Source: Original Site Post

  • NAXALT

    Feb 4, 2020, 3:24 PM

    —“NAXALT arguments fail when the data is accurate and the weight of the distribution is clear. The smaller part of the distribution is already acknowledged but doesn’t falsify the statement that most x ….”—Scott De Warren

  • The Natural Law Does Not Change Human Behavior, It Accounts for It, and Limits only Irreciprocity

    Feb 4, 2020, 3:56 PM by Scott Strong The Natural Law doesn’t change human nature…it accounts for it. As for the diversity issue, that’s easy – less diversity, more homogeneity. We stop attempting to go against what humans do naturally…sort into groups with those who share our values and either trade if possible or war if threatened. Also, there may be many religions but we only know of one that is compatible with the law. The rest will be expunged and can continue lying themselves into an inbred hole elsewhere.

  • The Natural Law Does Not Change Human Behavior, It Accounts for It, and Limits only Irreciprocity

    Feb 4, 2020, 3:56 PM by Scott Strong The Natural Law doesn’t change human nature…it accounts for it. As for the diversity issue, that’s easy – less diversity, more homogeneity. We stop attempting to go against what humans do naturally…sort into groups with those who share our values and either trade if possible or war if threatened. Also, there may be many religions but we only know of one that is compatible with the law. The rest will be expunged and can continue lying themselves into an inbred hole elsewhere.

  • They Always Want to Lie Cheat and Steal – Becaues They Don”t Want to Self-Police (they Have No Agency)

    Feb 4, 2020, 4:01 PM

    —“Ok the way the comments are here maybe you should call it totalitarianism. If the is what you want to do thats fine but take that shit to a deserted island and have at it”–John Lafferty

    Your only objection to natural law is to say that you have the right to impose costs upon others against their will. It means you want to lie, cheat, steal. So it means you’re a bad person. That’s all natural law prevents: lying, cheating, stealing, harming, directly or indirectly. SO why do you want to preserve lying, cheating, stealing, and harm? So you can lie cheat steal and harm?

  • They Always Want to Lie Cheat and Steal – Becaues They Don”t Want to Self-Police (they Have No Agency)

    Feb 4, 2020, 4:01 PM

    —“Ok the way the comments are here maybe you should call it totalitarianism. If the is what you want to do thats fine but take that shit to a deserted island and have at it”–John Lafferty

    Your only objection to natural law is to say that you have the right to impose costs upon others against their will. It means you want to lie, cheat, steal. So it means you’re a bad person. That’s all natural law prevents: lying, cheating, stealing, harming, directly or indirectly. SO why do you want to preserve lying, cheating, stealing, and harm? So you can lie cheat steal and harm?

  • Define Caucasian (from Quora)

    Feb 4, 2020, 10:18 PM Caucasian is like many terms – as they evolve, we attribute different definitions to them. The term Caucasian was used in the census and was synonymous with white european christian. This evolved into the conventional term for european peoples: latin, germanic, slavic, finnic. Man is a self-domesticated animal. Domestication is achieved by neoteny and suppression of underclass (genetic load) reproduction by sexual selection and environmental selection. The primary difference between races (or subspecies depending upon your tolerance for the truth), is that we vary largely by the degree of neoteny (suppression of maturity) vs increase in rate and depth of matureity, and in adaptation to local climates and more importantly – disease gradients. There are many others including rates of identical twins, variations in cranial size, minor skull and muscle difference, large differences in body scent, variations in the distribution of spatial verbal abilities, succeptibility to certain diseases, and mental illnesses. However, almost all the meaningful(consequential) differences are variations in one trait: neoteny (domestication) – with east asians the least sexually developed, caucasians in the middle, and then Africans the most and fastest sexually developed. Almost all group differences in social cultural, and political order are caused by this variation. The other significant dimension is the size of our genetic loads (lower and underclasses). There is little difference in our global elites across the races. But our conflicts come from proximity to one another given the vastly different sizes of our workingl, lower, and underclasses. For example, when we compare IQ differences between races and subraces, we are comparing differences in the size of the classes. In warm climates genetic load survives, and sexual maturity and rates of reproduction increase – and in cold climates where people live indoors in close quarters for many months of the year, and must organize to maintain animals and food over winters, sexual and natural selection reduce the lower classes rapidly. So given our differences in the rate and depth of sexual maturity, and the difference in the size of our underclasses, this creates groups that display different behavior, and conflict over what acceptable behavior is, and conflict over the commons and institutions we desire. There are three or four surviving races (subspecies): West Eurasian, African, and Asian – and the fourth is the austronesian remainder of early african migrations. West eurasians include everyone who isn’t african, (iranic-dravidian), east asian, or austronesian. Genetically, morphologically/phenotypically, civilizationally, culturally we separate the west eurasian people into post-glacial proto-peoples: the southern branch of north african, semitic (marsh arab, afro-asiatic), the eastern branch: turkic, and the indo-european branch: european, iranic, anatolian (lost), and the iranic branch integrated (lost) in admixture in india. We use ‘Caucasian’ as a synonym for europeans from spain to the urals, an south to the caucuses mountains. However, in practice we use it as synonymous for european christendom, and ‘white’ synonymous with european christendom -excluding the people of the caucuses. Since the greeks, southern italians, and Sardianins are remnants of the anatolian migration we include them as europeans and caucasians. Edit

