Source: Facebook

  • (man talk) Is there ANYTHING more pleasant than sitting with your friends, over

    (man talk)

    Is there ANYTHING more pleasant than sitting with your friends, over food and drinks, talking about business, politics, and women? I dunno. Add a fire and all we have done in 10,000 years is increase the number of syllables in a sentence.

    Same subjects. More parts. That’s it.

    🙂


    Source date (UTC): 2014-09-27 11:48:00 UTC

  • Why do the turks run the restaurants in Ukraine? So obvious: – The Turks LOOK fo

    Why do the turks run the restaurants in Ukraine? So obvious:

    – The Turks LOOK for something to do. (Just like european americans)

    – The Ukrainians wait until something MUST be done.

    – The Russians ONLY do things that they they were told to, and can’t get away with not doing. (Unless it involves shoving or hitting someone, which is an opportunity never to be missed).

    Any place that is clean is not run by Turks, Ukrainians or Russians – probably americans, or in the cases I’ve seen, people from western ukraine (less russified) that have seen enough of the world to want to bring the same standards here.

    Although I gotta say that americans here, in general, annoy the hell out of me. (it’s the ideology). But they work hard and are obsessively honest, and that’s still so rare and wonderful no matter where on earth you find it.

    I keep running into Brits that are such catholic-marxists in atheistic robes that I want to make them disappear in the night to save these people from them.


    Source date (UTC): 2014-09-27 11:10:00 UTC

  • BEST ANSWER YOU WILL FIND While you will hear objections to this, they are the e

    http://t.co/pTQV28O0q3THE BEST ANSWER YOU WILL FIND

    While you will hear objections to this, they are the exception not the rule. All university departments hold biases and suppress competing ideas, and the careers of the members of the department depend upon upholding those biases, because of the incentives to publish, and the authoritarian hierarchy of the university. Universities remain vestiges of the church – which invented the university. And for good reason: grad students make cheap slave labor.

    So, there is very little practical difference between the practice of ideology and the practice of academic research in this regard. In practice, ideas die with their originators and sponsors, not when they are successfully attacked. The incentive to over-invest in a paradigm to retain one’s position is too high. This is why students must choose departments based upon what the department members publish.

    Sowell’s recommended “fix” is to financially and organizationally separate research departments (that do not serve the interests of students whatsoever) from teaching departments (whose only concern is the students) but the administration (serving neither the students or the researchers) is currently consuming all the vast investment americans are making in educations (that have questionable return, and in some cases negative return.) Realistically if undergrad students paid teaching professors, not researchers, for their education, and we regulated administration and capital acquisition to 20% of fees, education would be absurdly inexpensive, and students would leave with little debt. We could then ask grad students and phd students and the government to bear the costs of research, rather than the undergrads. And we would shrink the administration back to it’s necessary and sufficient size. (Financially, academia now has absorbed all the costs originally saved by eliminating the church. For all intents and purposes, we have merely replaced academia and church with academia. In fact, I am pretty confident that academia is far more expensive than the post-enlightenment church was in every form of capital consumption.)

    But the university system is not designed for students and their careers, it is designed to provide economic rents to researchers and administrators, by selling faulty products to students, that in any other industry would be open to class action lawsuits for fraudulent representation, and possible only because of inflationary pressure on by the government, in the same way that the government created inflationary pressure on the housing industry leading to the 2008 crash.

    See Sowell’s work and Caplan’s work. Caplan is always someone you must be skeptical of nearly everything he says, so his his empirical work is what you can appreciate, but you must ignore all his conclusions. (Sort of like reading Marx.)


    Source date (UTC): 2014-09-27 10:46:00 UTC

  • 1) That the family structure of all worldwide organizations, from business and i

    http://www.quora.com/What-are-the-principle-ideas-of-the-American-political-theorist-James-Burnham-and-what-is-their-importance/answer/Curt-Doolittle?share=1BURNHAM?

    1) That the family structure of all worldwide organizations, from business and industry to politics and government would be replaced by professional managers with empirical expertise in individual disciplines. (Law, Accounting, Finance, Economics, Marketing (Propaganda), etc.)

