https://www.cnbc.com/2015/11/30/russia-bans-george-soros-charity-as-security-threat.htmlUpdated Sep 30, 2019, 9:50 PM
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-30 21:50:00 UTC
https://www.cnbc.com/2015/11/30/russia-bans-george-soros-charity-as-security-threat.htmlUpdated Sep 30, 2019, 9:50 PM
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-30 21:50:00 UTC
https://www.thepostmillennial.com/antifas-granny-bullying-is-another-hit-to-the-groups-crumbling-public-facade/?fbclid=IwAR36EeGLru9ZIxb0eQU2nTMtskRKus7uDUg8vADpOhZiaACeDPm6CKs4px8Updated Sep 30, 2019, 9:49 PM
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-30 21:49:00 UTC
“Leftism = Consumption made political. (Dysgenic) Any institution or person that promotes “consumption” without reciprocity (parasitism) promotes the very core of “Leftism.”-@[100000806477516:2048:Stephen Thomas]
(via Dax Rayner)Updated Sep 30, 2019, 6:39 PM
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-30 18:39:00 UTC
REDUCING THE CANNON OF THE WEST TO A BIBLE
The west never had a bible, but a canon, and that canon was written in multiple frames although primarily scientific, legal, philosophical, normative, literary, and theological.
While we traditional had rule of law beyond which no leader may tread, we allowed liberalism (even classical liberalism) to violate that traditional law.
Philosophy theology tradition are just narratives that explain a group strategy in a grammar of wishes.
Law is the evidence of what actually occurs, not what is wished for.
Our Founding Fathers, through generations of the english civil wars, sought to reduce that canon to constitution.
But they lacked the skill we developed in the 20th because of programming, the sciences, and the collapse of the philosophical program (yes).
They were successful despite those weaknesses as long as the heroic narrative of the revolution persisted, or what the founders said was dependent upon the moral teachings of the church.
The failure of the church to reform in the face of Darwin and the sciences, the replacement of the church with the academy, the capture of the academy by the immoral left, combined with Anti-whiteness, under guise of privilege, colonialism, and slavery (not unique to whites at all) provided the means of undermining that narrative, and
So we must complete the greco-roman-germanic-anglo-american research program and produce that bible in the form of a constitution such that no narrative can undermine it, without causing our retaliation.
We need to create the white law – a rational, scientific, western competitor to jewish law and muslim sharia. A strict construction from our founding differences: sovereignty and reciprocity, truth and duty, judge and jury, heroism and excellence, family and commons, and the market for voluntary cooperation in all walks of life – that together produce the *social political and economic order most rapidly open to adaptation and innovation*.
We need a constitution and a law closed to interpretation open to innovation, but beyond which no man, private, public, or foreign may tread.
Heroism and excellence, Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Truth, and Duty, Judge and Jury, and markets in all aspects of life: association, cooperation, production, reproduction, commons, polities, and war.
That is the secret to western civilization. Sovereignty.
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-30 18:37:00 UTC
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Si-CVXCc1ok&feature=shareUpdated Sep 30, 2019, 6:07 PM
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-30 18:07:00 UTC
https://medium.com/@predmetskyrosenborg/karl-marx-had-one-insight-and-one-insight-only-follow-the-money-6ae211c8e97fvia Shannon Constantine
“[…] when something really big happens, like a war, the reason it happened is usually (if not always) because some people with a ton of money either allowed it to happen or caused it to happen, and not because “the people” were inspired by certain moral ideals. In general what we’re taught in school about wars like the Civil War or World War II are reduced to simplistic, absurd moralistic narratives that are far removed from the more purely financial and geopolitical forces that caused it to happen. Abraham Lincoln did not really care about slaves, and he did not think that blacks were capable of democracy. His reasons for going to war were financial. Likewise, early presidents and Founding Fathers did concede that slavery was undesirable and that they would like to see it abolished, but they did not do so for economic reasons.”Updated Sep 30, 2019, 4:23 PM
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-30 16:23:00 UTC
—“The young talent we have beats anywhere else”—Erik Lukovsky
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-30 14:37:00 UTC
Updated Sep 30, 2019, 2:07 PM
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-30 14:07:00 UTC
Updated Sep 30, 2019, 1:53 PM
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-30 13:53:00 UTC
VERY IMPORTANT
(Regarding Economic Reform)
Ordinary people need elites, and elites need ordinary people unless dis-intermediated by capital. So end disintermediation by capital and you restore the reciprocal dependence of elites upon ordinary people. So in order to prevent elites from defecting from their ordinary people the people must prevent disintermediation their from elites by capital. How is this done? Relatively easily. Especially with full accounting of changes in capital.
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-29 19:29:00 UTC