Curt Doolittle

Source: Facebook

  • (contemplating the biases of indians who participate in our debates.) I think I

    (contemplating the biases of indians who participate in our debates.)

    I think I understand the frustrations I have with indian’s who try to participate in these conversations, whether educated in india or the states. First of all, i do appreciate the rather odd optimism free of evidence endemic in indian culture. it’s what i admire. But, in india, or in an iimmigrant indian family, or in an indian immigrant community, those with first generation educations have the “doctor problem”, or the ’60’s kid problem’ meaning that when you are surrounded by generations people drastically different in educational knowledge and subsequent ability you overestimate your knowledge and ability, and when you come to America you are ‘educated’ in our academy that markets to that demographic, and sells sociological psychological nonsense in order to preserve income from that demographic – by not ‘correcting’ you and ‘insulting’ you by doing so. This is why our academy is ridiculous now. At least European Americans are educated by habituation in the long history, culture, and information flow of eastern civlization, and our optimism is in our ability to work hard and not be blamed if we fail for our heroic efforts. Or we are optimistic (badly) in our estimations of people from other cultures because we do not realize how Aristotelianism, rule of law, truthful speech, responsibility for the commons, But it’s not some naive optimism that ‘everything is gonna be alright’.

    Regardless of what civilization or culture you are from, I’m not one of those professors paid to coddle you with comforting falsehoods, or pretense of respect, in exchange for preserving the income stream for the university, or my job. I know my job. My job is jurisprudence. I’m a prosecutor.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-29 15:17:00 UTC

  • CHOMSKY WITH HARD TRUTH NOT HIS PLATITUDES (hard-truth warning) (restating the 2

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XeWWz4y1coUANSWERING CHOMSKY WITH HARD TRUTH NOT HIS PLATITUDES

    (hard-truth warning) (restating the 20th in P’s “Big History”)

    All political conflict in the west was made possible only by the inclusion of women into the franchise without providing them with a separate house, thereby preserving the ability of the classes to negotiate for their interests in honest public discourse, while adding the participation women who have opposing genetic interests and intuitions to that of men, as another class with yet another set of intersets.

    So, all political conflict consists of the unstated and political unpleasant: it’s just the eugenic masculine european right against dysgenic feminine and anti-european left and in the postwar period the suppression of eugenics has created the crisis of the age, and threatened to reverse all human civlization to another semitic dark age.

    1. there is always room for new solutions consisting of trades between the classes, to compensate for vast almost unimaginable differences in ability between the classes, and the vast differences in productivity and value to mankind between the classes. There is never room for shaming, ridiculing, moralizing, psychologizing, gossiping, rallying, undermining, and reputation destruction for the vast genetic differences, vast productive differences, and vast value differences between the classes. Either an individual or group is engage in falsehood, irreciprocity, and particularly institutional irreciprocity we call ‘rent seeking’, or political rent seeking we call ‘corruption’, regardless of the proportionality of their returns on ability and effort, wherein we can take that individual or group to court for fraud and theft, or theft by rent seeking or corruption – or we can offer an exchange of trade by political negotiation for what we want, as long as we have something to offer. But without the other parties engaging in fraud, theft, rent seeking or corruption, the only reason a people have ‘wants’ is because they have failed to produce eugenically enough, and have failed to invest in their offspring enough, and failed to engaging in manners, norms, ethics, morals and commons enough, that they cannot themselves engage in fraud, theft(reallocation), or redistribution (rent seeking, corruption). You have less than others in a market economy because you and your family have chosen poorly. So how can you choose less poorly? Well you can demand rule of law instead of socialism. You can not seek redistribution, rent-seeking, or corruption. You can not engage in lying, fraud, theft, conspiracy. And you can ‘clean your room, clean your house, clean your hard, clean your neighborhood, and clean your city, clean your nation, and clean your government of human parasitic filth. Or you can do what islam does, and christianity encourages, which is reduce everyone in every civilization possible to the same low genetic, cultural, ethical, moral standard – and remain equal in superstition, ignorance, poverty and disease, and blame others for your condition.

    2. There is no threat from climate change, there is a threat of over population of the underclasses outside of the first world, now invading the first world, and reversing genetic evolution, reversing institutional, cultural and knowledge evolution, and engaging in hyper-consmption to do so. In fact there is nothin dangerous to this planet and the ecosystem which exstensive sterilization and universal one child policies will not solve in a few generations. There are no environmental problems that are not the result non-western people failing to repeat the western miracle of soft eugenic reduction of the underclasses through manorialism, requirement for property and income before marriage and reproduction, and the redistribution of reproduction from the underclasses that are genetic cultural informational, institutional, and genetic dead weight on man and planet.

    3. The right is devoted to the expansion of market economies and with it the eugenics that occur from the change of value of reproduction to consumption. The right was stopped form the eugenic program because of hitler (even if he was right), and because the nazi movement came after increases in underclass voting, and therefore it was impossible to restore institutional eugenics to compensate for new rates of reproduction. Instead, europe has gone from IQ parity with the Ashkenazi, and IQ superiority to asia, to rapidly approaching second if not third world intelligence levels – thus declining american productivity, financialization of the economy, and rapid underclass immigration to compensate for taxing the middle class out of reproductivity, all to maintain economic velocity, and as a consequence the generation of demand for redistribution and authoritarian state – ending western miracle of rule of law and markets in everything made possible by developing a ratio of talent to market productivity, because the underclasses are not competitive int he world economy given the present much higher standard of living in the western world.

