photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/45200388_10156747633972264_2897448134030393344_n_10156747633967264.jpg Another one from @[687166933:2048:Bjorn Moritz] omg.. lolJennifer DeanHmmn, looks like a visit to the chiropractor is in order.Nov 1, 2018, 5:37 AMJim WaltersLooking like you’re about to kill for the Night KingNov 1, 2018, 5:56 AMJohn MarkCurt after encountering several sacred cows.Nov 1, 2018, 7:22 AMSteven J. WoronSee? And you were complaining about your weight….Nov 1, 2018, 9:43 AMAnother one from Bjorn Moritz omg.. lol
ON DEMAND FOR THE SACRED: EUROPEAN MARKET OR SEMITIC MONOPOLY?
1 – Heidegger=german, which is the point of the discussion. Whether the Truth (knowledge, science, history, heroes, evolution) or Wisdom Literature (parables, fictions, myths) are the basis for civic contract (Monopoly). Or whether a hierarchy of graceful failure from the scientific to the religious is the basis of our civic contract (Market)
2 – The sacred can consist of us, ourselves, can be something else (creatures, anthropomorphic, or formless), can be of things (idols), can be of ideas (of books and words), or of anything that we owe a debt. Although, ideas, things, symbols-proxies for leaders, and ourselves is a very close to complete list of the possibilities.
3 – The sacred serves as a proxy between those who are not good enough to submit to one another.
4 – Religion consists of training (education) the intuition (emotions) so that people ‘feel like’ you do by taking advantage of our pre-cognitive biases.
6 – We can measure increase and decrease demand for ‘the sacred’ (proxies) and I am fairly sure the science of it (like that of status) is simply one that generates denialism. That is to to say that such therapeutic measures are unnecessary, but that they are not explicable.In other words, exposing the content and drive behind the ‘sacred’ makes the sacred impossible, thereby removing which is why it is denied. I
7 – So , to some people the scientific truth is sacred, to some of us (american constitutionalists) the constitution and by proxy ‘we, us, our-way’ is sacred. To some religious tradition is sacred. To some of us a monarchy or leader is sacred. To some of us family, tribe, and nation is sacred. To some of us mankind is sacred. To some of us the transcendence of mankind into the gods we imagine is sacred (that would include me). And to some of us we spread, combine, include, or exclude as suits our interests.
8 – Since debts of submission can be created along those and other axis, the behaviors we want to develop in a polity need only be expressible in all those paradigms – or at least, be sufficiently compatible that group persistence survives competition and shocks.
9 – So the question is, (a) what are those rules of group strategy obscured within and created by some sacred debt, (b) what paradigms within each grammar (system of thought) each system of thought which corresponds to a degree of agency and interests, given our age, class, and accumulated relationships and assets.
10 – it is not … challenging … to understand that the occult is an expression of vulnerability or powerlessness, that ritual an expression of mindfulness, that gatherings are an expression of inclusion, and that festival an expression of trust creation is rather simple. That the narrative content of a mythos allows us categories, relations, and values that can be taught to children (or idiots) which allows graceful (simple) calculation and coordination of cooperation is rather simple.
11 – I don’t do via positiva (religion, philosophy, and literature). I do via negativa law. While we differ in what is preferable and good, and we differ in demand for proportionality, and we differ in demand for liberty (opportunity), we do not differ in demand for reciprocity. Instead, we all seek to preserve our advantageous means of parasitism, predation, deception, and self deception.
12 – philosophy religion and literature (via positiva ) is for others (and frankly, for those who need them). I don’t do either.
13 – It is possible that the clash of civilizations between the german continental and the anglo scandinavian (naval) is simply that the british were smarter, better educated, and more evolved, and the germans, who were the “rednecks” of europe for all of her history, were, and remain a more sentimental people. I just don’t know if that’s an advantage or not. What it appears, is that it’s economically and militarily superior to follow the german model of TRUTH, DUTY, PIETY, AND RECIPROCITY.
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/45105824_10156746943187264_2041181012695711744_o_10156746943182264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/45082954_10156746944947264_1269175729459822592_o_10156746944927264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/45013078_10156746944932264_3806823488052789248_n_10156746944922264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/45103412_10156746944957264_4224756666748370944_n_10156746944937264.jpg WERE THE SUMERIANS WHITE? (NO)
RACIAL CATEGORIES OF WEST EURASIANS
I’ve covered this elsewhere in detail, but here, i’ll repeat:
While even Aristotle used Racial Categories, (and was clearly a supremacist by every measure, and identified the same behaviors we do today due to geographic causes).
