—“In an age of reason, kinship provides passion. Debasing kinship connections debases a man’s identity – no identity, no means to relate and identify with meaning… Love of and responsibility for kith and kin provides all the passion we need”— Todd Magnusson
(via Bill Joslin )
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-24 10:34:00 UTC
Curt Doolittle shared a post.
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-24 10:27:00 UTC
https://propertarianism.com/basic-concepts/https://propertarianism.com/basic-concepts/
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-23 16:35:00 UTC
Understanding Charlemagne:
The christians were useful to conquerors the same way jesuits were to western expansion, and jews today are useful to statists both foreign and domestic, and greeks were to romans: literary specialists, bureaucrats, propagandists, and spies, hiding under cover of non-violence. In other words, using the female means of conspiracy as a group strategy.
Charlemagne was able to conquer effectively by the use of siege technology and technique, cavalry making it possible to cover large distances ( high transport cost), and most importantly, a willing conspiratorial HOSTILE bureaucracy.
Now, what I want people to learn is the importance of conquest by a HOSTILE BUREAUCRACY SPREADING A CULT.
In the western case we are occupied by that same cult under an anti-darwinian, innumerate, illiterate, ahistorical, religion: marxism, postmodernism, feminism,
WHY: We put too many men to work in the work force and not enough of them in the militia and military.
THEY WIN BY CONSPIRATORS HIDING BEHIND WORDS.
We win by conspirators acting at war.
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-23 15:33:00 UTC
THE STRUCTURE OF THE OTHER GREAT LIE: MONOTHEISM (POLITY) VS HEATHENISM (HEARTH)
(important)
I talk all the time about the lie of socialism vs capitalism instead of rule by man vs rule of law.
But the equally common lie is that of heathenism (paganism) vs monotheism, instead of rule of law vs rule of lies.
Our sovereignty > our law of tort > our reason > our empiricism > our science > our TESTIMONIALISM.
We can converge on rule of law (science) or diverge by rule of men and their lies.
Truth, Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Rule of Law, Reason, Empiricism, Science, And Markets in Everything.
The literary means (analogies) by which we teach these principles need no magic, no superstition, just education.
Love of our own is enough.
Truth is enough.
Reality is enough for the gods we have become.
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-23 15:28:00 UTC
—Furthermore, the lack of success of the church to do so (govern) in the slavic lands, the secession from church rule by the germanic states, and the state eviction of the church from rule by the americans, is the reason for the catholic, germanic, anglo-scandinavian, and slavic differences in perception of the good and evil of the church.—
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-23 13:44:00 UTC
SPECTRUM OF TESTIMONIES (TRUTH)
(Nutshell version of Testimonialism)
[T]AUTOLOGICAL TRUTH: That testimony you give when you promising the equality of two statements using different terms: A circular definition, a statement of equality or a statement of identity.
[A]NALYTIC TRUTH: The testimony you give promising the internal consistency of one or more statements used in the construction of a proof in an axiomatic(declarative) system. (a Logical Truth).
[I]DEAL TRUTH: That testimony (description) you would give, if your knowledge (information) was complete, your language was sufficient, stated without error, cleansed of bias, and absent deceit, within the scope of precision limited to the context of the question you wish to answer; and the promise that another possessed of the same knowledge (information), performing the same due diligence, having the same experiences, would provide the same testimony. (Ideal Truth = Perfect Parsimony.)
[T]RUTHFULNESS: that testimony (description) you give if your knowledge (information) is incomplete, your language is insufficient, you have performed due diligence in the elimination of error, imaginary content, wishful thinking, bias, and deceit; within the scope of precision limited to the question you wish to answer; and which you warranty to be so; and the promise that another possessed of the knowledge, performing the same due diligence, having the same experiences, would provide the same testimony.
[H]ONESTY: that testimony (description) you give with full knowledge that knowledge is incomplete, your language is insufficient, but you have not performed due diligence in the elimination of error and bias, but which you warranty is free of deceit; within the scope of precision limited to the question you wish to answer; and the promise that another possess of the same knowledge (information), performing the same due diligence, having the same experiences, would provide the same testimony.
[D]emonstrated Preference: – Evidence of intuition, preference, opinion, and position as demonstrated by your actions, independent of your statements
[O]pinion: (justificationism) – a justified uncritical statement given the limits of one’s knowledge about external questions.
[P]osition: (criticism) – a theoretical statement that survives one’s available criticisms about external questions.
[P]reference (rational expression) : a justification of one’s biases (wants).
[I]ntuition: (sentimental expression) – an uncritical, uncriticized, response to information that expresses a measure of existing biases (priors).
DUE DILIGENCE NECESSARY FOR TESTIMONY (TRUTH)
[D]ue Diligence necessary for Warranty that our Testimony is Truthful.
1) Have we achieved identity? Is it categorically consistent?
