( If you get a chance, Mute (2018) on Netflix. Cyberpunk Noir. )
Source date (UTC): 2018-12-11 20:52:00 UTC
( If you get a chance, Mute (2018) on Netflix. Cyberpunk Noir. )
Source date (UTC): 2018-12-11 20:52:00 UTC
—“I’ve never been a fan of Mr. Doolittle. Most of his commentary is pure gibberish. Written as if he were drunk at the time.”— Chris Shaeffer
Why I am harder to understand than Bohm Bawerk, Nietzsche, Hegel, or Heidegger is beyond me. I think the principle difference between readers who grasp quickly and those who don’t is of course, IQ, but whether you have been exposed to the scientific method, programming, and economics sufficiently to ‘think scientifically’ in each of the dimensions: diligence(Science), operations(programming), equilibrations(economics). There are twenty something novel inventions in propertarianism. They can easily be understood. What is difficult is putting them into practice – particularly use of the definitions, series, incentives, and their equilibrations.
Source date (UTC): 2018-12-11 10:54:00 UTC
ANSWERING QUESTIONS ON THE COURSES
—“Hey Curt, I saw your post about “young men searching for answers” and I’m interested in the courses.
1) —“Do you think these courses will be accessible to someone like me, or should I wait a while and try to learn a bit more first?”—
I have worked very hard to make them accessible, by handing out the ideas one at a time, in incremental fashion. I don’t think you will need to know anything much prior. And the discussions (as you can see from participating in my feed) will often compensate for differences.
2) —“How much will these courses cost?”—
It depends upon the number of people who register for a course. We are not trying to make money at this, just cover costs.
(a) When courses roll out they will be at a discount.
(b) After that they will increase. They will increase further when (if) we obtain Accreditation (USA).
(c) We will *probably* use Purchasing Power Parity to price the courses since not everyone lives in western economies, and we want worldwide students.
(d) The courses will be either 3 or 6 credits. We don’t have the same issues as physical universities, so instead of breaking first year courses in two, we will teach them as one six credit course. A 3 credit course must consist of 45-48 hours of class time, and a six credit, (two semester) course double that.
(e) Accredited University courses of this nature are usually in the $500+ Range for three credits at a community college and $3000 in a proper liberal arts college. Which is obvious something we cannot do, do not need to do, and is not in our long term interest to do. We are targeting 100-200 for these courses. And we will reduce the price if more people take them. It’s a matter of paying for time, equipment, and servers.
(f) there is some behavioral tendency we need to deal with, which is that it if isn’t expensive enough we won’t filter for the right people – those who are truly interested in working thru it.
One way or another we will find a way for everyone who wants to, to study together.
3) —“How much time/week do you think would be needed to take them?”—
Believe it or not there are recommended time allotments for different courses. So there are some general rules. And they are roughly about the same as the credit hours. ie: 3 hrs per week per class. That includes ‘think time’. Most classes require you read a few wiki or SEP articles, and then answer a few questions. Then critique others in the forums. Mostly so that I can judge whether you’re onboard or not.
So far we are aiming at classes consisting of one weekly one three hour ‘class’ that may or may not be broken into two or three sections.
These courses do not have to be completed all at once. And I don’t use due dates so to speak. So if you need to take longer it’s fine. You either complete the course, and do so successfully or you don’t. I am not, and the university is not, testing whether you will make a good employee. We are teaching you to be a contemplative judge of the Truth and the Law.
—“4) Do you have any idea when the economics course will be available?”—
Economics course consists of defining economics as a discipline divided into a spectrum of levers, and then stating the problems with economics as it sits today, and how to repair it. Then teaching it through that ‘corrected lens’. Which involves Austrian (legal), Micro (standard micro), Chicago (insurance), Beckerian (human capital), and Macro (Levers of policy) with less emphasis on keynesian/Post-keynesian macro equilibria, and more on specific attempts to manage the spectrum of capital in the polity. From what I understand at this moment this will be 12 credits, or two 6 credit courses over two years. It is not meant to teach mathematical economic analysis, but political economy – understanding sufficient for rendering legal judgements on disputes over economic conflicts and proposals.
—“Good to see the progress you’re making with this kind of thing, glad my patreon shekels aren’t going to waste.”—
Your shekels are much appreciated. We do have costs. And it’s very helpful when you help us cover them. And it makes a big difference (especially in my stress level). And I’m forever grateful that you’re making Propertarianism and the White Law possible.
Source date (UTC): 2018-12-11 10:11:00 UTC
Source date (UTC): 2018-12-11 09:36:00 UTC
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
Source date (UTC): 2018-12-11 07:25:00 UTC
Curt Doolittle shared a post.
Source date (UTC): 2018-12-10 20:51:00 UTC
A NOTE TO ALL YOUNG MEN SEARCHING FOR POLITICAL ANSWERS
—(response to email request for help)—
It is in the nature of ambitious young men to rush to an hypothesis of their own construction upon their first few encounters with enlightenment – accompanied by the desperate wish to share their revelation. It is in the nature of great theorists to develop a question or hypothesis, and to survey the great thinkers of history to date, and those similar innovations in related fields, to inform, correct, or falsify that hypothesis – with extraordinary effort and thoroughness – and all but those few we remember, fail.
All of us write to learn. It is the most effective way of learning that we know of. It is easy to fool yourself in your imagination. A little less so in speech. Far harder in the written word. And very challenging in the published word – where your cherished efforts are the subject of misunderstanding, legitimate criticism and often, legitimate ridicule.
We are in a period of change. There is vast pent up demand during these periods. Ours is a more catastrophic period than most due to invasion and population collapse due to the policies of the last century. And so you, like many others, are searching for an answer that the thinkers of the last century, and the present, failed to provide.
