Source: Facebook

  • “Discoveries [were] made by church workers in regions and in a period where we w

    —“Discoveries [were] made by church workers in regions and in a period where we would assume particularly deep and well-instructed religiosity: Saxony and the neighboring parts of Germany around 1600. Once out of the upper-class circles, however, and even in a time of bitter theological rivalries to concentrate the greatest possible attention on the faith, the

    vast bulk of the population are found to have been largely or totally ignorant of the simplest matters of doctrine, rarely or never attending church. . . . “They were given over to “soothsayers, cunning women, crystal-gazers, casters of spells, witches, and other practitioners of forbidden arts.”—tGoEMC


    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-13 22:38:00 UTC

  • CHRISTIANITY AND THE FUTURE OF OUR PEOPLE —“Curt Doolittle what is the subject

    CHRISTIANITY AND THE FUTURE OF OUR PEOPLE

    —“Curt Doolittle what is the subject for which a man who is a Christian is unable to detach himself from his superstitions for a movement to consider the matter from the scientific perspective you put forth?”—Mitchell Ryan

    If I understand correctly 1) abrahamic argument (lying), 2) limiting our ability to outlaw abrahamic argument (lying), 3) limiting the possibility of restoring kin “worship”(debt), and therefore our defeat of the left’s replacement if christianity with universalism (multiculturalism rather than heaven), marxist multicultural democratic socialism (rather than markets and prosperity), postmodernism’s sophism )rather than semitic supernaturalism), and feminism(rather than christian submission.) In other words, our enemy in the current world uses abrahamism today, just as our enemy used abrahamism in the ancient world – for the same ends: destruction of civilizations.

    Now, neither our deism (organization of the universal laws of nature), nor the church’s natural law, nor jesus’s teachings, when stated truthfully (scientifically) are false, or bad, nor will they produce other than the optimum good if stated scientifically. But we are in fact indebted to our ancestors, first and foremost and will not fall prey to the evils of abrahamic faith, and only repaying that debt with recognition (worship) and prohibiting the use of abrahamic deceit by lying, fraud, sophism, superstition, magic, false promise, straw man criticism of tripartism, and the natural hierarchy of meritocracy, and worship(thanks) to our ancestors and future generations, and the beauty of the natural world, and our rescue of mankind from the hostility of that universe, and our ascent into gods ourselves as we take dominion over the universe.

    Ergo, yes, if you choose, walk in jesus’ footsteps as i walk in aristotle’s, others walk in aurelius’, others walk in alexander’s, or but not those others that walk in abraham’s, or buddha’s or mohammed’s. And separate Jesus’ simple lesson from the industrialized system of semitic lies that was built around it.

    God is the name of man-yet-to-be. And jesus (the rebel) but one more of the philosophers of the ancient world like his peers zeno(the achiever), epicurus(the appreciative) and buddha(the denier), mohammed (the destroyer) trying to organize a resistance movement against the alienating pressures of markets, reason, truth, and law, and prosperity brought about by european man. Each of whom was speaking in the ancestral stories and strategy of his people, seeking to find love, and membership, and place in a world where the family, clan, and tribe, was no longer able to to provide insurance, material support, emotional, psychological feedback, and ‘safety in the pack’ amid the era’s globalization and endemic malthusian poverty.

    But the abrahamic technique of deceit produces ignorance, poverty, and dark ages, all of which prevented rather than advanced into godhood.

    Conversely, it is the natural law of western man that is most identical to the laws of the universe, and all of the prophets have been wrong.

    There is no substitute for truth, action(duty), sovereignty, reciprocity, law, markets, and the exhaustive investment in possibility those who live within them – and exhaustive persecution of those that do not.

    That I know of, you have no right to worship against the interests of your people. So if you can accommodate the combination of jesus as a philosopher to learn the optimum means of cooperation from, and our ancestors to worship in our ascent into godhood, and your people in our ascend into godhood then this is compatible with the continuous ascent of our people from beast to gods by our law – the natural law. Then that is one thing. But if you insist on the lies of the abrahamists and the method of lying of the abrahamists to do it, then it is incompatible with our law, and a hindrance to our people.

    I worship our god. I talk to our god every day. I do not know his name. I know he is the god of our people. I do not know his form. I do not know his power. I know only his counsel.

    I love the ritual of church and our festivals. Although I am keenly aware that they are the equivalent of costumed soviet stage plays – mere marxist covers over our traditional love of ancestors, the seasons, the harvests, and nature’s bounty.

    I practice christian forgiveness and charity although I am aware that it is stoicism that was absorbed by the authors of christianity into the christian religion.

    I recognize jesus as a philosopher who, through the efforts of his disciples rather than he himself, transformed by design, the egyptian, babylonian, and persian and jewish customary law – in the form of wisdom literature – into a survival and resistance against the Greco Roman world, and replaced the great heroes of Homer, and the trials of achilles with the story of the jews and the trials of jesus.

    And any man who has read both will rapidly discover that we ended up with the worst of the two, when it is merely a comparison of the strong western man (Achilles) against the weak semitic man (Jesus), with Rome playing the unconscious, unknowing, bureaucratic fool.

    Christianity was invented to destroy. That we find use in the christ figure is merely dressing up Jesus in the garb of our own gods Sol Invictus of the late roman empire, jupiter and zeus and Dzayus Pitar of our Prehistoric Founding gods.

    So where you see Jesus and God, I see but the long line of our people rotating the same one through the Aryan, Germanic, Greco, Roman, and Eastern Roman(Greeco-Anatolian-Syrian-Jewish) phases.

