Source: Facebook

  • THE UNIVERSE IS GODLESS. THE MIND OF MAN IS NOT. AND WE CAN CHANGE THE UNIVERSE.

    THE UNIVERSE IS GODLESS. THE MIND OF MAN IS NOT. AND WE CAN CHANGE THE UNIVERSE.

    —“How does one cope with this fact? Like why acquire agency for the sake of acquiring it? I know you’ve mentioned that philosophy answers this for us – would you care to elaborate?”—Yiannis Kontinopoulos

    TO WORK TOGETHER TO BECOME THE GODS WE DESIRE.

    That is the end result of the Natural Law.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-28 14:16:00 UTC

  • THE UNIVERSE IS GODLESS. THE MIND OF MAN IS NOT How many proposed proposed chris

    THE UNIVERSE IS GODLESS. THE MIND OF MAN IS NOT

    How many proposed proposed christian structures have there been? They’ve all been wrong, right? Instead, we see a largely dead, empty universe, where man is irrelevant, nearly all of which is hostile to life, organized by very simple rules – rules which mean there is no information outside of the universe itself, and nothing exists other than the universe itself, boringly contracting and expanding in time cycles so vast that they are meaningless for any and all life within them and ending any and all life within them. We should se SOME evidence of supernatural power somewhere. instead we see tedious forces of energy in motion desperately trying to exhaust itself.

    GODS EXIST AS INFORMATION


    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-28 14:07:00 UTC

  • WHY? Because Meaningful can only refer to physically, emotionally, cognitively a

    WHY?

    Because Meaningful can only refer to physically, emotionally, cognitively actionable.

    It’s just like rational. All Actions are Rational. All that is Meaningful is Actionable. We aren’t capable of anything else.

    We cherry pick the scope of actions, rationality, and meaning to suit our attempts at persuasion.

    But when fully accounted, all actions include the physical, emotional, and cognitive, all that which is meaningful is actionable, and all actions are rational.

    The hard part is figuring out why someone made a rational action.

    A lot of the time it’s just frustration budgets: emotions.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-28 14:04:00 UTC

  • Aug 28, 2019, 11:36 AM

    https://propertarianism.com/contact-2/Updated Aug 28, 2019, 11:36 AM


    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-28 11:36:00 UTC

  • “SHARING IS GOOD, BUT COPY-PASTING IS BETTER” (a word from CurtD) Given recent t

    “SHARING IS GOOD, BUT COPY-PASTING IS BETTER”

    (a word from CurtD)

    Given recent trends and events in social media, please copy-paste and @Mention Doolittle’s work.

    We are going to keep taboo subjects off this platform and limit them to those platforms that tolerate discussion of the Taboo subjects.

    But given the number of people who archive these posts for future use, please copy paste – although Curt points out that he tends to edit a post over the course of the day as feedback or edits arrive.

    Cheers


    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-28 11:28:00 UTC

  • TELEGRAM GROUP Aug 27, 2019, 10:08 AM

    https://t.me/friendsofpropertarianismOUR TELEGRAM GROUP

    https://t.me/friendsofpropertarianismUpdated Aug 27, 2019, 10:08 AM


    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-27 10:08:00 UTC

  • NO LAW – A VIA NEGATIVA – IS NOT ENOUGH. BUT WHAT RELIGIOUS STRATEGY, NARRATIVE,

    NO LAW – A VIA NEGATIVA – IS NOT ENOUGH. BUT WHAT RELIGIOUS STRATEGY, NARRATIVE, GRAMMAR, AND DEBT ARE SO?

