Curt Doolittle

Source: Facebook

  • THE END OF THE DISCUSSION OF SOVEREIGNTY LIBERTY AND FREEDOM. ***The law must sa

    THE END OF THE DISCUSSION OF SOVEREIGNTY LIBERTY AND FREEDOM.

    ***The law must satisfy the market for dispute resolution, where property consists in the enumeration of those subjects of conflict having been decided by the law, and where the scope of property insured under the law is determined by the market for dispute resolution. And where reciprocity is always and everywhere decidable under all circumstances under which there is human conflict – because it is purely empirical, purely logical, purely rational, and of evolutionary necessity.***

    Thus endeth the lesson.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-26 15:52:00 UTC

  • UNDERSTANDING MEN OF POWER AND WEALTH 1. Ordinary people cannot comprehend the i

    UNDERSTANDING MEN OF POWER AND WEALTH

    1. Ordinary people cannot comprehend the incentives or minds of men of achievement. The difference is unimaginable. A life lacking agency, and a life made from it produce very different understandings of the world, and possibilities within it.

    2. Just assume you don’t understand.When you pretend that you understand the motives of men of achievement you simply demonstrate that you lack agency sufficient to understand them. To a successful entrepreneur working in hostile markets, Trump is tediously obvious and practical.

    3. You have never had responsibility in corridors of power, where we do not make character judgements of others who are in power, we simply trade favors in order to accomplish our goals. So you are making the mistake that you understand the behavior of men of agency and ….

    4. …. achievement just like many women fail to understand politics. You attribute your emotions values and influence to men who do not share them, as they are of no value to them. Wealth gives independence from the negative, and different opportunities to the positive, but the limit ….

    5. … of wealth is influence. On must buy it somehow, and money is not as helpful once you have it, as influence necessary to change the priorities of others who likewise have money and influence. …

    6 … Power is a market with a currency consisting of the power to influence the priorities of others with power. When one has money and influence the problem is setting the priorities of others in power with a trade for which money alone is insufficient. Favors Matter.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-26 15:39:00 UTC

  • (Yes I have my friends and followers lists. I’ll start restoring those when I ge

    (Yes I have my friends and followers lists. I’ll start restoring those when I get some down time.)

    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-26 15:26:00 UTC

  • MACDONALD “GETS THERE”!!! MacDonald: Genetics, Culture, Academy vs Judaism Duche

    https://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/1089691483/ref=tmm_pap_title_0?ie=UTF8&qid&sr&fbclid=IwAR12RGDl43_3JFfNGkVImaPxs_sRJYOnxU7aBWqH-w8kbAZscAXzv0LbOPAKEVIN MACDONALD “GETS THERE”!!!

    MacDonald: Genetics, Culture, Academy vs Judaism

    Duchesne: Philosophy, Literature vs Marxism

    Doolittle: Law, Testimony, Economics State, vs Abrahamism

    I didn’t know the book came out. But it has. I just bought it, skimmed the TOC, and a few pages, and he’s got most of it. Very well done. I’ll take time and take notes, and publish the notes.

    Actually… Why don’t we do a study group????

    https://l.facebook.com/l.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.amazon.com%2Fgp%2Faw%2Fd%2F1089691483%2Fref%3Dtmm_pap_title_0%3Fie%3DUTF8%26qid%3D%26sr%3D%26fbclid%3DIwAR12RGDl43_3JFfNGkVImaPxs_sRJYOnxU7aBWqH-w8kbAZscAXzv0LbOPA&h=AT1YfdWdIR40vAk3Rrx8jcCqMqnEmdZyuyUv7MRywANRTgUUQ5QcP48wTi8vPtlqW7cNS_4n3RBv7HScEVa-gXHFxyNNRBHPI31oHD1tACZBs-kFzqUmeJhX_WryI1l66FC3QnhHyg

    @[1788976802:2048:Kevin MacDonald]Updated Sep 26, 2019, 2:43 PM

    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-26 14:43:00 UTC

  • THERE IS ONLY ONE EXISTENTIALLY POSSIBLE SYSTEM OF LIBERTARIANISM AND IT IS EURO

    THERE IS ONLY ONE EXISTENTIALLY POSSIBLE SYSTEM OF LIBERTARIANISM AND IT IS EUROPEAN RULE OF LAW OF RECIPROCITY

    (updated)

    Libertarianism in the Western sense is just rule of law. The difference between libertarians (jewish vs european) has been the scope of tort (trespass) that the law must provide resolution of disputes over.

    Rothbardians use intersubjectively verifiable property (material things), and I (following Hayek and Ostrom) include everything at all in which people demonstrate and investment interest (demonstrated interest) over which disputes must be settled.

    The law must satisfy the market for dispute resolution, and the scope of property is determined by the market for dispute resolution. And reciprocity is always and everywhere decidable under all circumstances under which there is human conflict – because it is purely scientific purely logical, and of evolutionary necessity.

    Rothbardianism is just marxism(denial) of the commons instead of marxism(denial) of private property. In other words I use the empirical definition of property (that which people desire we insure) not an arbitrary one (that which is materially scarce).

