Feb 4, 2020, 9:46 AM
—“I think you nailed it a few years ago. We’re primarily focused on improvement and transcendence while they don’t even want to participate just seize, re-distribute, and spend down capital and wealth.”—James Santagata
Source: Original Site Post
-
They Just Want to Consume
-
Changing the Jesus Narrative to Fit Original Intent
Feb 4, 2020, 12:21 PM To change the narrative requires only that we say Jesus – as some have hypothesized – is the son of a roman soldier and a jewish prostitute, who rebelled against both roman conquest of Judea and Jewish abuse of one another, with a message of love one another – surrender your frustration, anger, jealousy, to heaven in exchange for building the bond of trust. And for his rebelliousness against both jews and rome, both rome and jews killed him. And then the jews took his message of love and wrapped it in lies, to create a victim hero to replace the greco roman hero Achilles and the Epic Cyle of the aristocracy, and continue the jewish narrative of the underclasses (slaves, slave traders, money changers-usurers instead.
-
Changing the Jesus Narrative to Fit Original Intent
Feb 4, 2020, 12:21 PM To change the narrative requires only that we say Jesus – as some have hypothesized – is the son of a roman soldier and a jewish prostitute, who rebelled against both roman conquest of Judea and Jewish abuse of one another, with a message of love one another – surrender your frustration, anger, jealousy, to heaven in exchange for building the bond of trust. And for his rebelliousness against both jews and rome, both rome and jews killed him. And then the jews took his message of love and wrapped it in lies, to create a victim hero to replace the greco roman hero Achilles and the Epic Cyle of the aristocracy, and continue the jewish narrative of the underclasses (slaves, slave traders, money changers-usurers instead.
-
Why Will New Laws Work?
Feb 4, 2020, 12:41 PM
—-“My point is how is a new set of laws going to change human nature? We are a nation of many different peoples with many different religions , cultures and morals.
What one group of people see as acceptable another group sees as unacceptable. I do agree that whatever laws we have , and few they should be, should apply equally to everyone regardless of any status.”—John Lafferty GOOD QUESTION 1) Under the natural law, we are each sovereigns (kings of different countries). Our contract with one another is an alliance that insures one another’s sovereignty. That is our ‘social contact’- it’s not social at all. It’s military. As such we are all equal before the law, because the law is nothing more than reciprocal insurance of one another’s sovereignty, and therefor the requirement for reciprocity in all interactions; and that in any violation of reciprocity, they may request defense restitution and punishment from the allies. So we are unequal in ability, unequal in value to one another, equal under the law, and equally insured. But we are sovereign, autonomous mini-countries, with each man, woman, and children and their land the smallest possible nation. 2) Natural law is a description of human nature. It is the MOST descriptive of human nature. Reciprocity is the same as the law of thermodynamics – but with our memory we can create credits(give help) and debts(receive help) with one another: But reciprocity is unavoidable because people demonstrably spend heavily on punishing irreciprocity – both interpersonally by retaliation, judicially by restitution, and socially by what we call altruistic punishment. 3) No, while people WANT differently, people all see irreciprocity equally: bad. They see proportionality differently. In other words, the right sees capitalizing, meritocracy, hierarchy and reciprocity more important than proportionality, and the left sees consumption, equidistribution, equality, and proportionality more important than reciprocity. This is just an expression of cognitive differences in development since these reflect female consumptive short term dysgenic, and male capitalizing long term eugenic strategies. 4) Given that we express different strategic demands, under the same natural law we can separate and pursue our different strategies (and the left will die off), or we can be eradicated by the left and all die off in another dark age, or we can eradicate the left and transcend man into the gods we imagine. The only solutions are separation to produce our commons, conquest, or failure.
-
Why Will New Laws Work?
Feb 4, 2020, 12:41 PM
—-“My point is how is a new set of laws going to change human nature? We are a nation of many different peoples with many different religions , cultures and morals.
