Curt Doolittle

Source: Facebook

  • WE ARE MORE LIKE THE CHINESE THAN THE SEMITES It is nearly impossible to talk to

    WE ARE MORE LIKE THE CHINESE THAN THE SEMITES

    It is nearly impossible to talk to abrahamic monotheists what have not traveled the world and learned about other ‘religions’ because they lack the frame of reference to consider ‘religion’ as it is practiced.

    The more I undrestand about world religions the more obvious it is that shinto is best, hindu a bit less so, and abrahamism the worst. While buddhism has turned into a religion, and stoicism on the borderline, and chinese folk religion, Taoism, Buddhism, Confucianism.

    We practice our folk religion still in many ways. And like the chinese we have our germanic tales (hearth religion), our our many versions of our religion, philosophy, and our law.

    That these are and always have been, ‘cults of the classes’ should be rather obvious.

    The chinese are ostensibly buddhism but they are so as much as we are christian – not so much. China is confucian.

    We are the same as china, not the same as the jews and muslims.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-16 06:44:00 UTC

  • Absolutists: We will do it because ‘we know best’. – Fascists: We will do it to

    – Absolutists: We will do it because ‘we know best’.

    – Fascists: We will do it to stop them.

    – National Socialists: We will do it because it is best for us.

    – Conservatives: We will only do it if we must as a last resort.

    – Libertarians: We won’t do anything except beg to be left alone.

    – Moderates: We will do as little as possible while preserving ours.

    – Leftists: We will do it to get ours.

    – Communists: We will do it to get from them.

    – Anarchists: We will do it to get back at them.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-16 05:53:00 UTC

  • THE DESIRES OF ABSOLUTISTS by Bill Joslin I don’t think the absolutists are hate

    THE DESIRES OF ABSOLUTISTS

    by Bill Joslin

    I don’t think the absolutists are haters. I think they lack what they claim we lack – that being a foundation for meaning,. motivation -“a superordinate transcendental ideal to be subservient to”…

    We have that – it’s called Career, Friends, Family and Kids.

    They’re looking for meaning and inspiration.

    They’re unestablished males seeking to individuate from “dad”.

    The critiques leveled at us as best as I can see are a series of straw men and equivocations , but suspect their main recruitment efforts which are successful are build off critique of propertarianism (much like our strongest arguments are leveled against libertarians) – without prop – there would not really be much for absolutist to build their case on without going whole hog pomo.

    Besides it’s a strange conflation of de Jouvenel On Power used to justify “charisma” (he who drives the idiom is king) as a “metaphysically” coherent justification for absolute rule (the idiomatic subterrain king) (which if you really thought about it – what drives idiomatic mimicking in society (fashion, fame etc) is often driven from the underclasses up (pop music, pop culture, thug culture etc)…

    At least we understand why this is: omegas service as stress relief for the group – deferred aggression and initiation of play.

    Why? Because that’s all they have to offer.

    They’re not haters per say, just building a castle in the clouds and looking for others to agree it’s made of stone.

    Now, I shouldn’t have said they “lack” what they claim we are lacking, but rather have said they are looking for (trying to construct) what they see we are missing.

    But it kind of baffles me… For instance; aesthetics and transcendentals being required for motivation… Joel once said to me that having an aesthetic is propelling these young men toward excellence – working out, self perfection, career etc…. Yet under in the sheepdog group the things which Ivar is doing with is family business, of Alain is doing personally, or Bryan is doing locally… There are many of us driven forward by understanding the operational necessity of agency-en-toto .

    It’s a simple if-then operation. If agency is at the root of this then I should build agency, if I value (xyz) then I should act (agency) …

    This doesn’t diminish or reduce motivation to some materialistic or positivist frame (Anglo ontology as they would say) but rather demonstrates that aesthetics grounds into something more fundamental.

    The result is a market for aesthetics – each moving in the same direction (increase agency) for their own personal reasons opposed to a grand unifying aesthetic.

    Just seems like they’re seeking another monopoly – or rather seeking someone who has a monopoly on aesthetics and/or a monopoly on inspiration ( a leader )

    You know…. “Anglo ontology can’t provide a transcendental” – yet I see that it is. It’s just not always a shiny, polished, sophisticated ideal… It can be mundane – like love of your family, or pride in work well done – it can be simple. And that is where I see their dissatisfaction – what we propose isn’t “special” enough. And that specialness they seek I think is the outward manifestation of young males seeking to establish themself via status symbols (specialness) at reduced costs (ideals over reals).