    “The Managerial Society”

    2) That Democracies must always result in Oligarchies, without exception, out of necessity.

    3) That the entire marxist, socialist, postmodern, (and feminist) program was both dishonest and contrary to science and reason. And that all that will occur no matter what we do, is that we will replace one set of oligarchs with another set of oligarchs and because these oligarchs will function as elites, there will no material difference.

    4) IMPLIED: that the managerial class will destroy family, culture, and nation.


    Source date (UTC): 2014-09-27 09:48:00 UTC

  • Untitled

    http://www.quora.com/Does-civil-society-include-business/answer/Curt-Doolittle?share=1


    Source date (UTC): 2014-09-27 09:43:00 UTC

  • having ignorant, liberal education twits write bot-like questions that do nothin

    http://www.quora.com/How-can-I-know-how-people-view-me-as-a-person/answer/Curt-Doolittle?share=1Stop having ignorant, liberal education twits write bot-like questions that do nothing more than persist postmodern pseudoscience? Learn something empirical ok?


    Source date (UTC): 2014-09-27 09:42:00 UTC

  • (sentimental) It’s OK For the States to burn it’s economy, inventory, and people

    (sentimental)

    It’s OK For the States to burn it’s economy, inventory, and people on containing Russian aggression and Islamic violence. But for some reason it isn’t OK for Germans to endure any economic hardship. And it’s only OK for France to experience a mild inconvenience if it hurts the States to experience it.

    If the Aristocracy (military) will not support freedom anywhere and everywhere it is not a member of the aristocracy, because it does not uphold both the aristocratic contract for reciprocal insurance, and the egalitarian entry of all those who would serve reciprocal insurance.

    You allies in liberty are your only allies. Everyone else is a mere convenience. France has never been an ally and Germany demonstrates it is not either.

    Merkel should go join Putin since it appears they are still comrades.

    (irritated)


    Source date (UTC): 2014-09-27 09:05:00 UTC

  • “Calling himself “dangerously addicted” to the Drudge Report, Thiel praised Inte

    ——-“Calling himself “dangerously addicted” to the Drudge Report, Thiel praised Internet media mogul Matt Drudge for “transform[ing] the media industry massively in the ‘90s.”’——-

    Don Finnegan


    Source date (UTC): 2014-09-27 08:59:00 UTC

  • (The fashionistas were right about one thing: multiple layers of polo shirts are

    (The fashionistas were right about one thing: multiple layers of polo shirts are really awesome when it gets cold. And it’s cold here today.)


    Source date (UTC): 2014-09-27 07:46:00 UTC

  • Morals vs Property — (excerpt) Of Haidt’s evolutionary origins of moral intuiti

    — Morals vs Property —

    (excerpt)

    Of Haidt’s evolutionary origins of moral intuitions three can be expressed as individual property rights:

    1. Care/harm for others, protecting them from harm. (The asset of life and body.)

    2. Proportionality/cheating, Justice, treating others in proportion to their actions. (The asset of goods.)

    3. Liberty/Oppression, characterizes judgments in terms of whether subjects are tyrannized. (The asset of time, opportunity.)

    And three can be expressed as community property rights covering social capital, which have been and continue to be mirrored in corporate shareholder agreements.

    4. In-Group Loyalty/In-Group Betrayal to/of your group, family, nation, polity.

    5. Respect/Authority/Subversion for tradition and legitimate authority.

    6. Purity/Sanctity/Degradation/Disgust, avoiding disgusting things, foods, actions.

    It should be noted that the male reproductive strategy among chimpanzees as well as humans evolved to kill off males in opposing groups and collect females. And that females evolved to place greater emphasis on children and females than the (fungible) tribe.

    As such the distribution of moral intuitions varies in intensity between the feminine (1-3) and the masculine (4-6). This difference in moral intuitions roughly reflects the voting pattern we have seen since the enfranchisement of women into the electorate: an increase in the use of political violence to produce an increase in the female reproductive strategy (individual dysgenic reproduction) and a decrease in the male reproductive strategy (tribal eugenic reproduction).


    Source date (UTC): 2014-09-27 03:03:00 UTC