Curt Doolittle

Source: Facebook

  • Curt Doolittle shared a post

    Curt Doolittle shared a post.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-01 14:31:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/49151040_10156888891502264_215630683

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/49151040_10156888891502264_2156306837970878464_o_10156888891492264.jpg Guy blocked me for the truth while defending molly. ;)Noel FritschI’m struck by the fact that Abrahamists actually agree with Molly here. They use the IQ game to their advantage well, and also gaslight against it using masscomms.

    Why?

    And why would we join them?

    Is the thought “if you can’t beat em, join ’em?Jan 1, 2019, 1:59 PMMartin ŠtěpánHe was defending Nassim. Blocked me too.Jan 1, 2019, 2:10 PMChris CantrellI see it in the real world all the time. People choosing to wrong in order to be nice. It does nothing but promote and support weakness.Jan 1, 2019, 2:10 PMBrendan HegartyI’ve noticed this guy has this indian problem of defaulting to Gurus even though he’s quite intelligent. This seems to be a very indian problem.Jan 1, 2019, 2:11 PMBrendan HegartyThey default to virtue epistemology way too much.Jan 1, 2019, 2:12 PMBill JoslinAnd other costsJan 1, 2019, 3:18 PMGöran DahlWait till you tell them that the Aryans were White, then they’ll run to their Guru faster than you can say arithmeticsJan 1, 2019, 3:21 PMKari Anne DorstadWow welcome to the club ! What a man , he knows how to push the block button ! WowJan 1, 2019, 4:20 PMTom RamboPeak soy faceJan 1, 2019, 4:21 PMJoe Redtreemolly fans are a cult. or at least cult-ish. he used to have an irl cult where he told people to cut themselves off from their families. he talks about reason and philosophy, but the whole thing is toxic just under the surface, with all sorts of perverted social pressures in his cult of personality.

    though he would probably tell me that’s not an argument.Jan 1, 2019, 7:29 PMSingular SpeechKari Anne Dorstad Just following his leader, who does the same all the time.

    Still like most of what Nassim has to say, even though I still lack the knowledge to properly evaluate what he has to say in this case.Jan 1, 2019, 7:36 PMSingular SpeechNassim does that and his cult follows, and the same goes for Molyneux.

    Doesn’t matter as far as the content goes, but, he lets it very clear that he is an asshole (online at least).Jan 1, 2019, 7:38 PMJim GingerichJust call Taleb an Arab and tell him butter is superior to olive oil. Instant block.Jan 2, 2019, 10:28 AMCurt Doolittlewell i do the asshole thing when necessary too, and to some degree it’s defensive. although I’m probably not an asshole in real life like he is.Jan 2, 2019, 11:07 AMJosh NorrisJoe Redtree To be fair, it isn’t an argumentJan 2, 2019, 11:20 AMJoe RedtreeJosh Norris neither is blocking people, or refusing to debate certain people.Jan 2, 2019, 11:45 AMGuy blocked me for the truth while defending molly. 😉

    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-01 13:55:00 UTC

  • THE MALE COGNITIVE LOAD? by Simon Ström How is the male cognitive load operation

    THE MALE COGNITIVE LOAD?

    by Simon Ström

    How is the male cognitive load operationalized?

    It isn’t as easily because of greater variation and division of labor among the male population. But the most basic load to which males are predisposed to carry should be the dominance hierarchy and male peer group.

    It probably goes a lot deeper and varies with class and IQ, and I bet there are actually evolved, discrete, ‘archetypical male clusters’ beyond the random, gaussian normal distribution of psychometric traits traits, (and the male-female division common to all of the animal kingdom.)

    Whereas the female cognitive load varies in sophistication along the class or IQ axis, I think the lifecycle of the reproductive bottleneck-sex limits the evolutionary plasticity of its physiological cognitive load.

    Men are not only biologically expendable but also evolutionarily plastic and differentiated along multiple axes of skills and ‘loads’.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-01 13:11:00 UTC

  • I wanna talk to Molly about doing a smack down on Taleb. The community would ben

    I wanna talk to Molly about doing a smack down on Taleb. The community would benefit from this discussion. I would like to cover taleb’s original insight, and how he is applying it outside it’s limits, and in doing so largely deflate his IQ position, illustrate why he’s just talking pseudoscience to justify his racial biases, while reinforcing his via-negativa argument as a general rule. It’s not that difficult but it will be better to have molly’s popularity and my arguments together because they will flatten Taleb on this issue.

    Can anyone contact someone who can try to arrange this?

