Oct 16, 2019, 7:38 PM Meth, Heroin, Cocaine all feel good. Sugar feels good. Wheat feels good. Pornography feels good. The fake affections of prostitutes feel good. Comforting lies feel good. Hyperconsumption feels good. Virtue signaling feels good. Feeling good isn’t a test of anything other than the sensations we evolved as hunter gatherers. We have developed many means under agrarianism, pastoralism, civilization, industrialism, and the sciences, by which to achieve sensations that we could not obtain from the natural world except as subtle cues to scarcity. That something feels good (or bad) in the moment tells us very little about whether it is cumulatively good for us, for those around us, for our people, civilizations, and man. The opiates of the masses indeed do feel good. They are however extremely BAD for us. In fact, they are genocidal. ~Curt Doolittle
Source: Original Site Post
-
Feeling Good Isn’t a Test of Anything
Oct 16, 2019, 7:38 PM Meth, Heroin, Cocaine all feel good. Sugar feels good. Wheat feels good. Pornography feels good. The fake affections of prostitutes feel good. Comforting lies feel good. Hyperconsumption feels good. Virtue signaling feels good. Feeling good isn’t a test of anything other than the sensations we evolved as hunter gatherers. We have developed many means under agrarianism, pastoralism, civilization, industrialism, and the sciences, by which to achieve sensations that we could not obtain from the natural world except as subtle cues to scarcity. That something feels good (or bad) in the moment tells us very little about whether it is cumulatively good for us, for those around us, for our people, civilizations, and man. The opiates of the masses indeed do feel good. They are however extremely BAD for us. In fact, they are genocidal. ~Curt Doolittle
-
FB Future
Oct 17, 2019, 8:02 AM Breaking up FB is not as important to me as regulating it. But if we were to break it up I would recommend breaking up publisher(content and advertising) and platform organizations, and remove Mark from the platform. And then open up the platform to other publishers. This preserves the income for the shareholders but eliminates the interference by the publisher (content control). I would do the same for google. Both of which are now infrastructure, and communication and business necessities – particularly for small international businesses.
-
FB Future
Oct 17, 2019, 8:02 AM Breaking up FB is not as important to me as regulating it. But if we were to break it up I would recommend breaking up publisher(content and advertising) and platform organizations, and remove Mark from the platform. And then open up the platform to other publishers. This preserves the income for the shareholders but eliminates the interference by the publisher (content control). I would do the same for google. Both of which are now infrastructure, and communication and business necessities – particularly for small international businesses.
-
It’s All Reciprocity … Extension of Physical Laws to Human Display Word and Deed
Oct 17, 2019, 8:57 AM While the principal innovation of P is Testimonialism, truthful testimony is merely reciprocity in speech. Agency is only possible under reciprocity. Trust is only possible under Reciprocity. Eugenia is only possible under Reciprocity. The foundation of P, the Natural Law of Reciprocity – is of course, just reciprocity: limiting one’s display word and deed to the productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary transfers of demonstrated interests, free of imposition of costs upon the demonstrated interests of others by externality. So while the physical world is dependent upon entropy and it’s consequences in the laws of thermodynamics, life requires reciprocity across generations; and humans have memory and the ability to predict futures using it, and to act to seize opportunities from those predictions. But while cooperation is disproportionately productive (advantageous), and while we can trade debts, resulting in reciprocity over time, we can also consistently generate debts and live parasitically off others – until they retaliate (which they always do). Reciprocity breaks down through disintermediation that limits the ability to test whether the sum of debts and repayments result in a balance (reciprocity). And this is what the state has achieved in all walks of life under pursuit of equality. But the result has been reversal of the universalization of middle class manners ethics and morals, and the reversal of underclass eugenics. Humans can, through life, defeat entropy, and through productivity, continue to defeat it, despite our increasingly costly brains; but reverse that existence through the continuous production of debt (parasitism) rather than reciprocity (mutually beneficial production), and continuous eugenics.
