Source: Facebook

  • CONSTITUTIONAL ORDER= NATURAL LAW = IN CONCERT WITH REALITY —“To uphold and re

    CONSTITUTIONAL ORDER= NATURAL LAW = IN CONCERT WITH REALITY

    —“To uphold and restore constitutional order if it becomes necessary, to provide further safeguards we will remove those who seek to destabilize constitutional order or have an allegiance to anything other than the constitutional order of this Republic.”—Jerry Odom


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-22 09:03:00 UTC

  • “To make the American Republic stronger and safer and more prosperous than ever

    —“To make the American Republic stronger and safer and more prosperous than ever before. we must realize that government is not the answer to our ills. Limiting government and limiting parasitic behavior, allowing individuals to excel on their own merits, will bring us great peace and prosperity.”–Jerry Odom

    Or said differently, there is no government that provides a solution to bad people, there is only good governmetn for good people. Ergo we must possess only good people, and good people want nothing but liberty.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-22 09:02:00 UTC

  • “A wise and frugal government, which shall restrain men from injuring one anothe

    —“A wise and frugal government, which shall restrain men from injuring one another, and which shall leave them otherwise free to regulate their own pursuits of industry and improvement, and shall not take from the mouth of labor the bread it has earned. This is the sum of good government.”

    ~Thomas Jefferson

    (via Jerry Odom)


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-22 09:00:00 UTC

  • Another Christian Understands. by Stephen Phillips (this is a masculine christia

    Another Christian Understands.

    by Stephen Phillips

    (this is a masculine christian speaking of the natural law in christian prose)

    Hello Curt, I understand what you’re driving at here. I’m a Christian, member of a Calvinist church. I am trying to convince people around me of the same things you were mentioning here.

    The bible conforms to natural law, as a Christian I would say natural law is God’s will.

    The heirarchy of God, men, women, children, animals and the environment. Men are the head of the house snd collectively we are the head of our nation/ethnicity.

    The bible speaks quite plainly about most of these things. Some are not as explicit throughout because I believe it was assumed in both the Greek and Hebrew speaking ancient world. Specifically nationalism but the themes and verses supporting that are there and the rejection of multiracialism is quite evident.

    The problem I have at this point is not Christianity or anything the bible says. I’m including the OT politics here because Jesus quotes the prophets all the time, I’m not a Marcionist and believe the OT and NT shares the same spirit of the same triune God.

    My problem is effeminate and cowardly white men. Both characteristics are condemned in the bible, men behaving this way go to hell.

    My thought on this is the ‘meek shall inherit the earth’ combined with Jewish word magic, the phrase meek and mild. When you read the Greek definition of the word meek, it has nothing to do with weakness. Rather it is what you do to a horse, a big beast but under control, being tempered. Not tyrannical, not soft but patient and not slow to use force. It is a good and proper balance which has been lost on modern white men.

    In any case, I’m working on it in my small way. I believe more people are going to listen as time goes on so I have hope for the future.

    Take care and God’s blessings to you and yours.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-22 08:38:00 UTC

  • “It’s 10 PM. Do you know where your children are?” —“This ominous question, so

    “It’s 10 PM. Do you know where your children are?”

    —“This ominous question, somberly intoned just prior to the local news, was eventually parodied by a multitude of stand-up comedians, novelty song artists, and horror movie posters. But the original intent of the line was very serious.

    New curfew laws had gone into effect in several cities across the U.S. as a result of urban unrest and rioting during the summer of 1967. New York City, feeling the effects of the Newark riots, was one of the largest metropolitan areas affected. “–


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-21 19:06:00 UTC

  • (NOTES) CONTEXT Context of this, the Aristotelian(scale) and enlightenment (scal

    (NOTES)

    CONTEXT

    Context of this, the Aristotelian(scale) and enlightenment (scale), and how the work contains the same degree of reformation.

    Because each time we run into the problems of scale – scaling ARISTOCRACY as fast a we scale MARKETS made possible by aristocracy.

    And we have this problem of scale because we don’t know why we have been successful – we just do it.

    So I explain why we were what we did what we do and now you won’t have to just intuit it as moral or not. You can explain it.

    PREFACE FOR CRITICS

    This is an adult conversation about the most important topic of our century. If you need to work to understand it, that’s simply true. John can help you. John and others will teach.

    Do you really understand the declaration, constitution, bill of rights, supreme court rulings, and federal code? or do you morally intuit them. I can test that theory if you’d like and I bet you won’t like the results.

    So try to imagine how stupid you sound when you say you want something simple. There is nothing simple. If it was simple we wouldn’t have had the social conflict of the 20th and 21st century.

    I have the patience for questions. I dont have the patience for the intellectually dishonest, overconfident ignorant or immoral – I work too hard every day to spend time on that.

    SO WHAT DOES A CONSTITUTION NEED TO COVER?

    What is the current problem – we can’t solve it if we can’t define it and most current confusion is over failure to define it.

    Why are we in this condition

    How can we fix this problem.