    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-01 13:07:00 UTC

  • “How did we go from 500 cc to 1500 cc brains? 2 million years of iterative genoc

    —“How did we go from 500 cc to 1500 cc brains? 2 million years of iterative genocide.”– Simon Ström

    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-01 12:58:00 UTC

  • NEURAL ECONOMY AND THE FEMALE MIND —“Women turn more conservative when they ha

    NEURAL ECONOMY AND THE FEMALE MIND

    —“Women turn more conservative when they have children.”—Martin

    Or put another way, women evolved to carry a cognitive load, and will generate demand for that cognitive load, and the signals to reinforce it, in one way or another until they possess it.

    It makes evolutionary sense that women who don’t have children would express ‘care’ to all, then express it more exclusively to their children when they have that “inventory” to worry about (expend their caretaking energies).

    So women evolved to carry the cognitive load of caring about proportionality and caretaking almost exclusively (the young short term) while men tend to are about the full spectrum of moral intuitions equally (the tribe long term).

    Men demand a cognitive load, but it seems less open to substitution than women. Men, we always have the tribe to defend.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-01 11:18:00 UTC

  • “William Manchester developed an intense writing regimen that he adhered to for

    —“William Manchester developed an intense writing regimen that he adhered to for much of his life, often writing nonstop for up to 50 hours at a time. He described the experience as follows: “I would work all day, all night, all the next day, all the following night and into the third day. I would look up at the clock, and it would be 3:30 in the afternoon, and I would say, ‘Oh boy, I’ve got three more hours to write.’ I just loved it.”—

    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-01 08:47:00 UTC

  • (From Twitter: putting an end to Nassim Taleb’s insight, edited a bit for clarit

    (From Twitter: putting an end to Nassim Taleb’s insight, edited a bit for clarity)

    WARNING: this is part of an ongoing debate on twitter between Molyneux and Taleb on intelligence and it is a controversial topic for Facebook. Unfortunately, this is a debate that must occur because is of profound importance for humanity – our values are not always survivable. Hence I’m sharing only with ‘Friends’.

    Nassim (all), IQ describes a curve. East and west are superior for having culled underclass reproduction, while center have failed to cull underclass reproduction.

    So, to reverse your statement: “I can understand loving one’s people, and apologizing for one’s people, but denying the science is quite sinister.”

    Other ‘peoples’ are ‘inferior’ (meaning poorer) socially, economically, politically, and militarily because of Pareto problem created by the size of their lower classes in relation to their upper classes. Hence continuous middle eastern failure under underclass religion and rule. Despite the wealth of possessing the optimum trade routes, the middle east was unable to fix this problem.

    Stephan is Correct. IQ (meaning, the relative size of genetic classes as measured by rate of learning), is the MOST important factor in group wealth. PERIOD. This is because trust and trustworthiness increase in concert with cognitive ability.

    Nassim: Your ‘admiration’ for a certain class of individuals is unscientific as well: they and their behavior are why no large corporations, and only smaller (inefficient) organizations. Our ‘clerical’ education and society, is why we HAVE large (efficient) corporations. In other words YOU ARE DESPERATELY WRONG. Relative wealth = demographics.

    Nassim, so if you hadn’t taken up this particular issue it wouldn’t have made me pay attention to, and understood, the catastrophic error in your conflation of individual speculators and the political orders in which wealth potential of such people is possible. YOU ARE WRONG.

    Nassim: The west, despite beginning with Aryanism (sovereignty and tort law), and Aristotelianism (empiricism), SURVIVED the first wave of Semiticism (Abrahamism) because of genetic reserves. Every other civilization that has tolerated Semiticism has been destroyed by the continuous expansion of the underclasses.We are in the process of not-surviving the second wave of Semiticism.

    Nassim: So I just unfortunately realized that your FatTony et all, sensibility is just Semitic hatred of high trust peoples who produce their extraordinary wealth by the production of COMMONS. And this insight, if widely understood will destroy your reputation even further.

    You think that our high-trust people, are ‘suckers’ when it is precisely that social order and those values that allow us to produce the commons that make high returns possible, while those historical peoples you (out of racial bias) favor, were NEVER ABLE TO, because of ‘petty profiting’ that you favor.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-01 08:19:00 UTC

  • happy new year!!!!

    happy new year!!!!

    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-31 21:43:00 UTC

  • PLEASE UNDERSTAND WHAT THIS MEANS —“It was a good year for wealth creation. It

    PLEASE UNDERSTAND WHAT THIS MEANS

    —“It was a good year for wealth creation. It was a tough year in financial markets, but for people who are creating wealth through companies, the economy itself is very strong.”— Michael Zeuner, managing partner of WE Family Offices.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-31 21:27:00 UTC