    Our european ancestors replaced combined their gods with those of the native-european stone age gods, as the old and the new. Then they reorganized those gods with their prophet Odin at the top. The people of old europe (the balkans, Greeks, Anatolians did not either have odin, or replace their gods. The Etruscans were at least exposed to the old gods, if not new, or odin. The romans conquered the Etru. But Combined their gods with the Greek. The semitic revolt made possible by the overextended, weakened, empire, was turned against Rome by the Eastern (Greek Empire), who got her revenge through christianity – it was the bosphorus that was the prize trade route between wooded and wet europe and arid dry west asia.

    We have but one highest god – the sun god. We just have had leaders dress him in different garb for political purposes. Lies and propaganda told by men to manipulate the ignorant, the weak, the foolish, and the stupid.

    Our ancestors invented the combination of horse, bronze, and wheel, contractualism, and heroism. And with that realization that they were no longer mere men, invented the sky gods as their aspiration.

    From them we took Sovereignty and Reciprocity (contractualism), Truth and Duty (cost of contract), The One Law of Property (Tort), and as a consequence Tripartism (fight, administer, work), Paternalism (property rights). And with that set of inventions we have in three eras done more to drag mankind out of ignorance, superstition, poverty, hard labor, disease, suffering, and the vicissitudes of nature, and started our journey into the stars.

    And men have resisted all the way.

    So the question is, will you remain a prisoner of the lies of the abrahamists and allow your people to disappear from this earth, or will you join your people in completing our restoration, our defeat of abrahamism both old and new, and our ascent into gods we imagined.

    A PAGAN, A CHRISTIAN, AN ARYAN, A WARRIOR, A MAN TRANSCENDENT

    I am a pagan if 1) I accept the laws of nature as binding on all of existence; and 2) if I treat nature as sacred and to be contemplated, protected and improved; and 3) I treat the world as something to transform closer to an Eden in whatever ways I can before I die; and 4) if I deny the existence of a supreme being with dominion over the physical laws, and treat all gods, demigods, heroes, saints, figures of history, and ancestors as characters with whom I may speak to in private contemplation in the hope of gaining wisdom and synchronicity from having done so. And 5) if I participate with others of my society in repetition of oaths, repetition of myths, repetition of festivals, repetition of holidays, and the perpetuation of all of the above to my offspring. And 6) if I leave open that synchronicity appears to exist now and then, and that it may be possible that there is a scientific explanation for it, other than just humans subject to similar stimuli producing similar intuitions and therefore similar ends.

    As far as I know this is all that is required of me to be a Pagan.

    I am a christian if I have adopted the teaching of christianity: 1) the eradication of hatred from the human heart. 2) the extension of kinship love to non-kin. 3) the extension of exhaustive forgiveness before punishment, enserfment, enslavement, death, or war.

    As far as I know, this is all that is required of me to be a Christian.

    I am an Aryan if 1) I proudly display my excellences so that others seek to achieve or exceed them; 2) I seek competition to constantly test and improve myself so I do not weaken; 3) I swear to speak no insult and demand it; 4) I speak the truth and demand it; 5) I take nothing not paid for and demand it; 6) I grant sovereignty to my kin and demand it; 7) I insure my people regardless of condition, and demand it; and in doing so leave nothing but voluntary markets of cooperation between sovereign men; and to discipline, enserf, enslave, ostracize or kill those who do otherwise; 8) to not show fear or cowardice, abandon my brothers, or retreat, and 9) to die a good death in the service of my kin, my clan, my tribe and my people.

    As far as I know, this is all that is required of me to be an Aryan.

    I am a warrior in that 1) we will prepare for war so perfectly that none dare enter it against us. 2) Once we go to war, we do so with *joy*, with eagerness, and with passion, and without mercy, without constraint, and without remorse; And 3) before ending war, we shall defeat an enemy completely such that no other dares a condition of our enemy, and the memory of the slaughter lives a hundred generations.

    As far as I know, this is all that is required of me to be a Warrior.

    As far as I know, if I succeed as a Pagan, as a Christian, as an Aryan, as a Warrior, then I have transcended the animal man, and earned my place among the saints, heroes, demigods, gods, in the memories, histories, and legends of man.

    And that is the objective of transcendent men we call Heroes. We leave the rest for ordinary men. And we leave those unworthy behind.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-13 17:05:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/48367472_10156844125242264_174681093

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/48367472_10156844125242264_1746810937844695040_o_10156844125237264.jpg The Little Connecticut Village Cafe In full Christmas window decor. Snow. Brownstone in the background. (The Brownstone quarry is forever closed). Very ‘quaint’.

    Now would I rather be in any of these other locations? Well yes. I can ‘testify’ to the awesomeness of each. I would much rather be ‘Home’ in Ukraine than here in the decaying sticks of american collapse. But we can find charm anywhere if we look for it.

    FAVORITE COFFEE SHOPS

    Kiev’s London Coffee? (Kiev Ukraine)

    SEE: https://www.tripadvisor.com/Restaurant_Review-g294474-d7139945-Reviews-Coffee_House_LONDON-Kiev.html

    Or

    L’viv’s Veronika Cafe? (L’viv Ukraine)

    SEE: https://www.tripadvisor.com/Restaurant_Review-g295377-d953333-Reviews-Veronika_Confectionery_Restaurant-Lviv_Lviv_Oblast.html

    Both of which are Nth-degree better?

