(Sorry. Was using the wrong setting in WP, and the book draft shouldn’t have been visible. )
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-05 20:41:00 UTC
(Sorry. Was using the wrong setting in WP, and the book draft shouldn’t have been visible. )
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-05 20:41:00 UTC
(Kinda pisses me off when some idiot criticizes me for taking full time care of my mother, who can barely walk across the room, and takes her an hour to dress herself. It’s like … what am I gonna do? Roll around europe as an itinerant philosopher-playboy and leave her in a home? It’s a burden, but it’s a better burden than screwing over a parent, and it has given me access to medical treatment that’s fixed what ailed me. but fk. some people are just foul wastes of oxygen.)
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-05 18:59:00 UTC
Any of the ‘-ists are meaningless. Unless you write a constitution that engineers order and suppresses demand for authority, then you’re hand waving another NAP-lie.
So say Rule of Law, Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Property-in-Toto, and then Commune, Oligarchy, Monarchy, or Despot, and then the means of revenue generation to pay for defense of territory externally, and defense of property internally with sheriff, and court , both of which are sufficient to deny competitors conquest. And then what comons will you produce and how will you pay for them, in order to attract trade, people, and opportunity, sufficient that neighboring ‘states’ do not conquer you as a parasite upon their economy.
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-05 18:33:00 UTC
All,
I am occasionally asked where I should direct christians, and I say either to Vox or to James. I follow James. I pay no attention to Vox. I sometimes pay attention to EMJ.
But Testimonial truth is a judicial discipline and it has no mercy. My work is hard enough for the smartest of us, and requires knowledge of multiple fields – especially law, economics, cognitive science, and the philosophy of mathematics and science. But most of all, it limits us to only what we can testify to when submitted as evidence. And there is every place for natural law and every place for christian love, but no place for faith in courts. Courts resolve differences between people who have many differences. Markets provide opportunities for cooperation despite our differences. And the state must create both court and market so we can cooperate despite our differences – especially differences in gender, class, experience, resources, agency, and age.
I do not do theology, philosophy, or ideology, I do law – for engineering the possibility of cooperation between peoples regardless of their differences. A law with which I hope to restore the Church or Churches to an equal house of government, with exclusive dominion over birth, marriage, family, and death, and with which to crush our enemies whether hostile in faith, hostile in pseudoscience, hostile in sophistry, hostile linying; or hostile in denial of evidence left behind by the demonstrated behavior of man.
My job is not to build a church. That is for the faithful. That is for you. But apparently, it is necessary to produce a clearing upon which others can build one. Because christianity has utterly failed as a political religion, has failed as a social religion, and is at present devolving into a folk religion – a pure ‘faith’ and not a religion. A Religion requires institutions to hold territory and people. And very shortly in civilizational time, christians will have none. And judaism’s undermining by the pseudosciences of marxism and feminism, and sophisms of postmodernism, and lying and denying political correctness and islam’s destruction of civilizations by rates of invasion, rates of reproduction and success in evangelism, have claimed every civlization that has not eradicated them.
As always, deliver faith unto your god as is his due.
But unlike god, Caesar (the court) cannot see, test, or trust your faith.
And I do the work of Caesar.
The work of faith is up to you.
Affections.
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-05 18:22:00 UTC

photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_dJ9jhts2Ng/74662391_500450310551864_2008810256502620160_o_500450307218531.jpg TYING THE UNIVERSE TOGETHER IN ONE CHART
(example of using the grammars)
I made this to illustrate that austrian economics is simply the lowest level of economic study, using operationalism (a sequence of rational incentives) in order to circumvent the problem of a full accounting. For this reason I equate austrian economics with rule of law as the foundations of social science. So, full accounting economics under rule of law,. The purpose of which is to improve our information and understanding without interfering.
Chicago Economics sought to remain within the rule of law and provide solutions to insure us from exceptions.
Most macro economics is concerned largely with monetary, banking, and financial system and it has very little to do with anything other than how broken this archaic treasury, financial, banking and credit system is.
