Curt Doolittle

Source: Original Site Post

  • Either You’re Conducting War Games Or You’re Not A Necessary Bureaucracy

    Apr 1, 2020, 2:34 PM I make the same argument. the CDC, Homeland Security, and Disaster Relief Organization, and The Treasury are either creating war plans and holding war games or they are wasting our time and money. Bureaucracies run by constant process rather than project deliverables, war plans, and shocks

    —“In 2015, I urged world leaders in a TED talk to prepare for a pandemic the same way they prepare for war — by running simulations to find the cracks in the system,” Gates wrote. “As we’ve seen this year, we have a long way to go. But I still believe that if we make the right decisions now, informed by science, data and the experience of medical professionals, we can save lives and get the country back to work.”–

  • Either You’re Conducting War Games Or You’re Not A Necessary Bureaucracy

    Apr 1, 2020, 2:34 PM I make the same argument. the CDC, Homeland Security, and Disaster Relief Organization, and The Treasury are either creating war plans and holding war games or they are wasting our time and money. Bureaucracies run by constant process rather than project deliverables, war plans, and shocks

    —“In 2015, I urged world leaders in a TED talk to prepare for a pandemic the same way they prepare for war — by running simulations to find the cracks in the system,” Gates wrote. “As we’ve seen this year, we have a long way to go. But I still believe that if we make the right decisions now, informed by science, data and the experience of medical professionals, we can save lives and get the country back to work.”–

  • Your Preferences Are Non-Neutral

    Apr 1, 2020, 3:55 PM The market will always converge on the moral utility that is necessary for the demographic distribution within the market. As such if you want a high trust prosperous polity, you will converge on reciprocity if and only if the population is capable of reciprocity under the given geographic, demographic, military, political, economic, and familial structure. So, no, in no case is either ‘moral intuition’ or ‘value’ neutral. A sufficient market demand for evil, criminality, or immorality is a market demand that is non-arbitrary. A market demand for hedonism, libertinism, hyper-consumption must be offset by others market demand for the opposite. Ergo, your preferences may be preferences, but that does not mean they are value neutral. They aren’t. They are consequent non-neutral.

  • Your Preferences Are Non-Neutral

    Apr 1, 2020, 3:55 PM The market will always converge on the moral utility that is necessary for the demographic distribution within the market. As such if you want a high trust prosperous polity, you will converge on reciprocity if and only if the population is capable of reciprocity under the given geographic, demographic, military, political, economic, and familial structure. So, no, in no case is either ‘moral intuition’ or ‘value’ neutral. A sufficient market demand for evil, criminality, or immorality is a market demand that is non-arbitrary. A market demand for hedonism, libertinism, hyper-consumption must be offset by others market demand for the opposite. Ergo, your preferences may be preferences, but that does not mean they are value neutral. They aren’t. They are consequent non-neutral.

  • Apr 1, 2020, 3:55 PM Western civilization allows for the clearing of moral prefe

    Apr 1, 2020, 3:55 PM

    Western civilization allows for the clearing of moral preferences through exchange in markets. All other civilizations fail because they don’t.

  • Apr 1, 2020, 3:55 PM Western civilization allows for the clearing of moral prefe

    Apr 1, 2020, 3:55 PM

    Western civilization allows for the clearing of moral preferences through exchange in markets. All other civilizations fail because they don’t.

  • I Gained My Knowledge by Investigating and Prosecuting Them for White Collar Crimes

    Apr 1, 2020, 6:12 PM Actually I know about (((them))) from prosecuting them for RICO, racketeering, churning, mortgage scams, wire fraud, bribery of court officials, data theft, tax evasion, lovely crimes like buying a ravine next to a child care, for next to nothing, and then trying to get a permit to build a halfway house next to it for sex offenders, and trying to force them to buy it at a ridiculous price out of self defense. It taught me both the law, and how it was being abused. I don’t care what wisdom literature says I care what results from Pilpul, Critique, and diasporic ethics. Now, my solution is to fix our laws so that ‘good people stay’ and ‘bad people leave’, but it’s not like I’m led by someone else’s opinion, or ‘the church’s gossip’. It’s because despite growing up with no experience in such things, I was able to identify a pattern of (((group))) behavior and how it’s endemic in the subculture and how it’s argued in (((their))) law and tradition. And research throughout history demonstrates that it’s been persistent for most of the past thousand years at least in europe. But it’s the same reason that the egyptians cast (((them))) out. So it’s got to be older than the past thousand years. So no. My experience is with closing their businesses, seizing their assets, putting them in prison – not reading what people said about them. I got out of it because it was too depressing. But I could have made an amazing career from it if I had the stomach for it. Deception and baiting into hazard are heroic for that part of the world in general. Cheating is a heroic win for (((them))). As is undermining every host people’s group harmony by fomenting conflict. Avoiding engaging in production is an ethic. And specializing in rent seeking is an industry. Yet, all of the above is crime for europeans. So, (((their))) history is selective. We are conscious of our history – including our history of conquest and genocide. We just choose not to do it any longer. The question is, why are (((they))) unconscious of their history, and why don’t (((they))) stop doing it, and why don’t (((they))) stop others from doing it? Because it’s a group advantage. Why? Crimes against the commons it turns out are more rewarding than crimes against private property. Because crimes against the commons can be passed off as voluntary – even though they were created by construction (baiting into hazard.) Don’t abandon your tradition and history. But learn what’s evil in it and change. A diasporic civilization with a highly competent majority that specializes in organized crime to privatize the commons.