    Or

    Victor’s Celtic Coffee (Redmond WA, USA)

    SEE: https://www.facebook.com/Victors-Celtic-Coffee-Co-528378507228007/

    Or

    John Watt and Sons (Carlisle, Cumbria, UK)

    SEE: https://www.facebook.com/johnwattandson

    (especially for scones with jam and cream)

    Or

    La Coquetterie (Angers, France)

    SEE https://www.facebook.com/lacoquetterieangers

    I actually can’t find anything good in London because every single place is busy and dirty and loud. And I haven’t spent any time in NYC lately, and the places I know in SOHO are all gone (as is the soho I remember).

    And I can’t remember the one in St Petersburg. And Moscow shops – while the most desirable – are simply too expensive to recommend in general.Rickyman BeisteinWhy do you like coffee shops? To get work done, to socialize occasionally or just a bean water addict?Dec 13, 2018, 4:07 PMCurt DoolittleYes, White noise environment is best for me to work in. You can people-watch, or get to know people so you can take frequent breaks. And of course, food, water, coffee. And they dont mind you hanging around all day. … lolDec 13, 2018, 5:26 PMRickyman BeisteinI just like the subconscious narcissism that someone might be looking at what I’m doing so it keeps me from dicking around as much.Dec 13, 2018, 5:28 PMAndrey SokoloffIf you have a fair salary, Kiev is one of the best cities to live in… especially if you are dude. Beer, food, women… etc. Moscow, is just too big, too much traffic.Dec 13, 2018, 6:21 PMCurt DoolittleagreedDec 13, 2018, 6:35 PMArno KælandOn the subject of coffee shops, you really ought to get to Vienna.Dec 14, 2018, 3:18 AMArno KælandMoscow’s architecture is also dehumanizing – too large, too brutal, too gray.

    The optimal size of urban buildings is four to five stories. Stalin ruined Moscow. St Petersburg is far superior.Dec 14, 2018, 3:19 AMCurt DoolittleHave been. Recall one in particular because of the cakes. But can’t recall the name. Did tour of the galleries. Architecture. Chamber music in a church.

    Would love to try to write there sometime and see what happens.Dec 14, 2018, 4:08 AMArno KælandCurt Doolittle There tend to be nice coffee shops in most of the old Habsburg capitals. A consequence of the defeat of the Turks.Dec 14, 2018, 4:15 AMThe Little Connecticut Village Cafe In full Christmas window decor. Snow. Brownstone in the background. (The Brownstone quarry is forever closed). Very ‘quaint’.

    Now would I rather be in any of these other locations? Well yes. I can ‘testify’ to the awesomeness of each. I would much rather be ‘Home’ in Ukraine than here in the decaying sticks of american collapse. But we can find charm anywhere if we look for it.

    FAVORITE COFFEE SHOPS

    Kiev’s London Coffee? (Kiev Ukraine)

    SEE: https://www.tripadvisor.com/Restaurant_Review-g294474-d7139945-Reviews-Coffee_House_LONDON-Kiev.html

    Or

    L’viv’s Veronika Cafe? (L’viv Ukraine)

    SEE: https://www.tripadvisor.com/Restaurant_Review-g295377-d953333-Reviews-Veronika_Confectionery_Restaurant-Lviv_Lviv_Oblast.html

    Both of which are Nth-degree better?

    Or

    Victor’s Celtic Coffee (Redmond WA, USA)

    SEE: https://www.facebook.com/Victors-Celtic-Coffee-Co-528378507228007/

    Or

    John Watt and Sons (Carlisle, Cumbria, UK)

    SEE: https://www.facebook.com/johnwattandson

    (especially for scones with jam and cream)

    Or

    La Coquetterie (Angers, France)

    SEE https://www.facebook.com/lacoquetterieangers

    I actually can’t find anything good in London because every single place is busy and dirty and loud. And I haven’t spent any time in NYC lately, and the places I know in SOHO are all gone (as is the soho I remember).

    And I can’t remember the one in St Petersburg. And Moscow shops – while the most desirable – are simply too expensive to recommend in general.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-13 13:30:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/48367472_10156844125242264_174681093

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/48367472_10156844125242264_1746810937844695040_o_10156844125237264.jpg The Little Connecticut Village Cafe In full Christmas window decor. Snow. Brownstone in the background. (The Brownstone quarry is forever closed). Very ‘quaint’.

    Now would I rather be in any of these other locations? Well yes. I can ‘testify’ to the awesomeness of each. I would much rather be ‘Home’ in Ukraine than here in the decaying sticks of american collapse. But we can find charm anywhere if we look for it.

    FAVORITE COFFEE SHOPS

    Kiev’s London Coffee? (Kiev Ukraine)

    SEE: https://www.tripadvisor.com/Restaurant_Review-g294474-d7139945-Reviews-Coffee_House_LONDON-Kiev.html

    Or

    L’viv’s Veronika Cafe? (L’viv Ukraine)

    SEE: https://www.tripadvisor.com/Restaurant_Review-g295377-d953333-Reviews-Veronika_Confectionery_Restaurant-Lviv_Lviv_Oblast.html

    Both of which are Nth-degree better?

    Or

    Victor’s Celtic Coffee (Redmond WA, USA)

    SEE: https://www.facebook.com/Victors-Celtic-Coffee-Co-528378507228007/

    Or

    John Watt and Sons (Carlisle, Cumbria, UK)

    SEE: https://www.facebook.com/johnwattandson

    (especially for scones with jam and cream)

    Or

    La Coquetterie (Angers, France)

    SEE https://www.facebook.com/lacoquetterieangers

    I actually can’t find anything good in London because every single place is busy and dirty and loud. And I haven’t spent any time in NYC lately, and the places I know in SOHO are all gone (as is the soho I remember).