    4. The war against communism is largely the cause of the crisis of western civilization, largely because the jewish intellectuals could obtain a foothold in overthrowing Russia that they could not obtain in other western countries. Then the could use Russia as the economic and military asset with which to destroy western civilization’s invention of Aristotelian reason, roman banking, templar banking, the Hanseatic League, the european age of sail, the empirical revolution, the scientific revolution, and the restoration of western civilization after the jewish, christian and islamic destruction and reduction to ignorance superstition poverty and dysgenia of every great civilization of the the ancient world by false promise of equality to women, slaves, underclasses and the dim and ignorant. The anti-war left was an intentional migration of the left wing from fomenting class warfare between the working and the middle classes, due to the worldwide failure of marxism and communism evident by 1960. Te communists under the Frankfurt school had early recognized the impossibility of undermining the rule of law, and open economy of western civilization because it was raising humanity out of poverty so rapidly. The first use of undermining America in the Russian model was labor, then Frankfurt against art values history, and culture, then the Postmodern revolution by french jews under Derrida, which was used by Alinsky and others to transform the anti-war movement’s effort to undermine western defeat of communism and underclass reversal of eugenic and market civilization, to generation of identitarian conflict between races, regions, and to open the American doors via the immigration act to underclasses to help in undermining western civlization as they had undermined Slavic civlization and set them back two hundred years – and cost humanity 100M deaths. although we should note that the left would have failed in every single lie and false promise if not for radical immigration and the taxation of the middle classes out of reproduction. Now, within the past few years we have (a) ended the pseudoscientific lie of the blank slate showing yes our differences are genetic not environmental (reversing boazianism) (b) ended the pseudoscientific lie of uniformity of cognition or other than rationality of human action (reversing freudianism), (c) ended the pseudoscientific lie that the genders are not profoundly different(reversing feminism), (d) ended the indifference of intelligence and character (postmodern, and feminist denialism) (f) And i”m in the process of ending the entire Abrahamic program of false promise, baiting into hazard, profiting from hazard, plausible deniability of blame due to the victim’s volition (instead of european warranty of due diligence, and your involuntary liability for those statements), using the abrahamic methods of pilpul (sophism) and critique (straw manning and undermining) rather than providing a reciprocally beneficial alternative and engaging in trades for mutual benefit, without tempting humans into hazard, causing their hazard, and profiting from the harm you did to them. ie: alcohol dealing, drug dealing, prostitution, pornography, usury, the pseudosciences (marxism, boazianism, fruedianism, frankfurtian critique), sophism (postmodernism) and denialisms (feminism) and the very big one: the myth that people are oppressed rather than converted from semi domesticated animals into fully domesticated animals the same way we domesticated every plant and animal: by controlling reproduction thru limiting reproduction to those that created value rather than loss, and culling from the herd those that created loss: shrills(women), gossips (women), liars(both), prostitutes (women), thieves(both), the risky, lazy, violent and disruptive (men), brigands(men), through aggressive use of punishment, public punishment, hanging everyone possible, asylums(mostly women), prisons(mostly men), men in war, winter starvation of the lazy, and a many people through endless recursive plagues.

    5. The government had no interests in a free press and while the second amendment had no debate whatsoever, because it was so obvious, the freedom of the press was the subject of hottest debate, and their inability to separate truthful from untruthful, speech because of the lingering presence of theology, and because they wanted to preserve the various protestant sects and their liberty in faith, they felt it necessary. The post office like the postwar highway system had nothing to do with freedom of speech it had everything to do with politics, war, holding new territory, and commerce, because time delays on this huge continent were a serious problem not satisfied until the telegraph., (my contribution is to repair this deficiency).

    6. The dominance of defensive corporations exists because of the excesses of labor as the industrial revolution kicked in, and the alliance of excess labor immigrated after the revolution kicked in, particularly after 1890 and up until the depression, with the communists, that put labor and industry at odds in politics. This is why businesses left the country. Instead of asking for defense against loss, the unions asked for premiums on labor that destroyed depression, postwar industrial international competitiveness, and forced companies to exit the USA labor market. It is one thin to not lose your job because your supervisor is a scumbag, or your business is trying to save nickel for shareholders, and another to extract pensions, high salaries, and benefits not available to the middle classes who are logarithmically more productive and valuable to the rest of the polity. But again labor was sold a false promise by communists using the abrahamic method of deceit to play upon their ignorance by casting genetic differences and economic realities as if they were family morality tales. The problem today has nothing to do with corporations which overpay everyone in very role because of the economic affects of concentration of markets in cities. It has everything to do with the financial system which again, takes advantage of false promise, baiting into hazard, justification using pilpul, and critique to distract you by calling it a business problem. There is absolutely no reason you pay interest on a house, a car, education, appliances, even clothes and furniture. Entertainment and food if you pay for with interest you deserve the hell you put yourself into – because your bad (defective, undomesticated) animal genes are showing.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XeWWz4y1coUUpdated Oct 29, 2019, 2:50 PM

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-29 14:50:00 UTC

  • CHOMSKY WITH HARD TRUTH NOT HIS PLATITUDES All political conflict in the west wa

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XeWWz4y1coU&feature=share&fbclid=IwAR1B674An1CDVYaeXtK0lEiz0GDBZvSbslqrYCWzi5mEpjdvffG5zZaU4UYANSWERING CHOMSKY WITH HARD TRUTH NOT HIS PLATITUDES

    All political conflict in the west was made possible only by the inclusion of women into the franchise without providing them with a separate house, thereby preserving the ability of the classes to negotiate for their interests in honest public discourse, while adding the participation women who have opposing genetic interests and intuitions to that of men, as another class with yet another set of intersets.

