(Happy Birthday Peter. 😉 )
Source date (UTC): 2019-01-04 09:43:00 UTC
Source: Facebook
-
(Belated happy birthday) 😉
(Belated happy birthday) 😉
Source date (UTC): 2019-01-04 09:41:00 UTC
-
Happy birthday! 😉
Happy birthday! 😉
Source date (UTC): 2019-01-04 09:40:00 UTC
-
PUTTING YOUR TRUST IN ONE GOVERNMENT ORDER OR ANOTHER? You have to choose whethe
PUTTING YOUR TRUST IN ONE GOVERNMENT ORDER OR ANOTHER?
You have to choose whether to trust the self interest of the judicial ‘priesthood’, the self interest of the monarchy, the self interest of the ruling oligarchy, or the self control of the democratic polity, or the self interests of public intellectuals.
My argument is that you can’t trust any of them, and that the judicial priesthood benefits from ‘maintaining the rules of the game’, but if and only if the military will back them up.
Why? The judiciary is a purely via-negativa discipline: it advocates nothing, and only resolves conflicts. It is already privileged. It is already high status. It is operationally selective (failure is quickly obvious and resolved), and failure of members is against the interest of the whole, who police it well through hierarchical review.
The central issue in limiting the judiciary and preserving its freedom from via-positiva action, is nothing more than insufficiently enumerated terms of decidability.
And that’s what i’ve done. Provided that completeness.
-Curt Doolittle
Source date (UTC): 2019-01-04 09:17:00 UTC
-
Curt Doolittle shared a post
Curt Doolittle shared a post.
Source date (UTC): 2019-01-03 23:27:00 UTC
-
Untitled
Source date (UTC): 2019-01-03 16:59:00 UTC
-
TOLD YA’ SO. —“In only three months, Apple has lost $452 billion in market cap
TOLD YA’ SO.
—“In only three months, Apple has lost $452 billion in market capitalization, including tens of billions on Thursday as the tech giant’s stock sank further. Apple shares have fallen by 39.1 percent since Oct. 3, when the stock hit a 52-week high of $233.47 a share. With its market cap down to about $674 billion, those losses are larger than individual value of 496 members of the S&P 500 — including Facebook and J.P. Morgan.”—
Apple is just pulling a microsoft and the sooner this clown goes the better.
If I am right they will have to redirect to compete with msft sometime in the next three to five years.
Source date (UTC): 2019-01-03 16:54:00 UTC
-
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/49277751_10156893074727264_553172499
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/49277751_10156893074727264_553172499026673664_o_10156893074717264.jpg US WARNS US CITIZENS TO EXERCISE CAUTION IN CHINA”
https://travel.state.gov/content/travel/en/traveladvisories/traveladvisories/china-travel-advisory.htmlErik LukovskyWhy the hell would they risk this? China’s chutzpah is growing day by dayJan 3, 2019, 4:22 PMTom RamboRicky MolnarJan 3, 2019, 4:30 PMRicky MolnarDon’t most countries arrest people who commit crimes within their borders?Jan 3, 2019, 4:47 PMCurt DoolittleRicky Molnar that’s not what it says.Jan 3, 2019, 4:54 PMJames Santagata100% predicted this back in late 1990’s from reports coming back from friends, neighbors, etc doing biz there – mostly in infra, telcomm and high tech.. It’s the logical conclusion of one way trade, having to sign over IP or form joint ventures to get a piece of the lie – the lie, not pie By mid 2000s I met countless apac and global hq execs who had realized what I said. Japan has high margins (though falling pop so it precludes some products), they don’t steal your ip, and you always get paid without the smog. Search “why I’m leaving china” on YouTube and watch this one. If you knew this it’s just final confirmation. If it’s new, then now you see (((who))) and why they carried chinas water for 30 years. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=HrzJcnK_c-4Jan 3, 2019, 4:55 PMThomas AndreassonRicky Molnar you have obviously not visited Sweden. LolJan 3, 2019, 4:58 PMJames SantagataBeyond that, you have to love china – once Chinese by genes always Chinese. Nothing changes it. It’s not a (((proposition))) like (((America))) and impossible to become a naturalized Chinese citizen. Look it up! Zero reciprocity. And no, china laughs at things like Holohoax mind control.Jan 3, 2019, 5:00 PMRicky MolnarCurt Doolittle Fill me in then. What am I not getting?Jan 3, 2019, 5:00 PMRicky MolnarReally good video, I actually watched it yesterday. Basically, as China develops further, they want to make a point about relying less and less on foreigners each day. A lot of Chinese society revolves around saving face and that’s what they’re trying to do.Jan 3, 2019, 5:02 PMRicky Molnar>tfw no ethnostateJan 3, 2019, 5:02 PMCurt Doolittlethey are targeting people who have dual