    And I can’t remember the one in St Petersburg. And Moscow shops – while the most desirable – are simply too expensive to recommend in general.Rickyman BeisteinWhy do you like coffee shops? To get work done, to socialize occasionally or just a bean water addict?Dec 13, 2018, 4:07 PMCurt DoolittleYes, White noise environment is best for me to work in. You can people-watch, or get to know people so you can take frequent breaks. And of course, food, water, coffee. And they dont mind you hanging around all day. … lolDec 13, 2018, 5:26 PMRickyman BeisteinI just like the subconscious narcissism that someone might be looking at what I’m doing so it keeps me from dicking around as much.Dec 13, 2018, 5:28 PMAndrey SokoloffIf you have a fair salary, Kiev is one of the best cities to live in… especially if you are dude. Beer, food, women… etc. Moscow, is just too big, too much traffic.Dec 13, 2018, 6:21 PMCurt DoolittleagreedDec 13, 2018, 6:35 PMAaron KahlandOn the subject of coffee shops, you really ought to get to Vienna.Dec 14, 2018, 3:18 AMAaron KahlandMoscow’s architecture is also dehumanizing – too large, too brutal, too gray.

    The optimal size of urban buildings is four to five stories. Stalin ruined Moscow. St Petersburg is far superior.Dec 14, 2018, 3:19 AMCurt DoolittleHave been. Recall one in particular because of the cakes. But can’t recall the name. Did tour of the galleries. Architecture. Chamber music in a church.

    Would love to try to write there sometime and see what happens.Dec 14, 2018, 4:08 AMAaron KahlandCurt Doolittle There tend to be nice coffee shops in most of the old Habsburg capitals. A consequence of the defeat of the Turks.Dec 14, 2018, 4:15 AMThe Little Connecticut Village Cafe In full Christmas window decor. Snow. Brownstone in the background. (The Brownstone quarry is forever closed). Very ‘quaint’.

    Now would I rather be in any of these other locations? Well yes. I can ‘testify’ to the awesomeness of each. I would much rather be ‘Home’ in Ukraine than here in the decaying sticks of american collapse. But we can find charm anywhere if we look for it.

    FAVORITE COFFEE SHOPS

    Kiev’s London Coffee? (Kiev Ukraine)

    SEE: https://www.tripadvisor.com/Restaurant_Review-g294474-d7139945-Reviews-Coffee_House_LONDON-Kiev.html

    Or

    L’viv’s Veronika Cafe? (L’viv Ukraine)

    SEE: https://www.tripadvisor.com/Restaurant_Review-g295377-d953333-Reviews-Veronika_Confectionery_Restaurant-Lviv_Lviv_Oblast.html

    Both of which are Nth-degree better?

    Or

    Victor’s Celtic Coffee (Redmond WA, USA)

    SEE: https://www.facebook.com/Victors-Celtic-Coffee-Co-528378507228007/

    Or

    John Watt and Sons (Carlisle, Cumbria, UK)

    SEE: https://www.facebook.com/johnwattandson

    (especially for scones with jam and cream)

    Or

    La Coquetterie (Angers, France)

    SEE https://www.facebook.com/lacoquetterieangers

    I actually can’t find anything good in London because every single place is busy and dirty and loud. And I haven’t spent any time in NYC lately, and the places I know in SOHO are all gone (as is the soho I remember).

    And I can’t remember the one in St Petersburg. And Moscow shops – while the most desirable – are simply too expensive to recommend in general.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-13 13:30:00 UTC

  • SECOND BIT OF CLARITY FOR THE DAY: DIMENSIONS OF DUE DILIGENCE Dimensions of Nec

    SECOND BIT OF CLARITY FOR THE DAY: DIMENSIONS OF DUE DILIGENCE

    Dimensions of Necessary Warranty of Due Diligence:

    + 0 identity

    + 1 internal consistency (logical) (verbal)

    + 2 external correspondence (empirical) (existential)

    + 3 existential possibility (operational) (actionable)

    + 4 rational choice (voluntary and rational) (choice)

    + 5 reciprocity (reciprocally voluntary and rational)(morality)

    —–

    + limits, full accounting, and parsimony (complete)

    —–

    = Coherence (complete consistency)

    (a) I sometimes don’t separate out rational choice and reciprocity and simply use Morality for the combination.

    (b) I sometimes don’t enumerate limits, full accounting, and parsimony, but just use full accounting.

    (c) I sometimes don’t mention coherence because it only seems to confuse people that it’s the consistency across all of the dimensions

    (d )All of these are simply tests of consistency within or across (coherence) dimensions that it is possible for man to test.

    (e) Limits, Full Accounting, Parsimony, are tests of every individual dimension The rest of the tests, only the given dimension.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-13 13:03:00 UTC

  • “Elites developed the industrial revolution, not peasants in the field or sittin

    —“Elites developed the industrial revolution, not peasants in the field or sitting around the table at dinner time. Like always elites create innovations and the masses follow along. They weren’t tricked into it, anymore than the elites were tricked into inventing things. It’s natural. The idea that there is some kind of intrinsic abuse of workers by the elites assumes “generational agency” on both parts to get to where we are that doesn’t exist….off the top of my head.”—Mike Harvey


    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-13 10:26:00 UTC

  • is really getting out. I’m seeing a huge surge in propertarianism.”—Curtus Max

    http://window.cu/—“Word is really getting out. I’m seeing a huge surge in propertarianism.”—Curtus Maximus

    1) John Mark is making a huge difference. it’s insane how effective he’s been already. He is more effective than everyone else combined.

