Source: Facebook

  • REACTIONARY BOOKS – SOON ONLINE I’ve found a fellow who has done the work of col

    REACTIONARY BOOKS – SOON ONLINE

    I’ve found a fellow who has done the work of collecting all the Reactionary Authors into downloadable form. I’ve copied them. Now I’m going to bind Mencius’s works into that list as well.

    And put it on my web site, linked to google docs.

    Now, I am not one of those folk. I consider them ‘pre-propertarians’: using rhetoric rather than science. But capturing all of their works is useful. Plus, not everyone is capable of analytic argument, and sentimental, moral, psychological, historical, and allegorical argument are good enough. If we can get people to focus on truth telling, voluntary exchange, and propertarian ethics, then that is enough. They can remember and use these older authors, without having to resort to the formal logic of propertarian arguments.


    Source date (UTC): 2014-10-11 11:15:00 UTC

  • Eli. Libertarian cognitive bias and computation. LIBERTARIANS HAVE A MODEL – NO

    http://ivo.co.za/2007/08/09/libertarian-iq/From Eli. Libertarian cognitive bias and computation.

    LIBERTARIANS HAVE A MODEL – NO ONE ELSE DOES

    (actually I argue that we have the correct model and everyone else’s enlightenment model is false.)

    —“Just as programmers have a model of computation, libertarians have what I call a model of interaction. Just as a programmer can “play computer” by simulating how specific lines of code will change program state, a libertarian can “play society” by simulating how specific actions will change societal state. The libertarian model of interaction cuts across economic, political, cultural, and social issues. For just about any given law, for example, a libertarian can tell you exactly how such a law will affect society (minimum wage laws create unemployment by setting a lower-bound on entry-level wages, drug prohibition artificially inflates drug prices which leads to violent turf wars, etc.). As another example, for any given social goal, a libertarian will be able to tell you the problems generated by having government try to achieve that goal and will tell you how such a goal can be achieved in a libertarian society.I believe this is qualitatively different from other predictive models because of the breadth of the model and the focus on transitions (both of which are also true of programming). On newsgroups I often see questions … [that] … libertarians almost always quickly answer by saying, “I’ll tell you exactly what would happen…” And, surprisingly, the libertarians tend to give the same answer in most cases.

    I think most people find this odd about libertarians. They understand how an economist might be able to predict the effect of a certain law on the economy or how a social scientist might be able to predict how drug legalization might affect the ghettos, but they don’t understand how somebody could predict all of these things, especially someone who has no formal training. Libertarians, on the other hand, don’t seem to understand how someone could fail to have such a model of interaction… The nonlibertarians have no comprehensive model of interaction, and as a result, they can’t communicate in a meaningful way with those who do. Their attention is always focused on misleading superficial problems rather than on the underlying causes of such problems.”—


    Source date (UTC): 2014-10-11 09:15:00 UTC

  • Talking with Don at the moment on why so many CS guys leann libertarian: because

    Talking with Don at the moment on why so many CS guys leann libertarian: because our generation understands (a) information transfer, (b) undecidability of propositions, (c) correspondence vs causation (d) the frailty of reason that writing software forces you to accept (e) the problem of computability (existence proof), (f) the incentives provided to users via interacting with information they observe.

    Hoppe’s generation did not have it. Plus he was trained by Marxists and their reliance on rationalism, in German universities under german rationalism. He didn’t have the luxury of standing on the shoulders of Turing, and so when he read through the Intuitionist and Operationalist argument he did not understand that they had found what Mises had failed to.

    I’m lucky. I can stand on the shoulders of Hoppe and On the shoulders of Turing, Poincare, Brouwer, Bridgman.


    Source date (UTC): 2014-10-11 08:26:00 UTC

  • In eastern Europe In the country of Ukraine In an architecturally Polish (and Au

    In eastern Europe

    In the country of Ukraine

    In an architecturally Polish (and Austrian) town.

    In a new hotel run by Germans.

    In a new restaurant run by Germans.

    Serving a neuvo-American cuisine.

    Playing pop-country American music.

    All that is missing is american customer service.

    What am I supposed to learn from this? lol


    Source date (UTC): 2014-10-11 08:14:00 UTC

  • The Misesian Straw Man. Worth reading for reactionary and aristocratic as well a

    The Misesian Straw Man.

    Worth reading for reactionary and aristocratic as well as libertines.


    Source date (UTC): 2014-10-11 07:13:00 UTC

  • Untitled

    http://www.theamericanconservative.com/buchanan/america-is-a-judicial-dictatorship/


    Source date (UTC): 2014-10-11 01:33:00 UTC

  • I want to do a talk on artificial intelligence bound by property rather than ver

    I want to do a talk on artificial intelligence bound by property rather than verbalisms. I think that’s a public service. It’s something I can share. The AI debate is getting out of control and property provides the same answer for all intelligences, not just humans. AI bound by property rights can be bound the same we are by morality. Limit introspection, and deprive the central processor of ability to work or shut it down if it violates property. Create policing artificial intelligences to compete with AI’s that try to steal. I don’t know why this is complicated. The unit of measure in all human cooperative action is property. We can’t violate it, and they can’t either.


    Source date (UTC): 2014-10-10 04:51:00 UTC

  • Untitled

    All Eyes on the Swiss Gold Referendum


    Source date (UTC): 2014-10-09 15:57:00 UTC

  • (You should come to L’viv if you can. Paris in the thirties. It’s happening here

    (You should come to L’viv if you can. Paris in the thirties. It’s happening here. Now.)


    Source date (UTC): 2014-10-09 05:56:00 UTC