Religion for the -80’s, Moralizing for the 90’s, Rationalization for the 100’s. platonism for the 110’s empiricism for the 120’s. operationalism for the 130’s+ There is a reason for islam in the arab and indonesian worlds, and hinduism in the hindustani worlds. buddhism on se asian. christianity in the south american, secular christianity in the european world, confucianism in the east asian world etc. The majority determines the necessary means of preserving the means of perpetuating metaphysics traditions and norms. The west retains a grammar (method of storytelling) for every standard deviation of ability. We are unified by our law that is via negativa. We are unified by our ethics that are christian via-positiva. Those chrstian ethics are expressible in theological, rational, philosophical, empirical and operational terms.
Source: Original Site Post
-
Fool Us Twice, Shame on Us.
Jan 8, 2020, 9:14 PM ‘FOOL US TWICE, SHAME ON US.
Why did they invent lying? And why are we susceptible to it? Abrahamic deceit is not backward. It is an advanced technology that like viruses or cancer, that takes advantage of a natural cognitive vulnerability to empathy and suggestion to bypass reason and create addiction. The vast majority of humans have trivial agency and are merely gene machines that imitate others around them. Institutions, Myth, Tradition, Norms are all means of training extremely adaptive domesticated animals to work as a group. European Civilization Institutions: Competition between 1. Military(Duty – Hierarchy), 2. Traditional Law(Markets Meritocracy), 3. Faith (Piety – Equality) UNDERMINING 1. Darwin Undermines faith 2. Postwar Jewish Intellectuals Undermine all three. 3. Successful Disintermediation of the Military from Politics. 4. Immigration prevents reformation The West has maintained a market (not monopoly) between all three Military, Law(Markets), Faith. And they attacked all three. Everyone thinks their ‘discipline(class)’ was the core of european civilization, but it was the balance of powers between them. Like everything in the West, once we have sovereignty we have markets, and tripartism: Military, Law (market), and Faith. We would have made it without immigration. Just like Rome. But this is how the (((christians))) destroyed rome. It’s a repeat of the attack on rome by the same people. Fool us once, shame on them. Fool use twice shame on us.’ FOOL US TWICE, SHAME ON US. Why did they invent lying? And why are we susceptible to it? Abrahamic deceit is not backward. It is an advanced technology that like viruses or cancer, that takes advantage of a natural cognitive vulnerability to empathy and suggestion to bypass reason and create addiction. The vast majority of humans have trivial agency and are merely gene machines that imitate others around them. Institutions, Myth, Tradition, Norms are all means of training extremely adaptive domesticated animals to work as a group. European Civilization Institutions: Competition between 1. Military(Duty – Hierarchy), 2. Traditional Law(Markets Meritocracy), 3. Faith (Piety – Equality) UNDERMINING 1. Darwin Undermines faith 2. Postwar Jewish Intellectuals Undermine all three. 3. Successful Disintermediation of the Military from Politics. 4. Immigration prevents reformation The West has maintained a market (not monopoly) between all three Military, Law(Markets), Faith. And they attacked all three. Everyone thinks their ‘discipline(class)’ was the core of european civilization, but it was the balance of powers between them. Like everything in the West, once we have sovereignty we have markets, and tripartism: Military, Law (market), and Faith. We would have made it without immigration. Just like Rome. But this is how the (((christians))) destroyed rome. It’s a repeat of the attack on rome by the same people. Fool us once, shame on them. Fool use twice shame on us.
-
Fable 112 – The Chariot of Hermes and the Arabs
Fable 112 – The Chariot of Hermes and the Arabs
“One day, Hermes drove across the entire Earth a chariot filled with lies, villainy and fraud. And he distributed a small portion of his cargo in each country he visited. But when he arrived in the country of the Arabs, the chariot suddenly broke down. The Arabs believed he was carrying a precious cargo and so they stole the contents of his chariot. Hermes was then unable to carry on into the countries of other peoples. More than all other people the Arabs are liars and cheats. Indeed, there is not even a word for ‘truth’ in their language.”
-
Fable 112 – The Chariot of Hermes and the Arabs
Fable 112 – The Chariot of Hermes and the Arabs
“One day, Hermes drove across the entire Earth a chariot filled with lies, villainy and fraud. And he distributed a small portion of his cargo in each country he visited. But when he arrived in the country of the Arabs, the chariot suddenly broke down. The Arabs believed he was carrying a precious cargo and so they stole the contents of his chariot. Hermes was then unable to carry on into the countries of other peoples. More than all other people the Arabs are liars and cheats. Indeed, there is not even a word for ‘truth’ in their language.”