    2) Bill is now the real deal and I’m not alone on the podium.

    3) Bill’s crew has finished baking giving us a sort of minimum critical mass of talent.

    4) I’ve begun talking about revolution directly,

    5) like I said, we actually have a solution, and no one else does, so as I predicted ‘natural force of gravity will advance us because of it’.

    6) yellow vests, brexit, US election, trump condition, and citizen ‘political exhaustion’ have moved practical revolt into the overton window.

    In other words, as I predicted, events march toward their deterministic conclusion. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-13 10:25:00 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle shared a note

    Curt Doolittle shared a note.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-13 10:01:00 UTC

  • PROPERTARIANISM CHEAT SHEET (The Cheat Sheet Version of Propertarianism) 0) |THE

    PROPERTARIANISM CHEAT SHEET

    (The Cheat Sheet Version of Propertarianism)

    0) |THE WEST| Transcendence (into Gods) > Agency + (?) > Sovereignty + Reciprocity > Truth + Duty > Natural Law + Jury > Contract + Markets in Everything > Optimum Private + Optimum Commons > Optimum Evolutionary Adaptation to Change |*| Vulnerability to deceit.

    Note: “Gods: Those with Agency: Omnicognizance (reason, OmniIndependence (Emotions, biases), Omniscience (knowledge), Omnipotence (Physical), Immortality (time), Others (Law of Sovereignty+Reciprocity). Note that the russian version does not include reciprocity.”

    1) |MARKETS| Expression > Association > Cooperation > Reproduction > Production > Conflict Resolution (law) > Commons > Polities (order) > (War).

    2) |LAW| Transcendence > Sovereignty + Reciprocity (One Law) > Insurer (Court) (King / Judge of last resort) > The Discovered Law > The Referee (Judge) > The Jury -> The Thang -> The Senate -> { the King/Monarchy, the Senate/Lords(oligarchy) And the House (industry) and the Church (families) and the “those who have only the law to defend them – the underclasses”}.

    3 |PROPERTY IN TOTO| : DEMONSTRATED PROPERTY IN TOTO (Demonstrated Property)

    I. SELF-PROPERTY

    Personal property: “Things an individual has a Monopoly Of Control over the use of.”

    ….a) Physical Body

    ….b) Actions and Time

    ….c) Memories, Concepts and Identities: tools that enable us to plan and act. In the consumer economy this includes brands.

    ….d) Status and Class (mate and relation selection, and reputation.)

    II. PERSONAL PROPERTY

    ….a) Several Property: Those things external to our bodies that we claim a monopoly of control over.

    III. KINSHIP PROPERTY

    ….a) Mates (access to sex/reproduction)

    ….b) Children (genetics)

    ….c) Familial Relations (security)

    ….d) Non-Familial Relations (utility)

    ….e) Consanguineous property (tribal and family ties)

    IV. COOPERATIVE PROPERTY

    ….a) Organizational ties (work)

    ….b) Knowledge ties (skills, crafts)

    V. SHAREHOLDER PROPERTY

    ….a) Shares: Partnership or shareholdership: Recorded And Quantified Shareholder Property (physical shares in a tradable asset)

    VI. COMMON PROPERTY

    ….b) Commons: Unrecorded and Unquantified Shareholder Property (shares in commons)

    ….c) Artificial Property: (property created by fiat agreement) Intellectual Property.

    VII. COMMON INFORMAL INSTITUTIONAL PROPERTY:

    ….a) Informal (Normative) Property: Our norms: manners, ethics, morals, myths, and rituals that consist of our social portfolio and which make our social order possible.

    VIII. COMMON FORMAL INSTITUTIONAL PROPERTY

    ….a) Formal Institutional Property: Formal (Procedural) Institutions: Our institutions: Religion (including the secular religion), Government, Laws.

    4) INSTITUTIONAL PROPERTY RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS

    I. OBLIGATIONS

    1) Non-Imposition :

    (a) Productive,

    (b) Fully informed,

    (c) Warrantied,

    (d) Voluntary Transfer(Exchange) of property-en-toto,

    (e) Free of External Imposition of Costs against others’ Property-in-toto.

    II. RIGHTS

    a) Constituo – Homesteading: Convert into property through bearing a cost of transformation.

    b) Transitus – Transit: passage through 3d space.

    c) Usus – Use: setting up a stall.

    d) Fructus – Fruits: (blackberries, wood, profits)

    e) Mancipio – Emancipation: (sale, transfer)

    f) Abusus – Abuse: (Consumption or Destruction) Opposite of Constituo.

    5) CATEGORIES OF PROPERTY

    I) Non-Property (Bring under total control)

    ….CONTROL: Total Control

    ….PURPOSE: Create Property

    ….YES: Constituo, Transitus, Usus, Fructus, Mancipio, Abusus.

    II) Possession

    III) Consensual Possession

    IV) Normative Possession – “property”

    V) INSTITUTIONAL POSSESSION – “PROPERTY RIGHTS”

    i) Personal (Private) Property (limited control)

    ….PURPOSE: Acquisition Inventory and Consumption

    ….YES: Transitus, Usus, Fructus, Mancipio,

    ….MAYBE: Abusus

    ii) Shareholder (Private) Property (very limited control)

    ….CONTROL: Very Limited Control

    ….PURPOSE: Dividends from Cooperation

    ….YES: Fructus

    ….MAYBE: ?Transitus, ?Usus,?Mancipio,

    ….NO: Abusus

    iii) Common (Public) Property (All Citizen Shareholders)

    ….CONTROL: No control.

