Source: Original Site Post

  • Sigh.

    Mar 9, 2020, 12:26 PM

    —“Catholic church is straight communism, especially in the 20s. Bolsheviks took over. Curt is obviously in the dark.”—

    Going from bad to worse isn’t the same as going from good to bad. The only truths are physical laws, natural law, and evolutionary necessity. The only not-false religion is ancestor and nature worship (debt recognition) The only good christian church is orthodoxy – civic ritualism in religious dress. The only good christian religion is evangelicalism – cognitive behavioral therapy in religious dress. All organized religions we know of evolved from the initiatic brotherhood of warriors. All religion is substitute for the oath (loyalty), hunt (army), sacrifice (thanks), feast (reward to all), celebration (bonding) cycle. The military is the source of western civlization, our equality in duty regardless of rank, and our loyalty to one another because of it. The primacy of religion was useful only for the lower classes and women to develop a parallel system of ritual and thanks, because they couldn’t fight, just as the primacy of democracy with the inclusion of women has undermined our martial polity from within.

  • Sigh.

    Mar 9, 2020, 12:26 PM

    —“Catholic church is straight communism, especially in the 20s. Bolsheviks took over. Curt is obviously in the dark.”—

    Going from bad to worse isn’t the same as going from good to bad. The only truths are physical laws, natural law, and evolutionary necessity. The only not-false religion is ancestor and nature worship (debt recognition) The only good christian church is orthodoxy – civic ritualism in religious dress. The only good christian religion is evangelicalism – cognitive behavioral therapy in religious dress. All organized religions we know of evolved from the initiatic brotherhood of warriors. All religion is substitute for the oath (loyalty), hunt (army), sacrifice (thanks), feast (reward to all), celebration (bonding) cycle. The military is the source of western civlization, our equality in duty regardless of rank, and our loyalty to one another because of it. The primacy of religion was useful only for the lower classes and women to develop a parallel system of ritual and thanks, because they couldn’t fight, just as the primacy of democracy with the inclusion of women has undermined our martial polity from within.

  • Self Domestication of Our Anti-Social Behaviors

    We spent thousands of years on the incremental suppression of male criminality using politics, our common law and the duel – even domesticating warfare by the westphalian peace, the geneva convention, the charter of human rights, and the evidence that neither russians nor americans would ever ‘press the button’ under mutually assured destruction. During the peak of our success, as a signal of our virtues, and the justness of our empires, we liberated Women and the Jews at roughly the same time, without awareness that the Jews are the world’s elites at the use of the female strategy of anti-social behavior – ascent by verbal undermining, social construction, free riding, and parasitism, that we call the abrahamic method of deceit. A technology that is a formal methodology of deceit and undermining by that seduction we call ‘false promise and baiting into hazard’, and that is the mirror opposite to the western aristocratic, masculine, aristotelian truth, testimony, reciprocity, and meritocracy. And we were vulnerable because of our tradition of sovereignty, reciprocity, and truth regardless of cost – whis is the only reason women were ‘free’ in western civilization despite their lack of masculine loyalty, and their bias in favor of consumption, hypergamy, and status, regardless of cost. So the lesson of this century is that we must either withdraw the enfranchisement and liberty of women and jews (and now muslims), or we must reform our warfare, reform our politics, increase our laws, restore our duels, so that we can suppress the anti-social behavior of women and the jews (and the muslims now), and return to our Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Truth, Duty, Markets, Meritocracy, and Class Harmony at the cost of the reproduction of the lower classes, and the direction of surpluses to the production of high-returns commons. And we must separate, or conquer to do so. Because the end result of the female strategy is always and everywhere decline and conquest by others.  

  • The Rest of The World Can’t Comprehend the West’s ‘game’

    Mar 9, 2020, 1:09 PM A universal militia, using Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Truth, Duty, Markets, Rapid Adaptability, Meritocracy, and Class Harmony at the cost of the reproduction of the lower classes, and the direction of surpluses to the production of high-returns commons, has no ‘authority’ other than the law of sovereignty, reciprocity, truth, and duty and markets in everything. So we must solve all problems by creating rules (laws) that apply to all equally. Western civilization requires we solve problems with rules of the game, NOT COMMANDS. The rules preserve the west’s strategy of adaptive velocity using sovereignty, reciprocity, truth, duty, jury and markets in everything with constantly rotating natural aristocracy(military), nobility (commercial), and priesthood(public intellectuals). So, to everyone else in the world, solving problems is easy, because they think in terms of commands not game rules. And because they choose the ‘easy way’ they stagnate. It’s a lower risk for them. They pay the cost of stagnation, in exchange for the ease of administration and adoption of norms. But this difference is greater than the difference between western truth before face, and asiant face before truth, or asian harmony and western adversarialism, or asian emphasis on verbs and composition and western emphasis on nouns and shapes. It is literally inconceivable to the semitic peoples (and even to our own western women) that the secret of our success is the high cost of norms and institutions of ‘continuous recursive adaptation to circumstance’ – we are not always first, but we are always fastest. And evolution cares about fastest.