    This jewish(monopoly, authoritarian) vs european(markets) conflict is consistent across every branch of thought, including the so called Austrian economics of Menger (european) and Mises (jewish) in which Menger merely applied calculus to markets, but mises tried to invent a version of Pilpul (a sophism) in praxeology, when all he had discovered (without knowing it, probably because the insight was not his own) operational falsification in economics.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-26 13:26:00 UTC

  • RECIPROCITY CUTS BOTH WAYS —“Employers need to grant you off for religious hol

    RECIPROCITY CUTS BOTH WAYS

    —“Employers need to grant you off for religious holidays if they think their beliefs are sincere and genuine. So what happens if an employer doubts your religiosity when asking off Rosh Hashanah and Yom Kippur, because you, for instance, don’t keep kosher?”–Ashley Rae Goldenberg @Communism_Kills

    Nope. If you want to burn personal time instead of working, please do but don’t ask employers to pay for your choice, or the loss of the work you should be providing. We can all think of excuses why we’re special. Sincerity isn’t testable, and isn’t meaningful.

    ·

    —“This is about religious holidays dude. Not everyone is Christian so not everyone gets their religious holidays off. It seems like you missed that.”—Ashley Rae Goldenberg

    @Communism_Kills

    I didn’t miss anything. The only Christian holiday is Christmas, and even then, only because it is so familially and commercially influential. All other holidays are secular. If we restored Christian holidays we’d have at least 35.

    There are no exclusively religious work holidays.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-26 07:06:00 UTC

  • WHY DOES RECIPROCITY MAKE LIBERTARIANS BUTTHURT? —“I shared some Curt Doolittl

    WHY DOES RECIPROCITY MAKE LIBERTARIANS BUTTHURT?

    —“I shared some Curt Doolittle posts about reciprocity and libertarians got extremely butthurt. Why is that? When I started talking about the cultivation of self, of yourself as a man, my “friends” from secret groups started trying to get me to denounce what I said and repent in public. Sjw-like behavior. But why?””—Christopher M Matthews

    Because rothbardian libertarianism is an SJW-targeted system of thought, argued with SJW logic, producing another Abrahamic cult of sophism. There is only one source of sovereignty, liberty, and freedom, and that is the natural law of reciprocity, insured by all able bodied men bearing arms. There is nothing more to be said.

    Libertarians won’t pay for the commons, because like those whose immoral ethics and sophomoric reasoning they imitate, they want to parasitically free ride upon the payment for commons by others, just as if they were wandering sheepherders or hunter gatherers with no necessity or responsibility of land holding.

    They don’t somehow grasp, despite some economic understanding, that one must produce sufficient commons to defend against the strongest opponent in the market for territory, polity, and order of their preference.

    So, those that produce greater commons in one way or another (whether predatory, parasitic, or productive) defeat those that do not produce commons sufficient to compete with them.

    Ergo, the market demands at least sufficient funding of commons to preserve sovereignty, liberty, and freedom, and it turns out that holding territory sufficient to create a condition of sovereignty is expensive.

    That is why all those who’ve failed are gone. It’s why there are at present something like 500 dead gods – the tombstones of peoples who failed.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-26 06:29:00 UTC

  • “Every system is either a form of Nomocracy or Kleptocracy.”— via Alain Dwight

    —“Every system is either a form of Nomocracy or Kleptocracy.”— via Alain Dwight

    Or stated Differently: one either lives under rule of law by the natural law of reciprocity or one lives in a kleptocracy.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-25 20:34:00 UTC

  • Most dangerous places to live, 2019. 1. Brazil 2. South Africa 3. Nigeria 4. Arg

    Most dangerous places to live, 2019.

    1. Brazil

    2. South Africa

    3. Nigeria

    4. Argentina

    5. India

    6. Peru

    7. Kenya

    8. Ukraine

    9. Turkey

    10. Colombia

    11. Mexico

    12. UK

    13. Egypt

    14. Philippines

    15. Italy

    16. US

    17. Indonesia

    18. Greece

    19. Kuwait

    20. Thailand

    (InterNations)

    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-25 20:32:00 UTC

  • UM, NO MORE USEFUL IDIOTS. IT’S RULE OF LAW VS NOT —“Markets don’t produce a d

    UM, NO MORE USEFUL IDIOTS. IT’S RULE OF LAW VS NOT

    —“Markets don’t produce a damn thing. People do. Capitalism is killing us.”—psychobabble @terieUSA

    —“Capitalism doesn’t kill us, people do.”—Robert P. Murphy @BobMurphyEcon

    The capitalism vs socialism dichotomy is yet another bit of Pilpul to distract useful idiots. The question is and always will be Rule of Law vs Rule by Discretion.

    Rule of law produces markets limited by externality, where “capitalists” want free trade regardless of externality.

    Socialists drive to produce arbitrary rule disregarding not only the external but the internal, and driving people into the market for corruption, rent seeking, and black markets.

    So the capitalism vs socialism debate distracts us from the west’s origin: Rule of Law by reciprocity.

    (Staying on message: rothbardian libertarianism is just Common Property Marxism – the low trust ethics of sheep herders and the ghetto. No more useful idiots. The only source of Sovereignty, Liberty, or Freedom is Rule of Law insured by every able bodied man bearing arms. Period.

    To answer the original nonsense-argument, that people produce not markets, this is patently false. Rule of Law produces, markets, and markets produce risk takers and organizers, and less and less frequently labor. The value is created by the risk, the organization, and not labor.

    That’s just the evidence. In fact, over the next fifty years the increasing decline in the value of labor will require paying people to not interfere in the market they depend upon because all they are able to do is generate demand for consumption given the disutility of labor.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-25 19:25:00 UTC