Curt Doolittle

Source: Facebook

  • HOW WILL P-LAW ON TRUTHFUL AND RECIPROCAL PUBLIC SPEECH AFFECT ME, AND OUR LIVES

    HOW WILL P-LAW ON TRUTHFUL AND RECIPROCAL PUBLIC SPEECH AFFECT ME, AND OUR LIVES?

    We’re decreasing tolerance for, and extending the liability for, the truthfulness and reciprocity we already enforce in contracts, selling, marketing and advertising, to all speech in public to the public, on matters of the public, making it impossible for anyone, including you, marketers, professors, intellectuals, media, and politicians, say anything they can’t testify to in court, because it is testifiable, and reciprocal. Meaning you must limit your public speech in public, to the public in matters public, especially for persona, economic or political gains, to what you can demonstrate you know enough to testify to, and that you can demonstrate you are not advocating, encouraging, or causing, the imposition of costs upon others without their fully informed, voluntary exchange. The only objection you can have is if you want engage in false and or irreciprocal speech. This means we will restore libel, slander, harmful gossip (undermining), psychologizing and moralizing (undermining instead of explaining the rational incentives of the people involved), suggestion(implying but not stating), obscurantism (hiding the truth), all left attempts at using the government to take rather than exchange between us, and all left attempts at lying about humans, our psychological, social, economic, and political orders. In other words, it will restore our informational commons to only that which one warrants is not false and not hurtful or harmful, or you will pay the price as if you did so in court. This means you can say whatever you want as long as it’s a constructive, a compromise exchange, helpful, and true. It means you cant say anything that’s destructive, encouraging conspiracy, harmful, and false. Yes the government, the media, advertising, marketing, public intellectuals, professors and teachers can no longer say comforting false things, and that your protection as a consumer made every single person in a company responsible for telling the truth and doing the reciprocal, ethical, moral thing, or they are open to prosecution. Yes it means that there will be a flurry of court cases as we build up a body of law for the many new conditions the law must cover, but this is what we do all the time, and we are very, very good at it. And it is very hard to be found guilty if you have in fact been careful with your words. And of course, no one cares about petty individual slip ups. We all make them. It is however different when it’s in the media, or from a public intellectual or politician attempting to inform the public or frame public discourse.. I suspect a rapid decline in news and a rapid shift in what remains, and that twitter and Facebook will have very serious problems if they are publishers, and as such will shift to platforms. And very quickly we will go back to a much less politicized, much more peaceful, much more prosocial civilization.”

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-29 19:03:00 UTC

  • “You mean that people think we’re proposing authority instead of reciprocity as

    —“You mean that people think we’re proposing authority instead of reciprocity as the only alternative to exerting authority? …. Is it that people don’t or can’t understand – or is it that they don’t want to because they’re addicted to their false narratives? …. I suppose that sort of addiction could be filed under don’t or can’t understand – little agency.”—Alain Dwight

    —“No, I just mean that people who little or no familiarity with P read or hear that we want to punish lie and automatically conclude we want a monopoly of truth just like so many totalitarian movements before. I know I’d think the same if that was all I knew about P.”—Martin Štěpán

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-29 18:28:00 UTC

  • “We’re saddled with the moral habits we developed for internal use and have been

    —“We’re saddled with the moral habits we developed for internal use and have been expanded externally. Much of Europe had eugenic fitness tested by various diseases and hardships and we heavily and violently suppressed what we now consider to be minor criminal infractions.”—Justin Warren

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-29 18:19:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/73381338_146050650126430_46359930207

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/73381338_146050650126430_4635993020766879744_o_146050643459764.jpg

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-29 18:00:00 UTC

  • Simple Version: You are as responsible for due diligence in what you say in publ

    Simple Version: You are as responsible for due diligence in what you say in public, to the public in matters public, as in testimony before the court.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-29 17:59:00 UTC

  • It took me longer to figure out what the germans had done to try to create secul

    It took me longer to figure out what the germans had done to try to create secular relligion than I think any other problem of religion. but the minute you have secular mindfulness, an ethnical and moral code adjudicated in law, then the ‘mythos’ is really just a matter of the means by which your mind ‘feels’ reality.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-29 16:55:00 UTC

  • YOU DON’T GET IT DO YOU? (RESTORING RELIGION) (Luke does) If we can find a way t

    YOU DON’T GET IT DO YOU? (RESTORING RELIGION)

    (Luke does)

    If we can find a way to unite the secular, rational, traditional, and feminine theological christian, and masculine mythological pagan under natural law, heroic virtues, and christian ethics, we can restore the church(es) to the central position in our civilization and restore the civil society, with common everything except grammar of expression.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-29 16:53:00 UTC

  • THE ONLY ANSWER NECESSARY —“So you think you came from a monkey?”– Jesse Daug

    THE ONLY ANSWER NECESSARY

    —“So you think you came from a monkey?”– Jesse Daughtry

    I know for certain I evolved from a common group of ancestors to the other great apes – yes.