  • The Rest of The World Can’t Comprehend the West’s ‘game’

    Mar 9, 2020, 1:09 PM A universal militia, using Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Truth, Duty, Markets, Rapid Adaptability, Meritocracy, and Class Harmony at the cost of the reproduction of the lower classes, and the direction of surpluses to the production of high-returns commons, has no ‘authority’ other than the law of sovereignty, reciprocity, truth, and duty and markets in everything. So we must solve all problems by creating rules (laws) that apply to all equally. Western civilization requires we solve problems with rules of the game, NOT COMMANDS. The rules preserve the west’s strategy of adaptive velocity using sovereignty, reciprocity, truth, duty, jury and markets in everything with constantly rotating natural aristocracy(military), nobility (commercial), and priesthood(public intellectuals). So, to everyone else in the world, solving problems is easy, because they think in terms of commands not game rules. And because they choose the ‘easy way’ they stagnate. It’s a lower risk for them. They pay the cost of stagnation, in exchange for the ease of administration and adoption of norms. But this difference is greater than the difference between western truth before face, and asiant face before truth, or asian harmony and western adversarialism, or asian emphasis on verbs and composition and western emphasis on nouns and shapes. It is literally inconceivable to the semitic peoples (and even to our own western women) that the secret of our success is the high cost of norms and institutions of ‘continuous recursive adaptation to circumstance’ – we are not always first, but we are always fastest. And evolution cares about fastest.

  • I Don”t Want You to Stop Veneration for Jesus – I Want You to Reform

    Mar 9, 2020, 1:18 PM I DON”T WANT YOU TO STOP VENERATION FOR JESUS – I WANT YOU TO REFORM Katherine Nixey: The Darkening Age. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Darkening_Age Christians were the social justice warriors, revisionist historians, victim narrative producers, anti-whites, sophists, science denialists, and communists of the ancient world. Which is why they assist the muslims and jews in the destruction of the modern world, with another era of universalism. The orthodox on one hand have preserved a ritualistic religion. The evangelicals have almost converted it into a folk religion. But “Churchianity” imposed by force by the byzantines upon the west, is no different from postwar jews imposing marxism, feminism, postmodernism, and human biology denialism upon the west once again, and incrementally using activism to undermine from within. The current fall is just christianity version two. (My instinct is that Christianity cannot survive without military service to provide the masculinity to the men. Paganism is nationalistic, or at civilizational, and militaristic. as well as providing debt recognition to ancestors.) Edit

  • I Don”t Want You to Stop Veneration for Jesus – I Want You to Reform

    Mar 9, 2020, 1:18 PM I DON”T WANT YOU TO STOP VENERATION FOR JESUS – I WANT YOU TO REFORM Katherine Nixey: The Darkening Age. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Darkening_Age Christians were the social justice warriors, revisionist historians, victim narrative producers, anti-whites, sophists, science denialists, and communists of the ancient world. Which is why they assist the muslims and jews in the destruction of the modern world, with another era of universalism. The orthodox on one hand have preserved a ritualistic religion. The evangelicals have almost converted it into a folk religion. But “Churchianity” imposed by force by the byzantines upon the west, is no different from postwar jews imposing marxism, feminism, postmodernism, and human biology denialism upon the west once again, and incrementally using activism to undermine from within. The current fall is just christianity version two. (My instinct is that Christianity cannot survive without military service to provide the masculinity to the men. Paganism is nationalistic, or at civilizational, and militaristic. as well as providing debt recognition to ancestors.) Edit

  • In P-Law Whose Money Do You Want to Waste?

    Mar 9, 2020, 1:28 PM

    —“I think an interesting idea as a prerequisite to being able to take someone to court for a violation of reciprocity under P-law would be the requirement that they show up to court “in propria persona” or “pro se,” or more succinctly, no more attorneys. Don’t kill them as Shakespeare suggested, just make it unlawful for them to show up in court except to represent themselves and their own interests.”—

    (good). Or go the other way: use the british method of a barrister, which won’t take a case from solicitor(lawyer) unless it has merit. So in the british model they have, in our terms, professional prosecutors for both sides. In america we have a lot of lawyers and a few prosecutors. It’s more ‘common law’ to take your route. It requires more judges with more skill but yes it will work. I’m not settled on the more adversarial american, or the less dishonest british. What I like about your position is that it’s cheap. What I like about their position is that it’s expensive. I think the judge-judy shows of the world illustrate how ignorant the public is of their own wrong doing. So it depends on whose time we want to waste on idiots: their own money with lawyers, or our money with the court’s.

  • In P-Law Whose Money Do You Want to Waste?

    Mar 9, 2020, 1:28 PM

    —“I think an interesting idea as a prerequisite to being able to take someone to court for a violation of reciprocity under P-law would be the requirement that they show up to court “in propria persona” or “pro se,” or more succinctly, no more attorneys. Don’t kill them as Shakespeare suggested, just make it unlawful for them to show up in court except to represent themselves and their own interests.”—

    (good). Or go the other way: use the british method of a barrister, which won’t take a case from solicitor(lawyer) unless it has merit. So in the british model they have, in our terms, professional prosecutors for both sides. In america we have a lot of lawyers and a few prosecutors. It’s more ‘common law’ to take your route. It requires more judges with more skill but yes it will work. I’m not settled on the more adversarial american, or the less dishonest british. What I like about your position is that it’s cheap. What I like about their position is that it’s expensive. I think the judge-judy shows of the world illustrate how ignorant the public is of their own wrong doing. So it depends on whose time we want to waste on idiots: their own money with lawyers, or our money with the court’s.

  • “Fed!!!!”

    Mar 9, 2020, 1:31 PM The lunatic fringe (borderline schizotypal) can’t imagine anyone having guts enough to speak the truth in public and to rally men to political reformation. Their paranoia is a psychological attempt to hide behind their fear, and to gain some semblance of sense of self control. What it really means when people call you a ‘fed’ is that they are scared, powerless, cowards, who desperately want someone else to solve the problem they lack the courage, ability, and agency to solve.