    ….PURPOSE: Prohibition on Consumption.

    ….MAYBE: Transitus, Usus, Fructus,

    ….NO: Mancipio, Abusus

    6) |CRIMES| Predation > Parasitism > Free Riding > Conspiracy > War > Evil.

    I – Predation (Physical)-

    Criminal Prohibitions.

    Harm:

    a. Murder

    b. Violence (harm, rape, damage, asymmetry of force)

    c. Theft (asymmetry of control)

    *FREEDOM Achieved Upon Suppression.

    II – Parasitism-

    Unethical Prohibitions.

    Fraud (Informational):

    d. Hazard Production (Baiting, Entrapment), Poisoning the Well (Gossip, Ridicule, Shaming, Rallying, Reputation Destruction, Straw Manning, Heaping of Undue Praise on the undeserving.)

    e. Fraud (false information)

    f. Omission (Omitting information)

    g. Obscurantism (Obscuring information)

    h. Obstruction (Inhibiting someone else’s transaction)

    *ETHICALITY Achieved Upon Suppression.

    III – Free-Riding (Social)-

    Immoral Prohibitions.

    Free Riding (Social):

    i. Profit without contribution to production.

    j. Externalization (externalizing costs of any transaction)

    k. Free Riding (using externalities for self-benefit)

    l. Socializing Losses (externalization to commons)

    m. Privatizing Gains (appropriation of commons)

    *MORALITY Achieved Upon Suppression.

    IV – Political Prohibitions.

    Conspiracy (Political):

    n. Monopoly, Cartel Seeking (or partial monopoly)

    o. Rent Seeking (organizational free riding)

    p. Corruption ( organized rent seeking)

    q. Conspiracy (organized indirect theft)

    r. Extortion (Organized direct theft), Blackmail.

    *LIBERTY Achieved Upon Suppression.

    V – War.

    Military Prohibitions.

    Warfare (Military):

    s. Conversion (Propaganda, Religious or normative theft of norms)

    t. Overbreeding

    u. Immigration. (dilution of norms, institutions, genes)

    v. War (organized violence for the purpose of theft)

    w. Conquest. (reorganization of all property and relations)

    x. Genocide. (extermination of kin and genetic future)

    *SOVEREIGNTY Achieved Upon Suppression.

    VI – Evil

    z. The imposition of costs upon the interests of others without intent or incentive for gain, but for the purpose of causing them loss regardless of one’s gain or loss.

    7) |TRUTHFUL GRAMMARS OF EXPRESSION| Math, Logic, Science, Operations(protocols, processes, recipes), Economics (money, banking, finance, accounting), Law (Natural), History, Literature (including poetry > essay > fiction > mythology).

    8) |DECEITS| failure of due diligence > ignorance > error > bias > wishful thinking > loading > framing > suggestion > obscurantism > fictionalism > denialism > and deceit.

    9) |FICTIONALISMS| Deceit > Sophism > Pseudoscience > Supernaturalism.

    10) |AVOIDANCE| Disapproval > shaming > moralizing > psychologizing > ridicule >rallying > gossiping > undermining > and reputation-destruction. “DSRRGUR”.

    ( Q: James Santagata: What series are you using for This? Because I think you use something shorter and I want to use both short and long versions. I think its GSRM or something like that?)

    11) |ABRAHAMIC GRAMMARS|: Disapproval as substitute for argument > False Promise > Pilpul (sophism) > Critique () > Heaping of Undue Praise, Straw Man Criticism as a Vehicle for Disapproval > Reputation Destruction > Failure to Supply a Competing alternative capable of surviving same criticisms > Authoritarian Conformity,

    12) |ABRAHAMIC EVOLUTION| Abrahamism > (Adding Platonism) > Judaism > Christianity > Islam > (Dark Age Theology) > Marxism > Postmodernism > Feminism > Denialism: “APMPFD”.

    13) |LONG CYCLE OF HISTORY| {MALE EVOLUTIONARY TERRITORIAL: Fast Western > Medium Rational Eastern > Slow Narrative Indian Indian} vs FEMALE DEVOLUTIONARY MIGRATORY: Supernatural Semitic counter-evolutionary strategy. With Africa, Americas and Pacifica Lagging, and (it appears) Australian-NZ regressing.

    14) |ORDER| Need to Acquire Resources > Action to Improve Acquisition > Cooperation to Improve > Opportunity for Parasitism > Incentive for Parasitism > Preserve incentive to cooperate > Prevent disincentives > Punish to create Disincentives > organize to punish to create disincentives.

    THE LAW

    1) Judges are forced to adjudicate between customary law, regulation, and legislation during a period of rapid social, economic, and political upheaval. In science for example, there is no temporal pressure to decide. In conflict there is temporal pressure to decide. The state has taken on the monopoly of the application of violence, and created a monopoly method of dispute resolution (courts), and created a monopoly body by which to adjudicate such conflicts (law, legislation, and regulation.)

    2) There exists only one universal law of human cooperation. We call that law ‘natural law’. That natural law consists in reciprocity. Reciprocity requires satisfaction of the criteria (a) fully informed, (b) productive, (c) warrantied, (d) voluntary transfer, (d) free of imposition of costs upon the interests of others by externality. One can obtain an interest by bearing a cost (performing an improvement) for the purpose of obtaining an interest; and one can have no interest until one has born a cost to obtain such an interest.

