Source: Facebook

  • “As our ability to select that which is in accordance with truth increases, we c

    —“As our ability to select that which is in accordance with truth increases, we converge on godhood, whereas I define God (Gnon) as the self-organizing system of the Universe, the invisible hand of nature.”— Martin Štěpán


    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-31 08:29:00 UTC

  • Updated Aug 30, 2019, 9:02 PM

    Updated Aug 30, 2019, 9:02 PM


    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-30 21:02:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_dJ9jhts2Ng/69333466_457221454874750_32709530757

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_dJ9jhts2Ng/69333466_457221454874750_32709530757

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_dJ9jhts2Ng/69333466_457221454874750_3270953075799490560_n_457221451541417.jpg #RECIPROCITY ;)#RECIPROCITY 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-30 14:53:00 UTC

  • THE RULES OF CONSCIOUSNESS WHEREAS 1. Our attention rotates in a competition bet

    THE RULES OF CONSCIOUSNESS

    WHEREAS

    1. Our attention rotates in a competition between sensation(observation and construction by prediction and reward identification), imagination (possibility by association), holding attention on a goal (possibility by continuous opportunity seizure), and releasing predicted actions (in pursuit of the goal).

    WHEREAS

    2. We rotate between sensation (observation and construction by prediction), anticipating (goal prediction), and storing (remembering by stimulating and rehearsing), on a 1/10th of a second rotation (Theta) creating competition and choice.

    AND WHEREAS

    3. There is no observer, other than memory of an observation.

    4. There are no observations other than sequences.

    5. There is no comparison of observations other than to previous sequences.

    6. There is no order in sequences other than that created by sequences.

    7. There are no sequences other than those of sensations.

    8. There is no existence sensed, other than those changes in time.

    9. Without change we cannot sense time.

    THEREFORE

    Existence is a verb

    Experience is a verb

    Imagination is a verb

    Consciousness is a verb.

    Because Acting is a verb – and we can only act in time.

    AND THEREFORE

    Without action, we produce no existence, no experience, no sequence, no memory, no consciousness.

    AND THEREFORE

    There is no observer other than the observations (hierarchy of increasing of sequences of memories in time.

    AND THEREFORE

    We see what the camera sees.

    We do not record images, but sequences of related stimuli.

    “I AM, MEANING, I EXIST AS, THE HIERARCHY OF MY MEMORY IN MOTION”


    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-30 14:51:00 UTC

  • The problem is, that the computational power of wetware is just far higher than

    The problem is, that the computational power of wetware is just far higher than hardware, but hardware is more durable in hostile conditions than wetware. Jello just isn’t that rigid.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-30 11:16:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_dJ9jhts2Ng/69379596_457129061550656_35712528941

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_dJ9jhts2Ng/69379596_457129061550656_35712528941

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_dJ9jhts2Ng/69379596_457129061550656_3571252894168514560_n_457129058217323.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_dJ9jhts2Ng/69242653_457129144883981_3019743307694604288_n_457129141550648.jpg PEA BRAINS ARE A REAL THING NOW

    (science humor)(but yeah, really)

    https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2019/08/190829150824.htm


    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-30 11:08:00 UTC

  • @JakeWojtowicz Influential among philosophers, Intellectuals, Politicians – or a

    @JakeWojtowicz

    Influential among philosophers, Intellectuals, Politicians – or among common people? Some of us work in R&D (like Research Academics), and some in Education (like Teaching Academics). Stefan is by far the most popular Teacher reaching the most people – by far.

    By that logic,shouldn’t Mark Dice,Crowder,Shapiro,Peterson be put above Stefan in reach according to ur criteria”—Checkov Pavlov @slimshadyrap98

    There is, empirically, a demarcation between philosopher/philosophizing the demarcation is a) the internal consistency (grammar of constant relations) that the speaker relies upon for his arguments and b) the publication of a work of at least one novel idea in that grammar.

    There is a demarcation between a philosopher and public intellectual, in the USE of that grammar of constant relations.

    My specialty is the disambiguation of science (operationalism), natural law, rational philosophy, justificationism, sophism, pseudoscience and supernaturalism.

    You just engaged in conflationa and sophism in the Abrahamic (GSRRM, Pilpul, Critique). And it’s unlikely that the others you mentioned know the difference. Peterson practices science but relies on suggestion using wisdom lit rather than operationalism. Borderline theology.

    You can claim that Stefan didn’t produce a durable work of philosophy – and that would be true (Zizek either). And that it is difficult to disambiguate from self help (wisdom) rather than decidability (truth). But he practices the grammar of philosophy, and has produced a work.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-29 11:27:00 UTC

  • NATURAL LAW IS A GUIDELINE FOR AN INDIVIDUAL’S PLACE, RIGHTS AND RESPONSIBILITIE

    NATURAL LAW IS A GUIDELINE FOR AN INDIVIDUAL’S PLACE, RIGHTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES

    —“Even many Christians, when they put on their “I can Science too” hat tend to differ to the notion of whether life is special and unique on this dead rock that orbits this dead star, in this dead galaxy in this dead universe. …. (Looking for brick wall). /breathe… Natural Law, the understanding of it, is a guideline for an individual’s place, rights and responsibilities in and to the universe/reality/household/body they belong to.”—Anne Summers


    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-29 10:04:00 UTC

  • INTENSE WORLD THEORY OF AUTISM Aug 29, 2019, 8:57 AM

    https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnhum.2010.00224/fullREPOST – INTENSE WORLD THEORY OF AUTISM

    https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnhum.2010.00224/fullUpdated Aug 29, 2019, 8:57 AM


    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-29 08:57:00 UTC

  • Aug 28, 2019, 10:08 PM

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lv9qHzwsvfMhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lv9qHzwsvfMUpdated Aug 28, 2019, 10:08 PM


    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-28 22:08:00 UTC