-
It’s All Reciprocity … Extension of Physical Laws to Human Display Word and Deed
Oct 17, 2019, 8:57 AM While the principal innovation of P is Testimonialism, truthful testimony is merely reciprocity in speech. Agency is only possible under reciprocity. Trust is only possible under Reciprocity. Eugenia is only possible under Reciprocity. The foundation of P, the Natural Law of Reciprocity – is of course, just reciprocity: limiting one’s display word and deed to the productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary transfers of demonstrated interests, free of imposition of costs upon the demonstrated interests of others by externality. So while the physical world is dependent upon entropy and it’s consequences in the laws of thermodynamics, life requires reciprocity across generations; and humans have memory and the ability to predict futures using it, and to act to seize opportunities from those predictions. But while cooperation is disproportionately productive (advantageous), and while we can trade debts, resulting in reciprocity over time, we can also consistently generate debts and live parasitically off others – until they retaliate (which they always do). Reciprocity breaks down through disintermediation that limits the ability to test whether the sum of debts and repayments result in a balance (reciprocity). And this is what the state has achieved in all walks of life under pursuit of equality. But the result has been reversal of the universalization of middle class manners ethics and morals, and the reversal of underclass eugenics. Humans can, through life, defeat entropy, and through productivity, continue to defeat it, despite our increasingly costly brains; but reverse that existence through the continuous production of debt (parasitism) rather than reciprocity (mutually beneficial production), and continuous eugenics.
-
Yes We Are Slowly Changing the World
Oct 17, 2019, 9:38 AM
—“Reciprocity is EVERYWHERE the last few weeks. P is changing the language being used, which in turn will change the conversations being had, which creates different attitudes (frames), which leads to different actions being taken. This is how to change the world.”—Noah J Revoy
-
Yes We Are Slowly Changing the World
Oct 17, 2019, 9:38 AM
—“Reciprocity is EVERYWHERE the last few weeks. P is changing the language being used, which in turn will change the conversations being had, which creates different attitudes (frames), which leads to different actions being taken. This is how to change the world.”—Noah J Revoy
-
Only the West Could Invent Science
Oct 17, 2019, 9:50 AM You’re missing the point that only the west could invent science (testimony) because only the west practiced the combination of militia, truth, reciprocity, heroism, excellence, markets, and aristocracy (meritocracy). Now that we have given the world our science and technology and law and finance like we gave the world empiricism, like we gave the world logic and reason and roman law, like we gave the world horse, bronze, and wheel, and like the old world gave us writing, bronze, and agriculture. And like we gave the world eugenics. Now, we will see how the chinese do vs the europeans. If the british choose to restore the british empire rather than fall to the french conquest of europe, and the russian re-conquest of eastern europe, then china will have a competitor. But this presumes we will not have a revolution on the scale of the past, or the scale of the chinese, and reverse the primitivization of western civilization by the second abrahamic conquest and the defection of our women. Did you see what I did there? You can have the technological products of our people, but you can’t have our ‘technology’ because it’s genetic and cultural. We only have to preserve that technology to win.
-
Only the West Could Invent Science
Oct 17, 2019, 9:50 AM You’re missing the point that only the west could invent science (testimony) because only the west practiced the combination of militia, truth, reciprocity, heroism, excellence, markets, and aristocracy (meritocracy). Now that we have given the world our science and technology and law and finance like we gave the world empiricism, like we gave the world logic and reason and roman law, like we gave the world horse, bronze, and wheel, and like the old world gave us writing, bronze, and agriculture. And like we gave the world eugenics. Now, we will see how the chinese do vs the europeans. If the british choose to restore the british empire rather than fall to the french conquest of europe, and the russian re-conquest of eastern europe, then china will have a competitor. But this presumes we will not have a revolution on the scale of the past, or the scale of the chinese, and reverse the primitivization of western civilization by the second abrahamic conquest and the defection of our women. Did you see what I did there? You can have the technological products of our people, but you can’t have our ‘technology’ because it’s genetic and cultural. We only have to preserve that technology to win.