    So, all political conflict consists of the unstated and political unpleasant: it’s just the eugenic masculine european right against dysgenic feminine and anti-european left and in the postwar period the suppression of eugenics has created the crisis of the age, and threatened to reverse all human civlization to another semitic dark age.

    1. there is always room for new solutions consisting of trades between the classes, to compensate for vast almost unimaginable differences in ability between the classes, and the vast differences in productivity and value to mankind between the classes. There is never room for shaming, ridiculing, moralizing, psychologizing, gossiping, rallying, undermining, and reputation destruction for the vast genetic differences, vast productive differences, and vast value differences between the classes. Either an individual or group is engage in falsehood, irreciprocity, and particularly institutional irreciprocity we call ‘rent seeking’, or political rent seeking we call ‘corruption’, regardless of the proportionality of their returns on ability and effort, wherein we can take that individual or group to court for fraud and theft, or theft by rent seeking or corruption – or we can offer an exchange of trade by political negotiation for what we want, as long as we have something to offer. But without the other parties engaging in fraud, theft, rent seeking or corruption, the only reason a people have ‘wants’ is because they have failed to produce eugenically enough, and have failed to invest in their offspring enough, and failed to engaging in manners, norms, ethics, morals and commons enough, that they cannot themselves engage in fraud, theft(reallocation), or redistribution (rent seeking, corruption). You have less than others in a market economy because you and your family have chosen poorly. So how can you choose less poorly? Well you can demand rule of law instead of socialism. You can not seek redistribution, rent-seeking, or corruption. You can not engage in lying, fraud, theft, conspiracy. And you can ‘clean your room, clean your house, clean your hard, clean your neighborhood, and clean your city, clean your nation, and clean your government of human parasitic filth. Or you can do what islam does, and christianity encourages, which is reduce everyone in every civilization possible to the same low genetic, cultural, ethical, moral standard – and remain equal in superstition, ignorance, poverty and disease, and blame others for your condition.

    2. There is no threat from climate change, there is a threat of over population of the underclasses outside of the first world, now invading the first world, and reversing genetic evolution, reversing institutional, cultural and knowledge evolution, and engaging in hyper-consmption to do so. In fact there is nothin dangerous to this planet and the ecosystem which exstensive sterilization and universal one child policies will not solve in a few generations. There are no environmental problems that are not the result non-western people failing to repeat the western miracle of soft eugenic reduction of the underclasses through manorialism, requirement for property and income before marriage and reproduction, and the redistribution of reproduction from the underclasses that are genetic cultural informational, institutional, and genetic dead weight on man and planet.

    3. The right is devoted to the expansion of market economies and with it the eugenics that occur from the change of value of reproduction to consumption. The right was stopped form the eugenic program because of hitler (even if he was right), and because the nazi movement came after increases in underclass voting, and therefore it was impossible to restore institutional eugenics to compensate for new rates of reproduction. Instead, europe has gone from IQ parity with the Ashkenazi, and IQ superiority to asia, to rapidly approaching second if not third world intelligence levels – thus declining american productivity, financialization of the economy, and rapid underclass immigration to compensate for taxing the middle class out of reproductivity, all to maintain economic velocity, and as a consequence the generation of demand for redistribution and authoritarian state – ending western miracle of rule of law and markets in everything made possible by developing a ratio of talent to market productivity, because the underclasses are not competitive int he world economy given the present much higher standard of living in the western world.

    4. The war against communism is largely the cause of the crisis of western civilization, largely because the jewish intellectuals could obtain a foothold in overthrowing Russia that they could not obtain in other western countries. Then the could use Russia as the economic and military asset with which to destroy western civilization’s invention of Aristotelian reason, roman banking, templar banking, the Hanseatic League, the european age of sail, the empirical revolution, the scientific revolution, and the restoration of western civilization after the jewish, christian and islamic destruction and reduction to ignorance superstition poverty and dysgenia of every great civilization of the the ancient world by false promise of equality to women, slaves, underclasses and the dim and ignorant. The anti-war left was an intentional migration of the left wing from fomenting class warfare between the working and the middle classes, due to the worldwide failure of marxism and communism evident by 1960. Te communists under the Frankfurt school had early recognized the impossibility of undermining the rule of law, and open economy of western civilization because it was raising humanity out of poverty so rapidly. The first use of undermining America in the Russian model was labor, then Frankfurt against art values history, and culture, then the Postmodern revolution by french jews under Derrida, which was used by Alinsky and others to transform the anti-war movement’s effort to undermine western defeat of communism and underclass reversal of eugenic and market civilization, to generation of identitarian conflict between races, regions, and to open the American doors via the immigration act to underclasses to help in undermining western civlization as they had undermined Slavic civlization and set them back two hundred years – and cost humanity 100M deaths. although we should note that the left would have failed in every single lie and false promise if not for radical immigration and the taxation of the middle classes out of reproduction. Now, within the past few years we have (a) ended the pseudoscientific lie of the blank slate showing yes our differences are genetic not environmental (reversing boazianism) (b) ended the pseudoscientific lie of uniformity of cognition or other than rationality of human action (reversing freudianism), (c) ended the pseudoscientific lie that the genders are not profoundly different(reversing feminism), (d) ended the indifference of intelligence and character (postmodern, and feminist denialism) (f) And i”m in the process of ending the entire Abrahamic program of false promise, baiting into hazard, profiting from hazard, plausible deniability of blame due to the victim’s volition (instead of european warranty of due diligence, and your involuntary liability for those statements), using the abrahamic methods of pilpul (sophism) and critique (straw manning and undermining) rather than providing a reciprocally beneficial alternative and engaging in trades for mutual benefit, without tempting humans into hazard, causing their hazard, and profiting from the harm you did to them. ie: alcohol dealing, drug dealing, prostitution, pornography, usury, the pseudosciences (marxism, boazianism, fruedianism, frankfurtian critique), sophism (postmodernism) and denialisms (feminism) and the very big one: the myth that people are oppressed rather than converted from semi domesticated animals into fully domesticated animals the same way we domesticated every plant and animal: by controlling reproduction thru limiting reproduction to those that created value rather than loss, and culling from the herd those that created loss: shrills(women), gossips (women), liars(both), prostitutes (women), thieves(both), the risky, lazy, violent and disruptive (men), brigands(men), through aggressive use of punishment, public punishment, hanging everyone possible, asylums(mostly women), prisons(mostly men), men in war, winter starvation of the lazy, and a many people through endless recursive plagues.

