The Jewish century is over. Like the Russian century was over. Like like the German century was over. Like the french century was over. Each of the ‘enlightenments’ were costly rebellions against Anglos for dragging humanity into science, medicine, rule of law, and markets. Every civilization has resisted modernity. We have paid the cost of dragging mankind kicking and screaming out of ignorance, poverty, hard labor, starvation, disease, suffering, and early morality. But we are bad for ‘colonizing’ them and policing their ability to conduct predation on each other.
Source: Original Site Post
-
The Only Political Argument
Feb 2, 2020, 7:45 AM
—“Leftists care more about an assertion being offensive than it being true.”— Χρόνος @HliosX
Yes.
—“Hi! I am a leftist, yet I don’t think this assertion applies to me. Would you like to discuss/debate?”—Flancia @flancian
Sure. 😉 Assertion: all differences are reducible to right evidentiary capitalizing, inter-temporal, reciprocal, falsificationary eugenic vs left experiential, consumptive, temporal, proportional, justificationary, dysgenic – and as such, decidable. As such all left propositions will be reducible to approval/disapproval, and right truth/falsehood. Cognitively left dysgenic female herd vs cognitively right eugenic male pack. We have no agency. We we are gene machines pursuing our reproductive strategies adapting them only to our class (status). And all speech and most importantly, all political speech is either truthful, reciprocal, meritocratic (hierarchical male right) or untruthful, irreciprocal, proportional (equalitarian female left). Right trade and truth and Left Seduction disapproval. The only solution is exchange. The condensation of the three classes of monarchy(judge of last resort), nobility(lords, senate), and family-business(house of commons), into a single parliamentary council, instead of adding a house of labor and a house for women eliminated the traditional european market between the classes, thereby creating a race to the majoritarian bottom, political conflict, and the incentive to immigrate vast underclasses to circumvent the western civilizational strategy of sovereignty. If we had added houses women (who are the only defectors driving leftward movement) would have learned how to use their access to political power in exchange, rather than using the traditional female method of undermining.
-
The Only Political Argument
Feb 2, 2020, 7:45 AM
—“Leftists care more about an assertion being offensive than it being true.”— Χρόνος @HliosX
Yes.
—“Hi! I am a leftist, yet I don’t think this assertion applies to me. Would you like to discuss/debate?”—Flancia @flancian
Sure. 😉 Assertion: all differences are reducible to right evidentiary capitalizing, inter-temporal, reciprocal, falsificationary eugenic vs left experiential, consumptive, temporal, proportional, justificationary, dysgenic – and as such, decidable. As such all left propositions will be reducible to approval/disapproval, and right truth/falsehood. Cognitively left dysgenic female herd vs cognitively right eugenic male pack. We have no agency. We we are gene machines pursuing our reproductive strategies adapting them only to our class (status). And all speech and most importantly, all political speech is either truthful, reciprocal, meritocratic (hierarchical male right) or untruthful, irreciprocal, proportional (equalitarian female left). Right trade and truth and Left Seduction disapproval. The only solution is exchange. The condensation of the three classes of monarchy(judge of last resort), nobility(lords, senate), and family-business(house of commons), into a single parliamentary council, instead of adding a house of labor and a house for women eliminated the traditional european market between the classes, thereby creating a race to the majoritarian bottom, political conflict, and the incentive to immigrate vast underclasses to circumvent the western civilizational strategy of sovereignty. If we had added houses women (who are the only defectors driving leftward movement) would have learned how to use their access to political power in exchange, rather than using the traditional female method of undermining.
-
An Articulate Progressive so An Opportunity for Articulate Comparisons
Feb 2, 2020, 8:24 AM
—“Progresiveness errs on the side of openness in face of the uncertainty. Conservativeness errs on the side of “known good or reasonable” arrangements. … None are in principle superior in all cases. … We must use a third axis, rationality, to bridge our differences constructively.”—@flancian
Progressives (consumptives) err on the side of consumption in the face of uncertainty. Conservatives(capitalizers) err on the side of saving in the face of uncertainty. The female consumptive herd (her children) the male capitalizing pack (their tribe). We must use TRADE to bridge our differences. (Are you starting to see yet?) I’m using male concrete (scientific) terms. You’re using female seductive (deceptive) terms. Once you see it you can’t un-see it. The question is adaptation possible? No. Hence institutions of trade.
