Source: Facebook

(Choice Words)

***Lester has therefore engaged in the argumentative technique of Marxist Critique, Using Postmodern verbalism, which is to postulate a straw man, as a vehicle for criticizing extant ideas, in an effort to leave his argument as the last one standing, even though it contains no critical properties. He then states that he is applying critical rationalism, which Popper evolved from cosmopolitan hermeneutic interpretation of scripture – albeit with less deceitful intentions – when in fact, he does not adhere to the constraints of scientific argument. By conflating Critique (verbalism) with Critical Rationalism (criticism), in the absence of testable propositions, Lester’s innovation is not his theory of liberty, it is that he has extended Marxist and Postmodern Critique to address libertarian property rights. Like the marxists, socialists, and postmodernists, we must assume that he does so for unconscious reasons and is a victim of his education. However, the twentieth century’s conquest of liberty, and its near dark age in social pseudoscience and deceptive philosophy, was conducted using such obscurantist and justifactionary arguments in both pseudoscience and pseudorationalism.***

This criticism of Lester has turned out to be an exceptional vehicle for illustrating just how much the liberty movement has absolutely nothing to do with aristocratic egalitarian liberty, and everything to do with creating as an elaborate justification of multiculturalism, as did the socialists and neo-conservatives.

(Thanks Don Finnegan )