Mar 23, 2020, 12:45 PM 1) It is absolutely possible to create a framework for the spectrum of european ‘religions’ and a pantheon. 2) It is absolutely possible to produce a non-false, syncretic, european religion. 3) It is absolutely positively possible to institutionalize those religions – gradually. 4) it is absolutely positively possible to teach physical and mental fitness, and the three sets of laws in ordinary education, decreasing the demand for falsehood. 5) There is absolutely positively demand for it – especially among men – and it will only increase. 6) It will take less than a century to succeed.
Source: Original Site Post
-
Libertarians try to escape responsibility and liability to others for the production of Commons
Mar 23, 2020, 12:49 PM LIBERTARIAN > ANARCHO CAPITALISM > NEOREACTION > SOVEREIGNTARIANISM (SOVEREIGNTY) All libertarian thought is lying to avoid the natural law of sovereignty and reciprocity so that libertarians can escape responsibility and liability to others for the production of Commons. All Sovereigntarian thought enforces the natural law of sovereignty and reciprocity so that our people can restore responsibility and liability to others for the production of commons. Libertarianism like all abrahamic sophisms is a feminine free rider secular theology. Sovereigntarianism (european traditional law of tort) is a masculine accountable science.
-
Libertarians try to escape responsibility and liability to others for the production of Commons
Mar 23, 2020, 12:49 PM LIBERTARIAN > ANARCHO CAPITALISM > NEOREACTION > SOVEREIGNTARIANISM (SOVEREIGNTY) All libertarian thought is lying to avoid the natural law of sovereignty and reciprocity so that libertarians can escape responsibility and liability to others for the production of Commons. All Sovereigntarian thought enforces the natural law of sovereignty and reciprocity so that our people can restore responsibility and liability to others for the production of commons. Libertarianism like all abrahamic sophisms is a feminine free rider secular theology. Sovereigntarianism (european traditional law of tort) is a masculine accountable science.
-
Stop the Libertarian Lie
Mar 23, 2020, 12:59 PM You can have a natural interest in your children. You can have a demonstrated interest in yourself, and in your children. If you claim self ownership you are confusing OWNERSHIP with NATURAL INTEREST and DEMONSTRATED INTEREST. You can have a natural interest in something. You can have a demonstrated interest in something, You can possess something, You can defend it yourself, or with other by normative means, or with a polity by institutional means. But to OWN a thing requires INSTITUTIONS that insure your control over it by the organized application of violenc. Libertarian pilpul conflates demand for, with existence of, in order to avoid starting with the first cause of sovereignty and reciprocity by the necessity of defense. You cannot magically impose fantasy on others. You must CONSTRUCT the institution of property and property rights by reciprocal defense. There are no existential ‘rights’. Only demand for them. They are created by the organized application of violence to defend them. Why would slaves not rely on the organized application of violence instead of idealisms out of ether and the threat of ostracization? Because they are powerless and poor. Why would aristocracy state the truth: property and property rights are organized application of violence? Because they are powerful and not poor. STOP THE LIBERTARIAN LIE DISAMBUGUATION?
ignorance > opportunity > natural interest > demonstrated interest or not > possession (or not) > property (norm) or not > property rights (institutions) or not.
All libertarian thought is lying to avoid the natural law of sovereignty and reciprocity so that libertarians can escape responsibility and liability FOR OTHERS. It’s all pilpul. It’s all using platonism (ideal terms, out of thin air) without accounting for causality.
-
Stop the Libertarian Lie
Mar 23, 2020, 12:59 PM You can have a natural interest in your children. You can have a demonstrated interest in yourself, and in your children. If you claim self ownership you are confusing OWNERSHIP with NATURAL INTEREST and DEMONSTRATED INTEREST. You can have a natural interest in something. You can have a demonstrated interest in something, You can possess something, You can defend it yourself, or with other by normative means, or with a polity by institutional means. But to OWN a thing requires INSTITUTIONS that insure your control over it by the organized application of violenc. Libertarian pilpul conflates demand for, with existence of, in order to avoid starting with the first cause of sovereignty and reciprocity by the necessity of defense. You cannot magically impose fantasy on others. You must CONSTRUCT the institution of property and property rights by reciprocal defense. There are no existential ‘rights’. Only demand for them. They are created by the organized application of violence to defend them. Why would slaves not rely on the organized application of violence instead of idealisms out of ether and the threat of ostracization? Because they are powerless and poor. Why would aristocracy state the truth: property and property rights are organized application of violence? Because they are powerful and not poor. STOP THE LIBERTARIAN LIE DISAMBUGUATION?
ignorance > opportunity > natural interest > demonstrated interest or not > possession (or not) > property (norm) or not > property rights (institutions) or not.
