Source: Facebook

http://www.unz.com/jman/regression-to-the-mean/CASTE AND CLASS RESIST REGRESSION

(please read) (jayman)

Jayman explains that while offspring regress toward the mean, each generation’s offspring regress toward their familial mean. ergo, selective reproduction maintains aristocracy.

Conversely, (which he doesn’t cover) suppression of rates of reproduction of the lower classes increase rates of regression toward the group mean: higher median abilities.

This is what I try to get across with my ‘soft eugenics’ of paying the lower classes to maintain the commons and to have only one child.

This is how I explain northern european success: manorialism, requirements for property before marriage and reproduction, delayed reproduction improving women’s choice of mate and teaching her work related skills, freedom from arranged marriages (women’s reproductive rights), and enthusiastic use of culling in the form of hanging in public which selects out the impulsive.

And this is why I am not a racist but a classist: while there are visible differences in talents in the races that are not explicable by impulsivity: aggression/competitiveness, verbal intelligence vs mechanical vs spatial, creative and novel vs persistent and repetitive – the general trend of increasing humanity’s mean abilities benefits all of us and brings about our evolution (transcendence).

The reason I am concenred about race is democracy, because people vote in blocks to conduct warfare via government policy that regresses toward the mean rather than the constant improvement of man under aristocratic (japanese, chinese or european) paternalism.

More another time, but you can probably see how I work this problem using incrementalism, that does not punish the current generation by asking them to suffer. I merely ask that we constrain the reproduction of the lower classes so that we continue to evolve in greater peace and prosperity by the ongoing ‘pacification’ of our genes, the life we share the planet with, nature, and the universe.