GOOD POSITIONING
—“I usually shorten Propertarianism to the Wilsonian synthesis (if they are academic) or an intellectual project to apply the scientific method to every other area outside of STEM.”–AlcyoneLast
Or the completion of the operationalist program.
Or the formal logic of social science.
Or the natural law….
lol
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-01 11:12:00 UTC
PROPERTARIAN LAW AND THE NEW “ABORTION STANDARD”
The purpose of the proposed law is to restore euthanasia to babies under the pretense of calling it ‘abortion’. This prevents having to take euthanasia through the court system.
Hence operational language. This abuse of the law, would not be possible under Propertarian Law.
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-01 10:49:00 UTC
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ljqra3BcqWMEXTREME OWNERSHIP: PROPERTY IN TOTO
While its the same message as every other self help book, this one is in masculine prose, and uses ownership which is compatible with property in toto – and that’s why I chose it.
via Simon Felden
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ljqra3BcqWM
YOUTUBE.COM http://YOUTUBE.COM
Extreme Ownership | Jocko Willink | TEDxUniversityofNevada
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-01 10:02:00 UTC
Curt Doolittle shared a post.
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-01 09:58:00 UTC
OWN IT. OWN YOURSELF. OWN THE COMMONS. OWN IT.
—“I realized [extreme ownership] was the correct path after listening to John Marks vids back in December. Pop culture has sunk to a state of grand victimhood. Everybody is trying to out-victim everyone else. I’m a victim I’m a victim.
No one is taking responsibility for anything. John Mark made me realize this and I have completely changed myself (I am trying anyway LOL).”— Matt Fahnestock
😉
(beautiful)
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-01 09:58:00 UTC
GENERATIONS AND THE ERAS OF FRAUD
E-Prime = Testimony of My Knowledge (Science=Testimony)
Medieval Thought = Supernatural knowledge
Greco/Roman Thought = Supernormal Knowledge
Germanic Languages = Testimonial (descriptive).
(Germanic=Scandinavian, Germanic, Celtic, Italic)
(Italic(present) = Romance (latin) languages.)
Aristotle RESTORED naturalist thought.
Bacon et all RESTORED naturalist thought.
The Operationalists RESTORED naturalist thought.
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-01 09:56:00 UTC
—“Q: Curtus Maximus. I want to learn more about this. Any suggestions as to where to start?”—Dominic DeLuca
By Curtus Maxiumus
A: This website gives a nice explanation of e-prime. Start with trying to write in E-Prime.
My list of disallowed and allowed words:
DISALLOWED WORDS
be; being; been; am; is; isn’t; are; aren’t; was; wasn’t; were; weren’t;
Contractions formed from a pronoun and a form of to be:
I’m; you’re; we’re; they’re; he’s; she’s; it’s; there’s; here’s; where’s; how’s; what’s; who’s; that’s;
ALLOWED WORDS
The following words, do not derive from forms of to be. Some of these serve similar grammatical functions (see auxiliary verbs).
become; has; have; having; had (I’ve; you’ve); do; does; doing; did; can; could; will; would (they’d); shall; should; ought; may; might; must; remain; equal.
https://www.nobeliefs.com/eprime.htm
NOBELIEFS.COM http://NOBELIEFS.COM
( Maximus: FYI: I also prohibit ‘become’ )
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-01 09:04:00 UTC
OWN IT – YOURSELF, YOURS, AND ALL COMMONS
—“In short – take responsibility for everything, absolutely everything – and good things will happen. Don’t shift blame, don’t talk about how it is the situation’s fault. It is all on you – but in a positive way. This is not to mean that everything that goes wrong is because of you – it means that putting everything on your own shoulders makes good things happen all around. Even when things go badly, take the responsibility – and it makes it easier to deal with.”—-
Source date (UTC): 2019-01-31 22:23:00 UTC
Bill Joslin
IMO korzybski devised a way to enact an essentially relativistic and nihilists position.
The brilliance of this tool, again IMO , was grounding e-prime into a standard criteria i.e. operationalism. By doing so it closes the door to the relativistic, nihilistic uses.
Further to that, e-prime strongly couples our speech and thought to the operational criteria. But if left at this alone, I think it would suffer the same flaws as logical positivism…
By expanding the criteria into multiple dimensions, we don’t reduce our warrant (speech and thought) to overly restrictive limitations (i.e. cherry picking, erroneous or undue dismissiveness.)
The last component , acknowledging truth as an approximation (as per Curt’s view) prevents us from undue certainty and dogmatically held assertions of “truth”.
So
– E-prime eliminates unfounded assertions
– Operationalism eliminates relativistic nihilistic application
– Expanded operationalism (testimonial criteria) eliminates myopic limitations (undue dismissiveness)
– And provisional truth theories eliminate dogmatic assertions of certainty.
– The first contributor did the light lifting – nothing really
– The second (Bridgeman) cross the major threshold
– Curt and his community (assuming other contributed – Curzon etc) the the heavy lifting
Source date (UTC): 2019-01-31 22:19:00 UTC
HUMOR
—“You’ll enjoy this. My son approached me the other day about sharing a meme (the IRS one) from someone who is considered “problematic.” I gently explained that we’d been friends for years and I saw nothing wrong with the post. But it is YOU he was objecting to. At least he’s not throwing a tantrum over it.
Just wanted to make sure you realize he is almost 40.
He was telling me I shouldn’t share it because you are “problematic.” He then proceeded to quote from the Propertarian website. He knew exactly what he was doing.”—
This is one of my long time female followers.
lol
Source date (UTC): 2019-01-31 21:59:00 UTC