Curt Doolittle

Source: Facebook

  • Curt Doolittle shared a post

    Curt Doolittle shared a post.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-02 10:46:00 UTC

  • Revolt. Separate. Prosper. Speciate

    Revolt. Separate. Prosper. Speciate.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-02 10:42:00 UTC

  • Untitled

    http://amzn.to/2CDBzj7

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-02 10:41:00 UTC

  • Frederick, IMO (selfishly on my part ) one of your best papers – success and fai

    https://www.academia.edu/…/Are_Institutions_Created_by_Coll…Danny Frederick,

    IMO (selfishly on my part ) one of your best papers – success and failure of institutions being near and dear to my heart.

    RE: https://www.academia.edu/38466999/Are_Institutions_Created_by_Collective_Acceptance?

    CONTEXT QUESTION

    0. Could be a little more ‘bold’ in the abstract, because the question you are trying to answer is relevant to the urgent present condition – abstract under rates the argument? My understanding is that you consistently address the arguments of other authors in proper academic fashion, but do you tie your work back to general theory, or general arguments? Or do you intend your audience to interpret each paper in a vacuum rather than as a collection of your works in defense or advocacy of a theory?

    ANSWERED QUESTION

    1. Attributing greater agency to people than they have? (not sure if this is answered)

    2. Do institutions(producers) rules (products) and actions (services) fulfill a market demand or fail to fulfill a market demand? (answered)

    3. Is the failure to fulfill a market demand due to (a) contrary to demand, (b) limiting demand, (c) assisting demand? (answered)

    UNANSWERED QUESTION

    5. Do you mean to say that status is assigned or that institutions can provide a vehicle for signaling by virtue of either the coercive power delivered to their members or success at competing within the limits of those coercive powers?

    6. Is the market demand determined by Moral Intuitions (group strategies), Ethical Intuitions (Organizational Strategies), or Generational, or Gender intuitions (strategies)?

    7. Are the Neocon, Marxist, Libertarian, Postmodern, Feminist movements made possible by temporary economic windfalls from hydrocarbons, the industrial and technological revolutions lasting only until asymmetry of underclasses and technology is ameliorated by regression to the mean? And is that the underlying conflict?

    8. Are we not only discovering that this luxury makes females and males diverge in demonstration of genetic interests (rather than converge as the left anticipated), but that groups within empires and nation states are seeking expression of genetic interests generating unresolvable conflict of interest?

    9. What equilibrium must be established to move in any given direction from existing intellectual, narrative, economic, political, social, and familial orders?

    10. Is there any value of scale, or (as in the ancient world) do we regress to the mean and decline slowly in order to preserve what we perceive as benefits of institutional and political scale?

    thanks.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-02 10:36:00 UTC

  • GOVERNMENT UNDER PROPERTARIANISM, NOT PROPERTARIAN GOVERNMENT. (AND THE ABSOLUTI

    GOVERNMENT UNDER PROPERTARIANISM, NOT PROPERTARIAN GOVERNMENT. (AND THE ABSOLUTIST QUESTION)

    (core)

    Propertarianism consists of a methodology for producing truthful, rational, reciprocal, commensurable fully accounted speech that all but prohibits error, bias, deceit, and fraud. And the application of that method to the scope of human knowledge, producing a universal vocabulary and grammar commensurable across all disciplines.

    With this methodology, applied to law, you can produce arguments, constitutions and bodies of law, that are fully commensurable, fully accounted, and prohibit error, bias, deceit, and fraud.

    With these arguments, constitutions, and bodies of law you can produce any form of government – you just must do so truthfully with full accounting and transparency.

    There is no ideal form of government because different forms of government are more or less suitable to different demographic distributions, degrees of neoteny, states of cooperative (middle class) development, and more or less suitable to times of war, peace, and windfalls.

    There is however, an optimum system of government for european peoples, and any other peoples who wish to produce european standards of life, because this form of government provides the greatest limitation on rents, greatest incentive for production distribution and trade, and the greatest adaptability to change, greatest rates of innovation, and the greatest shared rewards (commons) because of all of the above.

    That system of government consists in:

    A Federation (nomocracy).

    Of Nation States.

    Under Rule of Law:

    …Federally Limited to material conflicts between polities.

    …Locally unlimited production of commons.

    …Each Administered by an Independent Judiciary.

    And Defended by:

    …A Universal militia

    …In Regimental Orders

    …And a Cadre of Professional Warriors.

