THERE IS ONLY ONE EXISTENTIALLY POSSIBLE SYSTEM OF LIBERTARIANISM AND IT IS EURO

THERE IS ONLY ONE EXISTENTIALLY POSSIBLE SYSTEM OF LIBERTARIANISM AND IT IS EUROPEAN RULE OF LAW OF RECIPROCITY

(updated)

Libertarianism in the Western sense is just rule of law. The difference between libertarians (jewish vs european) has been the scope of tort (trespass) that the law must provide resolution of disputes over.

Rothbardians use intersubjectively verifiable property (material things), and I (following Hayek and Ostrom) include everything at all in which people demonstrate and investment interest (demonstrated interest) over which disputes must be settled.

The law must satisfy the market for dispute resolution, and the scope of property is determined by the market for dispute resolution. And reciprocity is always and everywhere decidable under all circumstances under which there is human conflict – because it is purely scientific purely logical, and of evolutionary necessity.

Rothbardianism is just marxism(denial) of the commons instead of marxism(denial) of private property. In other words I use the empirical definition of property (that which people desire we insure) not an arbitrary one (that which is materially scarce).

This jewish(monopoly, authoritarian) vs european(markets) conflict is consistent across every branch of thought, including the so called Austrian economics of Menger (european) and Mises (jewish) in which Menger merely applied calculus to markets, but mises tried to invent a version of Pilpul (a sophism) in praxeology, when all he had discovered (without knowing it, probably because the insight was not his own) operational falsification in economics.