    And, yes, I know for certain people that disagree are lying on purpose, or lying, as do all addicts, to obscure and justify their addiction to the psychological returns on some other lie or set of lies.

    Furthermore I know because of my genetic predispositions my clan has evolved more so than most other humans because we lack pre-human demand for empathic and intuitionistic stimulation in order to maintain attention, reason, judgement, and decidability.

    And yes I know that those of us who are more evolved in these abilities that provide us with agency, are burdened by the remaining less evolved, undomesticated demi-human animals, who are still dependent on herd following intuitions, like the other animals we have domesticated.

    The difference is only that demi-humans, fed a perpetual diet of addictive lies providing the sensation that they are still welcome in the herd, can be ruled, and taxed, more cheaply and productively than they can be enslaved like their ancestors.

    Unfortunately we were too optimistic after the enlightenment and industrial revolution, and gave the demi-human half domesticated animals the vote – and for unsurprising reasons think they are conscious, rational, and possessed of agency, rather than semi-conscious, addicted to comforting lies, slaves who must be herded with more lies, like any addict.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-29 16:21:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_dJ9jhts2Ng/75258567_495466877716874_54545145092

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_dJ9jhts2Ng/75258567_495466877716874_5454514509215432704_o_495466867716875.jpg CLICK YOUR HEELS DOROTHY, WE FOUND HOME. 😉

    —“By establishing mitogenomic timelines, frequencies and dispersals, we show that the L0 lineage emerged within the residual Makgadikgadi–Okavango palaeo-wetland of southern Africa7, approximately 200 ka (95% confidence interval, 240–165 ka). Genetic divergence points to a sustained 70,000-year-long existence of the L0 lineage before an out-of-homeland northeast–southwest dispersal between 130 and 110 ka. Palaeo- climate proxy and model data suggest that increased humidity opened green corridors, first to the northeast then to the southwest. Subsequent drying of the homeland corresponds to a sustained effective population size (L0k), whereas wet–dry cycles and probable adaptation to marine foraging allowed the southwestern migrants to achieve population growth (L0d1’2), as supported by extensive south-coastal archaeological evidence8–10. Taken together, we propose a southern African origin of anatomically modern humans with sustained homeland occupation before the first migrations of people that appear to have been driven by regional climate changes.”—CLICK YOUR HEELS DOROTHY, WE FOUND HOME. 😉

    —“By establishing mitogenomic timelines, frequencies and dispersals, we show that the L0 lineage emerged within the residual Makgadikgadi–Okavango palaeo-wetland of southern Africa7, approximately 200 ka (95% confidence interval, 240–165 ka). Genetic divergence points to a sustained 70,000-year-long existence of the L0 lineage before an out-of-homeland northeast–southwest dispersal between 130 and 110 ka. Palaeo- climate proxy and model data suggest that increased humidity opened green corridors, first to the northeast then to the southwest. Subsequent drying of the homeland corresponds to a sustained effective population size (L0k), whereas wet–dry cycles and probable adaptation to marine foraging allowed the southwestern migrants to achieve population growth (L0d1’2), as supported by extensive south-coastal archaeological evidence8–10. Taken together, we propose a southern African origin of anatomically modern humans with sustained homeland occupation before the first migrations of people that appear to have been driven by regional climate changes.”—

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-29 15:46:00 UTC

  • YOU CAN’T UNSEE IT Their rapid verbal facility with gossip, pilpul, and critique

    YOU CAN’T UNSEE IT

    Their rapid verbal facility with gossip, pilpul, and critique, is not matched by intellectual achievement in arts, writing, innovation, or productivity. And, upon investigation, in all but the hardest of sciences, it still consists of false promise, baiting into hazard, rewards from undermining achieved, pilpul and critique.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-29 15:33:00 UTC