    (important)

    Of the spectrum of Grammars I know of, including but not limited to: Supernatural, Mythical, Literary, Ideal, Magical, Pseudoscientific, Fictional, Ordinary Language, Written Language, Testimonial Language, Legal, Economic, Mathematic, Economic (Models), Algorithms, Engineering, Medical Protocols, Accounting, Finance, Logic, Mathematics and Arithmetic:

    a) Both Law and Morality evidentially reflexive and coevolutionary not hierarchical.

    b) Compare:

    Commodity Money (Proper) and Fiat Money,Credit Money, Money Substitutes

    -vs- Law(proper), and Command, Legislation, Regulation, Arbitrary Ruling

    -vs- Morality (Proper), and Institutionalized Morality, Normative Morality, Individual Morality.

    …. and by disambiguation, question just which ‘law’ or ‘morality’ or ‘money’ one is talking about when one makes an argument about the SERIES’ of law, morality, or money. empirically speaking international law is reciprocity, including oath, truth, duty to perform. Because there are no other requirements between those who are neutral or enemies. While within a polity we are cooperating to produce a portfolio of rights(income, credit) and obligations(expense, debt) the disambiguation of which is beyond the abilities of ordinary people other than a vague sense of ‘proportionality’.

    c) People require a group strategy, and a means of reinforcing it a binding narrative for cognitive decidability (altruistic punishment, non conflict, cooperation, signaling). This binding narrative radically decreases the burden of intuitionistic calculation of trust and standardizes ethical(interpersonal) and moral (extrapersonal) permissible and impermissible display word and deed. Without these SYSTEMS OF MEASUREMENT they will continually conflict (as we see with ‘multiculturalism’ as a means of undermining government, culture, tradition, and civilization) and fracture into races, cults, tribes, and clans decreasing group competitive ability (survivability).

    d) As far as I know, Organized religion vs Traditional Religion, evolved to SEPARATE macro (Politically Organized) groups, so that they could separate and compete (Iranic vs Indo Iranic). In other words, just as warfare has moved from military to economic to religious to propaganda in the modern world, warfare moved from military to economic to religious in the age of Transformation.

    e) As far as I know Political Law versus Customary Law evolved in response to governance of heterogeneous people (Middle east), beginning with normalizing punishments to prevent retaliation cycles between clans and tribes with different traditional standards of punishment. In other words, we are more sensitive to differences in punishment (altruistic punishment, especially) than we are to the content of proscribed norms themselves.

    f) As far as I know Historical Mythology serves as mythos (binding narrative) for successful peoples Ancient Europeans and all East asians (and arguably egyptians). Given our new understanding of the origin of middle eastern religion as an evolution of the burial, and it’s nexus as a trade route between the continents, it is easier to understand how pilgrimage, heavens, supernaturalism and authoritarianism evolved in that region amid the continuous wars between so many non-kin. Both christianity and buddhism were forcibly imposed by the governments after multiple failures in order to create a docile populace. In other words, those who need false gods are those who have no worthy ancestors, and have not obtained sufficient control of territory via organization, economics, culture, tradition, and warfare to create an historical mythos and their binding narrative institutions, while those of us who have need no fictitious myths and their binding narrative institutions.

    g) So the question is that given the spectrum of inherited debt-respect from 1- nature, ancestor, hero, founder, nation, in a binding narrative, producing knowledge wisdom and correspondence to reality to 2- Idealism, Literary characters in Character and Role Archetypes and Anthropomorphic Archetypes, to 3- Fantastical, supernatural, non-rational, authoritarian, ignorance-inducing non-correspondence with and active denial of reality.

    h) And so Territorial, Political, Economic, Demographic, Genetic Differences all generate Demand for a Binding Literature of the WEAK, the Powerless, the ABLE, and the POWERFUL – but in no case does this appear to be other than a portfolio of literatures except islam and judaism. In western civilization we have, as most have, relied upon Our ancient Heathen myths (childhood, family), Traditional Myths, Political Religions (formal Myths), Law (social and economic rules), Literary (temporary myths), and Fashions (ever expiring myths). And in western civilization and to a lesser degree in eastern civilization we have done so. The major difference being that the southeast and east were not conquered by Semitic Heterogeneous Political Religions, and preserved their natural religion (and justifiably consider us foolish for ours).

