Curt Doolittle

Source: Facebook

  • ((FOLLOW PATTERN PRINCIPLE (he disappeared for a while. he is back. he’s very go

    ((FOLLOW PATTERN PRINCIPLE (he disappeared for a while. he is back. he’s very good thinker))

    UNDERSTANDING HIGHER ORDER SUBVERSION AND LYING

    By @[100006830866673:2048:Pattern Principle]

    We’re accustomed with being lied to and so the deceiving subverters will often put many lies on the table of options. Sometimes those lies are very palpable and familiar, because those options are very tangible, in the sense we can select them and they would have very tangible consequences and realistic outcomes.

    An example? Take Communism. We can see this option on the table, and while it is full of lying, we know that if we were to select it, we understand its outcome – for better or for worse.

    Yet there is a worse kind of lie still. A lie which presents itself as not only appealing because it appears to be in full alignment with your ideology, yet it is physically & tangibly unobtainable. Here’s the crucial danger: it will parade itself to be the answer of the most reasonable category and persuasion without empirical demonstration.

    An example? “No lords or kings for me.”

    In reality – we don’t get that option. You either have dark lords who rule from the shadows of the modern, Democratic post WWII state and central banking (with no accountability), or you have lords whose names you know and whose self interest is in total alignment with the well being of his subjects without parasitism. This lie is critically dangerous because it can only continue to thrive as long as we believe in a mythology of supporting lies which makes it seem palpable, especially in the United States. To be clear – you have never NOT had a lord – even though you may have not known his name. Yes Americans, that includes you.

    The worst lies are the lies which appeal but can not be realized without us knowing it.

    “The utility of a lie is determined by the desirability of its repetition. Lies are information products like any other market product. ” – Curt Doolittle

    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-30 18:26:00 UTC

  • THE WORLD FAILS ONE CITY, ONE COUNTRY, AT A TIME. NOT IN A CRASH BUT A DECAY. —

    THE WORLD FAILS ONE CITY, ONE COUNTRY, AT A TIME. NOT IN A CRASH BUT A DECAY.

    —“I lived in Milan and Buenos Aires for a while in 1998 and 1999. Young people were more tied to their families and communities, but that was because they were BROKE and there were no decent jobs. I see the same behavior in the Millennial problems of today the problems of these places 20 years ago. Eking out an existence, living in the parents’ basement. Actually it is probably better than that in the US in a lot of cases now. But in Italy and Argentina things are generally worse.”—Michael Churchill

    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-30 18:24:00 UTC

  • I love the elegant Apple GUI, combined with the case insensitive unix based os.

    I love the elegant Apple GUI, combined with the case insensitive unix based os. But apple hasn’t done a single thing right since jobs died. (Just like I said they wouldn’t)

    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-30 17:50:00 UTC

  • “I’d argue that the energy efficency increase brought more mass media, and that

    —“I’d argue that the energy efficency increase brought more mass media, and that exponential increment on the propagation of lies is what made it easier to dumb down or deceive the populations. That should be counted as a factor, at least.”—Alejandro Luque

    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-30 17:04:00 UTC

  • Only four reasons for Microsoft computers: (a) writing code on visual studio (I

    Only four reasons for Microsoft computers:

    (a) writing code on visual studio (I just puked a little in my mouth)

    (b) being the prisoner of an IT department that wrote code in visual studio. (gagging…. )

    (c) extremely large complex spreadsheets on Excel. (Why apple doesn’t go after that market is beyond me.)

    (d) gaming (yes, ok, I”ll admit that you can’t really game on apple – but I wouldn’t use a laptop for gaming….)

    I don’t game. No time. I have you guys to play with instead.

    lol

    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-30 15:36:00 UTC

  • My Macbook Pro 17 is nine years old, and aside from 8GB instead of 16GB limitati

    My Macbook Pro 17 is nine years old, and aside from 8GB instead of 16GB limitation, it still the best laptop you can buy. Seriously. It’s the best laptop ever made. I love this thing.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-30 15:06:00 UTC

  • “I learned years ago to think in terms of what would be beneficial rather that w

    —“I learned years ago to think in terms of what would be beneficial rather that whats good or bad. Good and bad can be argued all day long but determining what is beneficial is quite simple and difficult to argue against.

    I believe that change in paradigm is aligned perfectly with reciprocity, as reciprocity(according to my understanding) is finding the most beneficial compromise between two or more parties.

    What people consider to be “moral” is subjective as it varies from culture to culture and has changed throughout time. I haven’t seen evidence to support the idea that there is such a thing as objective or absolute morality since it is subject to change.

    Perhaps the notion of defining morality or determining what is moral and amoral is a thing of the past and should be updated to include the most beneficial practices for all parties involved.

    One sided thinking in the extreme has led to most if not all the social issues that plague humanity, in my opinion of course – I’m sure there are plenty who would disagree(in their state of one sided thinking ;p)”—David McCarthy

    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-30 14:14:00 UTC

  • THE RESOLUTION IS IN REVOLUTION —“Life does suck for the attractive, smart, an

    THE RESOLUTION IS IN REVOLUTION

    —“Life does suck for the attractive, smart, and knowledgeable when they don’t have sovereignty over their own societies because they are ruled by parasites and dragged into quicksand by the underclass…the only solution is obvious. The resolution is in revolution.”—Nick Dahlheim

    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-30 13:35:00 UTC

  • NO. YOU HAVE FAITH IN A FRAUD. NOT REASON. —“….libertarians believe….”—

    NO. YOU HAVE FAITH IN A FRAUD. NOT REASON.

