Curt Doolittle

Source: Facebook

  • THE NEEDS AND WANTS OF CAPITAL by Michael Churchill Government is controlled by

    THE NEEDS AND WANTS OF CAPITAL

    by Michael Churchill

    Government is controlled by capital, and capital needs consumption like a mammal needs blood flow. And these days, with birth rates so low, capital is desperate for bodies.

    This is part of why interest rates are negative in Europe and Japan.

    Capital and democracy cannot coexist when CPI is negative, because real wages skyrocket.

    As such, capital must have bodies and it must have a Fed.

    So … capital doesn’t really care THAT much about the fine points of how national governments work. It just wants smooth regulation. What it needs to be able to do is sell stuff to humans, have clean title to assets and repatriate the earnings.

    That’s a pretty low bar actually. Even most of Africa lets you do that.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-29 13:54:00 UTC

  • THE REASON HE FOUNDING FATHERS HAD TO FIGHT by Micah Pezdirtz The founding fathe

    THE REASON HE FOUNDING FATHERS HAD TO FIGHT

    by Micah Pezdirtz

    The founding fathers (jesus) paid the cost of our liberty (salvation). they view liberty as salvation with disregard for temporal limits and recurring cost of maintaining it

    The very reason the founding fathers had to fight is the exact same reason we HAVE to fight now. because people exist who expect to profit on our LACK of freedom, liberty, and sovereignty.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-29 13:37:00 UTC

  • WHAT DO PEOPLE MEAN BY TRUST IN THEIR GOVERNMENT In the political context, when

    WHAT DO PEOPLE MEAN BY TRUST IN THEIR GOVERNMENT

    In the political context, when people are expressing in their government, it only refers to three factors (a) the framing of the debate by the media, academy, state complex, (b) the orderliness or at least comprehensibility of the patterns of speech and (c) the current levels of anxiety for the future.

    In other words, the academy, state, media, create demand by generation of conflict, just as diversity of race, ethnicity, and class generates conflict, just as ideological competition creates conflict. The state generates conflcit for ATTENTION which gets them POWER.

    Trust is a synonym for predictability over time.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-29 13:12:00 UTC

  • ECONOMICS OF CONSUMPTION IS BY DEFINITION LEFTIST Sovereignty demands Reciprocit

    ECONOMICS OF CONSUMPTION IS BY DEFINITION LEFTIST

    Sovereignty demands Reciprocity, where demand for Reciprocity includes all demonstrated interests, whether bodily, family, physical, normative, traditional, informational, or the civic and political institutions that defend them.

    To reinforce the intuition that productivity isn’t observable with a bit more edge: westerners produce commons that other people cannot produce, and we do by NOT DOING evil: lying, misleading, cheating, stealing, free riding, corruption, as much as what we DO: Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Truth, Duty, Heroism.

    So economists (all of whom are leftists) only measure individual consumer goods, not the production of commons: truth, honesty, integrity, contract, quality, civility, responsibility – which is what makes western civilization unique.

    We don’t live in a world where there is a problem of consumption – we have just enabled the world to stampede on a path to hyper-consumption – even of the commons we alone can make, which made their hyper-consumption possible.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-29 12:26:00 UTC

  • All norms tend to be suited to demarcating outsiders, the organization of produc

    All norms tend to be suited to demarcating outsiders, the organization of production, and defense – across all of history. Of those I would say production, defense, outsiders is the order.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-29 11:29:00 UTC

  • “MODERN DAY FOUNDING FATHERS” —“Also since I got your attention, I have never

    “MODERN DAY FOUNDING FATHERS”

    —“Also since I got your attention, I have never felt relief from discovering a political theory but propertarianism is genius. You and John mark are doing amazing work, truly modern day founding fathers. So thank you for doing this. It’s restored my faith for a better tomorrow.”—The Cultural Oncologist @CultureKancer

    Made my day.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-29 11:29:00 UTC

  • P: WE OPERATIONALIZE THE SERIES (Statement) NOT THE ELEMENTS (Evidence) —-“You

    P: WE OPERATIONALIZE THE SERIES (Statement) NOT THE ELEMENTS (Evidence)

    —-“Your proclamation as being scientific is also interesting considering the most interesting of your formulations are extrapolations (grammar “word->word”, non-operational, but well condensed.”— Twitter

    (That’s a great question. Very few people have the insight to ask it.)

    The Methodology:

    Disambiguation by Enumeration, Serialization and Operationalization.

    Serialization provides empirical evidence of the spectrum in a given language, even if some terms must be disambiguated. We operationalize the constant relations expressed in the SERIES, not the elements.

    So if I list the truth spectrum, identify its constant relations, and state them operationally, I have completed the method. (It’s just like geometry, three points make a line, lines are unambiguous).