-
No, You Don”t Get It
Jan 8, 2020, 10:02 PM I don’t get to ‘appeal’ to markets. The law doesn’t do that. We use the law to create policy that appeals to markets WITHIN the natural law. I CANT compromise without compromising the law itself. So no. Propertarianism isn’t an ideology or philosophy it’s just a formal logic of the cognitive, linguistic, psychological, and social sciences. The Propertarian constitution is a movement. We can use Propertarianism to create movements. The movement is the restoration and renaissance of western civilization. We can compromise on policy. But we can’t compromise on truth and reciprocity. So we have a harder job than theologians, sophists, ideologists, philosophers, pseudoscientists, and outright liars. (But I do reserve the right to mess around like everyone else does…. lol )
-
No, You Don”t Get It
Jan 8, 2020, 10:02 PM I don’t get to ‘appeal’ to markets. The law doesn’t do that. We use the law to create policy that appeals to markets WITHIN the natural law. I CANT compromise without compromising the law itself. So no. Propertarianism isn’t an ideology or philosophy it’s just a formal logic of the cognitive, linguistic, psychological, and social sciences. The Propertarian constitution is a movement. We can use Propertarianism to create movements. The movement is the restoration and renaissance of western civilization. We can compromise on policy. But we can’t compromise on truth and reciprocity. So we have a harder job than theologians, sophists, ideologists, philosophers, pseudoscientists, and outright liars. (But I do reserve the right to mess around like everyone else does…. lol )
-
We Know the Answer Now.
Jan 9, 2020, 9:10 AM
—“You lose me totally here. It’s ALL about race.”—Cortny
That’s because you’re conflating two issues. There is no contradiction between ethnonationalism for all to produce optimums for all, and eugenics for all to reduce the worst for all. In other words under truth (science), under reciprocity and rule of law, with a majority middle class at or above say 105, there is nothing intrinsically bad about any group of humans that prevents them from all the opportunities of western civilization. “All happy families are the same, all unhappy families are different” and “All domesticatable animals are the same, all undomesticatable animals are different” both express the same argument: a number of things have to go right, any one of which can go wrong and produce failure. RECIPE 1. A Heroic Narrative of Truth, Duty, Oath and Contract, Heroism, Excellence, Achievement, Mindfulness and The direction of dominance expression to the production of commons. 2. Ethnocentrism, Nationalism, The individual as the subject of Law and the Family as the subject of Policy. 3. Aristotelianism: Realism, Naturalism, Operationalism, Empiricism, Testimonial Truth (science) 4. Rule of law by Natural Law of Reciprocity and markets in everything, including a Market for the Suppression of parasitism in court 5. A Power Distribution of law, Pareto Distribution of Capital, and Nash Distribution of Returns. 6. A majority genetic middle class and the suppression of the reproduction of the underclass (unproductive). Diversity is a bad. Proximity causes hostility. Both undermine the willingness of peoples to devote resources to the commons and maximize the tragedy of the commons. We know the answer now. The question is, what people will pursue it, and what people will continue to be a drag on mankind?
-
We Know the Answer Now.
Jan 9, 2020, 9:10 AM
—“You lose me totally here. It’s ALL about race.”—Cortny
That’s because you’re conflating two issues. There is no contradiction between ethnonationalism for all to produce optimums for all, and eugenics for all to reduce the worst for all. In other words under truth (science), under reciprocity and rule of law, with a majority middle class at or above say 105, there is nothing intrinsically bad about any group of humans that prevents them from all the opportunities of western civilization. “All happy families are the same, all unhappy families are different” and “All domesticatable animals are the same, all undomesticatable animals are different” both express the same argument: a number of things have to go right, any one of which can go wrong and produce failure. RECIPE 1. A Heroic Narrative of Truth, Duty, Oath and Contract, Heroism, Excellence, Achievement, Mindfulness and The direction of dominance expression to the production of commons. 2. Ethnocentrism, Nationalism, The individual as the subject of Law and the Family as the subject of Policy. 3. Aristotelianism: Realism, Naturalism, Operationalism, Empiricism, Testimonial Truth (science) 4. Rule of law by Natural Law of Reciprocity and markets in everything, including a Market for the Suppression of parasitism in court 5. A Power Distribution of law, Pareto Distribution of Capital, and Nash Distribution of Returns. 6. A majority genetic middle class and the suppression of the reproduction of the underclass (unproductive). Diversity is a bad. Proximity causes hostility. Both undermine the willingness of peoples to devote resources to the commons and maximize the tragedy of the commons. We know the answer now. The question is, what people will pursue it, and what people will continue to be a drag on mankind?
-
Great example of Moral Prose (bad) vs Legal Prose (good):
Jan 9, 2020, 9:14 AM
Scapegoating vs Accountability – vs – Plausible Deniability vs Warranty.
by James Lyons Sr.
-
Great example of Moral Prose (bad) vs Legal Prose (good):
Jan 9, 2020, 9:14 AM
Scapegoating vs Accountability – vs – Plausible Deniability vs Warranty.
by James Lyons Sr.