What one group of people see as acceptable another group sees as unacceptable. I do agree that whatever laws we have , and few they should be, should apply equally to everyone regardless of any status.”—John Lafferty GOOD QUESTION 1) Under the natural law, we are each sovereigns (kings of different countries). Our contract with one another is an alliance that insures one another’s sovereignty. That is our ‘social contact’- it’s not social at all. It’s military. As such we are all equal before the law, because the law is nothing more than reciprocal insurance of one another’s sovereignty, and therefor the requirement for reciprocity in all interactions; and that in any violation of reciprocity, they may request defense restitution and punishment from the allies. So we are unequal in ability, unequal in value to one another, equal under the law, and equally insured. But we are sovereign, autonomous mini-countries, with each man, woman, and children and their land the smallest possible nation. 2) Natural law is a description of human nature. It is the MOST descriptive of human nature. Reciprocity is the same as the law of thermodynamics – but with our memory we can create credits(give help) and debts(receive help) with one another: But reciprocity is unavoidable because people demonstrably spend heavily on punishing irreciprocity – both interpersonally by retaliation, judicially by restitution, and socially by what we call altruistic punishment. 3) No, while people WANT differently, people all see irreciprocity equally: bad. They see proportionality differently. In other words, the right sees capitalizing, meritocracy, hierarchy and reciprocity more important than proportionality, and the left sees consumption, equidistribution, equality, and proportionality more important than reciprocity. This is just an expression of cognitive differences in development since these reflect female consumptive short term dysgenic, and male capitalizing long term eugenic strategies. 4) Given that we express different strategic demands, under the same natural law we can separate and pursue our different strategies (and the left will die off), or we can be eradicated by the left and all die off in another dark age, or we can eradicate the left and transcend man into the gods we imagine. The only solutions are separation to produce our commons, conquest, or failure.
-
Get It Thru. Left = Dysgenic
Feb 4, 2020, 1:07 PM
—“When the “normie”conservatives realize we’re simply fighting against the kids that got picked last in dodgeball as children and recognize these people are not a threat unless we do nothing.”—Jesse Daughtry
-
Get It Thru. Left = Dysgenic
Feb 4, 2020, 1:07 PM
—“When the “normie”conservatives realize we’re simply fighting against the kids that got picked last in dodgeball as children and recognize these people are not a threat unless we do nothing.”—Jesse Daughtry
-
The Position Higher Power: Religion, and Gods
Feb 4, 2020, 2:08 PM (warning. this topic is challenging. It touches on the direction I am working toward with religion)
—” I appreciate and can support so much of what I understood about #propertarianism. Is their any room for a belief in a higher power? A creator? The final Judge?”–Thor @Sov3r3ignSoul
In our civilization, despite the jewish attempt at forcing monopoly in each class, we have practiced a market of hierarchies we call Trifunctionalism /Tripartism which includes a Judicial material ‘priesthood’, AND a Religious spiritual priesthood. As always, render unto caesar the material world, and unto the gods the spiritual. The science says Physical law, Natural law, and Christian extension of kinship love, constitute the laws of the Universe. These Laws are the only evidence of god’s word, written in god’s hand. If any faith is incompatible with those laws, then it’s not god’s word but man’s lie. So there is plenty of room for faith, And you will find Aristotle and Jesus among his few prophets; and European man almost exclusively God’s translators – from his hand into the language of man: mathematics, science, and the Natural Law. And european man God’s only messenger. And that’s why European man has almost exclusively dragged mankind out of ignorance, poverty, hard labor, poverty, starvation, disease, suffering, and early death by mastery of god’s word, written in god’s hand – against other’s false gods, failed translations, and men’s lies. And if European man did not drag a people out of ignorance, hard labor, poverty, starvation, diseases, suffering and early death using god’s words, then those people are suffering because god punishes them for their false gods, failed translations, and men’s lies. Jesus asks us to work to drag those with false gods, failed translations, and men’s lies, out of longing, ignorance, poverty, starvation, disease, suffering, and early death. But if they resist, they must continue to suffer for their false gods failed translations and men’s lies. Europeans are the gods among men, and first among men. Not because we are yet gods ourselves. But because we think, speak, write, work, create, and spread the evidence of God’s words, his hands, and his will. In the language of gods words, hands, and will: Mathematics (geometry), Science, and Natural Law of Sovereign Men. For gods must be Sovereign, Omniscient and Omnipotent. And only Sovereign men may transcend into peerage with gods. And for all people, we are challenged to choose which god is the true god: an impersonal god who tests our ability to achieve sovereignty, omniscience and