    I have a great respect for and see them walking the same path I did 20 years ago… That path leads here not over there.

    Give them time, let them live, forebearence for what ever costs they’ll impose in the meantime… They’ll eventually meet us somewhere in the middle – all young men must individuate on their own terms (or it wouldn’t be an individuation process).

    They’re my brothers too…. If anything it’s taught me what that patient yet irritated look on my father’s face meant, when I railed away at some stupidity in my youth.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-16 05:48:00 UTC

  • Page is Actually OK. Surprisingly. Technically there is no meaning of life, othe

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meaning_of_lifeWiki Page is Actually OK. Surprisingly.

    Technically there is no meaning of life, other than increasing the probability of genetic persistence for those within six or fewer generations of you. We say we want to find ‘meaning’ but this is nothing more than a word-association between the (Positive) experience we feel when we understand, and the fact that there is nothing to undrestand about life other than to make the best use of it that we can before we die.

    So the question isn’t whether there is meaning to life. THere isn’t. At best we can estimate a sort of accounting. The question is whether we can CREATE MEANING with our lives.

    Experiences, Friends, Family, Generations, Achievements. Leave the world better for having lived in it.

    We have but one shot at life, and we have only one choice, and that is how we make use of the time within it.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-15 22:48:00 UTC

  • ( Teaching by the king of the hill game weeds out the betas faster than all othe

    ( Teaching by the king of the hill game weeds out the betas faster than all other tactics combined. Why? Female/Beta Moral intuition cannot resist self defense. It’s so obvious that once you see it, you see it everywhere. It’s like NAXALT bait in a Pringles can. )

    Ps: some females won’t fall for it – but few some betas won’t, but most will.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-15 22:31:00 UTC

  • Untitled

    https://youtu.be/Vbl5cCWOnt8

    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-15 22:16:00 UTC

  • ( Keeping with the theme: Fishing for morons is … it’s so easy. Find something

    ( Keeping with the theme: Fishing for morons is … it’s so easy. Find something a small mind can feel a sense of superiority (or less inferiority) by attacking or defending and leave it in the open like an eel trap. I should invent a name for this game and see if we can catalog the twenty five most effective moron-traps. )

    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-15 21:41:00 UTC

  • I feel history of the universe and man, and this world, and the natural world ‘s

    I feel history of the universe and man, and this world, and the natural world ‘spiritually’. But this is because I can. I understand that each of us has a range of possible comprehension and possible imagination and possible experience. Any religon that is not a barrier to transcendence (evolution) must provide a range of narratives (worlds) that supply the market demand for our different abilities.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-15 19:42:00 UTC

  • No religion should require you believe a falsehood – only pay the cost of initia

    No religion should require you believe a falsehood – only pay the cost of initiation and ongoing rituals in exchange for personal, interpersonal, social, political, and universal mindfulness.

    There is nothing false in the natural law of sovereignty reciprocity, truth, duty, charity, and markets in everything.

    There is nothing false in the elimination of hatred from the human heart, the extension of kinship love of family to the polity, personal acts of charity, and the exhaustion of forgiveness before abandonment or punishment.

    There is nothing false in ritual thanks to one another, to our ancestors, to those who made our existence possible, to the natural world, to the universe, and to the universe’s god – in whatever form that might be.

    There is nothing false in their parables, their myths, their histories other than their ignorance and vulnerability of time and place.

    There is nothing false in the ritual training of the body, intuition(soul), memory(knowledge), reason (calculation), ethics, morality, the law, and the skills with which to prosper.

    There is nothing false in that combination of of which will cause us, and any who likewise do the same, to transcend into the gods we have not yet made.

    That is not a sentimental argument. It is the optimum order for human beings. There is none better possible. It’s just science.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-15 19:36:00 UTC

  • (I know the religion thing is painful but I am very close to finished with it. M

    (I know the religion thing is painful but I am very close to finished with it. Most people want a new religion. I want to restore the church and family as the central institution of our society, and eliminate the state-finance-consumption sector as a means of preying upon our people. To make that work requires another reformation. Not to the exclusion of the protestant one. But to restore a religion for OUR people. And it doesn’t mean I have to invent it. I just have to put the box around it to protect whatever is there. So i’m sorry if it’s offensive but it’s got to be done. Even atheists have a religion, they just can’t articulate it as one. And the one we have is dying along with the next generation.)

    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-15 19:23:00 UTC