2) Is it internally consistent? Is it logical? Can we construct a proof(test) of internal consistency?
3) Is it externally correspondent, and sufficiently parsimonious? Can we construct a proof (test) of external correspondence.
4) Is it existentially possible? Is it operationally articulated? Can we construct a proof (test) of existential possibility? And is it free of imaginary content when we articulate it as such?
5) Is it limited? Do you know it’s boundaries (falsification)
6) Is it fully accounted? Do we account for all costs to all capital in all temporal and inter-temporal dimensions? (Have we avoided selection bias?) Can we construct a proof (test) of full accounting? (Is information lost or artificially gained?)
7) Is it morally constrained? Does it violate the incentive to cooperate? (Meaning, are all operations productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary transfers, free of negative externality of the same criterion?)
D]EMAND for TRUTH:
True enough to imagine a conceptual relationship
True enough for me to feel good about myself.
True enough for me to take actions that produce positive results.
True enough for me to not cause others to react negatively to me.
True enough to resolve a conflict without subjective opinion among my fellow people with similar values.
True enough to resolve a conflict without subjective opinion across different peoples with different values.
True regardless of all opinions or perspectives.
Tautologically true: in that the two things are equal.
WARRANTY (‘SKIN IN THE GAME’)
Your ability to warranty is limited to that for which you can perform restitution.
So, completing the cycle with Demand, your ability to perform restitution determines the depth of and limit of that which you can testify to.
TRUTH IS A WARRANTY OF DIFFERENT DEGREES.
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-23 13:43:00 UTC
EXAMPLE: RABBINICAL ARGUMENT > JESUIT ARGUMENT
So for example, you just engaged in the following deceptions:
1) That the economic history of the world and europe has anything to do with being educated in a european country.
2) That taxation is equivalent to corruption and capital sequestration
3) That whether you are ‘convinced’ or not is a matter of the truth or falsehood of an argument – rather than a measure of your dishonesty.
4) The charity by the church, obtained by deceit, corruption, and rents was somehow comparable to the economic consequences of their corruption, deceit, rents, and capital sequestering.
5) That the (insignificant) rate of intellectual, technological, material, progress under the church was vastly lower, and that what progress that WAS made was due to the aristocracy and the military, metallurgy, and trade despite the church’s mandate of ignorance.
6) That Aristotle was somehow not practicing the european traditional method of legal-empirical argument, and applying it as a means of correcting Plato’s idealism, and that it is necessary to be of greek (now greco-anatolian) origin to categorize his thought as european.
7) That it was not the eastern non-roman empire in collusion with the egyptian and syrian that intentionally destroyed roman civilization through suppression of it’s traditions, closing of its schools, burning of its buildings, and murder of its teachers and rulers.
I mean, that’s a lot of lies in half a dozen comments.
And you want me to take you as other than a perfect demonstration of the abrahamic method of deceit: Sophism, Pseudoscience, and Supernaturalism?
I mean you just illustrated my point so thoroughly that it’s hard to imagine anyone could be that intellectually dishonest without studying how to be.
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-23 13:37:00 UTC
It’s a very simple idea: NO MORE LIES.
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-23 13:15:00 UTC
JUDAISM, CHRISTIANITY AND ISLAM INVENTED THE MANDATE-OF IGNORANCE AND RULE UNDER IT.
Science is founded upon the prehistoric european tradition of legal empiricism, and it’s non-adoption of eastern irrigation-system magianism. Aristotle invents pre-scientific thought. the british empirical thought. and anglo-american-german (less so french) scientific thought. With all of the west participating by the industrial revolution. The christians made near zero progress until the middle class re-evolved after the viking conquest, and restored commercial civilization through trade, giving rise to the germanic expansionary trade system, where the church had spent its efforts on local extraction of rents, and cumulative hoarding of europe’s capital, and the expansion of corruption.
Furthermore, the lack of success of the church to do so in the slavic lands, the secession from church rule by the germanic states, and the state eviction of the church from rule by the americans, is the reason for the catholic, germanic, anglo-scandinavian, and slavic differences in perception of the good and evil of the church.
There is a reason france is a cancer to europe and that is that she is the central advocate or the church’s method of rule, because the french state replaced the monarchical rule with church rule, and secularized it.
Christians accomplished almost nothing throughout the christian period – and what little they did accomplish was despite the church not because of it.
Jews accomplished absolutely nothing other than specialization in profiting from parasitic moral hazard, and survival because of it, until converted to aristotelianism.
Muslims accomplished nothing except the conquest of superior people, the murder of their aristocracies, the centralization of their though leadership so that they could be converted to the religion of mandatory ignorance, the expansion of their underclasses, vast slave immigration and consanguineous reproduction, and the total destruction of every great civilization land-reachable in the ancient world.
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-23 13:03:00 UTC