual > family or clan > oligarchy (group) > democracy (most)

  • The Lies

    [T]he Lies: “I reject, I disapprove, I disagree, I’m wary, I don’t believe, or engaging in ridicule, shaming, moralizing or psychologizing.” None of these are a form of reciprocity: an argument – they’re counter-signaling in lieu of argument. And lacking argument because of one’s ignorance or incompetence. And cowardice in admission of one’s ignorance or incompetence. An intellectually honest man does not counter signal like a woman, but either seeks to understand by asking questions, or posits a counter proposition that is open to equal criticism. counter signaling is a violation of reciprocity – a pretense of knowledge when one has none. You have only THREE intellectually honest propositions: … 1. Refutation. … 2. Competition. … 3. Question. Or the female (dishonest) … 4. Disapproval by counter signaling One cannot disapprove of a truth only a preference. The female cannot use force, or necessarily physically cooperate, or even use organized force or competition, but she can deprive men of sex, affection, care, and advocacy, and engage in counter signaling, or undermining, and rally other women to counter signal, and undermine. That is their weapon of competition of necessity. It is the means by which the females CREATE MARKET DEMAND for men to SATISFY THEM in exchange for sex, affection, care, advocacy and perhaps most importantly, abstinence from undermining you and those you cooperate with. This is why, if not one family one vote, then men and women require different houses, and both the legal prohibition on male violence, as well as the legal prohibition on female avoidance of argument, undermining, and reputation destruction so that both genders are reduced as are all others in the marketplace to cooperation by voluntary exchanges. Which was the point of marriage and one family one vote – and one of the principle means by which women’s natural irreciprocity and social superpredation was let loose from the pandora’s box of enfranchisement without equal legal suppression of the female means of superpredation that we had evolved in legal suppression of the man’s means of superpredation. We are not consious of the causes of our behavior. Which is what I seek to cure. And which will restore us to reciprocity. And end the conflict. And force us back into markets. -Cheers

  • The Lies

    [T]he Lies: “I reject, I disapprove, I disagree, I’m wary, I don’t believe, or engaging in ridicule, shaming, moralizing or psychologizing.” None of these are a form of reciprocity: an argument – they’re counter-signaling in lieu of argument. And lacking argument because of one’s ignorance or incompetence. And cowardice in admission of one’s ignorance or incompetence. An intellectually honest man does not counter signal like a woman, but either seeks to understand by asking questions, or posits a counter proposition that is open to equal criticism. counter signaling is a violation of reciprocity – a pretense of knowledge when one has none. You have only THREE intellectually honest propositions: … 1. Refutation. … 2. Competition. … 3. Question. Or the female (dishonest) … 4. Disapproval by counter signaling One cannot disapprove of a truth only a preference. The female cannot use force, or necessarily physically cooperate, or even use organized force or competition, but she can deprive men of sex, affection, care, and advocacy, and engage in counter signaling, or undermining, and rally other women to counter signal, and undermine. That is their weapon of competition of necessity. It is the means by which the females CREATE MARKET DEMAND for men to SATISFY THEM in exchange for sex, affection, care, advocacy and perhaps most importantly, abstinence from undermining you and those you cooperate with. This is why, if not one family one vote, then men and women require different houses, and both the legal prohibition on male violence, as well as the legal prohibition on female avoidance of argument, undermining, and reputation destruction so that both genders are reduced as are all others in the marketplace to cooperation by voluntary exchanges. Which was the point of marriage and one family one vote – and one of the principle means by which women’s natural irreciprocity and social superpredation was let loose from the pandora’s box of enfranchisement without equal legal suppression of the female means of superpredation that we had evolved in legal suppression of the man’s means of superpredation. We are not consious of the causes of our behavior. Which is what I seek to cure. And which will restore us to reciprocity. And end the conflict. And force us back into markets. -Cheers

  • Why South America?

