Curt Doolittle shared a post.
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-22 07:16:00 UTC
Curt Doolittle shared a post.
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-22 07:16:00 UTC
A metaphor is (exists as) that category of fiction called ‘analogy’, that serves as a method of suggestion, that like all analogies functions as a substitute for description when the audience lacks the direct experience (memories) to reconstruct the intended experience (meaning). We generally use the spectrum of analogies to transfer properties between cases. And therein lies the problem.
The question is whether one is engaging the transfer of truths or falsehoods, and whether those falsehoods produce externalities that are positive or negative, either directly or cumulatively.
The central problem arises because as suggestion increases vulnerability increases.
The economics of meaning (neural economy) are such that reinforcement of false paradigms decreases future cost of paradigmatic expansion.
Conversely, those same economics mean that reformation of or replacement of those paradigms is a huge cost. And must be (at least for volition to be rational) offset by some reward.
For the professional liar or snake oil salesman or marketer, or politician, or philosopher, or priest, this threatens not only his cognitive malinvestment, but his means of obtaining attention, status, opportunity – and often, income.
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-21 19:52:00 UTC
Curt Doolittle shared a post.
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-21 19:04:00 UTC
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46520663_10156793787532264_3605722489210011648_n_10156793787527264.jpg (humor)Amit EmmGreat postsNov 21, 2018, 11:28 AMJesse GarciaBy the Gods I hope the Windows XP thing is true.Nov 21, 2018, 11:32 AMAndrea RoyallIt’s the little things.. ♥️Nov 21, 2018, 11:40 AMSteven KolpekGain nerd points by using Windows 2000 instead of XPNov 21, 2018, 12:16 PMHoward Van Der KlauwHey thats no laughing matter, I was running XP in VMWare on my Mac until recently so I could keep using my 20 year old accounting software on it.Nov 21, 2018, 2:33 PMAnjin BodhisattvaLINUXNov 21, 2018, 4:24 PMSteven KolpekOh absolutely. LINUX users should also know how stable and well supported Windows 2000 is to this day; the OS is free, even.Nov 21, 2018, 4:43 PMBill JoslinI loved XPNov 21, 2018, 9:13 PMGreg Hamiltonit’s still on my windows machines …Nov 21, 2018, 9:22 PMConnor SumnersEveryone knows true Propertarians only use TempleOSNov 23, 2018, 6:16 AM(humor)

Source date (UTC): 2018-11-21 11:13:00 UTC
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46520663_10156793787532264_3605722489210011648_n_10156793787527264.jpg (humor)Amit EmmGreat postsNov 21, 2018, 11:28 AMJesse GarciaBy the Gods I hope the Windows XP thing is true.Nov 21, 2018, 11:32 AMAndrea RoyallIt’s the little things.. ♥️Nov 21, 2018, 11:40 AMSteven KolpekGain nerd points by using Windows 2000 instead of XPNov 21, 2018, 12:16 PMHoward Van Der KlauwHey thats no laughing matter, I was running XP in VMWare on my Mac until recently so I could keep using my 20 year old accounting software on it.Nov 21, 2018, 2:33 PMAnjin BodhisattvaLINUXNov 21, 2018, 4:24 PMSteven KolpekOh absolutely. LINUX users should also know how stable and well supported Windows 2000 is to this day; the OS is free, even.Nov 21, 2018, 4:43 PMLuan RaphaelFrom Scratch, and it explains the hermit part too.Nov 21, 2018, 8:48 PMBill JoslinI loved XPNov 21, 2018, 9:13 PMGreg Hamiltonit’s still on my windows machines …Nov 21, 2018, 9:22 PMConnor SumnersEveryone knows true Propertarians only use TempleOSNov 23, 2018, 6:16 AM(humor)