Most political economics (mainstream) is an exercise in the use of maximum disinformation for the purpose of maximizing commercial, financial, and political extraction from the productive classes using the false promise of employment as a measure.TYING THE UNIVERSE TOGETHER IN ONE CHART
(example of using the grammars)
I made this to illustrate that austrian economics is simply the lowest level of economic study, using operationalism (a sequence of rational incentives) in order to circumvent the problem of a full accounting. For this reason I equate austrian economics with rule of law as the foundations of social science. So, full accounting economics under rule of law,. The purpose of which is to improve our information and understanding without interfering.
Chicago Economics sought to remain within the rule of law and provide solutions to insure us from exceptions.
Most macro economics is concerned largely with monetary, banking, and financial system and it has very little to do with anything other than how broken this archaic treasury, financial, banking and credit system is.
Most political economics (mainstream) is an exercise in the use of maximum disinformation for the purpose of maximizing commercial, financial, and political extraction from the productive classes using the false promise of employment as a measure.

Source date (UTC): 2019-11-05 16:48:00 UTC
DEFINITIONS: REGULATORY CAPTURE AND RENT-SEEKING AND CORRUPTION
REGULATORY CAPTURE (THE RESULT)
Regulatory capture is a corruption of authority that occurs when a political entity, policymaker, or regulatory agency is co-opted to serve the commercial, ideological, or political interests of a minor constituency, such as a particular geographic area, industry, profession, or ideological group.
When regulatory capture occurs, a special interest is prioritized over the general interests of the public, leading to a net loss for society.
Government agencies suffering regulatory capture are called “captured agencies.”
Regulatory capture is the result of “rent-seeking” and political failure; client politics βoccurs when most or all of the benefits of a program go to some single, reasonably small interest (e.g., industry, profession, or locality) but most or all of the costs will be borne by a large number of people (for example, all taxpayers).β
RENT SEEKING (THE PRIVATE SECTOR)
Rent-seeking in public choice theory, as well as in economics, involves seeking to increase one’s share of existing wealth without creating new wealth.
Rent-seeking results in reduced economic efficiency through misallocation of resources, reduced wealth-creation, lost government revenue, heightened income inequality, and potential national decline.
Attempts at capture of regulatory agencies to gain a coercive monopoly can result in advantages for the rent seeker in a market while imposing disadvantages on their incorrupt competitors. This is one of many possible forms of rent-seeking behavior.
CORRUPTION (THE POLITICAL SECTOR)
Corruption is dishonesty or criminal activity undertaken by a person or organization entrusted with a position of authority, often to acquire illicit benefit, or, abuse of entrusted power for one’s private gain.
Corruption may include many activities including bribery and embezzlement, though it may also involve practices that are legal in many countries.
Political corruption occurs when an office-holder or other governmental employee acts in an official capacity for personal gain. Corruption is most commonplace in kleptocracies, oligarchies, narco-states and mafia states.
Corruption can occur on different scales. Corruption ranges from small favors between a small number of people (petty corruption), to corruption that affects the government on a large scale (grand corruption), and corruption that is so prevalent that it is part of the everyday structure of society, including corruption as one of the symptoms of organized crime.
Corruption and crime are endemic sociological occurrences which appear with regular frequency in virtually all countries on a global scale in varying degree and proportion. Individual nations each allocate domestic resources for the control and regulation of corruption and crime. Strategies to counter corruption are often summarized under the umbrella term anti-corruption.
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-05 16:39:00 UTC
YES I AM A TRADITIONALIST EUROPEAN FASCIST π
—“The term “conservative” ought to be abandoned for no other reason than it is fundamentally a term that denotes a defensive position. That’s why it has never conserved anything. Playing defense is always a losing strategy. It’s time to go on offense. TRADITIONALISM is the way.”— New Republic @MeisterDutch
As in all things, all psychology, ethics, sociology and politics can easily be described in economic terms:
Masculine: Conservative: Accumulate Quality – Eugenics.