-
An Articulate Progressive so An Opportunity for Articulate Comparisons
Feb 2, 2020, 8:24 AM
—“Progresiveness errs on the side of openness in face of the uncertainty. Conservativeness errs on the side of “known good or reasonable” arrangements. … None are in principle superior in all cases. … We must use a third axis, rationality, to bridge our differences constructively.”—@flancian
Progressives (consumptives) err on the side of consumption in the face of uncertainty. Conservatives(capitalizers) err on the side of saving in the face of uncertainty. The female consumptive herd (her children) the male capitalizing pack (their tribe). We must use TRADE to bridge our differences. (Are you starting to see yet?) I’m using male concrete (scientific) terms. You’re using female seductive (deceptive) terms. Once you see it you can’t un-see it. The question is adaptation possible? No. Hence institutions of trade.
-
I Will Not Let Rome Fall Twice.
Feb 2, 2020, 8:44 AM
I will not let Rome fall twice.
THE LEFT RIGHT DIVIDE IN SIMPLE TERMS
...............Right....Left .........evidentiary....experiential ........capitalizing....consumptive ......inter-temporal....temporal ..........reciprocal....proportional ........meritocratic....equalitarian ....falsificationary....justificationary .............eugenic....dysgenic ...............truth....approval ................male....female ...............trade....seduction .........deprivation....ostracization ...............force....undermining ................pack....herd .............Markets....Monopolies .........Nationalism....Globalism
Cognitively left dysgenic female herd vs cognitively right eugenic male pack. We have no agency. We we are gene machines pursuing our reproductive strategies adapting them only to our class (status). And all speech and most importantly, all political speech is either truthful, reciprocal, meritocratic (hierarchical male right) or untruthful, irreciprocal, proportional (equalitarian female left). Right trade and truth and Left Seduction disapproval. And all consciousness of the self is just to facilitate the problem of balancing our incentives with the incentives of others. The only solutions to the present conflict are :
1. Markets for Commons, 2. Separation and Specialization 3. Civil War and Winner Take All I prefer the latter, I will morally compromise on either of the former. I will not let Rome fall twice.
-
I Will Not Let Rome Fall Twice.
Feb 2, 2020, 8:44 AM
I will not let Rome fall twice.
THE LEFT RIGHT DIVIDE IN SIMPLE TERMS
...............Right....Left .........evidentiary....experiential ........capitalizing....consumptive ......inter-temporal....temporal ..........reciprocal....proportional ........meritocratic....equalitarian ....falsificationary....justificationary .............eugenic....dysgenic ...............truth....approval ................male....female ...............trade....seduction .........deprivation....ostracization ...............force....undermining ................pack....herd .............Markets....Monopolies .........Nationalism....Globalism
Cognitively left dysgenic female herd vs cognitively right eugenic male pack. We have no agency. We we are gene machines pursuing our reproductive strategies adapting them only to our class (status). And all speech and most importantly, all political speech is either truthful, reciprocal, meritocratic (hierarchical male right) or untruthful, irreciprocal, proportional (equalitarian female left). Right trade and truth and Left Seduction disapproval. And all consciousness of the self is just to facilitate the problem of balancing our incentives with the incentives of others. The only solutions to the present conflict are :
1. Markets for Commons, 2. Separation and Specialization 3. Civil War and Winner Take All I prefer the latter, I will morally compromise on either of the former. I will not let Rome fall twice.
-
The University System Is Organized for Unsustainable Growth
Feb 2, 2020, 9:02 AM
—“unpromising future for economics phd’s”—
This is correct of course. It’s one of Eric Weinstein’s complaints: the university system is organized for unsustainable growth, false-promising careers to researchers that can’t exist, in order to obtain cheap research labor (and cheap immigrant research labor) rather than paying researchers and doing less and better research. This problem is exacerbated by the withdrawal of the military as the primary originator of basic research funds given that military epistemology is competitive, and our failure or inability to direct research funds without military priorities, to competitive advantage. I expect this will be corrected rather shortly (and painfully) one way or the other.