    5. The government had no interests in a free press and while the second amendment had no debate whatsoever, because it was so obvious, the freedom of the press was the subject of hottest debate, and their inability to separate truthful from untruthful, speech because of the lingering presence of theology, and because they wanted to preserve the various protestant sects and their liberty in faith, they felt it necessary. The post office like the postwar highway system had nothing to do with freedom of speech it had everything to do with politics, war, holding new territory, and commerce, because time delays on this huge continent were a serious problem not satisfied until the telegraph., (my contribution is to repair this deficiency).

    6. The dominance of defensive corporations exists because of the excesses of labor as the industrial revolution kicked in, and the alliance of excess labor immigrated after the revolution kicked in, particularly after 1890 and up until the depression, with the communists, that put labor and industry at odds in politics. This is why businesses left the country. Instead of asking for defense against loss, the unions asked for premiums on labor that destroyed depression, postwar industrial international competitiveness, and forced companies to exit the USA labor market. It is one thin to not lose your job because your supervisor is a scumbag, or your business is trying to save nickel for shareholders, and another to extract pensions, high salaries, and benefits not available to the middle classes who are logarithmically more productive and valuable to the rest of the polity. But again labor was sold a false promise by communists using the abrahamic method of deceit to play upon their ignorance by casting genetic differences and economic realities as if they were family morality tales. The problem today has nothing to do with corporations which overpay everyone in very role because of the economic affects of concentration of markets in cities. It has everything to do with the financial system which again, takes advantage of false promise, baiting into hazard, justification using pilpul, and critique to distract you by calling it a business problem. There is absolutely no reason you pay interest on a house, a car, education, appliances, even clothes and furniture. Entertainment and food if you pay for with interest you deserve the hell you put yourself into – because your bad (defective, undomesticated) animal genes are showing.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XeWWz4y1coUUpdated Oct 29, 2019, 2:49 PM

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-29 14:49:00 UTC

  • NOTE WHERE CHRISTIANS SIT IN THIS TRIANGLE MASCULINE/K .. Fascists (Ethno Nation

    NOTE WHERE CHRISTIANS SIT IN THIS TRIANGLE

    MASCULINE/K

    .. Fascists (Ethno National – Secular Theologians)

    .. .. Pagans (Ethno-Nationalists)

    .. .. .. Social Conservatives (reasonable, normativists)

    .. .. .. .. Right Libertarians (jeffersonian constitutionalists)

    .. .. .. .. .. Civic Nationalist (Centrists)

    .. .. .. .. .. .. Democratic Egalitarians (centrists, insurance)

    .. .. .. .. .. .. Christian Conservatives (Universalists)*****

    .. .. .. .. .. Left Progressives (socialists, redistributivists)

    .. .. .. .. Left Liberals (ant-masculine, destructivists, postmodernists)

    .. .. .. Left Radicals (anti-western destructivists, antifa)

    .. .. Communists (economic destructivists)

    .. Conservative Jews, Islamists (cultural destructivists)

    FEMININE/R DYSGENIC

    Note the location of Christians.

    Christians have traditionally been leftists. And until the Marxist, postmodern, feminist attack on christianity in an effort to create a religion of the state, the christians were absolutely positively anti-aristocratic, ant-commercial, and only pro family, pro theology.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-29 13:23:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/73395320_145944373470391_47669579595

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/73395320_145944373470391_476695795958022144_n_145944370137058.jpg (probably important given recent conversations)(probably important given recent conversations)

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-29 13:03:00 UTC

  • NAILING FAKE CHRISTIANS ON THE RHETORICAL CROSS (possibly offensive) (necessary

    NAILING FAKE CHRISTIANS ON THE RHETORICAL CROSS

    (possibly offensive) (necessary for preservation of christianity in european civlization) (the ‘harsh words’ for christians unwilling to accept the compromise with their scientific, rational, moral(traditional), non-theological christian peers.

    —“Modern Christianity just isn’t compatible with your ideas and will be a weak point if you adopt them. Christian concept of love and forgiveness is truly at odds. Islamic religion are far more inline with your concept. Eye for an eye is a neutral concept, restriction of free speech like lying, punishment for traitorous speech (their blasphemy concept), self defense of property and life is encouraged, rejection of debauchery is absolute and host of other issue make Islam superior for nation building. If you must hold onto Christianity, the older roots of christianity will work the best.”— Jay Smith

    Aside from the fact that you claim wisdom, knowledge, understanding, that you do not possess, or you would argue both sides and compare them, I think I have studied this subject as thoroughly as anyone in history with the least tolerance for lies from either side.