Neutral: Productive: Facilitate Accumulations – Compromise
Feminine: Consumptive: Accumulate Quantity – Dysgenics.
Established Male Empirical: Aristocracy, Hierarchy, Authority, Force(Command), Saving – Long Term
Ascendent Male Practical: Oligarchy, Meritocracy, Rule of Law, Production – Med Term
Female Empathy Impulsive: Priesthood, Equality, Undermining(religion), Consumption – Short Term
Western Man’s Strategy:
Rule of Law, Forces Markets, Forces Competition between Masculine, Aristocracy(law), Oligarchy(philosophy), Feminine, Priesthood(theology/secular theology), and their constituencies: Markets in everything, including Tripartism.
It’s the optimum order.
It’s the optimum order ASSUMING security. It’s most secure when OPPOSED at war, and is vulnerable to undermining within by 1-Pacifism w/o Conflict. 2- Financialism:Baiting 3-Cults: (Supernatural Jewish, Christian, Muslim) and pseudoscience: marxist, feminist, postmodernism.)
If you’re catching on, it means war is the only answer.
Talking just buys the enemy time.
Time we don’t have.
Soon. Return to Form: Hoist the Jolly Roger, St. George’s Cross, and profit from noose, guillotine, pike, and pyre. There is no more industry more profitable than war.
And no mark one leaves on history more indelible.
Rule by
… Rule of Law of
… … Sovereignty and Reciprocity,
… … Using Strictly Constructed P-Law
… … Including involuntary warranty for truthful speech.
… … Every Man A Sheriff
… … The Duel
… Judge and Jury
… … Extra Judicial Punishment in Extremis
… … Universal Letter Of Marque
Requiring;
… Civilizationalism,
… Nationalism,
… Familism,
… Zero Tolerance
Government by;
… Monarchy (Strong)
… Cabinet of Professionals
… Houses of the Classes with Veto Only
… … House of Lords (Territory)
… … Parliament of Industry
… … Church of The Family
With Arts and Letters
… Funded by The Monarchy
Economy with
… State investment and return on
… … Commercial and Consumer Credit
… … Basic Research
… … Heavy Industry
… … Resource Extraction
… … Infrastructure
… Private investment and return on
… … Automation wherever possible
… … Consumer goods services and information
Providing
… … mandatory retirement savings.
… … Redistribution of some % of proceeds
… … and zero interest consumer credit.
At Cost Of
… … Soft Eugenics
… … Very, very, selective tolerance for immigration
… … Forcible Repatriation.
Where
Insured by:
… A Militia of Every Able Bodied Man
… A Professional Military
… … with Sole Discretion over rules of engagement.
And An Empire Sufficient for Defense from All.
That is Fascist Traditionalism. And That’s A Good Thing
Deus Vult! π
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-05 15:17:00 UTC
ROMAN WEEKS VS USA CURRENT, AND FUTURE WEEKS AND WHY?
AFAIK: OPTIMUM CALENDAR:
13 * 4wk, 7day Months is pretty optimum in modernity.
5 * 6hr work days wit 1hr break, are maximum human productivity at current work rates (hard). Tohse of us who are elites will always work more – because we love to.
4 * 6hr work days, and three days off reconstructs the family unit. Even if both parents work. This should be possible with automation and exit of the underclasses.
End summer vacations for schools and universities, and increase vacations throughout the year for all.
WHY IS THIS MISLEADING?
because (a) indoctrination into the culture (which matters), (b) the necessity of ‘being open for business’ the maximum amount of hours, therefore seizing the maximum number of opportunities, is a competitive necessity unless not only the whole country does it (see Cyprus – which is an outlier) or the whole world does it (seven day weeks). Because ‘availability’ is in fact a competitive advantage.
So the problem remains one of competing with others externally for opportunity via availability, competing with others internally for access to opportunity, experience and information, so that ‘not being there’ is a disadvantage over those who ‘are there’ – and there is nothing that can stop it whatsoever – except legislatively and therefore universally leveling the playing field. So if you want it, that’s the answer.
