Source: Facebook

  • but we all KNOW that healthcare costs are the long term problem with the US budg

    http://www.multiplier-effect.org/?p=3351Yes, but we all KNOW that healthcare costs are the long term problem with the US budget.

    We also know WHY healthcare costs are the problem:

    1) extending the last year of life.

    2) experimental procedures.

    We also know why it’s a difficult problem to fix healthcare costs:

    3) Because there is no market system by which doctors can choose to deny coverage for experimental procedures and extending the last year of life. Because it is expressly against medical ethics. Because it is profitable for businesses to deliver services. Because it is bad for business to reject a customer, who will just go elsewhere for the service.

    4) Because there is no market system for controlling extension of the last year of life and experimental procedures, we must create a non-market system (a bureaucratic system) or “DEATH PANELS” to deny coverage for experimental procedures and extending the last year of life, in order to contain costs.

    We also know why bureaucratization of experimental procedures is dangerous:

    5) Because experimental work is expensive, research and development conducted by trial and error – most of which fails to produce beneficial results.

    We also know why conservatives (republicans) dislike the bureaucratic method:

    6) Because it is impossible to work harder, apply more discipline, and use one’s own initiative and resources, in order to secure access to the best doctors, facilities, and experimental treatments.

    And it’s disingenuous to argue that this is a financial problem. It is in fact, a series of moral hazards – in the broadest sense of the term.

    (The technical, mixed-economy solution, would be to transfer the costs that were rejected by the Death Panels for experimental procedures and extension of life to those poor people in need of health care. I’m not advocating that. I’m just suggesting that it’s the only known solution that avoids perverse incentives for all parties, while maintaining a closed healthcare ecosystem.)

    We already solve the problem of transfers by subsidizing insurance companies for automobile drivers. There is no reason that we cannot sponsor (insure) non-profit, insurance companies that specialize in coverage for the underclasses, and make use of the visa/mc network to manage payments for services. We insure banks. Why can’t we insure insurance companies as a proxy for serving the disadvantaged?


    Source date (UTC): 2012-01-20 14:35:00 UTC

  • GOSSIP Back in Seattle for a few days. Hearing the usual industry gossip. (This

    GOSSIP

    Back in Seattle for a few days. Hearing the usual industry gossip. (This is still such a small town.) And, I suppose nothing should surprise me. But the daftness of human beings, and their ability to envision drama where none exists, never ceases to amaze me. How on earth do people come up with this stuff?

    Nothing ever happens to or with money without a lot of bankers and investors agreeing to it. The world is a mundane, bureaucratic, procedural place administrated by lawyers who are incentivized to over analyze everything.

    Each of us has a narrow view of the world, and an exaggerated concept of our place in it.

    This region is extremely simple. We had one company that created a lot of manufacturing and engineering jobs, that was overtaxed, over-regulated, and finally fled the state. We then won the lottery and got a second company that concentrated an unheard of amount of money in what was a previously semi-rural population. That company had an atypical organizational structure that asked purchasing decisions to me made by very junior people. That purchasing strategy was important when technology was new – since the older generation would not have been as aggressive or experimental – or cheap to hire.

    But times change. People learn. Competitors emerge. And the Innovator’s Dilemma (curse) and the rent-seeking and laziness, politicization and disutility of bureaucracy take their normal course. That company no longer spends money in the same manner. It’s stock no longer appreciates in value as it did. And it’s employees no longer posses the relative wealth that they did. And so the entire region is affected by those changes.

    And many people, who previously sold their skills and labor to that company, and because of it, who had an impression of themselves and their skills as special, scarce or unique, are now stunned and despondent over the change in their fortunes. They lived in homes, worked at companies, and built organizations, during a period, where the entire American economy was booming with debt, booming with cheap overseas products, and while at the same time, that regional company was exporting cash into a town with scarce resources, and a small population. Those frustrated people are competing the broader economy, not the unique and temporary economy that they were living in during the past. Like American laborers, who must now compete in the global economy against people who will work 14 hours a day doing the same work, people in this area must compete globally.

    Revel in our time. In what we had. But don’t expect that it is repeatable. Or that there is anything you, or the people you work for, or the politicians that supposedly administer our governments, could have done anything about. If you had the opportunity to live during the period from 1988 – 2008 in this area, then appreciate having had the joy of participating in one of the greatest times and places to live in human history. (Remember the fun of Entros? The art galleries prior to 2001? The multiple playhouses? The increase in great restaurants? The feeling that it would never end? Daily life when Neo came upon our movie screens? Remember when Redmond was the ‘sticks’, and when Bellevue didn’t have a skyscraper?)

    The American dream was first built on cheap land. Second on jobs that were possible because of cheap land. Third because the world went into a debilitating war. Fourth because of cheap credit made possible by the petrodollar and our postwar anti-communist military capability.

    But the world caught up. There was no malfeasance – on anyone’s part. It’s just the slow five hundred year grid, as industrial capitalism moved from the heartland of England to every nation in the world. People in Beijing and countless other cities are living the seattle experience today. We can envy them, or celebrate them.

    It’s a choice.