    We can accommodate christianity because christianity is compatible with the natural law, and european high trust peoples compatible with christian tolerance and charity – to a point. But christianity has failed in the ancient, medieval, and modern world to solve the problem of politics, and at present universalist christianity and christians are hostile enemies of western civlization.

    So if instead we limit Christian tolerance to “our own’ and prevent Christians from lying to themselves that they are doing good by helping others than their own – virtue signaling, not doing good. And if we can embody natural law and christian tolerance (love) in the constitution, then we can eliminate the evils of marxism, postmodernism, feminism, judaism and islam, that seek to destroy our civilization, and maintain scientific, rational, moral, and theological strains of christian thought.

    I understand. You want to promote the lie that faith is truth so that you don’t have to work so hard at preserving your faith. I understand that. But it just means your a liar, a parasite, and a thief, and you have no faith if you cannot accept both the truth AND faith together. If you cannot, then you have no faith. you are just a liar – no different from a drug addict making excuses for your addition to your lies.

    We can no longer tolerate cancerous Christians. Either have faith, truth, and honor and duty, or you are not a Christian or a European you are just another useful idiot of the enemy, and a cancer undermining western civilization.

    Faith is not incompatible with truth unless you have no faith.

    If you cannot bear truthful christianity, rational christianity, moral (traditional) christianity, and theological christianity together, you are no christian. You are just a selfish, lying, parasite, and an enemy of our people.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-29 12:35:00 UTC

  • TRIPARTISM TO QUADRIPARTISM —“Those who Fight, Those who Pray, Those who Work

    TRIPARTISM TO QUADRIPARTISM

    —“Those who Fight, Those who Pray, Those who Work What’s the fourth class?”— Richard Hall

    ^Burghers (the middle class). “Those who Trade”

    The middle class emerged only once production was able to scale. And production could only scale once productivity was high enough to produce sufficient surpluses to scale.

    We can modernize Tripartism and simply call them The Defensive, Military, Judicial classes, The Administrative, Clerical, Educational classes, and Productive Financial Entrepreneurial, Professional, Managerial, Craftsman and Labor classes. None of us mention the underclasses, because until recently that meant ‘slave’ because they lacked agency, family, resources, and knowledge to be allowed to ‘roam free’ without an ‘owner’ to take responsibility for them – meaning defend the population from them.

    But since we develop elites in each of the Military, Administrative, and Productive classes, leaving the majority of the population managing only personal capital, especially the family, and making use of whatever elites that most serve their needs, we tend to separate the economic (Financial, Entrepreneurial,) from the Professional, Managerial, craftsmanly, and laboring classes.

    The middle east and far east, because of flood river valleys, and irrigation in them, combined the organization of production into the priesthood, and into the state, and the merchant class, even wealthy, traded specialty goods more than organized commodity capital goods in production. Preserving the trading, craftsman, and workman classes, and maintaining what we consider the capitalist class into the state. The problem is of course, state inefficiency and parasitism.

    The big economic shift occurred when the middle class Germanic Europe, was able to accumulate enough capital to develop the Hanseatic league on the continent – thanks to the lack of a strong central state – and create its own rule of law, own defense, own outposts, and trade networks. It ruled for three hundred years dragging northern Europe into post medieval wealth.

    The British people able to do the same in the colonies by the same reason: a military state, but an entrepreneurial middle class, capable of funding it’s own adventure. The colonies ended up being a better long term investment, which is why germany, after fighting off napoleon, needed to unify to prevent another despotic french catastrophe, sought to expand her influences (rightly so in my understanding) into territories it had economically domesticated, putting her into competition with Russia and England by unbalancing the world distribution of powers england found (like the usa wrongly does today) the optimum for commercial gains.

    The British Americans took this to the ultimate test, and created a purely middle class civilization – escaping both church and state – preserving the germanic rule of law, and individual sovereignty.

    And while england created empire, germany created science, we created opportunity and productivity, and the rest is history.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-29 12:19:00 UTC

  • THE CURRENT CONDITION OF PHILOSOPHY, SCIENCE AND WESTERN CIVILIZATION (important

    THE CURRENT CONDITION OF PHILOSOPHY, SCIENCE AND WESTERN CIVILIZATION

    (important)(profound)

    —“The best practical use of analytic philosophy was rooting out methodological problems in scientific inquiry that arise from conceptual confusion or can otherwise be treated with conceptual analysis. The process of formalization of a language of inquiry failed, but it was only a means to the end of improving scientific methodology.”—Duke Newcomb

    Sort of. This isn’t quite correct. The process of formalization failed, and in doing so took philosophical rationalism, and the claim that philosophy was a means of developing truth by proof, down with it. There is no closure outside of first order logic, and there is no ‘proof’ to be had in argument like there is in mathematics. Even in mathematics, it is only possible because it’s axiomatic (declared), and scale independence(there is no scale independence outside of the arrow range of human senses). The result is that the logics are only falsificationary. That’s all. So, popper’s program of falsification, which he evolved from jewish via-negativa pilpul and critique, was incomplete, and the anglo-germanic analytic via-positiva program was incomplete, and the pursuit of scientific method was incomplete – all for the same reason: all epistemology is eliminative (falsificationary) just like all market activity: trial and error by which that which is not false, survives competition between reason, action, and the results of action in reality.