    What benefits do we gain from fixing the problem.

    What are the costs and consequences of fixing it.

    And… what are the costs if we just go to civil war.

    SECTIONS

    There are roughly four sections.

    1 – The Indictment, is an overall explanation of the success of the european peoples and why we are in this problem today.

    2 – The Law is a technical description of the Natural Law. It’s sort of like learning programming language. Because its very much like one.

    3 – The Prosecution and Crimes

    4 – The Judgement and Enforcement.

    FUTURE ORIENTED GRAND STRATEGY

    (last video)

    CONCEPTUAL DIFFERENCES

    Whereas our original constitution was an experiment in governing under the common natural law, this constitution repairs weaknesses in that constitution, and common law.

    Common law differs from continental law in that….

    We obsess over government, but we this constitution obsesses on law and rule of law. We tend to focus on governments because our laws are weak. when if we have better laws, the method of governing matters far less.

    CORRECT OUR BIGGEST ERRORS

    Repeating the Error of Monarchy MONOPOLY:

    Conflating rule and governance has been one of our three largest errors:

    1) conflating rule and governance

    2) not expanding houses for the classes.

    3) repeating the roman error of the unearned franchise.

    4) majority monopoly rather than market.

    5) Monarchy. Better to think of monarchies as intergenerational custodians. It is clearly better to have intergenerational families make profits or loss from rule (arts and limits) and a rotating middle class for governance (commons).

    PRIMARY DIFFERENCES

    1. The primary improvement in the constitution is to increase the ability of the law to criminalize the saturation of the people with disinformation misinformation and lies in order to profit from manipulating them and fostering conflicts between them for profit. The 20th was largely an era of pseudoscience, lies, sophism and economic and financial innumeracy (a kind of pseudoscience) that created our current crisis.

    2. The second is to restore the constitution to its original intent, and a continuation of the european civilizational project, which is a continental military, judicial, and trade union, as we had in Europe throughout most of our history – even though we don’t think of the church as a weak political judiciary that was largely it’s political function. So a restoration of he constitution to a constitution of the european peoples in the european tradition.

    3. The third is controversial, which is solving the failure of integration the failure of multiculturalism, and the failure of the marxist-feminist-postmodern program to produce other than illusory improvements at the cost of destruction of the family and rates of reproduction. And that is a set of choices – I only recommend a set of them – of escalating unpleasantness. This is where we will find conflict.

    4. The fourth doesn’t really consist of much policy so much as a set of restitutions to compensate for the crimes of the 20th and 21st century, so that we restore our civilization and our families, and the benefits of our ‘third way’ of civilizational order. There won’t be a lot of conflict here. And it’s what most people want from our government anyway.

    OFFEND EVERYONE

    There is something to offend everyone. Your offense is part of the cost of any solution.

    Naming the enemy and the enemies and explaining their strategy in detail is not something I’ve treated gently – just the opposite. And that’s what will start the escalation in both directions.

    TABLE OF CONTENTS

    Introduction – summary of the case

    Declaration – to mirror the original in content

    Preamble – how this modifies the existing constitution

    Article I – Man – Definitions

    Article II – The Law – What it is and how to write it.

    Article III – Rights and Obligations – everyone has under the law

    so notice that the law is before and higher than the state or the government.

    Article IV – The Court

    Article V – The State

    Article V Section I – The State

    Article V Section II – The Military, Regiments, and Militia

    Article V Section III – The Treasury

    Article V Section IV – The Insurer of Last Resort

    Article VI – The Government of the State

    Article VII – The Governments of the Several States

    Article VIII – The People

    Article IX – The Economy

    Article X – The Commons

    Article XI – Commerce and Cooperation

    Article XII – Marriage, Family, Children

    Article XIII – Training: Religion, Fitness, Education, Training,

    Article XIV – The Territories, Monuments, Arts, and Letters

    Article XV – Articles of Devolution

    Article XVI – Restitutions and Punishments

    Addenda

    Threats, Charges, and Duties (“The Black Pages”)

    Letters of Marque

    ====

    PICK YOUR GOVERNMENT

    Think about that question for a moment.

    What protection did our founders intend?

    What protection do we have now?

    What is the ultimate protection that we CAN have?

    Globalism

    or

    Nationalism

    … Ethnocentrism

    … … Homogeneity

    … … … Conformity

    … … … … Subject of Law

    … … … … … individual

    … … … … … or;

    … … … … … individual and collective

    … … … … Subject of Policy

    … … … … … Extended Intergenerational Family

    … … … … … or;

    … … … … … Nuclear Intergenerational Family;

    … … … … … or;

    … … … … … Individual

    … … … … Subject of Polity

    … … … … … Consumption (dysgenia)

    … … … … … or;

    … … … … … Capitalization (eugenia)

    and (Limits)

    Rule by Priesthood (tradition? wisdom?) (Islam)

    … Rule by Justification (Supernatural)

    or

    Rule by Politicians (discretion)(europe)