  • Define Caucasian (from Quora)

    Feb 4, 2020, 10:18 PM Caucasian is like many terms – as they evolve, we attribute different definitions to them. The term Caucasian was used in the census and was synonymous with white european christian. This evolved into the conventional term for european peoples: latin, germanic, slavic, finnic. Man is a self-domesticated animal. Domestication is achieved by neoteny and suppression of underclass (genetic load) reproduction by sexual selection and environmental selection. The primary difference between races (or subspecies depending upon your tolerance for the truth), is that we vary largely by the degree of neoteny (suppression of maturity) vs increase in rate and depth of matureity, and in adaptation to local climates and more importantly – disease gradients. There are many others including rates of identical twins, variations in cranial size, minor skull and muscle difference, large differences in body scent, variations in the distribution of spatial verbal abilities, succeptibility to certain diseases, and mental illnesses. However, almost all the meaningful(consequential) differences are variations in one trait: neoteny (domestication) – with east asians the least sexually developed, caucasians in the middle, and then Africans the most and fastest sexually developed. Almost all group differences in social cultural, and political order are caused by this variation. The other significant dimension is the size of our genetic loads (lower and underclasses). There is little difference in our global elites across the races. But our conflicts come from proximity to one another given the vastly different sizes of our workingl, lower, and underclasses. For example, when we compare IQ differences between races and subraces, we are comparing differences in the size of the classes. In warm climates genetic load survives, and sexual maturity and rates of reproduction increase – and in cold climates where people live indoors in close quarters for many months of the year, and must organize to maintain animals and food over winters, sexual and natural selection reduce the lower classes rapidly. So given our differences in the rate and depth of sexual maturity, and the difference in the size of our underclasses, this creates groups that display different behavior, and conflict over what acceptable behavior is, and conflict over the commons and institutions we desire. There are three or four surviving races (subspecies): West Eurasian, African, and Asian – and the fourth is the austronesian remainder of early african migrations. West eurasians include everyone who isn’t african, (iranic-dravidian), east asian, or austronesian. Genetically, morphologically/phenotypically, civilizationally, culturally we separate the west eurasian people into post-glacial proto-peoples: the southern branch of north african, semitic (marsh arab, afro-asiatic), the eastern branch: turkic, and the indo-european branch: european, iranic, anatolian (lost), and the iranic branch integrated (lost) in admixture in india. We use ‘Caucasian’ as a synonym for europeans from spain to the urals, an south to the caucuses mountains. However, in practice we use it as synonymous for european christendom, and ‘white’ synonymous with european christendom -excluding the people of the caucuses. Since the greeks, southern italians, and Sardianins are remnants of the anatolian migration we include them as europeans and caucasians. Edit

  • Do Laws Expire Under P?

    Feb 4, 2020, 11:06 PM QUICK DEFINITIONS: LAW – rules in a given political order NATURAL LAW – Reciprocity COMMAND – Rule by Degree LEGISLATION – A rule by decree of a legislative body REGULATION – Rule for enforcing legislation CONTRACT OF THE COMMONS – A contract between representatives on behalf of the people having force of law. FINDING OF LAW – record of decision made by a court for future reference. BODY OF LAW – the sum of all of the above. CONTRACT – an agreement under law insured by a court. A constitution describes process and procedure for the production of commons. All contracts must state dependencies, fulfillment criteria, an expiration date, termination clauses, means of restitution, and responsible parties. Under P-Law we may only make contracts of the commons, and findings of law. Regulations are processed as changes to the terms of the contract of the commons. As such all contracts of the commons expire. As such we should expect regular renewal of those contracts whose value remains in place – and regular termination of contracts of the commons and regulations that no longer apply – and a chain of terminated contracts of the commons and regulations that are dependent upon those terminated contracts of the commons.

  • Do Laws Expire Under P?

    Feb 4, 2020, 11:06 PM QUICK DEFINITIONS: LAW – rules in a given political order NATURAL LAW – Reciprocity COMMAND – Rule by Degree LEGISLATION – A rule by decree of a legislative body REGULATION – Rule for enforcing legislation CONTRACT OF THE COMMONS – A contract between representatives on behalf of the people having force of law. FINDING OF LAW – record of decision made by a court for future reference. BODY OF LAW – the sum of all of the above. CONTRACT – an agreement under law insured by a court. A constitution describes process and procedure for the production of commons. All contracts must state dependencies, fulfillment criteria, an expiration date, termination clauses, means of restitution, and responsible parties. Under P-Law we may only make contracts of the commons, and findings of law. Regulations are processed as changes to the terms of the contract of the commons. As such all contracts of the commons expire. As such we should expect regular renewal of those contracts whose value remains in place – and regular termination of contracts of the commons and regulations that no longer apply – and a chain of terminated contracts of the commons and regulations that are dependent upon those terminated contracts of the commons.

  • Graceful Escalation and Graceful Failure

    Feb 5, 2020, 11:05 AM

    1. Constrain one another’s words with the duel.
    2. Constrain one another’s action with the court, having failed to constrain them with threat of the duel.
    3. Constrain a group, or industry with the court of commons for having failed to constrain one another with the court.
    4. Constrain a government with an election for having failed to constrain individuals, groups, or industries.
    5. Constrain a monarchy with a revolution for having failed to constrain the government.