    —“Continental philosophy is perfectly fine philosophy, if you judge it by the standard of concept production. It’s just poorly written and maliciously employed. However, some interesting, important, and insightful concepts have been produced in the mess of the Continental tradition. It would also be possible to construct an anti-Abrahamic Continental philosophy, starting with Heidegger and Nietzsche. Granted, it would be mostly just another kind of pilpul, but it could be effective.”—Duke Newcomb

    Again, agreed, but I might state this a little more precisely. The continental tradition advances the human technique of fiction we call parable, storytelling, mythology, and theology (free association – utility) requiring the least knowledge, into the human technique of idealism (hypothesis – good) requiring we falsify by reason with more knowledge, before we use the human technique we call science (theory – truth) where we falsify by evidence with the most knowledge.

    Someone brought up Compte last night and I suppose I should do us a favor and drawing the historical parallels as we developed social science over the past few centuries, by the same means Compte suggested in continental prose and I’ve formalized in anglo legal prose.

    And so it is perhaps better to say that a Reasonable Preference or Reciprocal Good aren’t decidable by Truth – only by preference and shared preference. Conversely, a Truth isn’t decidable by preference or good, only by decidability independent of preference or good.

    So the value of the continental method is in the reorganization of paradigms, for the choice and production of preferences and goods, because it served by the subjective and empathic, and communicated by the subjective empathic, and the question of the truth or falsehood, gain or loss, reciprocity or parasitism, that would falsify that claim of preference or good, is the function of science – or what I call Testimonial Truth under the Law of Reciprocity.

    So ideas move up and down the hierarchy, between fictions, ideals(preferential and good), and reals(Decidable), where we suggest, inform, agree, and falsify upon ideals, stated as fictions, ideals, or reals according depending upon our ability, experience(age), and knowledge(information).

    The principle difference being that the continental(ideal) method like the magical, occult (fictional) method, is open to use for deceit – especially the abrahamic deceits which evolved to take advantage of them – and between story on one end, and testimony on the other, we have room for supernatural abuse of storytelling, sophomoric abuse of idealism, and pseudoscientific abuse of testimony.

    Human Cognition

    Intuition—————–Reason————-Operationalism

    Free Association ——-Hypothesis——————Theory

    Empathy—————-Sympathy—————–Evidence

    Story ——————– Ideal —————— Testimony

    Fiction—–Theology — Sophistry — Pseudoscience —-Lie

    Internal Market – Interpersonal Verbal Market – Action Market

    Competition————Competition ———–Competition

    —“The problem is conceptual analysis isn’t enough.”–

    Let’s complete that sentence. Enough for what? To meet the demand for infallibility in the given question? It’s not enough to warranty due diligence that a preference or good is’t an act of fraud or deceit.

    Do you see what I did there? I removed the (foolish) presumption of intellectual honesty, reciprocity, and presumption of error, and moved the point of demarcation for lying from presumption to demonstrated.

    This is why the law of speech has to change. A high trust people able to presume intellectual honesty limited to error, because of thousands of years of (a)militia service for standing, training in reporting, and the criminality of courage (b) the oath upon adulthood, (b) our law to enforce it regardless of rank even if proportional in cost and disincentive, (c) punishment by one’s parents, kin, community, nobility, or aristocracy.

    We were invaded yet again in the modern world, because of our high trust and presumption of innocence, as we were invaded by jews and christianity (making us vulnerable to islam) using the lies of religion in the ancient world; this time with false promise of marxism (class and pseudoscience), feminism (gender and denialism), postmodernism (identity and sophism). And like the ancient world women were the target because they evolved not to speak truth but to obtain conformity from children through continuous false statements, and resources of men through continuous false promise – because that was their evolutionary necessity. Not truth before face and eugenic hierarchy, but dysgenic survival of children regardless of merit, and alliance with women against dominant males for the same reason, at the cost of being continuously undermined by women who do not form a hierarchy of rule, but complete for attention in a rotating market for female sexual, caretaking and social, value.

    —“There are a lot of practical technical problems in empirical methodology of science, as well as in mathematical statistics, the real language of science.”—

    As far as I know, yes, but these are problems of failure of due diligence in the limitation of claims made from the data, because we have created a market under which publication regardless of merit must be justified in order to obtain funding. Which we can easily correct.

    In statistics, which does nothing more than seek to provide commensurability between different distributions at different scales, assisting us in the discovery of hypotheses, we can then attempt to operationalize, there is a very simple test:

    (a) are you engaging in conflation (almost always)

    (a) can you construct an operational hypothesis, theory, or description (meaning operational name) that reproduces those statistics – particularly those statistics that involve rational choice (See Gary Becker’s works) in psychology, or sociology, or politics, or group strategy. In mathematics are you doing the same? (almost never outside of applied mathematics). In physics are you doing the same (absolutely not – Bohr brought postmodernism AND idealism back into physics. And this is the problem with the copenhagen interpretation, and the vast woo woo and mathematical “wooo woo” and pseudoscience that has emerged from it. the failure of mathematicians to develop operational rather than statistical and probabilistic models to describe the wave form we call string that produce the wave form we call quantum fields, that produce the density of quantum fields we call particles. As far as I know the problem is operational acna cannot be solved by mathematics upon which the entire discipline wastes its time, only by trial and error construction of primitive geometries in the manner of protein folding. Why? There is nothing left to “average” below the quantum fields’ underlying wave form, the String. (I doubt very very much I will err in this prediction, since I am simply predicting the dominance of this category of error, given the history of this category of error prohibiting human innovation. )

    So, If we required operationalization of all statistical claims, and due diligence against categorical, logical, operational, empirical, rational, and reciprocal inconsistency and therefore inflation and conflation, and obscurantism, very few statistical claims would be published. And those that did would be truth candidates rather than misleading or deceptive, or in furtherance of fraud, for personal, group, political advantage or destruction.