Source date (UTC): 2018-11-21 11:13:00 UTC
Curt Doolittle shared a post.
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-21 10:51:00 UTC
Curt Doolittle shared a post.
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-21 10:32:00 UTC
In every great era of transformation men must be reminded that while we pursue ideals together to improve current conditions, that we must not, by doing so, lose our comprehension of the real. And by the real, i mean, that cooperation is merely one of the means of conflict, and that either we are pushing people out of the bottom of our group, or pushing other groups out of the bottom of all groups, but that we are always and everywhere in competition as the optimum evolutionary means of conflict. Hence why we have the generational need for warriors to write reminders of how to fight, lest we fall under the illusion that no fight exists, or that others will not resort to non-cooperationg, and warfare by all means possible at all times.
THere are many dead gods, for all the peoples who are dead.
(worth repeating)
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-21 10:31:00 UTC
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46513881_10156793254527264_4450314467799990272_o_10156793254522264.jpg Piero ThymiopoulosLol, that was my reply to your post.
I don’t understand your attacks on NS.
In the same hand, I’m not sure if you were being ironic but you called yourself fascist.Nov 21, 2018, 9:42 AMJeff UrizenThey are monstrosities is rightNov 21, 2018, 9:44 AMChristopher HallAn identity is defined by what is and is not.Nov 21, 2018, 9:44 AMAnthony MigchelsHitler’s implementation of National Socialism was absolutely totalitarian. Both in theory and in practice.
The economy was completely State dominated, with Industry’s role (besides massive profiteering) being merely to produce what the State demanded, and all boys were taken by the Hitler Jugend at a very early age, and few parents dared say no. The State in effect reared the boys, and while they loved it, they were in fact prepared for the Front.
Also note that point 25 of the National Socialist 25 point Manifesto reads:
“For the execution of all of this we demand the formation of a strong central power in the Reich. Unlimited authority of the central parliament over the whole Reich and its organizations in general. The forming of state and profession chambers for the execution of the laws made by the Reich within the various states of the confederation. The leaders of the Party promise, if necessary by sacrificing their own lives, to support by the execution of the points set forth above without consideration.”Nov 21, 2018, 9:58 AMPiero ThymiopoulosNov 21, 2018, 10:03 AMAnthony MigchelsI don’t see at all what bearing this has on my comment?!
And while Hitler was right about the Jews, he was hardly the ‘first’. In fact: in late 19th century Germany hundreds of top level German elites actually came together to see what to do about the JQ in Germany. Their conclusion: it’s too late. The Jew’s money scams had already enslaved and bought everybody at that stage.
And of course: Hitler attacked the little Jews, and he let the Big Jews escape to Britain and the US, before the war.Nov 21, 2018, 10:42 AMEthan TriceNational socialism and fascism are authoritarian. Communism is totalitarian. The degree of influence of the state is the key. In an authoritarian state, you’re ok if you keep your head down. In a totalitarian one, you may be killed if you don’t praise it enough. Obviously the treatment of the jews in nazi germany makes one think of totalitarianism, but that was more a status crime.Nov 21, 2018, 11:04 AMErik LukovskyWhat was this meeting called? With the German elites? Is there a record of this? I would like to read about it because I’ve never really heard about that before
Jews were not ruling industries until the Jewish enlightenment which only occurred in the 19th centuryNov 21, 2018, 11:04 AMAnthony MigchelsI can’t find it right now Erik, but I have asked the site’s owner, I’ll let you know.Nov 21, 2018, 11:18 AMAnthony MigchelsEthan, I don’t think I can agree with your definition of totalitarian. Classically totalitarian is about the level of State intrusion in both public and private life, and National Socialism was heavy handed in both regards, especially historically.
Today, with the simply unreal State overreach under ‘democracy’ (open rule of the filthy rich), people can be forgiven for thinking it might not have been so bad under National Socialism, but besides Stalin and the Communist Party in Beijing, few States have controlled the economy so tightly ever. With the exception, of course of the Pharao’s, who ruled like the NWO wants to rule, but that’s another question.Nov 21, 2018, 11:21 AMAnthony MigchelsErik, here it is:
https://justice4poland.com/2018/10/07/1882-dresden-anti-jewish-manifesto-explains-nwo/Nov 21, 2018, 11:34 AMEthan TriceAnthony Migchels I mean you may not agree with it, but that doesn’t really matter (I can say I don’t like the definition of something, but unless I offer an alternative definition, ideally with evidence for other people using it that way, the first definition is all we have to go on). As you said, totalitarianism is about the level of state intrusion in both public and private life. The problem is you’re viewing that in a vacuum. All governments have *some* intrusion in both public and private life, but not all governments are totalitarian. the degree of intrusion of fascism or national socialism is far less than that of communism but far more than that of a libertarian state. it’s a sliding scaleNov 21, 2018, 11:43 AMPaul TrippNazism > Fascism. The biggest difference between National Socialism and Natural Selectionism is that Natural Selectionism moves the focus from the race to the gene, while recognizing that races are a product of our genes, as are individuals.Nov 21, 2018, 9:58 PM

Source date (UTC): 2018-11-21 09:39:00 UTC
Curt Doolittle shared a post.
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-21 09:32:00 UTC