Curt Doolittle

Source: Facebook

  • A logical statement, in formal language statement is not semantically bound (cor

    A logical statement, in formal language statement is not semantically bound (correspondent with reality); it is an axiomatic argument and is merely internally consistent. The only information present is that stated in the axioms.

    A statement in informal language *is* semantically bound (correspondent with reality). There is more information present in informal languages than in formal languages.

    A statement in normative ‘natural’ language is not logically bound, or semantically bound, but merely a matter of useful communication – short hand. There is information outside of the statements necessary to interpret them.

    A statement in colloquial language consists of a mixture of natural and analogical symbols neither logically, correspondently, nor normatively bound. There is both information and structure outside of the statements and structure necessary to interpret them.

    Operational language is an informal language (correspondent with reality) bound not internally, but by existence. It is a higher standard than natural langauge.

    Source date (UTC): 2014-08-05 11:58:00 UTC

  • Untitled

    Source date (UTC): 2014-08-05 09:04:00 UTC

  • THE SOCIALIST DESTRUCTION OF TRUTH The first casualty was Rhetoric. The second D

    THE SOCIALIST DESTRUCTION OF TRUTH

    The first casualty was Rhetoric.

    The second Darwin.

    The third History.

    The fourth Science.

    That was how they attacked truth.

    The ten planks were not all they did.

    Source date (UTC): 2014-08-05 03:49:00 UTC

  • THE TRUTH: MAKING HONEST CAN’T VS SHOULD ARGUMENTS If you’re making a “CAN’T” ar

    THE TRUTH: MAKING HONEST CAN’T VS SHOULD ARGUMENTS

    If you’re making a “CAN’T” argument, then just admit it’s because you can’t. If you’re making a “SHOULD or SHOULDN’T” argument, then state why you should or shouldn’t. But if you’re making a can’t argument while saying it’s because you shouldn’t, then that’s not truth that’s deception.

    It’s true that you CAN’T hold Russia accountable for attacking Ukraine, breaking the postwar consensus, and restarting nuclear proliferation, but that doesn’t me you shouldn’t.

    Truth is true. Lie is Lie. Unknown is Unknown. It’s not complicated.

    Source date (UTC): 2014-08-05 03:43:00 UTC

  • RESTORING LIBERTY: VIOLENCE, TRUTH AND COMMONS 1) First I put VIOLENCE back into

    RESTORING LIBERTY: VIOLENCE, TRUTH AND COMMONS

    1) First I put VIOLENCE back into liberty. (reciprocal insurance and militia)

    2) Then I put TRUTH back into liberty. (propertarian ethics, testimonial truth, and operationalism).

    3) Now I am putting the COMMONS back into liberty.

    Correcting a Century of Pseudoscience, Deception and Immorality – One Concept at a Time.

    THE RESTORATION: Aristocratic Egalitarianism, Propertarianism, and Testimonial Truth.

    (Yes, I am a bit giddy now. Yea. You would be too.)

    Source date (UTC): 2014-08-05 02:50:00 UTC

  • THE PURPOSE OF CRITIQUE – CONSUMPTION So, the purpose of critique is to prevent

    THE PURPOSE OF CRITIQUE – CONSUMPTION

    So, the purpose of critique is to prevent us from constructing our amazing commons by enticing every possible individual to increase consumption rather than save and invest in the commons. You see, declining prices also are part of the commons. Wealth is not created by consumption, but by increases in production that are captured in the commons. In other words, Westerners act as shareholders. We did not need to invent the corporation, because we have lived it for 6000 years.

    Source date (UTC): 2014-08-05 02:44:00 UTC

  • (I figured it out you know. Aristocratic Egalitarians : The Only People Who Coul

    (I figured it out you know. Aristocratic Egalitarians : The Only People Who Could Create Voluntary Commons.)

    Source date (UTC): 2014-08-05 02:06:00 UTC

  • DAILY MISSION TO SWAP DECREASED HUMAN CAPITAL FOR SORT TERM CONSUMPTION You do r

    http://www.nytimes.com/2014/08/05/upshot/why-is-the-economy-still-weak-blame-these-five-sectors.html?smid=tw-shareNYT’S DAILY MISSION TO SWAP DECREASED HUMAN CAPITAL FOR SORT TERM CONSUMPTION

    You do realize that the NYT is all about Critique right? That western civilization produces the worlds greatest commons, and that the Cosmopolitans have been trying to force us to increase consumption and therefore profit the merchants and bankers, at the expense of constructing our competitive advantage: our ability to create commons by denying short term consumption.

    (I figured it out you know. Aristocratic Egalitarianism : The Only People Who Could Make Voluntary Commons)

    Source date (UTC): 2014-08-05 02:05:00 UTC

  • YA DEPARTMENT: CASH FOR CLUNKERS PRODUCED THE OPPOSITE EFFECT

    http://www.aei-ideas.org/2014/08/oops-obamas-cash-for-clunkers-program-actually-lowered-total-new-vehicle-spending/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+aei-ideas%2Feconomics+%28AEIdeas+%C2%BB+Economics%29TOLD YA DEPARTMENT: CASH FOR CLUNKERS PRODUCED THE OPPOSITE EFFECT

    http://www.aei-ideas.org/2014/08/oops-obamas-cash-for-clunkers-program-actually-lowered-total-new-vehicle-spending/

    Source date (UTC): 2014-08-05 02:02:00 UTC

  • END THE LIES: TRUTH, NOT GUILT

    END THE LIES: TRUTH, NOT GUILT

    Source date (UTC): 2014-08-05 02:00:00 UTC