We generate demand for types of social orders (the suite of cooperative economies), governments (means of production of commons, insurer of last resort), and rule (decision making of last resort) with the geography, capital, demographics, and military capacity to produce those we desire, and to deny alternatives – by seizing opportunistic moments in time. We do not have undiscovered countries (borderlands, continents) to settle as greenfields under the protection of distant empires. So just as we must work with the people we have, we must work with the opportunities we have, and the social orders that are possible to bring about with them.
At present western advantage in other than demographic distribution has been liquidated through redistribution to the rest of the world. Nationalism is returning – largely in reaction to islamism, the same way we reacted to communism. And as strange as it might seem at the moment, with Chinese leadership, what looks very much like national socialism with communist dress of some sort, is emerging rapidly as the principle model of the 21st century.
There is a reason that libertarian thought consists largely if not entirely of introductory books. There is a reason that geostrategy, economics, law, and war, do not. There is reason all Sovereignty (european aristocracy), Liberty (Anglo), Free City (German), Libertarian (the Pale), and Libertine (French) opportunities existed, and why they no longer do so.
What all of these systems share is Sovereignty of the Individual under our ancient european customary laws (tort), and a Demand for Reciprocity to produce that sovereignty. The result of doing so is Rule of Law. What we differ in, is the GROUP COMPETITIVE STRATEGY, and the POSSIBLE organization of rule, government, economy, and social order within it that allows that social order to survive in competition with the other social orders.
A general fights with the resources available, not the one he wishes to have. A people fight with the social, economic, political, and military order they have, not the one they wish they had. An activist fights with the available conditions by applying, like a general, the most force in the weakest places, to steer a more favorable outcome than the one at present, but not the most optimum he desires. A theorist fights with the knowledge available not the knowledge he wishes he had.
A man is sovereign because he has the power to be so, because he has sufficient insurers to guarantee so. A man has liberty by permission of the sovereign. A man has freedom because he is a more profitable asset to the sovereign than a serf or slave. A man is a serf or slave because he has no alternative. The uniqueness of western civilization is the militia. The organized application of violence, by sovereign men, producing rule of law, and as a consequence, no alternative but markets in every aspect of life. There is no theory you can construct to sell. In the market for sale of political orders, you will find liberty is the want of the few even if its proceeds are the want of the many, and freedom is a synonym for theft from some and gifts to others. There is only one means of producing sovereignty: a sufficient number of men willing to use violence to deprive everyone else of imposing any alternative.
Suggest you watch George Friedman and Peter Zeihan’s videos from this year and last. They are accessible summaries of work from around the world. This will help you understand the environment in which we are producing the upcoming social orders.
IF YOU WANT THE INSTITUTE’S HELP
Our reading list is here and there is none better to choose from: http//Propertarianism.com/reading-list/.
Most if not all of the books, plus hundreds more, are in our library and can be read for free online.
We will be offering courses in “The education you wish you had” beginning in January.
They will include:
The Uniqueness of Western Civilization: European History from the ice age forward.
The Theory and History of The Arts
The Theory and History of the Conduct of War
The Natural Law (of Sovereign Men): The history of our law, and the Strictly Constructed Natural Law of Reciprocity (which is my restatement of hoppe’s german rationalist method in anglo scientific prose)
The Means of Cooperation: Micro, Social(human Capital), and Macro Economics (they way econ should be taught)
The Perfect Government: The various possible political orders given the conditions in which one produces the private and common.
The Group Evolutionary Strategies of Competing Groups, Cultures, and Civilizations
Online Courseware. Video. Short Readings. Assignments(essay). Discussion. Feedback. More Discussion.
This is not feel good material. It is US 300-600 level material. And requires work.
So far ART and LAW look like they will start in January. WAR sometime later.
Otherwise, if you have very specific questions I’m available on FB pretty much all the time.
Cheers.
Source date (UTC): 2018-12-10 20:19:00 UTC
SIMPLE VERSION
The problem of trust in a heterogeneous people is both gender, family, tribe, class, and race. In a homogeneous people it is just gender, family, and class. Marriage market solves gender conflict, and commercial market solves familial market, and houses of government solve class markets for commons. So the problem is scale of middle class, and limiting competition in political markets.
Source date (UTC): 2018-12-10 13:09:00 UTC
—“I knew you’d come around to being stoked about these chimp-outs in France.”—Michael Darr
Like I said to you before – I don’t open my mouth if I don’t know what the fuck is going on… lol.
I can tell you that they’re doing it the right way, which is to pick a simple issue to collect enough bodies, and then let the mob’s sense of togetherness and mission expand the scope of the revolt.
I can tell that they are using digital media to coordinate – although I don’t understand why the govt hasn’t shut it down yet.
They are organized well enough NOT to chimp out, but to selectively target the right kind of properties and people.
It’s clear that a leadership is forming.
It’s clear that they have learned to use young people as human shields (priceless).
it’s clear that the police aren’t exactly against them.
It’s clear that while heavily white it’s not exclusively so.
It’s clear as of today that they’re increasing the radius to make it more difficult to concentrate forces against them.
And it’s starting to turn into the bigger issue of cultural direction.
And it’s starting to spread.
There is propaganda coming out of RT and other russian outlets that is nonsense. Otherwise it’s good.
Source date (UTC): 2018-12-10 11:33:00 UTC
—Diversity not only generates demand for an authoritarian state, but for a supernatural religion. Why? To find an alternative to KINSHIP RULE, AND ANCESTOR WORSHIP.—
(worth repeating)
Source date (UTC): 2018-12-10 11:31:00 UTC