    WHY SOUTH AMERICA? 1. Population of natives and slaves. 2. christianity => increase trust to increase cooperation. 3. church => will to power by the weak. 4. church => high rates of reproduction, mysticism to govern them and anti-empiricism and anti-meritocracy to maintain control over them. 5. high rates of reproduction => underclass poverty 6. vast underclass poverty => demand for socialism. 7. demand for socialism => demand for authority instead of rule of law. 8. lack of rule of law = lack of militia to defend against corruption under rule of law by threat of overthrow. This is the cycle of poverty, dysgenia, corruption, and stagnation under the church – a cycle only broken in northern europe by aristocratic manorialism to suppress the growth of the underclass, and the subsequent middle class restoration of trade, and the subsequent restoration of rule of law, and the subsequent wealth, and the subsequent literacy, and the subsequent break with the parasitism mysticism and dysgenia of the church, and the subsequent conquest of the world, and the subsequent industrial, scientific, technical, medical, and informational revolutions, and the subsequent dragging of mankind – kicking and screaming against the european aristocracy – out of their addiction to ignorance, superstition, hard labor, poverty, starvation, disease, suffering, child mortality, early death, tyranny, and the victimhood of nature all but hostile to life. Then the academy, which had evolved as an extension of the church to teach church dogma, shifted from mythology, theology, and the granting of indulgences to alternate history, pseudoscience, and the granting of useless diplomas under the second jewish attack on western civilization.

  • Why South America?

    WHY SOUTH AMERICA? 1. Population of natives and slaves. 2. christianity => increase trust to increase cooperation. 3. church => will to power by the weak. 4. church => high rates of reproduction, mysticism to govern them and anti-empiricism and anti-meritocracy to maintain control over them. 5. high rates of reproduction => underclass poverty 6. vast underclass poverty => demand for socialism. 7. demand for socialism => demand for authority instead of rule of law. 8. lack of rule of law = lack of militia to defend against corruption under rule of law by threat of overthrow. This is the cycle of poverty, dysgenia, corruption, and stagnation under the church – a cycle only broken in northern europe by aristocratic manorialism to suppress the growth of the underclass, and the subsequent middle class restoration of trade, and the subsequent restoration of rule of law, and the subsequent wealth, and the subsequent literacy, and the subsequent break with the parasitism mysticism and dysgenia of the church, and the subsequent conquest of the world, and the subsequent industrial, scientific, technical, medical, and informational revolutions, and the subsequent dragging of mankind – kicking and screaming against the european aristocracy – out of their addiction to ignorance, superstition, hard labor, poverty, starvation, disease, suffering, child mortality, early death, tyranny, and the victimhood of nature all but hostile to life. Then the academy, which had evolved as an extension of the church to teach church dogma, shifted from mythology, theology, and the granting of indulgences to alternate history, pseudoscience, and the granting of useless diplomas under the second jewish attack on western civilization.

  • Prosecution Online

    Apr 11, 2020, 1:13 PM [O]ne does not sell a liar – one prosecutes him. You cannot get them to agree. So deny the enemy the field. You can leave them defeated such that they come to their own conclusions. But no man is a hero to his debtors. For a decade now, I’ve taught the same strategy.

    1. Return any taunt they made as dispassionately as possible.
    2. Call them a liar or failing due diligence.
    3. State your central argument
    4. repeat until they are exhausted.

    All they do with every cycle is provide you with opportunity to recite the same statements “you are lying, either by design, or by failure of due diligence, [this is the truth], you can either refute it by testimony and warranty within the limits of liability (… 1. Refutation), or offer an equally criticizable solution to the question so that we can judge it’s possibility costs and benefits (2. Competition.), or seek to understand what you clearly don’t (3. Question). But at present you are [lying, denying, fictionalizing, sophistry, pseusocience,mysticism, impossibility, irreciprocity]. Just do the same thing over and over again and they will eventually expose themselves out of frustration – works every time if you stick with it over time.

  • Prosecution Online

    Apr 11, 2020, 1:13 PM [O]ne does not sell a liar – one prosecutes him. You cannot get them to agree. So deny the enemy the field. You can leave them defeated such that they come to their own conclusions. But no man is a hero to his debtors. For a decade now, I’ve taught the same strategy.

    1. Return any taunt they made as dispassionately as possible.
    2. Call them a liar or failing due diligence.
    3. State your central argument
    4. repeat until they are exhausted.

    All they do with every cycle is provide you with opportunity to recite the same statements “you are lying, either by design, or by failure of due diligence, [this is the truth], you can either refute it by testimony and warranty within the limits of liability (… 1. Refutation), or offer an equally criticizable solution to the question so that we can judge it’s possibility costs and benefits (2. Competition.), or seek to understand what you clearly don’t (3. Question). But at present you are [lying, denying, fictionalizing, sophistry, pseusocience,mysticism, impossibility, irreciprocity]. Just do the same thing over and over again and they will eventually expose themselves out of frustration – works every time if you stick with it over time.

