Source: Facebook

  • Boettke Quoting Evans: Priceless “Whether we “blame” central bankers or not is r

    Boettke Quoting Evans: Priceless

    “Whether we “blame” central bankers or not is really a secondary consideration to our attempts to understand what happened and why. By assigning blame we suggest that the Fed should have done better. … But the problem isn’t that individuals focused on the wrong targets, and the solution isn’t to work out how they can improve. The lesson should be that the nature of central banking – the attempt to centrally plan the monetary system – imposes an epistemic burden on policymakers that they cannot possibly ever fulfill. “

    Yep. Priceless.

    We should not attempt to find or train humans to suit our ideal concept of government. We should make a government that will tolerate the existence of the limits and frailty of humans.

    And that is to say, the least government that is possible.

    I don’t mean to say that we should eschew development of public services by private means. I simply mean to say that government is outside of the information system of the market, and as such, it is as blind as the statue of Justice was ever imagined to be.

    While my libertarian friends do not agree, men do not hate government per se. They hate the abuse of it that is endemic to any bureaucracy, and in particular a monopolistic bureaucracy that exists outside of the market.


    Source date (UTC): 2012-01-05 15:27:00 UTC

  • know, sex sells everything. Even the dismal science of economics and the sport o

    http://www.capitalismv3.com/2012/01/05/a-propertarian-response-to-your-bedroom-activities/You know, sex sells everything. Even the dismal science of economics and the sport of political theory.

    A Reply To John Quiggin’s Anti-Propertarianism


    Source date (UTC): 2012-01-05 13:10:00 UTC

  • (Amanda has gone temporarily nuts. She will be on her horse tomorrow.)

    (Amanda has gone temporarily nuts. She will be on her horse tomorrow.)


    Source date (UTC): 2012-01-04 18:36:00 UTC

  • Like most men, I get lots of hits from scammers from the Asian and Eastern Block

    Like most men, I get lots of hits from scammers from the Asian and Eastern Block countries. But this is the first time I’ve been solicited in Arabic over Facebook chat. I read on one of the blogs that the solicitation industry had moved off the web and onto Facebook. But I tend to think of Facebook as family friendly safe zone. So I was a little surprised at this.

    HER: ممكن نتعرف Is an introduction possible?

    ME: كل شيء ممكن Sure, anything’s possible.

    HER: فتحي من جيجل . و أنت با حلوة [?I think?] you’re sweet and attractive

    ME: لدي العديد من النساء بالفعل. لا أستطيع أن تبقي أكثر من ذلك. إنما أنا رجل واحد. I have many women already. 🙂 I can’t take any more. I am only one man.

    HER: باي باي Bye

    (And before someone teases me, I talk to people about libertarianism in just about every language on earth (thanks to google translate). So, how am I to know from the name “Fethi Mazi”, a profile thumbnail of a sunset, and a request for introduction that it’s a solicitation?) It’s probably some guy in a room running fifty chat sessions at once.


    Source date (UTC): 2012-01-04 11:44:00 UTC

  • During their schooling years, we ask our children to find their natural talents

    During their schooling years, we ask our children to find their natural talents and virtues. To find themselves. And the truth is, they don’t have any natural talents. It’s just whatever they spend 10,000 hours doing. So we don’t find ourselves, we maker ourselves, and asking children that question is actually destructive. It only forces them to be more introspective – self centered. When in fact, the world treats you far better if you try to master the art of satisfying the wants of others, rather than yourself. You only get to live your fantasy for having made the satisfaction of others come true. So Instead, we should ask our children what very obscure thing that they could imagine being really good at, and imagine enjoying, that others will pay them for.


    Source date (UTC): 2012-01-04 10:55:00 UTC

  • A EULOGY FOR A MANOR HOUSE Everyone has a happy place, usually somewhere from ch

    A EULOGY FOR A MANOR HOUSE

    Everyone has a happy place, usually somewhere from childhood. When we are overwhelmed by life, we retreat to that place seeking comfort only those guaranteed places can provide us with.

    My happy place was a house – more than a house, a manor really. And more than the house itself – the vast yard and farm around it. As a very young child, before my parents bought their first home, we lived in that house. It was built in rural NY in 1914 – At the hight of anglo american civilization. At the last possible moment before the fall of western civilization and the great european civil war. It was a monument to the last gasp of the agrarian age of western man — before the industrialization of the war converted us from a farming society to a manufacturing one, and before the postwar converted our homes into post-war panel-products instead after centuries of wood and brick.

    The house’s name was “Sunny Lee”. It was a large stucco house with a barn out back. About 6000 square feet of home. It had been designed brilliantly for a working-farm summer house for urbanite New Yorkers. Porches on either side. And a central living area that could be closed off in the cooler weather. Beautiful walnut bookcases. Elegant bannisters and trim. Fireplaces everywhere. A smokehouse out back. Bedrooms for family and staff. The yard had been planted Victorian style, with chestnuts, pines, and oaks, cherry’s and lilacs – back when ornamental meant something of a much greater scale that it does in this suburban era. Back when people thought in acres and seasons, not square feet and weeks.