-
The University System Is Organized for Unsustainable Growth
Feb 2, 2020, 9:02 AM
—“unpromising future for economics phd’s”—
This is correct of course. It’s one of Eric Weinstein’s complaints: the university system is organized for unsustainable growth, false-promising careers to researchers that can’t exist, in order to obtain cheap research labor (and cheap immigrant research labor) rather than paying researchers and doing less and better research. This problem is exacerbated by the withdrawal of the military as the primary originator of basic research funds given that military epistemology is competitive, and our failure or inability to direct research funds without military priorities, to competitive advantage. I expect this will be corrected rather shortly (and painfully) one way or the other.
-
The time has come once again to set limits.
Feb 2, 2020, 9:14 AM (re-post from ban) Imitate Jesus. There wasn’t much better advice. I’ve harped on it here for a while, but this requires re-telling. Jesus imitation offers the best strategy for those that lack agency. And in his time; that was damn near every soul. The low/no-agency Jesus strategy works in low-trust and high-trust systems/situations. But, please understand at the time of emergence it was ONLY patriarchal systems of order in which to navigate. The foundation for an agency-less ethic to disperse to an underclass was sorely lacking. When there is proper order, acceptance and maintenance of that order is needed. With the Jesus trick one is sure not to run afoul of those with more power (specifically in ways that could get you picked out of the herd and culled). This allows one to stick around long enough to develop agency of their own. But, in a landscape of chaos (currently caused by over-order and over-abundance of information lacking coherence and salience) the Jesus trick only allows for further entropy. In times where order needs to be created the creator’s son falls short of the mark [his trick doesn’t multiply/no breeding]: By: James Thomson (d. 1882)
“This poor sexless Jew, with a noble feminine heart, and a magnificent though uncultivated and crazy brain, did no work to earn his bread; evaded all social and political responsibilities, took no wife and contemned his own family; lived [as] a vagabond, fed and housed by charity (if by miracle, it is clear that we cannot imitate him: would that we could!); uttered many beautiful and even sublime moral truths and more impracticable precepts; preached continually himself, and faith in himself alone as the one thing necessary; and died with the lamentable cry of womanish desperation, perhaps the most significant confession in history of a life of supreme self-illusion laid bare to itself at the point of death. My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me? He founded a sect which holds him up as the Great Exemplar of mankind, and scarcely one member of which even tries to tread in his footsteps. I have much love and reverence for him as a man; but am quite certain that if everyone really set about following his example, the world (which is surely mad enough already) would soon be one vast Bedlam broken loose.”
Jesus provides an imitation model for the ideal under-class citizen {That is ANY dependent: men/women that lack agency, disabled, children, etc.} but, doesn’t set up an iterative, imitable, image for those needing to create order. See, in order creation, what IS isn’t enough. If it were, we wouldn’t be driven to produce. In a situation that needs order more of those able to unfurl order in the cosmic space are necessary one must be able to produce. We ought not have incentives that favor consumers but producers. It is irresponsible to imitate Jesus as you ought to do more than sacrifice yourself to the greater “good”{as right now it’s the greater BAD} of humanity. As humanity isn’t what it was; and to sacrifice yourself to it (for their sins) isn’t heroic anymore but moronic; they’re undeserving and spoiled {NOT oppressed}. They know EXACTLY what they do; and if they don’t it’s a failure on their behalf to correct for the error {you have the internet and the worlds information at your finger-tips; ignoramus}[if you’d like to place the blame on the system, fine, but you best not be a part of it]. We are now at a point in time where we ought to be saying do as Jesus said; not as he did [calculate like Jesus]. And we ought to be picking out specific instances to pull from: We need the Jesus that flipped over tables and scolded the higher-ups of the day; we need the Jesus that proclaimed “go forth and multiple,” we need the Jesus that spat out the lukewarm, we need the Jesus that warns us of God coming back with that flaming sword of Truth to do some swift re-ordering… the tolerance isn’t (for)bearable any longer! It’s irresponsible to act in this naive manner: forbearing for those that will surely act irreciprocal when given the chance. Irreciprocity IS immoral and to roll out the red carpet for its manifestation is suicide. To extend tolerance to those that will use tolerance against you to undermine and usurp your position is not kind, it isn’t Jesus like; it’s immoral, an insane display of ineptness and it’s no better if it’s innate {your instinct to allow others to walk all over you; agreeable; feminine}. The time has come once again to set limits. And as man is the measure of all things; it is he that ought to set those limits. And those limits ought to lead to the form and function of a flourishing culture. One that preserves its landscape of Jesus-like emergence as opposed to dismantling that very landscape in His name.’