    3) This one law (reciprocity) provides decidability independent of opinion, preference, custom, or presumption of good, and is the reason international law is governed by reciprocity it is the only rule that provides reciprocal (equal) incentive against retaliation for the imposition of costs upon one another. Law evolved, from the first record, to the present, for the purpose of preserving the volume, velocity, and returns on cooperation, and preventing cooperation’s opposite: retaliation cycles that throughout history have produced the deleterious effects of feuds.

    4) Customary Law (especially germanic, if not all european) consists of the discovery and accumulation of applications of this law of reciprocity that we call Tort law. Legislation (command) and regulation (prior constraint) have been given the FORCE of LAW by those whose profit interest – either the population (preservation of returns on cooperation) or the territorial rulers (returns from taxation).

    5) The primary function of RULE has been the preservation of cooperation by use of organized violence to suppress impositions of costs upon the investments of others. This is the role of insurer of last resort of Personal Interests.

    6) The primary function of GOVERNMENT has been the construction of commons and the extraordinary returns produced by commons, while insuring those commons from privatization of commons, socialization of losses into the commons, by the organized use of violence. This is the role of insurer of last resort of the Commons.

    7) The primary function of the STATE, particularly with the advent of paper currency, and now fiat (unbacked) currency (our money consists of nothing but shares in the economy) has increasingly evolved to function as the insurer of last resort against the Hazards of the vicissitudes of nature (disasters, tragedies, accidents, disability, health, old age, and even war).

    8) Rights can only exist (a) by reciprocal exchange of the same obligation, and (b) when insured by a third party with sufficient organized violence to insure and reinforce them. Otherwise they are not rights but impositions by means of command. It is correct to say we create a market ‘demand’ natural rights, and we create a market demand for human rights, but those rights do not exist until we organize sufficient violence into roles and institutions to insure those rights: police, sheriffs, soldiery, and judges.

    9) Human rights consist of AMBITIONS that we demand from the Governments of States in order to tolerate their retention of a monopoly of control over a territory. They exist as a postwar attempt to constraint governments to improving their territory, people, and assets by market means, without imposition upon their neighbors. Such rights, likewise, do not exist. But are merely an ambition.

    10) The universal declaration of human rights contains a few provisions that were necessary to obtain the signatures of the then-communist states, that asserted positive rights (obligations to provide for one another without constraint on the reproduction that exhausts the ability to provide for others, and therefore results in the gradual dysgenic decline as we reverse thousands of years of upward redistribution of reproduction back down to the underclasses who are not able to produce sufficient market goods and services to exist without harming the reproduction of the middle and upper classes.) [note: we have reversed the flynn effect and have, even in china, been losing a third of a point of intelligence over a fairly short number of years. The productivity of a people is reducible to the median of the population’s cost of education and training, such that every point below what is today’s 105 and tomorrow’s 110 places an intolerable burden upon the rest of the polity.]

    8) Our American constitution persisted the anglo saxon, germanic, proto-germanic (and possibly proto-indo-european) law of sovereign men limited to acts of reciprocity, and licensed the government to act in their interests to preserve their sovereignty (the original text being ‘life, liberty, property’). Unfortunately at the time the techniques of formal logic, strict constriction from first principles, were not known. We are no longer limited, and there is no reason any and every law cannot be constructed formally from the natural law of reciprocity, producing a complete, consistent, and easily falsifiable body of adjudicatable law. There is no reason any and every act of legislation, and any and every act of regulation, cannot be so constructed. The principle difference under such formal construction is that the one law, discovered application of the one law, regulation to limit hazards of those actions not open to restitution, and CONTRACTS for the production of commons would be consistent, and as such the government could only issue contracts under law, not edicts above that law. (This would destroy the left’s ability to usurp power by democratic means).

    9) The uniqueness of western civilization is reducible to (a) a militia that constitutes the shareholders, (b) individual sovereignty of shareholders, (c) the demand for truth, duty, and reciprocity from one another in mutual insurance of our sovereignty. (d) And sovereignty results in the necessity of markets for association, cooperation, reproduction, production, commons, and polities. (e) such markets, adjudicated by the law of tort, adapt to change faster than all other methods of human organization. (f) it is this rapidity of adaptation and resulting insulation from corruption and rent seeking that made the west develop faster than the rest in both the ancient world and the modern, with the Abrahamic Dark Age of the Jewish, Christian, and Muslim attacks on the great civilizations, providing the only hindrance. Once north sea trade was reestablished, the saxon commercial order constructed in europe, and the atlantic opened to the age of sail, the west was finally, by the age of napoleon, able to return to Roman levels of institutional sophistication, and universal imposition of law. [note that the west had fertile lands and forests but no flood river valleys to concentrate production, concentrate people, and develop taxation. So while the ancient world could form armies by taxation, western people had to form militias that relied on advanced (at the time) technology that required whole families to pay for. These militias (cattle raiders, sea peoples, vikings, pirates, european explorers ) organized expeditions (raids) but did so voluntarily. There was no other means of organizing other than contract. It was this order that led to our law, our debate, our reason, and from there our science and technology. Western excellence is due to our law – which elsewhere is not contract but command.

    10) The progressives lie to mask what is merely theft – they rely on postmodernism (lying by sophistry), and they rely on marxism (pseudoscience) as well as freudian and boazian pseudoscience. So yes, the Progressives (socialists) lie, but the Conservatives (Aristocratics) cannot tell the truth: The truth is quite simple: the reason for the success of western and eastern civilization, and most obviously the ashkenazim, is the upward redistribution of reproduction, and the use of manorialism, taxation, and the vicissitudes of nature to limit the reproduction of the underclass until such point that surpluses are sufficient to continually increase the standard of living through continuous market competition and innovation. Man was not oppressed. The man self domesticated through the same process he used for plants and animals: breeding the best and culling the rest. This is the dirty secret of civilizations.