    i) And I cannot tell the difference between the addiction response by a herd of people practicing ritualizing a falsehood despite reality, and a tribe of people and their addiction response TO ONE ANOTHER AND THEIR HISTORY. Other than … that drugs sedate us, and drugs that escape from reality are desirable even if destructive.

    j) As such I will continue my efforts to create the optimum Science, Law, Tradition, Religion for my people and mankind that are the least infected by falsehood and the production of submission, ignorance, vulnerability, and dysgenia. 😉

    Do you see that it’s disambiguation and testimony I practice, and that the outcome of doing so is Natural Law – but what trades and portfolios we construct within that Natural Law’s requirement for reciprocity within the limits of proportionality are infinitely malleable.



    In response to:

    Culture Precedes Law by Troy Camplin

    https://medium.com/@troycamplin/culture-precedes-law-183763eaa861


    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-27 10:03:00 UTC

  • (OMG I am getting so much more work done, this is fking awesome)

    (OMG I am getting so much more work done, this is fking awesome)


    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-26 15:55:00 UTC

  • THE MEANING OF LAW (read this) Aug 25, 2019, 3:21 PM

    https://propertarianism.com/2019/02/27/hierarchy-of-laws-core/CORE: THE MEANING OF LAW

    (read this)

    https://propertarianism.com/2019/02/27/hierarchy-of-laws-core/Updated Aug 25, 2019, 3:21 PM


    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-25 15:21:00 UTC

  • SORRY ALL BUT, NO. RATE OF MUTATION TELLS US LITTLE OTHER THAN TIME. (a) mutatio

    SORRY ALL BUT, NO. RATE OF MUTATION TELLS US LITTLE OTHER THAN TIME.

    (a) mutation rate != yardage (or any other linear measure)

    (b) some mutations (cortical scale) are profoundly differentiating – just one gene. (20% of neurons in the cortex are regulatory That number increases by region. The same is true for genes. It certainly appears that the vast majority are either dead (not expressed) or regulatory. We don’t know what percent are expressed. So all mutation rate tells us is time difference it does not tell us difference in genetic expression.

    (c) some are profoundly consequential (delay in maturity : neoteny – just hormonal development is largely what varies between human races)

    (d) Genes do not produce linear effects (machine parts) but are causally dense (program code) with anything from zero consequence (noise, or regulatory), some of tiny consequence (rates of expression), and some profound.

    (e) One Single Additional Protein (molecular machine) may cause billions of consequences.

    So;

    (f) Of our evolutionary history, regardless of the RATE of migration, it could be only .001% of those mutations that cause 99.999% of competitive evolutionary variations.

    (g) we make a big deal out of 3% difference from chimpanzees but we have no idea the scale of difference provided by each of those variations. intelligence appears to be affected by hundreds if not thousands (a concert problem). Neoteny appears not to be (a small number of hormonal channels). Yet together the effect of these two sets is profound with just small changes.

    (h) As far as I know almost all evolutionary change is driven by:

    – demand for success in the local environment (ie: black resistance to malaria).

    – failure in the local environment (loss of height in southeast islands, loss of fire making, tool making, by austronesians.)

    – utility (white consumption of milk adding 40% more calories to the diet)

    – social animal sortition (variations in demand for competitive traits)

    – age of the carriers (rate of mutation or degradation)

    – errors in replication (genes – which happen all the time – cancer etc )

    – conflicts in integration (male and female genes)

    – random mutations.

    – combinations of all of the above.

    On statistics:

    There isn’t much evidence that we are capable of using statistics on any causally dense phenomenon with any greater precision than a single regression. Period.

    YOU CAN’T AVERAGE AN AVERAGE, and STATISTICS MUST BE OPERATIONALLY EXPLICABLE OR THEY’RE MEANINGLESS. (correlation is not causation, and operations produce correlations)

    You have to explain both to make a truth claim.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-25 12:33:00 UTC