citizenship in order to capture american IP, and prevent talent and capital flight, because they know their ‘correction’ is coming.Jan 3, 2019, 5:08 PMGordon ThompsonWE are seeing the beginning of a worldwide division of spheres of economic interests to preserve THE dominance of USA in West…we arehaving travel restricted and commercial business will be curtailed with Asia.Jan 3, 2019, 5:19 PMRicky MolnarThat’s impossible. It says in the image that they don’t acknowledge dual citizenship. “Dual citizenship” has no meaning in Chinese law.Jan 3, 2019, 5:20 PMRicky MolnarIt seems to me that you’re adding information to this post that was not previously present. Nothing about the image says anything about IP or protecting talent. So to say “that’s not what it says” does me no good because you still aren’t clarifying what it says. You’re just giving unrelated analysis of China.Jan 3, 2019, 5:22 PMAna Stowe GeorgievCompare Western and Eastern Europe right now. Western Europe has a higher travel advisory rate than almost all Eastern European countriesJan 3, 2019, 6:13 PMJon Jonathan”to aid Chinese authorities in resolving civil disputes in favor of Chinese parties”Jan 3, 2019, 6:29 PMRicky MolnarRight, because if you commit a crime against a Chinese national and flee the country then there’s no recourse for that Chinese person. Seems rational to me.Jan 3, 2019, 6:30 PMJon JonathanThough tbh parts of Eastern Europe probably should have a higher travel advisory, “if you are of African descent do not attempt to harass women under threat of your own safety” but Western travel advisories won’t get broken down by race even to issue notices to protect minorities 🤣Jan 3, 2019, 6:32 PMScott FreemanThere’s nothing new in this announcement.Jan 3, 2019, 8:31 PMErik LukovskyWhat if you’re born in China and one parent is Chinese?
Also don’t the Chinese love Jews? I think they admire their business prowess, I’ve only heard positive from Jews who are thereJan 3, 2019, 9:18 PMRicky MolnarIf you were born in China and one parent is Chinese, then you would be Chinese. Obviously the complication is that if the other parent is American, that would make you American too, right? Well, under Chinese law you have to pick one or the other. If you choose to take up American citizenship, you must give up your Chinese citizenship.
Chinese don’t think about Jews much. Their impressions of Jews are “wow those people are very clever” and “Hitler tried to kill them” but ultimately they don’t give a shit because it’s not their history and not their problem. Six million dead Jews means nothing compared to all the dead Chinese from WWII and they definitely don’t have the white guilt that has caused Westerners to chastise themselves for 80 years. Fortunately for the Chinese, Jews are unable to blend into Chinese society and cannot operate at full capacity as a parasitic race.Jan 3, 2019, 9:22 PMErik LukovskyInteresting, so they make you choose
Jews have minimal history in Asia and China, they were always small in population there and never wanted to live there en masse like they wanted to in the West, but yeah that’s what I’m saying, the Chinese are more or less indifferent to them
Now, what if you tried to apply for dual citizenship later after choosing Chinese, they would just decline you?Jan 3, 2019, 9:43 PMRicky MolnarIf the Chinese government found out that you had claimed citizenship in another country after already being a Chinese citizen, they would revoke your Chinese citizenship.Jan 3, 2019, 9:45 PMKari Anne DorstadWell I know for fact I will never visit China !!i had hard time seeing what this warning said because it’s so smallJan 3, 2019, 9:45 PMKari Anne DorstadI no longer own a desk top computer! I’m so glad it’s gone ! I’m down to Just an iPhone !Jan 3, 2019, 9:46 PMMary RomanoRicky Molnar Fortunately for the Chinese, their culture isn’t run by an ethnic minority that despises them and has brainwashed them into hating their own history and whitewashed the history of ((())).Jan 4, 2019, 5:47 AMKarl KühlschrankOne of the Americans picked up by the Chicoms, the male, is a member of an organization full of globalists, and Soros. Makes me realize the Chinese are not our friends generally, yet still based. They act like a nation that want to remain a nation. There are a lot of shitty Americans and I hope Trump gives this guy the same help he would have give Bo Bergdahl. Meanwhile MSM will sell pointless patriotic hurr durr to pressure their return.Jan 4, 2019, 11:04 PMUS WARNS US CITIZENS TO EXERCISE CAUTION IN CHINA”
https://travel.state.gov/content/travel/en/traveladvisories/traveladvisories/china-travel-advisory.html
Source date (UTC): 2019-01-03 15:38:00 UTC
-
Curt Doolittle shared a post
Curt Doolittle shared a post.
