Feb 3, 2020, 1:13 PM by Göran Dahl There’ve been studies alleging that Ramses II Y-haplogroup is E1b1a, which is a typical Middle Eastern paternal marker. His autosomal DNA hasn’t been sequenced, meaning that we can’t compare to him to any ethnicity. As for his hair colour, Wikipedia says it was ginger in his youth according to a French analysis; others say the mummy’s hair was ginger due to the henna Egyptians applied to their hair when it turned gray (used as early as 3400 BC). Ultimately, we can’t be sure until he has been sequenced. And red hair does occur among Middle-Easterners more frequently than most people think. Besides, by his time (New Kingdom), ancient Egyptians resembled Lebanese/Palestinian people, which is made evident by how New Kingdom samples plot on PCAs.
Source: Original Site Post
-
Democracy Does Not Produce Accountability
Feb 3, 2020, 1:36 PM Democratic representatives are not accountable in any measurable way other than to throw out the entire party via cyclical dissatisfied with status quo. P-Law constrains them to truthful reciprocal constitutional speech, requires stated terms, subjects them to legal prosecution. So that they are accountable for their party actions; for the commitments they made; liable for the constitutionality of legislation and regulation they sign; and for their display word and deed. That’s accountability.
-
Democracy Does Not Produce Accountability
Feb 3, 2020, 1:36 PM Democratic representatives are not accountable in any measurable way other than to throw out the entire party via cyclical dissatisfied with status quo. P-Law constrains them to truthful reciprocal constitutional speech, requires stated terms, subjects them to legal prosecution. So that they are accountable for their party actions; for the commitments they made; liable for the constitutionality of legislation and regulation they sign; and for their display word and deed. That’s accountability.
-
Update on Origins
Feb 3, 2020, 1:44 PM by Goran Dahl The R1b chronologically: Bell Beakers > Single Grave Culture > Corded Ware Culture > Yamnaya (unlikely now) / Sredny Stog 2 > Eastern Hunter-Gatherers > Ancient North Eurasians
—“Great. Thank you. So the gene flow for Rib is out of Corded ware. But does that change the technology(culture) flow from Yamnaya into Europe?”—Curt Doolittle
They had more or less the same culture; I mean, genetically they were identical and most definitely spoke the same PIE language. I can’t say anything about potential technological differences. In the end, I’m pretty sure the later descendants of Sredny Stog (Proto-Indo-Iranians) destroyed whatever was left of Yamnaya, absorbing what they could. The Catacomb culture, a descendant of Yamnaya which was heavily influenced by Proto-Indo-Iranians, held a lot of sway over Mycenaean Greece judging by shared material traditions. (CD: thank you!) Edit
-
Update on Origins
Feb 3, 2020, 1:44 PM by Goran Dahl The R1b chronologically: Bell Beakers > Single Grave Culture > Corded Ware Culture > Yamnaya (unlikely now) / Sredny Stog 2 > Eastern Hunter-Gatherers > Ancient North Eurasians
—“Great. Thank you. So the gene flow for Rib is out of Corded ware. But does that change the technology(culture) flow from Yamnaya into Europe?”—Curt Doolittle
They had more or less the same culture; I mean, genetically they were identical and most definitely spoke the same PIE language. I can’t say anything about potential technological differences. In the end, I’m pretty sure the later descendants of Sredny Stog (Proto-Indo-Iranians) destroyed whatever was left of Yamnaya, absorbing what they could. The Catacomb culture, a descendant of Yamnaya which was heavily influenced by Proto-Indo-Iranians, held a lot of sway over Mycenaean Greece judging by shared material traditions. (CD: thank you!) Edit
-
No, The Constitution Didn’t Survive the Civil War
Feb 3, 2020, 2:05 PM The constitution didn’t survive the civil war. That’s the whole point. If it had, we’d still be a collection of european states like old europe, like it was intended, and people could move to states that had the values that they preferred, while the entire continent could be protected by a unified army (military) as the founders intended. The left wants to destroy the constitution as a transactional document of natural law of sovereigns and their reciprocal rights to life, liberty, and property. They want to change from rule OF LAW that limits the state and the people from violating that natural law, to rule BY LAW that violates that constitution of natural law. There is no political means of saving the constitution. There is only conflict or at least sufficient threat of consequences of conflict, that will require both parties to settle. The right wants to take over and rule. The left to take over and rule. And I propose converting blue cities to states, with 50% of the population and income, and red states with 50% of the population and income. Then to restore the 10th destroyed by the civil war, clearly numerate the federal governments limited scope of powers, and return all power to these states. This will allow the ‘big sort’ to continue and leftists moves to their cities so that they can continue to cause them to collapse one at a a time, while not letting the leftist disease spread to the rest of us. If this is not ‘fair’ then war is preferable and there is zero chance the right will lose. There is no possible moral objection to the constitutional amendments we have proposed other than to engage in conquest of peoples and to deprive them of rights to self determination. If that is the case then war is what we are left with. You may not deprive us of rights of self determination. Ever.