  • More Advocacy of Orthodoxy as A State Religion

    MORE ADVOCACY OF ORTHODOXY AS A STATE RELIGION (and correcting me) by James Dmitro Makienko [I] made a long detailed post on the christian denial of the laws evident in god’s hand. Here: https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle.personal/posts/253632416034919 James corrects me – as did others, that none of these criticisms apply to orthodoxy only to evangelicals and catholics. I might argue that the church of england might apply as well. (Where I was married) I agree on orthodoxy as the optimum political christian religion. I only argue that the evangelicals are closest to jesus’ teachings as a folk religion, and I only make that argument in order to advance some form of nationalist christianity that tolerates the entire spectrum of human cognition: feeling, intuition, reason, observation. The only thing I criticize in the slavic sphere (a) intermarium inability to produce commercial and military scale, and (b) russian inability to produce trust at scale, rule of law at scale, and use of rule of law to suppress corruption at scale. Conversely, the number of things I criticize in the west middle east and far east are endless. I tend to use christianity to refer to evangelical, protestant, and catholic divisions, and I call out orthodoxy in particular. I will try to correct this habit as “western christianity” instead of ‘christianity’ but I think it will be a hard habit to break. thank you for the ‘correction’. 😉 James correctly answers below. == From James Dmitro Makienko == To clarify on what you said about Christianity “denying”, NONE of that applies to Orthodox Church. Of this set of God’s laws, what does Christianity DENY?

    1. physical laws of nature. – You won’t see any of this “young earth creation” crap in Orthodox churches, they are generally accepting of science now and don’t try to override it.

    2. the political law of homogeneity – Virtually every Orthodox church is nation-centered – hence you have Greek, Ukrainian, Bulgarian, Russian, Serbian, Georgian, Armenian, Coptic Ethiopian, Coptic Egyptian, Romanian, North Macedonian etc – this is why it has such difficulty in multicultural countries like Canada and America to create its own indigenous Orthodox church. We have Armenian and Ethiopian that go to out church, but we are Ukrainian, do our liturgy in Ukrainian, and not destroying our identity because there are people who are not Ukrainian.

    3. the evolutionary law of transcendence – we venerate numerous saints who have transcended through their works, and a lot of them did it through military victories and statesmanship.

    4. the … law of self domestication – there are many ways such as numerous feasts/fasting throughout the year, which toughens you in case hard times hit, rituals you do, which presents a framework for all classes to work together and not go after each other

    5. the … law of competition. – Do you mean economic competition (no Orthodox will have an issue with that, most will be negative towards socialism) or competition on the marketplace of ideas (Orthodox church likes to test things against time, so thats why a lot of things may take a few generations to implement – it is slow, yet it exists and we recognize its importance)

    Now if you apply it to the modern evangelical Christianity you will see that:

    1. Laws of nature – lawsuits against teaching of evolution, “bible parks” that promote young earth creationism – they literally allocate millions of dollars that they fleece from their hapless flocks to promote their anti-scientific falsehoods.

    2. Homogeneity – all the multi-culti crap you hear from liberal media is in evangelical (especially mainline) churches “we’re all the same, in jesus name, god loves you regardless of your skin, lets sing kumbaya for jesus” etc. Canada’s United Church is the absolute worst in trying to cuck to the progressives

    3. Evolutionary law of transcendence – they do the opposite, they love to revel in underclasses, and promote the message of equality regardless of cost or merit.

    4. Self domestication? Not much on this front either, because why domesticate when jesus loves you the way you are

    5. Competition? This is where evangelicals are actually outdo themselves, as they like to latch onto different new worldly ideas and modify them for their needs. It sometimes may come at the cost of discarding doctrine – but who cares about doctrine when to be “saved” in evangelical christianity you just need to say a Shahada(declaration of faith) that “i accept jesus christ as my lord and savior” – just like in Islam (that Mo is the prophet).

    The speculation about an industrial age in the first or second century AD which Christianity allegedly averted makes about as much sense as if ancient Egypt didn’t collapse we’d all be living in the giant space-travelling pyramids heading for nearest stars. We wuz space vikangs and shiet (makes me think of that lost vikings game of the early 90s!) It is impossible to combine all of Christianity into one-size-fits-all model. As for the reasons of the collapse of the Roman Empire it’ll just take me too much time to research and argument. In brief, i think you give Christianity too much credit for the collapse of the Roman Empire, as most of the 4th century was spend by Christians coming up with a Nicene creed and confronting Arianism(Jesus created & not divine, non-trinitarian), then confronting Nestorianism(Mary mother of Jesus, dyophysitism of Christ etc).