Source: Original Site Post

  • What It Says Right There in Text…

    Feb 1, 2020, 7:38 PM by Jerry Odom

    —“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.–That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the “consent” of the governed, –That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, ….”—

    So what it says here is our rights don’t come from government or from words on paper. Let’s be real here the only reason that we actually create government is to protect the rights of the people. So, what are inalienable rights? Among the natural rights of the people, are life, liberty, and property together with the right to protect and defend them with the best possible means possible. So if you don’t have the right to life you’re dead, if you don’t have liberty in your servant of the government you created, if you don’t have a right to property and that you don’t have a right to life and your subject to whoever owns the property, if you don’t have a right to defend these things than you are slave you are not a free man, if you have to ask permission of the government protect my life my and my property then you are not a free man, inalienable rights are not subject to laws of man especially when we gave them the ability to govern based on the consent of the people. Edit

  • Inalienable rights

    Feb 1, 2020, 7:39 PM

    Inalienable means not only that it can’t be taken from you – but you can’t let it be taken from you, and you can’t give it away.

  • Inalienable rights

    Feb 1, 2020, 7:39 PM

    Inalienable means not only that it can’t be taken from you – but you can’t let it be taken from you, and you can’t give it away.

  • To Violate Our Sovereignty Is to Invite Us to War

    Feb 1, 2020, 7:45 PM See, you don’t get it. The only reason not to conquer, deprive, exploit, enserf, enslave, or end – or worse, is reciprocity. You see, ‘sovereign means’ capable of defense – every man a sovereign: a king, a legislature, a knight, a husband, a craftsman and all else he might be. That is why natural law and international law are the same: because no man has say over another unless he violates the sovereignty of another – and if so then they may war. If they choose not to war they may duel. If they choose not to duel they may seek decision from the people in a jury. If they do not abide by the jury they have lost the insurance of their sovereign peers, and are limited to their own defense. And as such, they will easily be the victims of war by the polity rather than just their prior enemy. We are the men of Europa. We are sovereigns – all. And to violate that sovereignty is to invite us into war.

  • To Violate Our Sovereignty Is to Invite Us to War

    Feb 1, 2020, 7:45 PM See, you don’t get it. The only reason not to conquer, deprive, exploit, enserf, enslave, or end – or worse, is reciprocity. You see, ‘sovereign means’ capable of defense – every man a sovereign: a king, a legislature, a knight, a husband, a craftsman and all else he might be. That is why natural law and international law are the same: because no man has say over another unless he violates the sovereignty of another – and if so then they may war. If they choose not to war they may duel. If they choose not to duel they may seek decision from the people in a jury. If they do not abide by the jury they have lost the insurance of their sovereign peers, and are limited to their own defense. And as such, they will easily be the victims of war by the polity rather than just their prior enemy. We are the men of Europa. We are sovereigns – all. And to violate that sovereignty is to invite us into war.

  • Threat Perception in Internet Age

    Feb 1, 2020, 8:43 PM by Bill Joslin I think the threat detection issue spans the entire political, soci-economic bell curve. i think think this stems from “threat signal saturation”. I suspect threat saturation disrupts friend foe identification. friend foe identification expresses differently across the bell curves – The left has an inverted identification – where in-group competitive drives supersede predator proximity drives. And the right has an amplified “err on the side of false positives” where proximity sensitivity becomes applied to friends. In both cases this results in a positive feedback loop which exacerbates the problem. We live with a nightmarish degree of anomie – social instability resulting from a breakdown of standards and values. In rat utopia, normie rats in proximity to the beautiful ones display this behavior – obsessive territorial marking – because they lose the ability to tell the difference from fellow colony marking from adversarial markings.

  • Threat Perception in Internet Age

    Feb 1, 2020, 8:43 PM by Bill Joslin I think the threat detection issue spans the entire political, soci-economic bell curve. i think think this stems from “threat signal saturation”. I suspect threat saturation disrupts friend foe identification. friend foe identification expresses differently across the bell curves – The left has an inverted identification – where in-group competitive drives supersede predator proximity drives. And the right has an amplified “err on the side of false positives” where proximity sensitivity becomes applied to friends. In both cases this results in a positive feedback loop which exacerbates the problem. We live with a nightmarish degree of anomie – social instability resulting from a breakdown of standards and values. In rat utopia, normie rats in proximity to the beautiful ones display this behavior – obsessive territorial marking – because they lose the ability to tell the difference from fellow colony marking from adversarial markings.