-
No, The Constitution Didn’t Survive the Civil War
Feb 3, 2020, 2:05 PM The constitution didn’t survive the civil war. That’s the whole point. If it had, we’d still be a collection of european states like old europe, like it was intended, and people could move to states that had the values that they preferred, while the entire continent could be protected by a unified army (military) as the founders intended. The left wants to destroy the constitution as a transactional document of natural law of sovereigns and their reciprocal rights to life, liberty, and property. They want to change from rule OF LAW that limits the state and the people from violating that natural law, to rule BY LAW that violates that constitution of natural law. There is no political means of saving the constitution. There is only conflict or at least sufficient threat of consequences of conflict, that will require both parties to settle. The right wants to take over and rule. The left to take over and rule. And I propose converting blue cities to states, with 50% of the population and income, and red states with 50% of the population and income. Then to restore the 10th destroyed by the civil war, clearly numerate the federal governments limited scope of powers, and return all power to these states. This will allow the ‘big sort’ to continue and leftists moves to their cities so that they can continue to cause them to collapse one at a a time, while not letting the leftist disease spread to the rest of us. If this is not ‘fair’ then war is preferable and there is zero chance the right will lose. There is no possible moral objection to the constitutional amendments we have proposed other than to engage in conquest of peoples and to deprive them of rights to self determination. If that is the case then war is what we are left with. You may not deprive us of rights of self determination. Ever.
-
We Aren’t Seeking Converts
Feb 3, 2020, 2:09 PM by Luke Weinhagen We are looking for those that recognize our solution, and have any desire at all to address the issues while we have any say in what the solutions look like. We are not recruiting. Recruiting and converting gives the impression we need you. We don’t. You need us.
CD: We are seeking founding fathers.
-
We Aren’t Seeking Converts
Feb 3, 2020, 2:09 PM by Luke Weinhagen We are looking for those that recognize our solution, and have any desire at all to address the issues while we have any say in what the solutions look like. We are not recruiting. Recruiting and converting gives the impression we need you. We don’t. You need us.
CD: We are seeking founding fathers.
-
Name Calling Doolittle Number 9999999999….
Feb 3, 2020, 3:33 PM
—“I don’t know how many things you’ve been accused of being, but here’s one you might find interesting.🤣”— A Friend
(re: doolittle) ….—“He’s a wannabe Nassim Taleb. He’s trying to re invent stoicism.”–Sabo Vojvodic
LOL…. That’s pretty much missing the ballpark.. by a few continents… I did work on religion for a year, and did push for stoicism as one of the answers to mindfulness – until I understood it’s the stoic method of discipline but not it’s virtues. So, it’s really just a matter of complexity. People don’t have a frame for Propertarianism other than ideology, philosophy. If I sold red lollipops people would understand Red Lollipops. If I sold something trivial like “The NAP”, people would understand Red-Lollipop NAP. But I sell, a methodology producing a universally commensurable value natural vocabulary, grammar, and logic across all fields, a table of grammars explaining all paradigms of communication, an explanation of the means of undermining western civilization by the use of abrahamic method of deception – the polar opposite of aristotelian testimony – a method of falsifying testimony using that language to complete the scientific method, the formal logic of the psychological and social sciences, uniting hard and soft sciences, the strict construction of law, using that language and method, a constitution restoring the american constitution and the foundations of western civilization; and and explanation for the success of western civilization and the failure or stagnation or decline of other civilizations. Ok. So. We’ve had a the socrates(criticis) plato(justificationism) aristotle (falsificaton) program; The paul-whomever-augustine program; the Bacon-Locke-smith-hume program to restore aristotle, the rousseau-Kantian-german idealist program (thru Heidegger) to undermine aristotle, and the marxist-postmodernist-feminist-denialist program to undermine the entire western tradition again. And in my view im’ completing the hilbert-brouwer/bridgman-maxwell-darwin-crick-menger-popper-kuhn-hayek program that was interrupted by the war, and the invasion of the west by the marxists and jews. And for some reason it’s hard to imagine that P is on the same scale as Aristotle – When, it’s really just rewriting and completing Aristotle’s project in fully scientific prose. (Not that it was my intention. It’s just the outcome.) So yeah. It’s waaaaaay too much for people to understand P if they don’t know the history of thought.’