    After the war started, the house was boarded up. It was vacant until the late 1950s when a family bought it and renovated it to use as their farm house. We only lived there for a few years while my father started his business downtown, and before my parents bought their first house. I slept in a bedroom on the third floor. And I used to believe the house was haunted. The attic was off the upstairs bath and the keyhole flickered with the movements of a tree outside the attic window, looking as if someone was always behind the door watching or moving. The closet in my bedroom didn’t have a light and each change of clothes was an expedition into the unknown. It was a very big house, and that one flight of stairs was a very, very far distance to walk for a frightened five year old in search of his mother after waking from a nightmare. But those scary bits live alongside the joy of getting lost in cornfields. Of sun on chestnuts. Of a tire swing on an oak tree. Of the sheer size of the great trees. Of the rich smell of lilacs. Of cutting a finger on a broken truck’s window. Of picking and eating cherries. Of the smell of hay and oats in the barn. As sliding down the bannister over my mother’s half hearted objections while holding back a smile. As sitting in front of the fire listening to fairy tales on cold winter night. As wrapped in a knitted blanket at three a.m. while she rocked me through an ear-ache. As Running across the spring lawn into the bright morning sun.

    Growing up, and especially after we moved away, I always dreamed of buying the house someday. So that I could find my happy place – and maybe make it real once again. And about three years ago it went up for sale. I flew back to look at it. Houses in certain parts of the country absurdly cheap, and western NY is one of them. There is nothing up there but farms, so the Mennonites gravitate there because of the cheap land. I took videos of the house, and went through it making a list of what had to be done. Walls had to be removed to restore it to it’s original beauty. Baths updated. Plumbing, electrical and heat all had to be replaced. The trees that had reached maturity were grown weak, lifeless and broken. The barn had fallen off it’s foundation and sagged. The stucco needed loving care. So I did the math, and no matter what I did, it didn’t work out. So I gave up my a dream. Grudgingly I passed on my dream of owning my happy-place. It would have to live on as a memory that I tended to and loved in a way that the house could never experience.

    I got an email from the real estate agent today, telling me that she’d thought of me. She said someone had bought the house that year. Shortly after, a fire had started. The owners got out alive – barely. they were rescued from the roof. I found some photos and a short grainy video. The house was entirely gutted.

    As a house, as a manor, it had a hard life. It was built as elegantly as the times allowed. It was aspirational. It was designed with thought and wrought with craftsmanship. It raised but one family in its less than a century of life. And the house died at night in it’s sleep, never having achieved it’s ambitions, and never fulfilling it’s purpose. Despite the good intentions and lofty ambitions that had been put into it.

    I’m sad for that house. I loved it. I’ll do a little quiet mourning for it. Be a little thankful for it. And appreciate that it lives on as my happy place.

    Link

    http://www.mpnnow.com/news/x1692323518/Two-daring-fire-rescues-keep-Ontario-County-crews-busy-throughout-the-morning


    Source date (UTC): 2012-01-04 02:35:00 UTC

  • LIBERTARIANS: OK. Let me help out on this issue of Property Rights: Property isn

    LIBERTARIANS: OK. Let me help out on this issue of Property Rights:

    Property isn’t the only ‘right’. It’s that all ‘rights’ can be expressed as property rights. If all rights are expressed as property rights, then the voluntary and involuntary transfers are made visible and open to rational analysis, articulation and debate. Expressing all rights as property rights helps us articulate the actual transfers – voluntary and involuntary – inherent in moral arguments. It helps us avoid the conflict of visions inherent in moral arguments, which are, by their very nature, inarticulate ‘folk speech’.

    So, please try not to confuse the peasants too much. They get agitated, unruly, and even more irrational. We’re supposed to be the smart ones. OK?


    Source date (UTC): 2012-01-01 13:09:00 UTC

  • LIBERTARIANS: Has someone already torn apart Bryan Caplan’s paper criticizing Au

    LIBERTARIANS: Has someone already torn apart Bryan Caplan’s paper criticizing Austrianism? Or do I have to? (Seriously.)

    The use of the pretense of science as a means of obscuring preferences is just ridiculous no matter what side of the fence one is on.


    Source date (UTC): 2012-01-01 12:33:00 UTC

  • EVERYTHING FRENCH IS BAD EXCEPT THE FOOD AND ARCHITECTURE A quote from Hans Herm

    EVERYTHING FRENCH IS BAD EXCEPT THE FOOD AND ARCHITECTURE

    A quote from Hans Hermann Hoppe:

    Hoppe also condemned the French revolution as belonging in “the same category of vile revolutions as the Bolshevik revolution and the Nazi revolution,” because the French revolution led to “Regicide, Egalitarianism, democracy, socialism, hatred of all religion, terror measures, mass plundering, rape and murder, military draft and the total, ideologically motivated War.”

    Let’s add to that a condemnation of French philosophers who twisted and then ruined the concept of English freedom by converting what had been a practical and empirical philosophy into an evangelical, ideological, verbally-empty absurdity which they used to justify taking power from and destroying both the monarchy and the catholic church — and by consequence they created the body of work that Marx would use to compose his irrational economic plague and pseudo-religion which in turn caused 160M deaths.

    Hitler is laughing in his grave. The Deutch Mark simply had to dress in Euro clothing in order to accomplish in only 20 years, profitably, and without firing a shot, what he had hoped to accomplish with his expensive purges and war.

    If you could to travel in time and kill only one religious philosopher in history at birth, it’s a tossup whether that should be Zoroaster, Abraham, Mohammed, Rousseau or Marx.


    Source date (UTC): 2012-01-01 07:15:00 UTC

  • “Firearms are second only to the Constitution in importance; they are the people

    “Firearms are second only to the Constitution in importance; they are the peoples’ liberty’s teeth.” — George Washington

    There was no lack of clarity between the founders. The purpose of weapons is to make your government fear abusing you.


    Source date (UTC): 2011-12-31 20:53:00 UTC