Curt Doolittle

Source: Facebook

  • The truth is always anti-something or other. Otherwise we wouldn’t need it

    The truth is always

    anti-something or other.

    Otherwise we wouldn’t need it.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-01 13:01:00 UTC

  • TEST OF ABRAHAMIC RELIGION What are priests selling in exchange for income and s

    TEST OF ABRAHAMIC RELIGION

    What are priests selling in exchange for income and status?

    Is christianity history or mythology, true or poetic?

    Is there life after death or not?

    Is it truly wisdom or is it a means of self deception?

    If you learned stoicism instead of christianity, and if you learned history and science instead of mythology and supernaturalism would you and your people live a better life?

    Why did we rise out of superstition ignorance and poverty once we restored aristotelian thought, and literacy rather than semitic thought and illiteracy?

    Why did we have such a drastic increase in quality of life after the church was no longer able to prey upon the people through rents and tithes?

    Why are we vulnerable to marxism, postmodernism, and feminism if it is not for christianity?

    Why is christianity taught and argued using the same techniques as marxism, postmodernism, and feminism?

    Why do christians let our people be conquered rather than fight like the pagans do?

    Why are pagans and atheists so desirous of conflict and the christians cowardice?

    TEST OF RECIPROCITY

    Productive (fail) it’s parasitic.

    Fully informed (fail) it’s totally false.

    Warrantied (fail) they can’t warranty supernatural.

    Voluntary (fail) threat if you don’t comply

    Free of Externality: the externalities are suicidal.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-01 09:51:00 UTC

  • u·su·ry [ˈyo͞oZH(ə)rē] NOUN the illegal action or practice of lending money at u

    u·su·ry

    [ˈyo͞oZH(ə)rē]

    NOUN

    the illegal action or practice of lending money at unreasonably high rates of interest.

    Why would there be laws against excessive interest rates?

    1. I loan you money. you pay me many times the original amount. and you can’t catch up, ever…..

    2. I loan you money, you cant pay, I take your house….

    3. I loan you money, you can’t pay, you have to resort to crime, others are harmed….

    In each of these circumstances the public is now carrying you as a burden, while the usurer is free riding on the public because he succeeded in baited you into moral hazard. As such it breaks the prohibition on negative externality.

    It breaks productivity by benefitting disproportionately from the suffering of others.

    It breaks asymmetry of information by asymmetry of incentive (taking advantage of the moment).

    The actor has no material skin in the game and no warranty. So we say instead the usurer has a negative due diligence.

    It’s “baiting into moral hazard.”

    TEST OF RECIPROCITY (Morality):

    Productive, (fail)

    Fully Informed (baited into optimism)

    Warrantied, (fail)

    Voluntary Transfer (“under duress”)

    Free of Negative Externality (fail)

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-01 09:44:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/53084598_10157020137832264_263703139

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/53084598_10157020137832264_2637031399151894528_o_10157020137827264.jpg Via @[525087895:2048:James Santagata]

    (humor)James SantagataIt was Darren O’Connor. 😂Mar 1, 2019, 9:23 AMDarren O’ConnorOh, I can’t take credit for it…just a humble sharer.Mar 1, 2019, 9:40 AMJames SantagataOne of the best ones this year!Mar 1, 2019, 10:05 AMMartin ŠtěpánHigh mutational load. People ugly on the outside are likely to be ugly on the inside too, despite everything we’re being told. It’s actually the whole reason we perceive them as ugly in the first place.Mar 1, 2019, 10:18 AMMark Di RussoLiterally a Roman neckbeard. I’d not be surprised if he shared their sexual proclivities too.. 😏Mar 1, 2019, 10:35 AMJB BurnsNero looks like hes part of the Odoyle family in Billy MadisonMar 1, 2019, 10:52 AMAlain DwightGuy who ordered Seneca to kill himself would be a neck beard.Mar 1, 2019, 12:37 PMNathan McLaughlinJames LynchMar 1, 2019, 1:54 PMPatrick SmythMark Di Russo pretty sure he did…Mar 1, 2019, 2:38 PMNick HeywoodBoth have been accused of Satan 🙂