So anyone’s job that is driven by opportunity (sales, executive), and private professionals who want to work will work whatever they want for as much as they want, and people who not opportunity but production oriented, such as managerial, administrative, clerical, craftsman, labor, and service will work regularly because frankly YOU ARE SUBSTITUTABLE. That’s why you will always make less income that NON-SUBSTITUTABLE pepole. And it’s why non-substitutable people make more money: because ten percent of the people do
ROMAN CALENDAR
The Romans did not recognize the week as a unit of time, so didnβt have weekends.
The Romans had months, which they divided up by specially named days: Kalends(1st), Nones(~5th/7th), and Ides(~13th/15th). The time of these was probably originally based on phases of the moon.
The Kalends was always the first day of the month.
The Nones were eight days before the Ides, on either the 5th or 7th of the month.
The Ides were thought to have originally coincided with the full moon, and fell on the 15th of months with 31 days, and otherwise on the 13th.
These were not treated as holidays; they were purely for identifying days in the month. Instead of saying, βItβs Monday,β the Romans would say, βItβs sixteen days before the Kalends of September.β They always counted backwards, and inclusively.
As for workdays vs holidays, the Romans celebrated many fixed holidays (feriae), as well as ones that were simply declared. Most were religious, at least in name, and were occasions when at least some people did not work.
In some cases, games were held, often funded by the wealthy, perhaps with the goal of getting votes.
There were nearly 180 of these held during a typical year, and though every worker did not take every one of these days off, there were many opportunities to have a day off here and there.
Roman work days: 365days – 180days = 185days = ~15 Days a Month work, ~15 days off. (this isn’t likely). It’s more likely 20-22, with every day for hand to mouth people, who didn’t run a farm.
Americans work ~21 days a month including holidays.
One thing to remember: there were no laws limiting how many hours or days an employee could work, what they must be paid, or how many days off they must have. People who were not slaves lived hand to mouth, and probably could not take a lot of days off for economic reasons.
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-05 13:42:00 UTC
JESUS
While Aristotle explains it, albeit doesn’t finish, as far as I know jesus gave us the only ‘scientific’ improvement on the natural law. The ONLY ONE EVER IN HISTORY. That’s why he’s important for mankind. Every other person who tried to deliver that message whether european, or hindu or buddhist, sinic or semite failed – spectacularly.
I do true. That’s all have to do. True is always better. ALl of history is excessively concerned with good even if false.
I do true.
Jesus is correct because made a true claim in the only language and paradigm he understood.
I don’t have that problem. I can speak in parsimonious natural law and say he spoke a truth even if not truthfully – simply because he couldn’t.
Unfortunately his insight was used to destroy and decline rather than expand and improve.
Which is something we can do that he couldn’t.
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-05 12:31:00 UTC

photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_dJ9jhts2Ng/74687758_500313907232171_6537583039382290432_o_500313903898838.jpg MAKE MEN
—“I tried to follow Doolittle into an alleyway in Warsaw. He thrashed me with his gold-tipped cane and called me a degenerate cur!”–Michael Vermeer @freedomismoral
We must balance the permissiveness with discipline, so that the boys engage in pranks but not crimes; so that as men they will be competitors in the market and fathers at home; and be soldiers in war, and citizens in the commons.
Aristocracy: Cheer them on, but carry a stick. ;)MAKE MEN
—“I tried to follow Doolittle into an alleyway in Warsaw. He thrashed me with his gold-tipped cane and called me a degenerate cur!”–Michael Vermeer @freedomismoral
We must balance the permissiveness with discipline, so that the boys engage in pranks but not crimes; so that as men they will be competitors in the market and fathers at home; and be soldiers in war, and citizens in the commons.
Aristocracy: Cheer them on, but carry a stick. π

Source date (UTC): 2019-11-05 12:21:00 UTC