Curt Doolittle

Source: Facebook

  • “Its a modality of life that can go either way but has apply universally. I thin

    —“Its a modality of life that can go either way but has apply universally. I think we currently have the worst of both worlds. No reciprocity.”—Tyrone Jackson @cashmoneyglock

    You are confusing Reciprocity with Proportionality. We have more reciprocity in the US than anywhere on earth because we have common law.

    We have insufficient consumer protection (warranty,liability) especially in truthful speech (fully informed), especially in Consumer Finance.

    We might argue that the state, through contractual asymmetric enforcement (bundling, optimistic presentation without warranty and responsibility-liability, entrapments, penalty clauses etc ) permits and facilitates irrecipprocity in commerce, but we cannot make the case that the state or economy produces irreciprocal conditions. Just the opposite.

    I am not going to let the left ‘mal-appropriate’ Reciprocity the way they have inverted rule-of-law, liberalism, freedom, equality, into explicit lies.

    Morality = Reciprocity within the Limits of Proportionality. Reciprocity increases, and Disproportionality Decreases, Cohesion.

    The Entrepreneurial billionaires’ aren’t the problem. The multi-millionaries in the financial sector are – and every single one of them is a parasite upon our people.

    Hugs.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-07 09:53:00 UTC

  • HUMAN BEINGS IN A FEW PARAGRAPHS The human brain grows in utero, biased in organ

    HUMAN BEINGS IN A FEW PARAGRAPHS

    The human brain grows in utero, biased in organization, either for the female Synthetic(conflationary) by hemispheric integration (side to side), short term (temporal), experiential(emotional), personal (empathic), preferable(experience) and dysgenic(quantity); or the male Analytic(disambiguating), by hemispheric isolation (back-to front) long term (intertemporal), analytical(intellectual), political (empirical), truth(action), and eugenic(quality) – with each of us resulting by genetic bias, to demonstrate some point on that distribution, between the Female Solipsistic-to-Psychotic and the Male Aspie-to-Autistic Extreme.

    And because the brain is organized as it must be, to give attention to that which provides the most information, and because that which receives attention (novelty identification, rehearsal to integrate for recall, and reinforcement through recall), provides the associative-foundation for subsequent learning (framing), and as a consequence, the associative bias for subsequent learning.

    As such we think, display, speak and act, within our genetic biases, including the preference for the most easily understood frame (Feminine empathic to Masculine analytic),the most easily understood means of expression (speech), the most easily understood means of advocacy(approval/disapproval-empathic/personal vs truth/falsehood-analytic/political), including our means of argument (approval/disapproval independent of truth/falsehood, vs truth/falsehood independent of approval/disapproval).

    And while we currently (poorly) articulate intelligence plus five factors of personal (personality) bias: openness/novelty-consistency/familiarity, Extraversion-Introversion, Agreeableness-Disagreeablness, Conscientiousness(Organized)-Impulsivity(Disorganized), Neuroticism/Worry-Calm/Mindfulness, we all cluster around three common (stereotypical, archetypal) combinations: mother, ascendent male, and established male.Evidence in argumentative methods, educational degrees, occupational intersets, and voting patterns.

    And while we currently (rather well) articulate six factors of interpersonal(moral) biases, Care/Harm, Fairness/Cheating, Loyalty/Betrayal, Authority/Subversion, Sanctity/Degradation, and Liberty/Oppression, we all cluster around three common (stereotypical, archetypal) combinations: liberal(mother), libertarian(ascendent male), and conservative(established male). Evidence in consumer and voting patterns.

    And our conflict strategies vary accordingly between feminine undermining and reputation destruction (‘ostracize/kill’), and male argument and hierarchy construction(‘discipline, correct’).

    And our anti-social behavior varies accordingly between feminine social hostility by promiscuity, emotional terrorizing, social undermining, and male physical hostility by substance abuse, violence, crime.

    While each of us appears impenetrable as an individual given the abilities and biases we possess, the memories we possess, and the context we live in, in the aggregate, all populations adhere to these evolutionary tendencies, with the principle variation between groups very few factors: (a) the degree of neoteny achieved, (b) the verbal acuity achieved, (c) the demographic distribution of ability (class) and therefore (d) the strategy institutions,, traditions, norms, that are necessary for that degree of neoteny, verbal acuity, demographic distribution.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-07 07:06:00 UTC

  • All truth propositions seek to meet demand for sufficient infallibiilty for the

    All truth propositions seek to meet demand for sufficient infallibiilty for the given question – but we forget it’s only useful if we know the question.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-06 16:54:00 UTC

  • Got instructions from ‘the management’ to invest in Brandon, Luke and a few othe