    Will the real Satan, please stand up?!?!Mar 1, 2019, 5:40 PMChristian WarwickVery Cro-magnon features.Mar 1, 2019, 6:19 PMBrendan McGlynnJeff SevercoolMar 1, 2019, 6:50 PMBen FrayleGreatest Artistic Genius in Human History. World champion poet, dramatist, musician, wrestler, chariot racer. … everything he did he was the best. Sort of like the Howard Hughes of Ancient Rome.Mar 1, 2019, 7:27 PMMarko KlaicFed trying to be funnyMar 4, 2019, 5:32 AMVia James Santagata

    (humor)

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-01 09:23:00 UTC

  • so·cial·ite [ˈsōSHəˌlīt] NOUN socialites (plural noun) —“a [female] person who

    so·cial·ite

    [ˈsōSHəˌlīt]

    NOUN

    socialites (plural noun)

    —“a [female] person who is well known in fashionable society and is fond of social activities and entertainment.”–

    (ie: A Seller)

    Synonyms

    —“a [male] person who is known as a ladies’ man, womanizer, philanderer, rake, roué, rich man about town, ladykiller”—

    ( ie: A Buyer)

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-01 09:22:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/53292243_10157020122247264_150357994

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/53292243_10157020122247264_1503579947665457152_n_10157020122242264.jpg SCIENCE OF BEER GOGGLES

    (I’m only guilty once.)Jaromír MiškovskýBag over head now Appstore iBag™.Mar 1, 2019, 10:09 AMEric Blankenburghttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O_a3oY1ND_8Mar 1, 2019, 11:11 AMSCIENCE OF BEER GOGGLES

    (I’m only guilty once.)

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-01 09:12:00 UTC

  • “Markets in everything is not how we want it to be. Markets in everything is how

    —“Markets in everything is not how we want it to be. Markets in everything is how we already are without externals forcing to be behave otherwise.”—Stephen Thomas

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-01 09:10:00 UTC

  • ECONOMICS IS THE STUDY OF PEOPLE by Stephen Thomas (mutliple quotables in this o

    ECONOMICS IS THE STUDY OF PEOPLE

    by Stephen Thomas

    (mutliple quotables in this one)

    Economics is not really the study of money or financial systems. It’s the study of people and groups and the behaviors of each/both.

    The more I have studied it. The more I realize. I am not learning about anything other than people. The People are the market.

    Markets in everything is not how we want it to be. Markets in everything is how we already are without externals forcing to be behave otherwise.

    Need(desire) > Incentive(demand) > Motivation > Action > Result(Failure/Success) > Need(desire)

    This seems to be the cycle of nearly all human actions.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-01 09:09:00 UTC

  • YES PSYCHOLOGY IS PLAGUED BY PSEUDOSCIENCE AND YES THE REPLICATION CRISIS DESTRO

    YES PSYCHOLOGY IS PLAGUED BY PSEUDOSCIENCE AND YES THE REPLICATION CRISIS DESTROYED ITS CREDIBILITY

    ‏

    —“Paper finds evidence that the reproducibility crisis may already have damaged the trust in psychological science and the perception of its value among lay people beyond repair. https://osf.io/4ukq5 “— Rolf Degen

    It has in both Psych. and Soc. Cog-Sci Won. Better model is neural networks, neural economy, the Homunculus, hemispheric competition (predatory prey), gender differences, reward systems, division of labor, and that all human behavior is expressible as acquisition using economics.

    In other words, if you can’t explain human behavior in economic language you’re projecting judgements (biases) to conformity on what is a division of perception, cognition, memory, advocacy, and labor.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-01 08:35:00 UTC

  • WEAPONIZED GYNOCENTRISM by JWarren Prescott The primary neurochemical for the pl

    WEAPONIZED GYNOCENTRISM

    by JWarren Prescott

    The primary neurochemical for the pleasure response is dopamine.

    Yes, it’s evolutionary, however, political power triggers not only dopamine but testosterone in both men and women.

    Then the dominance/submissiveness hierarchy further rewards individuals as they gain dominance and penalizes them as they lose dominance.

    Too much dopamine disrupts normal cognitive function and emotions giving rise to errors in judgment and erratic behavior.

    While it is true that Men are better suited to handle higher levels of testosterone, women have a greater sensitivity to it.

    Addicted to power? Yeah, pretty much.

    Now, clear the path to political power by legitimizing victimhood and philanthropy and you have just weaponized gynocentrism.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-28 18:48:00 UTC