All libertarian thought is lying to avoid the natural law of sovereignty and reciprocity so that libertarians can escape responsibility and liability FOR OTHERS. It’s all pilpul. It’s all using platonism (ideal terms, out of thin air) without accounting for causality.
-
The Law
Mar 23, 2020, 1:04 PM Claiming the existence of potential interest, natural interest, and demonstrated interests are true. Claiming the existence of Ownership is a lie. Property is a lie. Property rights is a lie. Potential, natural, demonstrated interests, and possession exist in fact, independent of others. Property and Property Rights, and as a result that legal Ownership must be constructed by cooperation using the organized application of violence by others to ensure them. Everything libertarianism said was sophistry to avoid the necessity of producing commons at personal cost and of defense of those commons at personal cost. Why? Jewish diaspora (rothbard, rand). German Free Cities (hoppe) under which the magical authority of the empire and its taxes were somehow an oppressor rather than a producer of defense under which commercial civilization was possible.
-
The Law
Mar 23, 2020, 1:04 PM Claiming the existence of potential interest, natural interest, and demonstrated interests are true. Claiming the existence of Ownership is a lie. Property is a lie. Property rights is a lie. Potential, natural, demonstrated interests, and possession exist in fact, independent of others. Property and Property Rights, and as a result that legal Ownership must be constructed by cooperation using the organized application of violence by others to ensure them. Everything libertarianism said was sophistry to avoid the necessity of producing commons at personal cost and of defense of those commons at personal cost. Why? Jewish diaspora (rothbard, rand). German Free Cities (hoppe) under which the magical authority of the empire and its taxes were somehow an oppressor rather than a producer of defense under which commercial civilization was possible.
-
How Many More Years Before We End (((libertarian))) Lies?
Mar 23, 2020, 1:43 PM HOW MANY MORE YEARS BEFORE WE END (((LIBERTARIAN))) LIES? SEE? Sovereigntarians > Classical Liberals > (((Libertarians))) > Sovereigntarians. (((Libertarianism))) is just another attempt to circumvent the universal militia, heroism and excellence, sovereignty and reciprocity, truth and duty, law and jury, markets in everything, and the continuous transcendence of man at the cost of suppression of the reproduction of the underclasses so that the proceeds can be devoted to the production of the high high returns on the commons. Nobody rides for free.
-
How Many More Years Before We End (((libertarian))) Lies?
Mar 23, 2020, 1:43 PM HOW MANY MORE YEARS BEFORE WE END (((LIBERTARIAN))) LIES? SEE? Sovereigntarians > Classical Liberals > (((Libertarians))) > Sovereigntarians. (((Libertarianism))) is just another attempt to circumvent the universal militia, heroism and excellence, sovereignty and reciprocity, truth and duty, law and jury, markets in everything, and the continuous transcendence of man at the cost of suppression of the reproduction of the underclasses so that the proceeds can be devoted to the production of the high high returns on the commons. Nobody rides for free.
-
DEFINITION: Own, Owning, Ownership
Mar 23, 2020, 2:01 PM OWNING The concept of ‘own’ cannot come into existence without others to compete with you for control of something, and as such as a means of enforcement by self, or others, justifying retaliation. Without others: |ACTIONS| I know of something or not > I act to bear a cost of it or not > I take physical control of it or not > i defend it or not > i engage in reciprocal defense of others or not (Property Ownership) > we construct institutions of defense or not (Rights Title). So, interest, where interest = born a cost. |INTEREST| potential interest > demonstrated interest > demonstrated possession > demonstrated defense > demonstrated reciprocal defense (property, ownership) > demonstrated institutional defense (property rights, title). You can demonstrate an potential interest, demonstrated interest, possession, independent of others. You can only demonstrate defense, property-ownership, rights-title with others. I mean. that’s a proof. In other words, that’s a set of series that fully disambiguate all dimensions, and prevents the use of sophistry (deceit) by conflation. We retroactively apply the terms rights property ownership given that we habituate the terms under our laws. But these terms are dependent on those laws and institutions – produced with others. Notice how I use “demonstrated” – meaning actions. Notice how I don’t use ‘ideals’ (Platonisms) without defining them operationally as how they came into being. You see? P uses this technique of disambiguation by operationalization, and serialization. This transforms what we call ‘logic’ into a system of measurment.