    —“….libertarians believe….”— Libertarian Party

    0) Everything you subsidize will increase in consumption thereby increasing the overall proportion of productivity used to consume it. The only question is whether like engines of the animal, mechanical or digital categories, they produce higher returns for doing so – or not.

    1) Libertarianism persists fallen angel version of man vs the risen beast, slowly domesticated by the violent imposition of demand for reciprocity under that law we call tort. Findings of Law, Legislation, and Regulation do in fact limit scams and frauds. … and ….

    2) … so the problem is not law, and regulation, but the inability of the consumer to judge the product delivered to him, and the use of redistribution to compensate those who engage in fraud that takes advantage of that ignorance.

    3) This is an example of a common (infantlie) libertarian trope:that the consumer can possess sufficient information to avoid irreciprocity, and that the insurer of last resort should not force due diligence in the service of the market by those who might abuse asymmetry of info.

    4) Jewish law, which is the source of left libertarianism, only enforces the demand for volition,and not warranty. European law, which is the source of liberalism, enforces reciprocity and warranty. There is a reason for the historical incompatibility, of the two ethical systems.

    5) We are faced today with not only the difference between Anglo classical liberal and reciprocal, germanic reciprocal proportional, french authoritarian socialist proportional, jewish voluntary unwarrantied, but now Islamic Authoritarian irreciprocal law of conquest.

    6) Libertarians are wrong. Whether they are wrong because they are infantile, or wrong because they have parasitic preferences is immaterial. There is only one source of liberty: sovereignty and reciprocity, truth and duty, the law of tort and jury, violence and defense.

    7) Sovereignty exists in fact. Liberty by the permission of the sovereign. Freedom by the utility of the sovereign. And sovereignty has but one source, and that is the organized application of violence to deny all other alternatives.

    8) Welcome to the revolution. Those who fight will have sovereignty not liberty or freedom. Those who do not fight will have none.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-30 13:34:00 UTC

  • MORE ON ADAM AND CURT’S DISCUSSION ON METAPHYSICS. (QUESTIONS FOR METAPHYSICISTS

    MORE ON ADAM AND CURT’S DISCUSSION ON METAPHYSICS. (QUESTIONS FOR METAPHYSICISTS)

    —“…substance…”—

    Your [Adam] approach is extremely useful in demarcation of legal decidability. It is the physical equivalent of the decidability provided by potential interest and demonstrated interest. So as you taught me recently Aristotle is an exceptional framework for cognition at human scale, and while we may know post human scale both micro and macro, that only assists us in removing falsehood and error from decisions at human scale. We are only capable of acting at human scale and cooperating at human scale…. So Aristotle really did learn about the universe from writing the athenian constitution….

    —“…underlies…”–

    Operationalize that term and …

    —“Real Metaphysics – How we ought to think. If you are actually thinking, then you are so constrained that you cannot help but think such and such, which we call “metaphysics”. This there is a form of necessity that is neither logical nor physical, but which underlies both.”—

    I don’t know what metaphysics means – other than ‘Aristotle’s failed attempt to operationalize the brain’.

    So ‘fitting’ is simply error. And any talk of “metaphysics’ is fitting. We can instead ask, given his ignorance, what categories of phenomenon was he seeking to explain?

    He could not explain the function of the brain, and the relationship between that lower function, and the means of calculation and communication we call language. (serial, continuous, recursive, disambiguation, resulting in sufficiency for a contract for meaning.)

    I know the following.

    1 – the natural world exists (reality) and persists independent of our thought and action, and follows simple deterministic rules from which complexity arises, including the complexity of near chaos due to the hierarchy of possible operations and near-infinite scale. I know this because I am unwilling to act contrary to that condition in any manner that would test that condition; and I observe this in everyone else; Beyond that is meaningless because only action determines outcomes.

    2 – to be able to act in this world and capture calories we have evolved a great deal of memory with which to convert high information density experience into fragmentary (distributed fractional memory) but reconstructable experiences, of lower information density.

    3 – to be able to plan a sequence of actions we have evolved categories of constant contingent relations in memory by the addition of more layers of memory.

    4 – to be able to communicate we evolved language to communicate stories in serial, continuous, recursive, disambiguation until a contract for meaning has been achieved.)

    5 – this language required rules of continuous disambiguation, and so we evolved the natural grammar.

    6 – once we had the grammar we could engage in reason, calculation, and eventually computation.

    7 – increases in opportunity for exploitation of the natura world (and the human) cause increase scope of communication. T

    8 – the greater the correspondence with reality, and the greater the scope, and the more consistent the relations in those categories and grammar, the greater the ability to act to seize calories by which to insulate the mind, emotions, and body from stress and cellular damage (wear and tear).

    9 – at some point a competitive advantage in non-correspondence evolved (frauds and deceits) in order for those lacking agency to compete with those possessing agency.

    10- this ‘resistance movement’ creates many fictions (non correspondences) to improve political resistance in opposition to economic and military agency

    Ergo my only interest is not in the correspondence per se but in the use of non-correspondence for the purpose of parasitism and predation.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-30 12:29:00 UTC