    11) Sovereignty, Truth, Duty, and Reciprocity produce markets, and markets are eugenic. They are just a peaceful form of eugenics rather than war, enslavement, enserfment. By use of Sovereignty, Truth, Duty, Reciprocity, and Markets western man in the ancient world, and in the modern, dragged humanity kicking and screaming out of ignorance, superstition, hard labor, poverty, starvation, infant mortality, early death,

    12) The chinese are not so inhibited as we are. they do not care about markets other than in their ability to preserve their racially homogenous polity, and return themselves to position of world power to do so. They are actively researching methods of direct improvement while event their one child policy did not help the ongoing decline in the distribution of intelligence. We are doing the opposite, which is undermining the very reason for our evolutionary success, ad the means by which we dragged mankind out of darkness, and we are doing it through immigration of those very peoples who we have spent thousands of years eliminating from our polities. As far as I know anglicans and ashkenazim remain at parity, but the anglos otherwise have lost a full standard deviation or more since the beginning of the industrial revolution. Even the Norwegians are in distributional decline.

    13) The most profitable action any polity can take is to institutionalize benevolent eugenics, and that is to pay the underclasses not to reproduce, and to limit all immigration to skilled professionals, and to push the young and old into the labor force in the less demanding occupations. This is the lesson of our experiment with universal democracy and marxist-postmodernist globalism: dramatic reversal of centuries of civic improvement. At present only the east asians are willing to pay the costs of retaining their accumulated achievements. The eugenicists were right and in retrospect it appears that the Boas, Marx, Freud, Frankfurt, and French Postmodern movements were but reactions against Darwin, Maxwell, Menger, Spencer, and Nietzsche. And the entire postwar period has been nothing but a pseudoscientific and pseudo-rational attack on western civilization – an effort to repeat the destruction of the civilizations of the ancient world by the same means – false promises. This time with pseudoscience and pseudo-rational sophisms using the major media instead of supernatural sophisms using roman roads and greek writing.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-13 09:53:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/48275433_10156843735022264_145502531

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/48275433_10156843735022264_145502531231940608_n_10156843735017264.jpg (No idea who authored it. but got it Via James)Brandon Hayeshttps://www.facebook.com/Propertarian-Meme-Depositorium-230026437866938/Dec 13, 2018, 9:40 AMJohn EdwardThis is goodDec 13, 2018, 9:49 AMCurtus MaximusWord is really getting out. I’m seeing a resurgence in propertarianism.Dec 13, 2018, 10:12 AMJohn MarkOh yeah. This will be in my next vid.Dec 13, 2018, 10:21 AMBrandon HayesWe’ll get it up on the Institutes page once you’ve finished; I’ll put together some supplements.Dec 13, 2018, 10:22 AMCurt Doolittle1) John Mark is making a huge difference. it’s insane how effective he’s been already. He is more effective than everyone else combined. 2) Bill is now the real deal and I’m not alone on the podium. 3) Bill’s crew has finished baking giving us a sort of minimum critical mass of talent. 4) I’ve begun talking about revolution directly, 5) like I said, we actually have a solution, and no one else does, so as I predicted ‘natural force of gravity will advance us because of it’. 6) yellow vests, brexit, US election, trump condition, and citizen ‘political exhaustion’ have moved practical revolt into the overton window.Dec 13, 2018, 10:24 AMJohn MarkBrandon Hayes sounds goodDec 13, 2018, 10:26 AMAndrew DawsonI’m really excited Curt. I feel like a kid in the Lego storeDec 13, 2018, 10:45 AMJacob SmithThis meme is so true. I’ve learned more about the world from your reading list than from any of the libertarian books I had read before.Dec 13, 2018, 11:10 AMChristopher M MatthewsThe girl on the right should say (((libertarianism)))Dec 13, 2018, 12:52 PMCurt Doolittlemade my day. every time I hear that it makes my day. -hugsDec 13, 2018, 1:04 PMCurt Doolittleouch… niceDec 13, 2018, 1:05 PMJohn John StephensI’m seeing the growth, but I tell you, it is not easy to digest it all (and it is still growing). I thought I would have done it months ago, as I am fairly intelligent and read a ton. But man, there is so much depth to it. I wish I had more time to spend studying it, but at 44, I work a demanding full time job, go to college full time (studying Business Management), and homeschool 2 teenagers. To say I stay busy is an understatement.

    Also, it matches many conclusion I had already came to on my own, so I must question it even more so at every step. Falsification is your friend. But sometimes I overthink, I believe. Deflating grammar has probably been the most difficult part for me, so if anyone has any suggestions on that part, I am open to them and would be appreciative.

    And so many sacred cows that must be slain. I few people I have tried to bring into the fold did not understand it or refuse to sacrifice their sacred cows to truth. I have a few friends that I have painfully watched accept non-operational utopian talking points, but either refused to take the time to research propertarianism, or could not grasp it. And honestly, I point them to the Institute for research, as I am not to the point to be able to break it down and explain it in layman’s terms. I plan on attempting again soon, now that John Mark has made them easier to digest videos.

    Curt, love you brother!Dec 14, 2018, 12:33 AMCurt DoolittleJohn John Stephens love you back. ;)Dec 14, 2018, 4:24 AMJames Fox HigginsI’ve got John Mark booked in for my show next week. It’s going to be hard to ignore these ideas soon.Dec 15, 2018, 5:28 PM(No idea who authored it. but got it Via James)


    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-13 09:38:00 UTC