It wasn’t until the western use of sail to cover the globe that we were able to observe and understand that all groups on the globe evolved on different continents and under different conditions and that all people could be categorized into three or four groups with common features and customs. (African, west asian, east asian, and the early people along the coastal route from africa to india, through the pacific into australia.)
WHITE DIFFERENTIATION FROM OTHER GROUPS
White (European, Western, Christendom) practices a unique combination of cultural traits, as well as two genetic traits.
Cultural:
(i) speaking the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, regardless of the impact on the status, dominance, and competence hierarchies that we inherited from the Yamna/Corded Ware, and Indo European Expansion (Paganism).
This is in direct opposition to ‘Face’ practiced by all other cultures, and direct opposition to ‘postmodern political correctness’ and their attempt to restore the primitivism of ‘face’.
(ii) the development of the ‘corporation’ or ‘commons’ that broke family barriers under bipartite manorialism, (high trust),
(iii) the four principles of christianity also invented to break kinship bonds:
iii.1 The eradication of hatred from the human heart.
iii.2 The extension of kinship love to non-kin.
iii.3 The extension of exhaustive forgiveness before punishment, enserfment, enslavement, death, or war.
iii.4 The demand for personal charity until personally certain it didn’t work.
Genetic:
(i) greater neoteny than all but east asians but different dimorphic distribution of traits.
(ii) a balance between both linguistic and spatial intelligence
(iii) the additional successful reduction of the lower and underclasses and a downward expansion of the genetic middle classes, under (most recently) bipartite manorialism, but (apparently) back into prehistory as well.
(iv) the additional successful reduction of the lower classes by aggressive hanging of scolds, malcontents, indolent, and criminals for over a thousand years (maybe as much as one half percent per year),
(v) further culling of the impulsive during long winters, starvation, warfare, disease – despite better living standards under manorialism than the rest of the world – such that by 1200 europeans were already ahead in caloric consumption and military development than the middle east.
THE MEANING OF ‘WHITE’
We use ‘white’ today simply because ‘christendom’ and ‘european’, and ‘western’ have been intentionally undermined by the pseudoscientific postwar movement using marx(economics), boas(sociology), freud(psychology), the frankfurt school (culture), and the (literary sophism) of the french postmodernists (outright denialism), in order to prevent the continuation of the scientific revolution into the social sciences, which was started by Darwin, Menger, Maxwell, Poincare, Spencer, Nietzsche, and the Romanticists
.
So, white refers to the set of european ethnicities (Genetic Groups) consisting of Old Europe (Greeco-Byzantine Civilization, the boot of italy, sicily, and sardinia), The Southern Europeans, The Atlantics, Germanics/scandinavians, Slavs, Finnics.
They consists of those people of the western indo european expansion of the Yamna ( Pit Grave, Militaristic, Technological, Paternalistic, Expansionist, Sky Worshipping, that gave us the uniqueness of western civilization, in combination with horse, bronze, and wheel.).
WHITE is the identity of atlantic, germanic, scandinavian, finnic, slavic peoples, and for historical reasons we include Old Europeans even though they are of anatolian extraction, not european – hence the complexion, build, and hair. These are the people of the westward expansion of the indo europeans (Yamna, corded ware cultures). (and yes, they largely replaced (exterminated) those that they conquered.
However, ‘Whites’ are just the westernmost branches of west eurasians.
We broadly group these people into the category ‘caucasian’, which might be better said either ‘peoples of the black sea’, or ‘people of the black sea that evolved during the ice age.
—“I am curious as to how you haven’t been de-platformed yet Curt, with your open advocacy of revolution? Is it just because your language is academic enough for the hate speech bots to skim over?”— James Fox Higgins
Well there are keywords I avoid because they HAVE caught me, but usually FB lets me back on after an appeal. Lately they don’t even block me just take down a post if it’s not cool (which is what I THINK they should do).
1) I don’t engage in hate at all ever, but nationalism for all as a solution to our conflicts.
2) I never cross the line into advocacy of action
3) I’m warning revolution will come, not encouraging it
4) My solution (law) will prevent the revolution in exchange for constitutional reformation (and its a libertarian solution)
5) I have participated in class actions before, and have worked for the justice department and for the three letter acronym org, and suppression of the kind of speech I make just gives me opportunity for actions. And so (a) an intellectual, not a risk, (b) I won’t ‘inflame’ the idiot-crowd, (c) any attempt to frame me as otherwise just provides me with leverage in court.
6) and YES, it takes a lot of IQ points to understand WTF I am talking about – and that is by design.