Source date (UTC): 2019-01-02 21:56:00 UTC
-
“Curt, How are the courses going to work?”— Well, lets get across the principl
—“Curt, How are the courses going to work?”—
Well, lets get across the principle reason we need the university format.
(a) To provide you and others confidence in your investment of time and effort.
(b) To provide social, physical (fitness, fighting, war) and strategy (how to conduct war), the natural law and government under the natural law – the most ‘complete’ western aristocratic education that you can recieve.
(c) Our methodology requires a rather great deal of general knowledge that you have been denied in order to suppress the continuation of western civilization.
(d) To provide consistent training so that you all ‘sound the same’, and therefor preserve the brand value (persuasive value) of the methodology.
(e) To provide the full set of courses necessary for a judicial priesthood in the natural law, to transform our civilization just as thoroughly as did the M-P-F’s.
(f) To weaken any possible criticism.
In other words, this is going to be, as is in all my work, serious.
The courses will work just like college/university:
1 – Lecture (video),
2 – Assignment (usually short essay questions), and;
3 – Online discussions (in other words, a lot of help is available, because that’s part of ‘our thing’ is teaching one another.)
You will be able to just engage in online conversation, to join social events and activities, to take individual courses, or to take a certification in a series of courses, or to get a degree.
These courses will be (I promise) as good or better than those you would receive in the top ten universities. If you want to study law, it’s yale and harvard, if you want tech and science it’s MIT and Stanford. But if you survey the courses at these universities and compare them to ours, you will find that we are teaching far more substantial content than those others do, even at that level of university.
Part of the Accreditation process[1] requires those who teach warranty the students achievement. So this requires high investment of my time. So the first generation or two will get access to me. Afterward I do not know since I expect to do a lot of work generating the course material. I assume (hope) others will move in to teach the course. I know others who could do so already.
The workload will be the same as university, which is two hours of work to every one hour of course time. This is extremely hard for me to judge and we will have to tailor it going forward. Mostly I see short readings with some writing.
Some classes are 6 credits (two semesters of work) and some are 3 (one semester’s worth of work), and I have added some 1 credit courses as well. We are not bound by time constraints as much as universities so I will accelerate or slow the courses on demand
So, this is not one of those multiple choice things (gut courses). We want our education to be meaningful androck solid and doing it online this way produces extraordinarily good data for the accreditation process.
I think grades are going to be ‘incomplete’, ‘complete’, ‘distinction’, ‘honors’.
I am trying to figure out how to prevent people from overreaching their abilities, so that we don’t have a high drop out rate, or make people unhappy and critical. And so we are going to have an ‘application’ process that does some limited filtering for some of the classes, while say, the combat and weapons classes we just want to know if you’re mentally stable. lol.
Oh, and until we have accreditation (which takes years) we will charge the minimum possible for each course that we can.
-Curt
—
[1] regarding accreditation: In the USA anyone can start a college or university, offer training, credits, and certification. It is up to the market to determine whether those certifications have any value. The purpose of Accreditation for the student is to understand the value of those certifications, credits, and degrees in the market. The purpose of Accreditation for the organization, is the access to student loans it provides. Access to student loans will allow us to scale quickly.
Source date (UTC): 2019-01-02 19:31:00 UTC