  • No, Service Isn’t Enough.

    Feb 1, 2020, 9:23 PM

    —“Curt, I’m sure you’d agree, some of our most gallant, extraordinary soldiers, black & brown, native American, come from the worst of ghettos, in every state, every large or small city, maybe, speaking of history, even the war fighter in the tomb of the unknown came from there?”—

    Sure. Although the majority come from intergenerational military families. And sure, you can try to spin my work as other than ‘If you can’t fit into anglo rule-of-law middle class civilization, and you vote the left in to undermine it, then your military service is irrelevant.” All NAXALT arguments are attempts at deception. Statements of distributions are true if they describe the area under the distribution. I don’t care about race but people vote almost entirely by it, and have made race an existential construct – in a war on the american experiment. So, extending the franchise to non-propertied (non-business owners) was instituted as a means of choosing priorities for the allocation of scarce revenues to the production of commons in common interest. It was not an invitation to destroy the American experiment in a third way. And the Left is desperately chasing the false promise that they can be free of genetic, sexual, social, economic and political market value in a world where the european civilizational windfall has been spent on dragging the world out of communism, socialism, and now islamism. We have the most ignorant generation in almost two centuries for a reason: by design of the left to manufacture useful idiots under the postwar false promise that their evolutionary condition was a product of oppression rather than market value to others. And since evidence has falsified marxism, socialism, and science has falsified feminism, postmodernism, and denial of our substantial differences in gender, class, and race, other than invasive immigration the west would have survived the 20th century of social pseudoscience. So we can’t let you take the rest of us down with us. It’s over. The century of false promise is over. You killed democracy. And it will die with your names on it for eternity. There will be no second fall of the Roman Empire – this time by pseudoscience instead of theology.

  • No, Service Isn’t Enough.

    Feb 1, 2020, 9:23 PM

    —“Curt, I’m sure you’d agree, some of our most gallant, extraordinary soldiers, black & brown, native American, come from the worst of ghettos, in every state, every large or small city, maybe, speaking of history, even the war fighter in the tomb of the unknown came from there?”—

    Sure. Although the majority come from intergenerational military families. And sure, you can try to spin my work as other than ‘If you can’t fit into anglo rule-of-law middle class civilization, and you vote the left in to undermine it, then your military service is irrelevant.” All NAXALT arguments are attempts at deception. Statements of distributions are true if they describe the area under the distribution. I don’t care about race but people vote almost entirely by it, and have made race an existential construct – in a war on the american experiment. So, extending the franchise to non-propertied (non-business owners) was instituted as a means of choosing priorities for the allocation of scarce revenues to the production of commons in common interest. It was not an invitation to destroy the American experiment in a third way. And the Left is desperately chasing the false promise that they can be free of genetic, sexual, social, economic and political market value in a world where the european civilizational windfall has been spent on dragging the world out of communism, socialism, and now islamism. We have the most ignorant generation in almost two centuries for a reason: by design of the left to manufacture useful idiots under the postwar false promise that their evolutionary condition was a product of oppression rather than market value to others. And since evidence has falsified marxism, socialism, and science has falsified feminism, postmodernism, and denial of our substantial differences in gender, class, and race, other than invasive immigration the west would have survived the 20th century of social pseudoscience. So we can’t let you take the rest of us down with us. It’s over. The century of false promise is over. You killed democracy. And it will die with your names on it for eternity. There will be no second fall of the Roman Empire – this time by pseudoscience instead of theology.

  • The Jewish Century Is Over

    The Jewish century is over. Like the Russian century was over. Like like the German century was over. Like the french century was over. Each of the ‘enlightenments’ were costly rebellions against Anglos for dragging humanity into science, medicine, rule of law, and markets. Every civilization has resisted modernity. We have paid the cost of dragging mankind kicking and screaming out of ignorance, poverty, hard labor, starvation, disease, suffering, and early morality. But we are bad for ‘colonizing’ them and policing their ability to conduct predation on each other.