omniscience by learning his words, hands, and will; a god with whom we trade as allies; or a god who we obey as slaves. Will you transcend into gods, remain a client, or obey as slave? THERE IS NO QUESTION: ARISTOTLE IS GOD’S ONLY TRUTHFUL PROPHET Democritus, and others culminated in Aristotle, and Aristotle caused a chain of reaction throughout time. But it is Aristotle who understood the language of the gods in their own hand. And the evidence of man’s transcendence by his translation, and the evidence of man’s stagnation or decline otherwise. CHANGING THE JESUS NARRATIVE TO FIT ORIGINAL INTENT To change the narrative requires only that we say Jesus – as some have hypothesized – is the son of a roman soldier and a jewish prostitute, who rebelled against both roman conquest of Judea and Jewish abuse of one another, with a message of love one another – surrender your frustration, anger, jealousy, to heaven in exchange for building the bond of trust. And for his rebelliousness against both jews and Rome, both Rome and jews killed him. And then the jews took his message of love and wrapped it in lies, to create a victim hero to replace the greco roman hero Achilles and the Epic Cycle of the aristocracy, and continue the jewish narrative of the underclasses (slaves, slave traders, money changers-usurers instead
-
The Position Higher Power: Religion, and Gods
Feb 4, 2020, 2:08 PM (warning. this topic is challenging. It touches on the direction I am working toward with religion)
—” I appreciate and can support so much of what I understood about #propertarianism. Is their any room for a belief in a higher power? A creator? The final Judge?”–Thor @Sov3r3ignSoul
In our civilization, despite the jewish attempt at forcing monopoly in each class, we have practiced a market of hierarchies we call Trifunctionalism /Tripartism which includes a Judicial material ‘priesthood’, AND a Religious spiritual priesthood. As always, render unto caesar the material world, and unto the gods the spiritual. The science says Physical law, Natural law, and Christian extension of kinship love, constitute the laws of the Universe. These Laws are the only evidence of god’s word, written in god’s hand. If any faith is incompatible with those laws, then it’s not god’s word but man’s lie. So there is plenty of room for faith, And you will find Aristotle and Jesus among his few prophets; and European man almost exclusively God’s translators – from his hand into the language of man: mathematics, science, and the Natural Law. And european man God’s only messenger. And that’s why European man has almost exclusively dragged mankind out of ignorance, poverty, hard labor, poverty, starvation, disease, suffering, and early death by mastery of god’s word, written in god’s hand – against other’s false gods, failed translations, and men’s lies. And if European man did not drag a people out of ignorance, hard labor, poverty, starvation, diseases, suffering and early death using god’s words, then those people are suffering because god punishes them for their false gods, failed translations, and men’s lies. Jesus asks us to work to drag those with false gods, failed translations, and men’s lies, out of longing, ignorance, poverty, starvation, disease, suffering, and early death. But if they resist, they must continue to suffer for their false gods failed translations and men’s lies. Europeans are the gods among men, and first among men. Not because we are yet gods ourselves. But because we think, speak, write, work, create, and spread the evidence of God’s words, his hands, and his will. In the language of gods words, hands, and will: Mathematics (geometry), Science, and Natural Law of Sovereign Men. For gods must be Sovereign, Omniscient and Omnipotent. And only Sovereign men may transcend into peerage with gods. And for all people, we are challenged to choose which god is the true god: an impersonal god who tests our ability to achieve sovereignty, omniscience and omniscience by learning his words, hands, and will; a god with whom we trade as allies; or a god who we obey as slaves. Will you transcend into gods, remain a client, or obey as slave? THERE IS NO QUESTION: ARISTOTLE IS GOD’S ONLY TRUTHFUL PROPHET Democritus, and others culminated in Aristotle, and Aristotle caused a chain of reaction throughout time. But it is Aristotle who understood the language of the gods in their own hand. And the evidence of man’s transcendence by his translation, and the evidence of man’s stagnation or decline otherwise. CHANGING THE JESUS NARRATIVE TO FIT ORIGINAL INTENT To change the narrative requires only that we say Jesus – as some have hypothesized – is the son of a roman soldier and a jewish prostitute, who rebelled against both roman conquest of Judea and Jewish abuse of one another, with a message of love one another – surrender your frustration, anger, jealousy, to heaven in exchange for building the bond of trust. And for his rebelliousness against both jews and Rome, both Rome and jews killed him. And then the jews took his message of love and wrapped it in lies, to create a victim hero to replace the greco roman hero Achilles and the Epic Cycle of the aristocracy, and continue the jewish narrative of the underclasses (slaves, slave traders, money changers-usurers instead
-
NAXALT
Feb 4, 2020, 3:24 PM
—“NAXALT arguments fail when the data is accurate and the weight of the distribution is clear. The smaller part of the distribution is already acknowledged but doesn’t falsify the statement that most x ….”—Scott De Warren