    Source date (UTC): 2012-01-17 17:22:00 UTC

  • SILLY I need a little set of printed person humor cards, that say: 1) “We are bu

    SILLY

    I need a little set of printed person humor cards, that say:

    1) “We are business people. We sell ideas for a living. That means that we are a bit clueless by our very nature. So if we are loud, tell us. It’s OK. It’s also perfectly OK to throw us out of the restaurant at closing time. Because we aren’t going to notice that you want to go home on our own. We won’t feel bad. We’ll even tip you better. –Thanks in advance.”

    2) “A martini is a ritual. It’s like the Japanese Tea Ceremony. It’s heretical and unpatriotic to make it incorrectly. This is how you make a proper martini: a) a very cold glass b) a cocktail shaker c) place three ounces of gin d) four or five drops of vermouth e) four or five ice cubes: holding each cube in the palm of your hand, bash it a good one with the back of a heavy tablespoon, to crack it into chunks. Drop the ice chunks into the cocktail shaker. e) Shake HARD back and forth for 15 or 20 seconds – this will make it very cold. Pour into the glass. Add either lemon peel or olive, and serve immediately. –Thank you for your diligence in this matter.”

    3) “No, I don’t think you’re attractive, I’m just an extrovert and a nerd. Being nice to random people, regardless of gender, is like physical exercise: it makes me feel good. And like smiling, it costs nothing, requires little effort and makes the world a better place for all of us. –Noblesse Oblige.”

    I’d use the first one all the time. I’d use the second one some of the time. I’d never use the third one. But it would make me feel better to know that I could use it if I wanted to. 🙂


    Source date (UTC): 2012-01-12 11:54:00 UTC

  • MOVIE: “The Darkest Hour” Despite the negative reviews, it is a fun, simple Sci-

    MOVIE: “The Darkest Hour”

    Despite the negative reviews, it is a fun, simple Sci-Fi B-Movie that’s good with popcorn. I tend to side with Roger Ebert, that movies should be judged by what the are. And it’s just a fun little disaster movie. Sure it’s been done before. But having Moscow as the subject of a Sci-Fi movie alone is fun. Certainly worth the matinee price.


    Source date (UTC): 2012-01-10 21:13:00 UTC

  • of Hans Hermann Hoppe’s “Democracy: The God That Failed”

    http://www.capitalismv3.com/2012/01/09/the-arab-spring-demonstrates-the-stability-of-monarchy/Vindication of Hans Hermann Hoppe’s “Democracy: The God That Failed”


    Source date (UTC): 2012-01-09 19:41:00 UTC

  • ARE MONARCHIES BETTER THAN REPUBLICS? Proof of Hoppe’s Thesis in a Paper by UW’s

    http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1548222WHY ARE MONARCHIES BETTER THAN REPUBLICS?

    Proof of Hoppe’s Thesis in a Paper by UW’s Victor Menaldo.

    MY FAVORITE PARAGRAPH:

    “This paper argues that the [Arab Spring] region’s monarchs have been particularly well-suited to deter political unrest. Through the strategic use of constitutions, formal political institutions, Islamic principles, and informal norms, MENA monarchs have “invented” a political culture that has helped create a stable distributional arrangement and self-enforcing limits on executive authority. A monarchic political culture has promoted cohesion among regime insiders, such as ruling families and other political elites, and bolstered their stake in the regime. Moreover, this unique political culture has provided the region’s monarchs with legitimacy: regime outsiders have benefited from the positive externalities associated with secure property rights for the political elite—sustained economic growth and increased economic opportunities. This has helped monarchs consolidate their authority and foster political stability. Conversely, the region’s non-monarchs have relied on a divide-and-conquer strategy and terrorized potential opponents into submission, gutting their societies of rival institutions and creating layers of militias and secret police.” Victor Menaldo, UW.

    (Where has Victor Menaldo been? In my back yard, and I’ve never heard of him! Now I have to read his other ten papers. Hopefully all tonight!)


    Source date (UTC): 2012-01-09 19:34:00 UTC

  • APPLE GIVE DIVIDENDS? ARE YOU NUTS? 🙂

    http://modeledbehavior.com/2012/01/06/open-letter-to-apple-shareholder/WHAT? APPLE GIVE DIVIDENDS? ARE YOU NUTS? 🙂


    Source date (UTC): 2012-01-06 18:05:00 UTC

  • DO WE HAVE CHINS? An Interesting question by the Smithsonian

    http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/hominids/2012/01/why-do-humans-have-chins/WHY DO WE HAVE CHINS? An Interesting question by the Smithsonian.


    Source date (UTC): 2012-01-06 17:49:00 UTC

  • NERD STATUS: I’ve written like 10k words today, in six hours, on tangerines, pea

    NERD STATUS: I’ve written like 10k words today, in six hours, on tangerines, peanut butter cookies, and a cup of coffee.

    (Thank you God for the time and freedom to write. There is no greater luxury I could ask for.) 🙂


    Source date (UTC): 2012-01-05 17:10:00 UTC

  • Don’t Like Creative Students? No they don’t. I can speak from experience

    http://marginalrevolution.com/marginalrevolution/2011/12/teachers-dont-like-creative-students.htmlTeachers Don’t Like Creative Students? No they don’t. I can speak from experience.


    Source date (UTC): 2012-01-05 15:47:00 UTC