Curt Doolittle

Source: Original Site Post

  • Name Calling Doolittle Number 9999999999….

    Feb 3, 2020, 3:33 PM

    —“I don’t know how many things you’ve been accused of being, but here’s one you might find interesting.🤣”— A Friend

    (re: doolittle) ….—“He’s a wannabe Nassim Taleb. He’s trying to re invent stoicism.”–Sabo Vojvodic

    LOL…. That’s pretty much missing the ballpark.. by a few continents… I did work on religion for a year, and did push for stoicism as one of the answers to mindfulness – until I understood it’s the stoic method of discipline but not it’s virtues. So, it’s really just a matter of complexity. People don’t have a frame for Propertarianism other than ideology, philosophy. If I sold red lollipops people would understand Red Lollipops. If I sold something trivial like “The NAP”, people would understand Red-Lollipop NAP. But I sell, a methodology producing a universally commensurable value natural vocabulary, grammar, and logic across all fields, a table of grammars explaining all paradigms of communication, an explanation of the means of undermining western civilization by the use of abrahamic method of deception – the polar opposite of aristotelian testimony – a method of falsifying testimony using that language to complete the scientific method, the formal logic of the psychological and social sciences, uniting hard and soft sciences, the strict construction of law, using that language and method, a constitution restoring the american constitution and the foundations of western civilization; and and explanation for the success of western civilization and the failure or stagnation or decline of other civilizations. Ok. So. We’ve had a the socrates(criticis) plato(justificationism) aristotle (falsificaton) program; The paul-whomever-augustine program; the Bacon-Locke-smith-hume program to restore aristotle, the rousseau-Kantian-german idealist program (thru Heidegger) to undermine aristotle, and the marxist-postmodernist-feminist-denialist program to undermine the entire western tradition again. And in my view im’ completing the hilbert-brouwer/bridgman-maxwell-darwin-crick-menger-popper-kuhn-hayek program that was interrupted by the war, and the invasion of the west by the marxists and jews. And for some reason it’s hard to imagine that P is on the same scale as Aristotle – When, it’s really just rewriting and completing Aristotle’s project in fully scientific prose. (Not that it was my intention. It’s just the outcome.) So yeah. It’s waaaaaay too much for people to understand P if they don’t know the history of thought.’

  • Powers of The British Monarchy

    Feb 3, 2020, 4:15 PM (as of 2003) (via a friend) Summary. If the queen has the loyalty of the armed forces she can do anything she wishes. The only practical means of her action is in crisis, if the government fails. The Monarch is Sovereign People are her subjects (family, wards) Above the law and immune from prosecution Diplomatic immunity anywhere on earth Exempt from FOI requests No passport nor driving license No taxes Commander in chief of all armed forces, who are sworn to her, not the state The making of treaties Declaration of war Deployment of armed forces overseas Recognition of foreign states Accreditation and reception of diplomats Appointment of Queen’s Counsel (Cabinet) The appointment and regulation of the civil service The appointment and dismissal of ministers, including the prime minister. The summoning, prorogation and dissolution of Parliament Royal assent to bills (or veto) Consent before any law that affects the monarchy can be even discussed. BUT!!! …. Cannot create law, only assent or veto – this is the cornerstone. (And can bring in the army if she wants to enforce it) Issue and revoke passports Arrest, seize, anything commander anything at will Administer punishments at will prerogative to keep the peace Creation of corporations by Charter Granting honours Prerogative of mercy Even over their souls – head of the church. Only revolution can replace her. Which is how it should be. Devoted to public service Limits her opinions to saying nothing Specializes in ‘soft power’. Most powerful woman in the world. The commissioning of officers in the armed forces Directing the disposition of the armed forces in the UK