    Repairing the incentives means only (b) restoring government research grants to basic knowledge of the universe, within a list of publicly available known problems, with military (political physical), applied technological(commercial physical), basic bio (political biological), applied medical(commercial bio) and in the private sector – because this is all that is economically possible and demonstrably and operationally successful. (c) separating funds of teaching (undergrad, grad) from research (phd postgrad) in universities by hard financial, legal, and institutional walls.

    —“However, I think much of analytic philosophy would be useful training for a broad spectrum analytic methodologist who aims to improve the structure and interpretation of scientific practice. That should be a career field with specific vocational preparation: analytic methodologist. Analytic philosophy is just a proper subset of this.”—Duke Newcomb

    Scriptural, textual, spoken interpretation is dead. Things don’t speak. Only people do. Things have no intent, people do. All speech is testimonial(due diligence) or honest(warrantied), or dishonest(Fraud). Analytic philosophy is dead. It was killed when Godel wrote his sentence, dying when Popper wrote his, and dead when Kripke gave his first lecture, and Strawson gave the eulogy. Hayek understood he just couldn’t bring it across the line. He didn’t have Turing and Chomsky. I did.

    So we will have no more presumption of honesty and reciprocity until we have restored truthful speech as we have in the past through aggressive suppression, with every man a sheriff, in policing display word and deed for failure of due diligence, failure of warranty, fraud and theft. Until once again we are the able to speak truth regardless of cost, ake nothing not paid for regardless of need, defend the commons regardless of cost.

    The soft eugenics of truth, duty, and reciprocity.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    October 2019.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-29 11:45:00 UTC

  • THE CURRENT CONDITION OF PHILOSOPHY, SCIENCE AND WESTERN CIVILIZATION (important

    THE CURRENT CONDITION OF PHILOSOPHY, SCIENCE AND WESTERN CIVILIZATION

    (important)(profound)

    —“The best practical use of analytic philosophy was rooting out methodological problems in scientific inquiry that arise from conceptual confusion or can otherwise be treated with conceptual analysis. The process of formalization of a language of inquiry failed, but it was only a means to the end of improving scientific methodology.”—Duke Newcomb

    Sort of. This isn’t quite correct. The process of formalization failed, and in doing so took philosophical rationalism, and the claim that philosophy was a means of developing truth by proof, down with it. There is no closure outside of first order logic, and there is no ‘proof’ to be had in argument like there is in mathematics. Even in mathematics, it is only possible because it’s axiomatic (declared), and scale independence(there is no scale independence outside of the arrow range of human senses). The result is that the logics are only falsificationary. That’s all. So, popper’s program of falsification, which he evolved from jewish via-negativa pilpul and critique, was incomplete, and the anglo-germanic analytic via-positiva program was incomplete, and the pursuit of scientific method was incomplete – all for the same reason: all epistemology is eliminative (falsificationary) just like all market activity: trial and error by which that which is not false, survives competition between reason, action, and the results of action in reality.

    —“Continental philosophy is perfectly fine philosophy, if you judge it by the standard of concept production. It’s just poorly written and maliciously employed. However, some interesting, important, and insightful concepts have been produced in the mess of the Continental tradition. It would also be possible to construct an anti-Abrahamic Continental philosophy, starting with Heidegger and Nietzsche. Granted, it would be mostly just another kind of pilpul, but it could be effective.”—Duke Newcomb

    Again, agreed, but I might state this a little more precisely. The continental tradition advances the human technique of fiction we call parable, storytelling, mythology, and theology (free association – utility) requiring the least knowledge, into the human technique of idealism (hypothesis – good) requiring we falsify by reason with more knowledge, before we use the human technique we call science (theory – truth) where we falsify by evidence with the most knowledge.

    Someone brought up Compte last night and I suppose I should do us a favor and drawing the historical parallels as we developed social science over the past few centuries, by the same means Compte suggested in continental prose and I’ve formalized in anglo legal prose.

    And so it is perhaps better to say that a Reasonable Preference or Reciprocal Good aren’t decidable by Truth – only by preference and shared preference. Conversely, a Truth isn’t decidable by preference or good, only by decidability independent of preference or good.

    So the value of the continental method is in the reorganization of paradigms, for the choice and production of preferences and goods, because it served by the subjective and empathic, and communicated by the subjective empathic, and the question of the truth or falsehood, gain or loss, reciprocity or parasitism, that would falsify that claim of preference or good, is the function of science – or what I call Testimonial Truth under the Law of Reciprocity.

    So ideas move up and down the hierarchy, between fictions, ideals(preferential and good), and reals(Decidable), where we suggest, inform, agree, and falsify upon ideals, stated as fictions, ideals, or reals according depending upon our ability, experience(age), and knowledge(information).

    The principle difference being that the continental(ideal) method like the magical, occult (fictional) method, is open to use for deceit – especially the abrahamic deceits which evolved to take advantage of them – and between story on one end, and testimony on the other, we have room for supernatural abuse of storytelling, sophomoric abuse of idealism, and pseudoscientific abuse of testimony.