    And either Limited Monarchy:

    …A Hereditary Monarchy

    …A Professional Cabinet

    …Houses of Juries by Class (assent, veto)

    …Privatized Bureaucracies

    Or Narrowly Participatory Monarchy:

    …A Hereditary Monarchy (assent, veto)

    …A Professional Cabinet

    …Houses as a Market between Classes (market)

    …Privatized Bureaucracies

    Or Broadly Participatory Monarchy:

    …A Hereditary Monarchy (assent, veto)

    …A Professional Cabinet

    …Virtual Houses as a Market between Classes (market)

    …Privatized Bureaucracies

    With each state producing commons suitable to the interests and desires of the people.

    I work under the model of progressive decline in sovereignty given ability to organize. The lesson of the soviet model is that

    (Authoritarian )

    Monarchy

    Military

    Warriors

    Judiciary

    Sheriffs

    Police

    (Market)

    Finance, Scientific Elites, Academic Elites

    Entrepreneur, Scientists, Professors

    professional, researchers, teachers

    administrator, research assistants, media.

    (Mixed Market)

    craftsman,

    laborer,

    dependents,

    (Non-Market)

    Soldiers

    Serfs

    Slaves

    Prisoners

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-02 10:25:00 UTC

  • Untitled

    https://m.dailykos.com/stories/2019/2/22/1837028/-NC-court-invalidates-voter-ID-amendment-because-it-was-passed-by-illegally-gerrymandered-legislature

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-02 09:47:00 UTC

  • Untitled

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b3YTUotj0VY

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-02 09:46:00 UTC

  • COURSE UPDATE: LAW103 – Foundations. You are going to love this course. It break

    COURSE UPDATE: LAW103 – Foundations.

    You are going to love this course. It breaks the methodology in to very clear layers, and the outcome is a sort of cheat sheet of definitions, and methods for vocabulary, statements, arguments, and laws. I am pretty sure we’ve succeeded in making it ‘learnable’.

    … Back on antibiotics again. Too much sniffling and sneezing to record the audio today.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-02 09:45:00 UTC

  • Danny, IMO (selfishly on my part ) one of your best papers – success and failure

    Danny,

    IMO (selfishly on my part ) one of your best papers – success and failure of institutions being near and dear to my heart.

    RE: https://www.academia.edu/38466999/Are_Institutions_Created_by_Collective_Acceptance?

    CONTEXT QUESTION

    0. Could be a little more ‘bold’ in the abstract, because the question you are trying to answer is relevant to the urgent present condition – abstract under rates the argument? My understanding is that you consistently address the arguments of other authors in proper academic fashion, but do you tie your work back to general theory, or general arguments? Or do you intend your audience to interpret each paper in a vacuum rather than as a collection of your works in defense or advocacy of a theory?

    ANSWERED QUESTION

    1. Attributing greater agency to people than they have? (not sure if this is answered)

    2. Do institutions(producers) rules (products) and actions (services) fulfill a market demand or fail to fulfill a market demand? (answered)

    3. Is the failure to fulfill a market demand due to (a) contrary to demand, (b) limiting demand, (c) assisting demand? (answered)

    UNANSWERED QUESTION

    5. Do you mean to say that status is assigned or that institutions can provide a vehicle for signaling by virtue of either the coercive power delivered to their members or success at competing within the limits of those coercive powers?

    6. Is the market demand determined by Moral Intuitions (group strategies), Ethical Intuitions (Organizational Strategies), or Generational, or Gender intuitions (strategies)?

    7. Are the Neocon, Marxist, Libertarian, Postmodern, Feminist movements made possible by temporary economic windfalls from hydrocarbons, the industrial and technological revolutions lasting only until asymmetry of underclasses and technology is ameliorated by regression to the mean? And is that the underlying conflict?

    8. Are we not only discovering that this luxury makes females and males diverge in demonstration of genetic interests (rather than converge as the left anticipated), but that groups within empires and nation states are seeking expression of genetic interests generating unresolvable conflict of interest?

    9. What equilibrium must be established to move in any given direction from existing intellectual, narrative, economic, political, social, and familial orders?

    10. Is there any value of scale, or (as in the ancient world) do we regress to the mean and decline slowly in order to preserve what we perceive as benefits of institutional and political scale?

    thanks.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-02 09:19:00 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle shared a post

    Curt Doolittle shared a post.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-01 14:01:00 UTC