  • Powers of The British Monarchy

    Feb 3, 2020, 4:15 PM (as of 2003) (via a friend) Summary. If the queen has the loyalty of the armed forces she can do anything she wishes. The only practical means of her action is in crisis, if the government fails. The Monarch is Sovereign People are her subjects (family, wards) Above the law and immune from prosecution Diplomatic immunity anywhere on earth Exempt from FOI requests No passport nor driving license No taxes Commander in chief of all armed forces, who are sworn to her, not the state The making of treaties Declaration of war Deployment of armed forces overseas Recognition of foreign states Accreditation and reception of diplomats Appointment of Queen’s Counsel (Cabinet) The appointment and regulation of the civil service The appointment and dismissal of ministers, including the prime minister. The summoning, prorogation and dissolution of Parliament Royal assent to bills (or veto) Consent before any law that affects the monarchy can be even discussed. BUT!!! …. Cannot create law, only assent or veto – this is the cornerstone. (And can bring in the army if she wants to enforce it) Issue and revoke passports Arrest, seize, anything commander anything at will Administer punishments at will prerogative to keep the peace Creation of corporations by Charter Granting honours Prerogative of mercy Even over their souls – head of the church. Only revolution can replace her. Which is how it should be. Devoted to public service Limits her opinions to saying nothing Specializes in ‘soft power’. Most powerful woman in the world. The commissioning of officers in the armed forces Directing the disposition of the armed forces in the UK

  • “GSRRM IS WITNESS INTIMIDATION”

    Feb 3, 2020, 4:17 PM

    GSRRM = Under Natural Law is Witness Intimidation Threatening me with social penalty if I speak the truth (witness) is witness intimidation. We need shorthand for every concept. And those shorthands need to be directly tied to centuries held western male beliefs. —Greg Hamilton

  • “GSRRM IS WITNESS INTIMIDATION”

    Feb 3, 2020, 4:17 PM

    GSRRM = Under Natural Law is Witness Intimidation Threatening me with social penalty if I speak the truth (witness) is witness intimidation. We need shorthand for every concept. And those shorthands need to be directly tied to centuries held western male beliefs. —Greg Hamilton

  • Yes P Is a Universalist Program

    Feb 3, 2020, 8:13 PM Yes P is a universalist program. It says that all people can transcend ignorance, superstition, fraud, baiting into hazard, rent seeking, organized crime, corruption, tyranny, hard labor, poverty, disease, suffering, conversion, immigration, conquest if they adopt P-rule of law with universal standing in the commons, state-private capital investment, state consumer credit, and SOFT EUGENICS. But that if you don’t adopt soft eugenics and rule of law then you will not be able to do any of the above with any degree of certainty for any substantial period of time. P is just physics applied to social science.

  • Yes P Is a Universalist Program

    Feb 3, 2020, 8:13 PM Yes P is a universalist program. It says that all people can transcend ignorance, superstition, fraud, baiting into hazard, rent seeking, organized crime, corruption, tyranny, hard labor, poverty, disease, suffering, conversion, immigration, conquest if they adopt P-rule of law with universal standing in the commons, state-private capital investment, state consumer credit, and SOFT EUGENICS. But that if you don’t adopt soft eugenics and rule of law then you will not be able to do any of the above with any degree of certainty for any substantial period of time. P is just physics applied to social science.

  • Thomas Jefferson recommended an uprising evert twenty years

    Feb 3, 2020, 8:17 PM by Skye Steward and Thomas Jefferson Imperialists hate secession. Thomas Jefferson recommended an uprising evert twenty years 🤔: —“What country before ever existed a century and a half without a rebellion? What country can preserve it’s liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance? Let them take arms. The remedy is to set them right as to facts, pardon & pacify them. What signify a few lives lost in a century or two? The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots & tyrants. It is it’s natural manure.” —-Letter to William Stephens Smith. Paris Nov. 13. 1787

  • Thomas Jefferson recommended an uprising evert twenty years

    Feb 3, 2020, 8:17 PM by Skye Steward and Thomas Jefferson Imperialists hate secession. Thomas Jefferson recommended an uprising evert twenty years 🤔: —“What country before ever existed a century and a half without a rebellion? What country can preserve it’s liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance? Let them take arms. The remedy is to set them right as to facts, pardon & pacify them. What signify a few lives lost in a century or two? The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots & tyrants. It is it’s natural manure.” —-Letter to William Stephens Smith. Paris Nov. 13. 1787

  • The Tendency for People to Genetically Associate

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homophily