  • I Gained My Knowledge by Investigating and Prosecuting Them for White Collar Crimes

    Apr 1, 2020, 6:12 PM Actually I know about (((them))) from prosecuting them for RICO, racketeering, churning, mortgage scams, wire fraud, bribery of court officials, data theft, tax evasion, lovely crimes like buying a ravine next to a child care, for next to nothing, and then trying to get a permit to build a halfway house next to it for sex offenders, and trying to force them to buy it at a ridiculous price out of self defense. It taught me both the law, and how it was being abused. I don’t care what wisdom literature says I care what results from Pilpul, Critique, and diasporic ethics. Now, my solution is to fix our laws so that ‘good people stay’ and ‘bad people leave’, but it’s not like I’m led by someone else’s opinion, or ‘the church’s gossip’. It’s because despite growing up with no experience in such things, I was able to identify a pattern of (((group))) behavior and how it’s endemic in the subculture and how it’s argued in (((their))) law and tradition. And research throughout history demonstrates that it’s been persistent for most of the past thousand years at least in europe. But it’s the same reason that the egyptians cast (((them))) out. So it’s got to be older than the past thousand years. So no. My experience is with closing their businesses, seizing their assets, putting them in prison – not reading what people said about them. I got out of it because it was too depressing. But I could have made an amazing career from it if I had the stomach for it. Deception and baiting into hazard are heroic for that part of the world in general. Cheating is a heroic win for (((them))). As is undermining every host people’s group harmony by fomenting conflict. Avoiding engaging in production is an ethic. And specializing in rent seeking is an industry. Yet, all of the above is crime for europeans. So, (((their))) history is selective. We are conscious of our history – including our history of conquest and genocide. We just choose not to do it any longer. The question is, why are (((they))) unconscious of their history, and why don’t (((they))) stop doing it, and why don’t (((they))) stop others from doing it? Because it’s a group advantage. Why? Crimes against the commons it turns out are more rewarding than crimes against private property. Because crimes against the commons can be passed off as voluntary – even though they were created by construction (baiting into hazard.) Don’t abandon your tradition and history. But learn what’s evil in it and change. A diasporic civilization with a highly competent majority that specializes in organized crime to privatize the commons.

  • The Iron Gauntlet, Reformation of Smithian Political Economy:

    Apr 2, 2020, 2:17 PM by James Krieger (gold) The satisfaction of preferences tend toward equilibrium in that the utility produced by the satisfaction of the marginal preference, ceteris paribus, never exceeds the cost of satisfying the marginal preference. Rule of Law ensures equilibrium by prosecution (via negativa) in the event of externality i.e. the law ensures that all externalities are internalized such that the social-optimum emerges from the optimizing behavior of individuals. Markets for goods & services function to ensure equilibrium in private-consumption of consumer-goods & by extension allocative efficiency in capital markets through the production of price signals–via positva production; whereas the market for rule & commons ensures equilibrium by incrementally suppressing the satisfaction of preference at the expense of peers & commons­–via negativa elimination of externality. (Smith was wrong. The ‘hand’ that guides the division of perception, cognition & labor is iron, not invisible.) —CD— Stated in P-law: Economics is a measure of the group’s success at suppression of irreciprocity with the rule of law.

  • The Iron Gauntlet, Reformation of Smithian Political Economy:

    Apr 2, 2020, 2:17 PM by James Krieger (gold) The satisfaction of preferences tend toward equilibrium in that the utility produced by the satisfaction of the marginal preference, ceteris paribus, never exceeds the cost of satisfying the marginal preference. Rule of Law ensures equilibrium by prosecution (via negativa) in the event of externality i.e. the law ensures that all externalities are internalized such that the social-optimum emerges from the optimizing behavior of individuals. Markets for goods & services function to ensure equilibrium in private-consumption of consumer-goods & by extension allocative efficiency in capital markets through the production of price signals–via positva production; whereas the market for rule & commons ensures equilibrium by incrementally suppressing the satisfaction of preference at the expense of peers & commons­–via negativa elimination of externality. (Smith was wrong. The ‘hand’ that guides the division of perception, cognition & labor is iron, not invisible.) —CD— Stated in P-law: Economics is a measure of the group’s success at suppression of irreciprocity with the rule of law.