    Which is why you see me using geometry in everything. It’s a higher (less ambiguous) standard of measurement. Or said differently, geometry constitutes the most complete grammar we have, and sets are a means of producing ideals and sophism. Or better: all language is measurement.

    The question is only the precision of the measures.

    P is the most precise n-dimensional language we have.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-29 11:29:00 UTC

  • A QUESTION ABOUT THE CORTEX —“Does the commensurability of the edge of the cer

    A QUESTION ABOUT THE CORTEX

    —“Does the commensurability of the edge of the cerebral cortex require fractal geometry, like a coastline? Does it have self similarity?”—The Nationalist @Nationalist7346

    No.

    1. the outer layer of the cortex is just a couple of mm thick; consists two functions (what,where), using six layers; divided into columns and modules (groups of columns); homogenous in structure but differing in neural density by physical origin of nerves that enter them.

    2. So no it’s not fractal: the average size of a human cortex, if laid out flat would be approximately the size of a dinner napkin, and just as thick. The rest of the neocortex consists entirely of white matter (nerve fibers: axons) which connect everything to everything.

    3. With the hippocampus consolidating and organizing information, and then using rehearsal (replay) to encode episodes of memory, and thalamus controlling attention (what gets thru to the neocortex for computation, and basal ganglia that surrounds both releasing physical actions.

    4. Most of the advanced functions of the brain consist of these three ‘levers’ and the natural increase in reflection created by increasing brain size, from back (senses) to front (permuting, planning, manipulating). So the brain functions as a series of loops (operating system)

    5. That recursively process a moment of information and merge it with the next moment of information in a continuous stream which we can ‘buffer’ with a half life of just a few seconds, and no more than twenty or so. By Comparison of these moments we discern change in state.

    6. When people say the brain isn’t a computer they’re only a tiny bit right. It does operate in binary (on off) and frequency (hertz), and by competition for attention but with unimaginable numbers of connections in unimaginable parallel, in a continuous loop (OS).

    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-29 11:28:00 UTC

  • ORRGSM IS A RESOURCE, JUST LIKE VIOLENCE GSRRM like Violence for which it is a s

    ORRGSM IS A RESOURCE, JUST LIKE VIOLENCE

    GSRRM like Violence for which it is a substitute, is simply a resource. The question is what you are using the resource for … punishing the dissemination of undesirable truth and demand for reciprocity, or punishing the dissemination of falsehood and ir-reciprocity.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-29 11:28:00 UTC

  • BECAUSE OF THE TECHNIQUE USED TO SELL AND ARGUE THE ABRAHAMIC RELIGIONS —“Can

    BECAUSE OF THE TECHNIQUE USED TO SELL AND ARGUE THE ABRAHAMIC RELIGIONS

    —“Can you explain how that paradigm is Abrahamic?”— Sean-Vernon Sutherland

    (Referring to capitalism vs socialism instead of rule of law and arbitrary rule)

    Using the method of persuasion consisting of false promise, pilpul, and critique (undermining) by which the abrahamic religions of the old world, and the new world: marxism, socialism, feminism, postmodernism, and denialism, with of course, fundamentalist islam persisting.

    It’s the female method of undermining, rather than western masculine truth and reciprocity.

    in effect the abrahamic method (undermining) is the primary competitor to european science and chinese reason. It is the art of lying.

    Study women’s conflict strategy.

    —“I don’t see what that has to do with Abraham.”— Sean-Vernon Sutherland

    Then maybe you don’t need to. Unless you want to learn the different means by which different civilizations conduct their propaganda (mythology) and group strategy then it’s not important for you.

    Just learn the technique, learn the technique of western truth, and every civilization employs a system of argument (persuasion) somewhere between european truth and abrahamic lying, with chinese closest to european, followed by hindustani, followed by buddhist followed by abrahamic (middle eastern, monotheistic, supernatural sophism, and its modern reformation in pseudoscience, and sophism).

    If we use the term rabbinical (who invented it) then we exclude christianity, islam, judaism, marxism, freudianism, boasianism, postmoernism, feminism and denialism (political correctness) which are all constructed by the same means. So we use abahamic to encompass both the first generation of abrahamic sophisms (abrahamic religions) and the second generation (marxism, socialism, postmodernism, feminism, denialism, political correctness).

    This (The Grammars) is one of the foundational methodologies in propertarianism:

    0. Enumeration, Serialization, Disambiguation, and Operationalization

    1. Testimonial Truth and The Grammars of truth and deceit

    2. Reciprocity, Demonstrated Interest

    3. Compatibilism

    4. Strict construction of law

    5. Perfect Government

    There is much more than that but that’s about all people can manage at one time.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-29 11:28:00 UTC