    Got instructions from ‘the management’ to invest in Brandon, Luke and a few others I won’t name. Truth is Stepan is better online than I am, and Alain is close. And it’s thrilling, Brandon can be. … But I want to explain why I’m cautious with investments. And that’s because by trying to accelerates one’s journey we always and everywhere interfere and anchor that journey. And for intellectual excellence to emerge in any individual he must produce and OWN his journey. So it is only helpful to provide positive reinforcement, and to ‘advise’ on ‘near misses’. This means keeping an eye on something and investing in ‘expanding gupon’ any given insight they have. So one can ‘instruct a body of people in foundations. You can play king of the hill to teach afterward. But you can only give subtle assistance upon request if you want to make fellow ‘kings’. This method of teaching requires knowledge skill, and must only progress over time. And this is why I am increasingly hostile to our prussian industrialized education system – which is suitable only for girls and the underclasses, and not at all suitable for boys and men – who if anything must learn to compete in individually, in groups, and in tribes (armies) to care enough to invest in themselves, their families, their societies and their people.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-06 15:23:00 UTC

  • “Guilt based religion demands there be victims to provide a source for guilt. Ma

    —“Guilt based religion demands there be victims to provide a source for guilt. Makes for easy alignment with the martyrdom of victim signal parasitism.”—Luke Weinhagen

    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-06 15:12:00 UTC

  • There is no ‘oh woe is me’ in europe’s natural religion

    There is no ‘oh woe is me’ in europe’s natural religion.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-06 13:55:00 UTC

  • “Your writing is difficult to read because it’s unreadable.”—@Slackhurst Not t

    —“Your writing is difficult to read because it’s unreadable.”—@Slackhurst

    Not true: millions of people watch it, thousands read it, hundreds learn from it, dozens of compete with it, and a handful now teach it. So you are only a measure of your own ignorance and inability. I write for leaders – not pop theology, philosophy, or therapy for the whining weak.

    Man up. Grow up. Do the Work.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-06 12:48:00 UTC

  • Look, there are feminine theologians (weak), ascendent male philosophers (able),

    Look, there are feminine theologians (weak), ascendent male philosophers (able), and masculine law-givers (strong). I know what I do. I do law as did Odin. I do law, as did Aristotle. Law states the via negativa, theology states the via-positiva, and philosophy attempts to produce human action that delivers the compromise results.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-06 12:38:00 UTC

  • “The Bible is not what it seems. It is a book of the mind.”—Stephen Stobinski

    —-“The Bible is not what it seems. It is a book of the mind.”—Stephen Stobinski

    Yes it is a book that functions by SUGGESTION undermines reason rather than EXPOSITION that improves reason?

    Is the bible a book for poisoning the mind with an addiction to self indulgence?

    Or like aristotle, a book for empowering the mind so that it is free of self indulgence?

    Or is it as simple as weak feminine-brained and infantile minds must feel, and strong masculine-brained and adult minds may reason?

    I am increasingly convinced that this is the answer which is why it’s an necessity to provide different paradigms for teaching a distribution of minds incapable of learning by other means.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-06 12:34:00 UTC

  • Most advanced subject in P-Operationalism, that so far I can’t find a single per

    Most advanced subject in P-Operationalism, that so far I can’t find a single person that grasps it – even though my video on the 20th century of mysticism has been around forever..

    —“A preference for truth or for sincerity as a method may be prejudice based on some personal standard, inconsistent, in politics, with practical good”– – Keynes

    —“Is Keynes, (an Anglo aristocrat?) in the same tradition as The Enemy or is it a different type of lying?”–@TruthRespecter

    1) He’s British, Eccentric, Wealthy, and Gay 2) He’s a marxist (it’s in his notes) 3) He’s restating marx in quantitative redistributive innumeracy (mathematical pseudoscience) 4) He did not understand the consequences to capital – hayek sure did; 5) Nor how people would run with it; 6) Hayek did and thought he should counter him, but he lacked the language (or didn’t use it).

    This is Advanced P-Operationalism, where the 20thc Problem with the sciences is consistent between (right-wrong): Poincare-Cantor, Hilbert-Einstein, Hayek-Keynes, Turing-Godel, Doolittle-Mises,

    With Bridgman (Physics) understanding Einstein’s partial success without understanding Einstein’s failure. Hilbert’s failure understanding Brouwer, and his failure to correct Einstein as has led to the current condition where

    Economics is frozen and off the rails

    Physical science is frozen and off the rails

    No progress has been made in law, political science, or social science.

    Education in general is a catastrophe.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-06 12:28:00 UTC