    Human Cognition

    Intuition—————–Reason————-Operationalism

    Free Association ——-Hypothesis——————Theory

    Empathy—————-Sympathy—————–Evidence

    Story ——————– Ideal —————— Testimony

    Fiction—–Theology — Sophistry — Pseudoscience —-Lie

    Internal Market – Interpersonal Verbal Market – Action Market

    Competition————Competition ———–Competition

    —“The problem is conceptual analysis isn’t enough.”–

    Let’s complete that sentence. Enough for what? To meet the demand for infallibility in the given question? It’s not enough to warranty due diligence that a preference or good is’t an act of fraud or deceit.

    Do you see what I did there? I removed the (foolish) presumption of intellectual honesty, reciprocity, and presumption of error, and moved the point of demarcation for lying from presumption to demonstrated.

    This is why the law of speech has to change. A high trust people able to presume intellectual honesty limited to error, because of thousands of years of (a)militia service for standing, training in reporting, and the criminality of courage (b) the oath upon adulthood, (b) our law to enforce it regardless of rank even if proportional in cost and disincentive, (c) punishment by one’s parents, kin, community, nobility, or aristocracy.

    We were invaded yet again in the modern world, because of our high trust and presumption of innocence, as we were invaded by jews and christianity (making us vulnerable to islam) using the lies of religion in the ancient world; this time with false promise of marxism (class and pseudoscience), feminism (gender and denialism), postmodernism (identity and sophism). And like the ancient world women were the target because they evolved not to speak truth but to obtain conformity from children through continuous false statements, and resources of men through continuous false promise – because that was their evolutionary necessity. Not truth before face and eugenic hierarchy, but dysgenic survival of children regardless of merit, and alliance with women against dominant males for the same reason, at the cost of being continuously undermined by women who do not form a hierarchy of rule, but complete for attention in a rotating market for female sexual, caretaking and social, value.

    —“There are a lot of practical technical problems in empirical methodology of science, as well as in mathematical statistics, the real language of science.”—

    As far as I know, yes, but these are problems of failure of due diligence in the limitation of claims made from the data, because we have created a market under which publication regardless of merit must be justified in order to obtain funding. Which we can easily correct.

    In statistics, which does nothing more than seek to provide commensurability between different distributions at different scales, assisting us in the discovery of hypotheses, we can then attempt to operationalize, there is a very simple test:

    (a) are you engaging in conflation (almost always)

    (a) can you construct an operational hypothesis, theory, or description (meaning operational name) that reproduces those statistics – particularly those statistics that involve rational choice (See Gary Becker’s works) in psychology, or sociology, or politics, or group strategy. In mathematics are you doing the same? (almost never outside of applied mathematics). In physics are you doing the same (absolutely not – Bohr brought postmodernism AND idealism back into physics. And this is the problem with the copenhagen interpretation, and the vast woo woo and mathematical “wooo woo” and pseudoscience that has emerged from it. the failure of mathematicians to develop operational rather than statistical and probabilistic models to describe the wave form we call string that produce the wave form we call quantum fields, that produce the density of quantum fields we call particles. As far as I know the problem is operational acna cannot be solved by mathematics upon which the entire discipline wastes its time, only by trial and error construction of primitive geometries in the manner of protein folding. Why? There is nothing left to “average” below the quantum fields’ underlying wave form, the String. (I doubt very very much I will err in this prediction, since I am simply predicting the dominance of this category of error, given the history of this category of error prohibiting human innovation. )

    So, If we required operationalization of all statistical claims, and due diligence against categorical, logical, operational, empirical, rational, and reciprocal inconsistency and therefore inflation and conflation, and obscurantism, very few statistical claims would be published. And those that did would be truth candidates rather than misleading or deceptive, or in furtherance of fraud, for personal, group, political advantage or destruction.

    Repairing the incentives means only (b) restoring government research grants to basic knowledge of the universe, within a list of publicly available known problems, with military (political physical), applied technological(commercial physical), basic bio (political biological), applied medical(commercial bio) and in the private sector – because this is all that is economically possible and demonstrably and operationally successful. (c) separating funds of teaching (undergrad, grad) from research (phd postgrad) in universities by hard financial, legal, and institutional walls.

    —“However, I think much of analytic philosophy would be useful training for a broad spectrum analytic methodologist who aims to improve the structure and interpretation of scientific practice. That should be a career field with specific vocational preparation: analytic methodologist. Analytic philosophy is just a proper subset of this.”—Duke Newcomb

    Scriptural, textual, spoken interpretation is dead. Things don’t speak. Only people do.Thans have no intent, people do. All speech is testimonial(due diligence) or honest(warrantied), or dishonest(Fraud). Analytic philosophy is dead. It was killed when Godel wrote his sentence, dying when Popper wrote his, and dead when Kripke gave his first lecture, and Strawson gave the eulogy. Hayek understood he just couldn’t bring it across the line. He didn’t have Turing and Chomsky. I did.

    So we will have no more presumption of honesty and reciprocity until we have restored truthful speech as we have in the past through aggressive suppression, with every man a sheriff, in policing display word and deed for failure of due diligence, failure of warranty, fraud and theft. Until once again we are the able to speak truth regardless of cost, ake nothing not paid for regardless of need, defend the commons regardless of cost.

    The soft eugenics of truth, duty, and reciprocity.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    October 2019.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-29 11:42:00 UTC

  • Noah J Revoy Counsel: normal browser window with Biz Account (you), incognito br

    Noah J Revoy

    Counsel: normal browser window with Biz Account (you), incognito browser window with Alt Account. Toggle between for Soft vs Hard arguments. Cross-invite all ‘friends and followers’. Avoid all algorithm sensitive words.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-29 09:57:00 UTC