The whole point of increasing the probability of revolutionary violence is to prevent it from happening.
Seriously. It’s the time of year when you bring the animals down from the pasture, slaughter those you can’t feed, store the harvest for the winter, and welcome the winter and the dead back from their slumber. And to feed them, by burning the undesirables at the stake, to decrease the burden of winter costs 😉
hugs all. ;)Andrea RoyallAlso a time to celebrate your dead ancestors so that they 1-) bless your hearth, home, fertility (and harvest goes with fertility) and 2-) provide protection throughout the winter as the nights lengthen.Oct 31, 2018, 7:05 PMCurt DoolittleCold Nights, Soft Linens, Warm Bodies, Hot Drinks, Slow Cooked Meals. Cold Floors.Oct 31, 2018, 7:09 PMNick DahlheimHugging all of you by the Halloween funeral pikes and pyres!Oct 31, 2018, 7:16 PMAlejandro ChirinosOw,the edgeOct 31, 2018, 7:45 PMSteven J. WoronOr…Oct 31, 2018, 7:49 PMCurt DoolittleI like your idea better… lol.Oct 31, 2018, 8:21 PMBrett StevensEugenics now!Oct 31, 2018, 9:09 PMWilliam Viergeveris that Matt Lauer in the background??Oct 31, 2018, 11:58 PMBjorn MoritzHappy Halloween 🎃Nov 1, 2018, 2:56 AMNick DahlheimCurt Doolittle is such a great meme-character. I feel so warm and fuzzy and wanting to hug when I see these. Haha. 😆😉😜😝Nov 1, 2018, 2:58 AMCurt DoolittleOMG … ok. I really love this one. lolNov 1, 2018, 5:19 AMJennifer DeanI would rather not say, restore human sacrifice (especially considering, it never stopped but only went underground in the most vile forms)…rather, restore sacrifice of the inhuman.Nov 1, 2018, 4:21 PMHAPPY HALLOWEEN!
(restore human sacrifice!)
Seriously. It’s the time of year when you bring the animals down from the pasture, slaughter those you can’t feed, store the harvest for the winter, and welcome the winter and the dead back from their slumber. And to feed them, by burning the undesirables at the stake, to decrease the burden of winter costs 😉
OK. This is worth a video, but in short, when I said in 06, the correction would happen in 08, recover by 14, tinker along till 17, and that we would have a revolution by 2020 to 2025 at the latest, I was correct. Why? Because DEMOGRAPHICS IS DESTINY: Demographic outcomes are deterministic.
While it’s true that the left are NPC’s, it’s also true that the right is empirical. But without a THEORETICAL basis of social science to PREDICT, alter, and adapt to outcomes, one lacks agency.
SO when I started out and said:
1) we are going to have a revolution
2) nothing can stop it.
3) all we can do is control it.
4) the optimum means of controlling it is to provide a plan
5) that plan needs to provide sufficient incenties that the majority of the population will not RESIST.
6) because they won’t resist if the obtain material, emotional, and intellectual, rewards.
7) And because we have removed the ‘doubt’ (uncertainty) as to the function of a polity after that revolution.
8) And to provide greater fear of uncertainty due to revolutionary chaos if they DO resist.
I wasn’t wrong before, I haven’t been wrong so far, and I won’t be wrong in the future.
By birth I am an american citizen. By upbringing, an anglo saxon. (WASP). In civilizational philosophy, I am an empiricist. In discipline I am a social scientist, in that specialization we call the Law.
How’s that?
—“By birth I am an Anglo Saxon colonial. By upbringing I am an Anglo Saxon colonial. In civilizational philosophy I am an Anglo Saxon colonial. In discipline I am an Anglo Saxon colonial, in that specialization we Anglo Saxon colonials call the Law’”— Rock Mandjinn
That’s pretty good, except it fails to connect innovation in technology with Aryanism, Aryanism with Colonialism, Christianity as an ‘excuse’ for Colonialism and Aryanism.
Where Paternalist and Expansionist means “Domesticating the Animal Man for Profit.”
I get it. I do. The problem is that domesticating humans other than our own turns out to be a losing proposition for us. So separation in the chinese, korean, japanese model is the only solution to coexistence with ‘less domesticated’ peoples.
http://propertyandfreedom.org/2018/10/rahim-taghizadegan-why-are-western-europens-so-naive-pfs-2018/RAHIM MAKES TELLS THE STORY SO THAT I DON’T HAVE TO:
The Weaponization of the Commons as means of FUNDING the KNIGHTS.
Rahim Taghizadegan, Why Are Western Europens So Naive (PFS 2018)