    … Rule by Discretion (Sophistry)

    or

    Rule of Law (non-discretion)(old-usa)

    …Rule of Law (Technology)

    and Judiciary (Resolution of Disputes)

    … Constitution

    … … Supreme Court

    … … … Courts of Appeals

    … … … … Regional Courts

    … … … … … Specialty Courts

    … … … … … … Professional Judiciary (judges)

    … … … … … … … Professional Officers of Court (law)

    … … … … … … … … Prof.l Property Finance, Banking (title)

    … … … … … … … … … Prof Insurers

    and (Production of Commons)

    Government (Closure: final decision maker)

    … Dictator

    … or

    … Monarchy

    … or

    … President

    … or

    … Prime Minister

    and (selection of commons)

    … … … cabinet

    … … or

    … … … Jury (veto) of appropriations

    … … or (representation)

    … … … Senate-lords

    … … … or

    … … … Parliament and senate-lords

    … … … or

    … … … Lower house(families),

    … … … Middle house(parliament/business), and

    … … … … Upper house (senate-lords/territories)

    … … or (direct participation)

    … … … direct proportional democracy

    … … … or

    … … … direct economic democracy (by who pays)

    and Services (Assets)

    … … Military

    … … … Standing

    … … … … Warfighters

    … … … … Professional Technical

    … … … … Logistics and Supply

    … … … … Medical and Care

    … … … Regiments (Local Part time)

    … … … Reserves( those who have served )

    … … … Militia (every able bodied citizen)

    … … Infrastructure (assets)

    … … Insurer (emergency, disasters, etc)

    … … Treasury

    and Administration (Operations)

    … … … Bureaucracy

    … … … or

    … … … Bureaucracy – Private Partnership

    … … … or

    … … … Competing Private Contractors

    … … … or

    … … … Private Mandatory Public Service

    and Participation (participation)

    … … … … Maximally Earned Franchise

    … … … … Minimally Earned Franchise

    … … … … Citizenship Franchise

    … … … … Resident Franchise

    … … … … Genetic Franchise


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-21 17:37:00 UTC

  • (diary) Thinking trying to understand the disconnect between my thinking, my wor

    (diary)

    Thinking trying to understand the disconnect between my thinking, my work, and the online community, and … how I’m misled by that online community.

    My family is and was Puritan. Activist Military, Politicians, Puritans. Lawyers, Preachers, Businessmen, Craftsmen.M y family has been military since before the Norman invasion. I grew up with that influence. I grew up in new England in an new England family. I read military history and encyclopedias and the great science fiction, which was mythology restated in technological terms. Samuel Colt was my childhood hero.

    I think I intuit (understand) military people in the pre-war sense of aristocracy, middle-class, and soldiery: as ‘society’. I do not understand military in the combined arms sense of a bureaucracy.

    I understand Aristocracy, the constitution, and christianity as my ancestral ‘religion’.

    The only people that matter are ‘men’. Men in the Military Aristocracy, the military and in the police forces, the sheriffs, and those of us who are already “every man a sheriff”, and the first responders. The rest are not ‘owners’ of the polity -they are merely operators, participants, beneficiaries, or parasites.

    So that’s the disconnect. That’s what’s been bothering me with the libertarian community. What[s been bothering me with the online community. What’s been bothering me with the ‘whiny bitchy losers’.

    They have no agency. Because only men have agency. And aristocracy from the monarchy to the boys in the luggage consists exclusively of ‘men’.

    Sorry for taking your time, just trying to figure out how to go forward with strategy given what I’m learning as the window shifts, and as certain things ‘bubble up’ in my mind from the work I’m doing.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-21 14:55:00 UTC

  • MONOTHEISM IS NOTHING BUT CRIME WAR: Islam is a system of political warfare masq

    MONOTHEISM IS NOTHING BUT CRIME

    WAR: Islam is a system of political warfare masquerading as religion.

    RESISTANCE: Christianity is a resistance movement masquerading as religion.

    CRIME: Judaism is organized crime masquerading as religion.

    Judaism to undermine > Christianity to weaken >Islam to destroy.

    Thankfully we have domesticated (Germanized) christianity into a folk religion in the west, and orthodoxy has preserved it as an organized religion in the east.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-21 14:42:00 UTC

  • I’ve been struggling with the knowledge that as soon as I publish i’m going to e

    I’ve been struggling with the knowledge that as soon as I publish i’m going to end up in a worse position than Macdonald and Duchesne, because I’m proposing solutions. So talking it over with a friend today (my “Therapist”) and helped me realize that my defense is pretty easy:

    1) It’s true. period.

    2) It will make the world a better place – and fast.

    3) And the cost is intolerance, rectification, and escalating restitution, and punishment of those who did harm.

    So the problem is, if you don’t want those things, what’s your defense?


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-21 14:37:00 UTC

  • A Priest in hardship A Monarch in ordinary times. A Tzar in war

    A Priest in hardship

    A Monarch in ordinary times.

    A Tzar in war.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-21 13:26:00 UTC