Source: Facebook

  • ANTI-CHRISTIAN IS A CODE WORD FOR ANTI-WHITE —“Today, in the USA, the only Chr

    ANTI-CHRISTIAN IS A CODE WORD FOR ANTI-WHITE

    —“Today, in the USA, the only Christians that are targeted for criticism are the White Christians. The attacks on Christianity are not really about religion; they are about race. The racist subtext of anti-Christian rhetoric is palpable and just as often it is explicit rather than implicit. Black Christians in contrast are not criticized; they are even praised for their roll in “civil rights” causes.”—Glen Runciter

    In other words, they circumvent the racist accusation by criticizing christians. But it’s still a racist argument.

    On the other hand, a large number of the critics are single and unattractive white women who have been sold ‘the second great lie’.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-12-06 03:56:00 UTC

  • Dear Idiots. 1) First law of construction. “The Tendency of a Rock is to Fall St

    Dear Idiots.

    1) First law of construction. “The Tendency of a Rock is to Fall Straight Down”.

    2) The Second law of construction “A chain is only as strong as its weakest link.”.

    3) The Third law of construction: “Mass at rest < structural integrity. Mass + any Acceleration by Gravity > Structural Integrity.”

    That’s why. OK? That’s Why.

    Please stop being stupid in public.

    OK? It’s painful for the rest of humanity.

    It’s Sunday morning. I want to believe in a benevolent god that didn’t create people like you. You’re harshing on my divinity.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-12-06 03:21:00 UTC

  • TUCKER AS RATIONALIST IN AGE OF SCIENCE (Note: I’m not anti-Tucker. I see him as

    TUCKER AS RATIONALIST IN AGE OF SCIENCE

    (Note: I’m not anti-Tucker. I see him as a very good man with good intentions but part of a prior generation’s thinking whose time has long passed, and methods have long failed. But I have no reason to believe that he is anything other than a good man with good intentions. I like him quite a bit and always have.)

    —“The media is a business meaning that they can’t coerce you, tax you, bomb you, deport you, kill you. All they can do is write articles and make shows that sell advertising. And you are willing to celebrate a would-be dictator because he foils some reporters???”—Jeffrey A. Tucker

    (a) Regarding the media, are you rationalizing what the media can do, or are you relying upon empirical evidence of what the media can do? Because the evidence is that they create opinion in sufficient voters to do precisely what you say they cannot. (b) I have a hard time seeing the difference between the current president and a trump presidency or any other presidency in the absence of rule of law. And given the evidence of (a), its logical to prefer a president who will continue to undermine (a).

    Liberty is produced by rule of law(universal application) demanding the total prohibition on parasitism(imposition of costs) in the private (morality) and public (liberty) spheres of action, constructed by individual enforcement of norms, individual enforcement of law under universal standing, organized enforcement of the law under an independent judiciary, and organized prevention of usurpation of that law by the militia.

    And liberty is (again, empirically not just rationally) a preference of and only of a limited number of individuals in limited family structures, with limited cultural traditions, with limited legal traditions. All others systematically seek to undermine it in every polity on earth.

    Man was not kept down and oppressed by his betters. Man was incrementally civilized by his betters, much against his will. He was forced to abandon murder, violence, theft, fraud, fraud by asymmetry, fraud by indirection, fraud by obscurantism, free riding, privatization of commons, socialization of losses, conspiracy, conversion, immigration, war, and conquest.

    By being forced to abandon all unproductive and parasitic actions, the only venue left for man was the burden of participation in the market through productive, fully informed, voluntary exchange free of imposition of cost by externality.

    But the arts of production are difficult, and the arts of lying, defrauding, cheating, stealing, blackmailing, free riding, privatization of commons, socialization of losses, conspiracy are much easier.

    Liberty requires meritocracy and meritocracy is not a matter of belief it is a mater of ability.

    Genes matter. Open immigration is empirically destructive. While we can estimate the decline in anglo intelligence since 1850, we can measure the decline in French intelligence due to immigration just since 1950. The Flynn effect can be reversed through degradation of the gene pool.

    It is the gene pool that establishes the degree of liberty, the degree of truth telling, the degree of productivity, the norms and traditions of a polity.

    It is a romantic amateurism to pursue liberty as a philosophical choice – a religion or cult – versus an empirical problem to be solved.

    The age of rationalization has ended just as the age of mysticism ended. The current era is one of science: requiring both internal consistency(logical and rational) and external correspondence(empirical) as well as existentially possible (operationally articulable) and morality (voluntary transfers) bounded by full accounting (of all costs to all capital) and parsimony (defined limits of falsification).

    Time for the adult version of liberty: Aristocratic(meritocratic) Egalitarian(meritocratic) Eugenic(meritocratic) Nomocracy(rule of law) assisted by a market for the production of commons using the exception of legal dissent, rather than the requirement of universal assent by majority rule.

    Trump is a tool of progress. That is all. Liberty requires progress. Moreover it requires we repress the rates of reproduction of the underclasses who will not and cannot participate in liberty.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-12-06 02:47:00 UTC

  • ON THE DECLINE IN FRENCH INTELLIGENCE: ITS BIOLOGICAL (immigrants)(misbreeding)

    http://drjamesthompson.blogspot.co.uk/2015/12/the-puzzle-of-falling-french.html?spref=twMORE ON THE DECLINE IN FRENCH INTELLIGENCE: ITS BIOLOGICAL

    (immigrants)(misbreeding)


    Source date (UTC): 2015-12-06 00:13:00 UTC

  • I DON’T DO ANTI-SEMITISM. I DO TRUTH AND RULE OF LAW. Again. Please do not go al

    I DON’T DO ANTI-SEMITISM. I DO TRUTH AND RULE OF LAW.

    Again. Please do not go all anti jewish on me. I dont do racism. it’s tedious and useless. I know how the germans failed. i know how the french failed. I know how we anglos failed. I don’t think the jews of the 19th and 20th centuries knew what they were doing any more than the Germans, French and Anglos knew what they were doing. We all work with the frames of reference we get from our cultures.

    I want to know how to accomplish the elimination of lying in the social sciences, and law, what we accomplished with the elimination of mysticism and the elimination of rationalism.

    To do that I must understand the technique. Did Plato know what he was doing? I am not sure. Did Socrates? I am not sure Did Aristotle = I think he did. Did Smith and Hume? I think they did. Did Jefferson, yes. Did Marx, I don’t think so. Did Adorno and crew? I have no idea but according to him, not really. Did Rand and Rothbard – rand maybe, rothbard I don’t think so.

    The technique of the talmud is quite simple. The question is, why does it work so well?


    Source date (UTC): 2015-12-05 17:39:00 UTC

  • Untitled

    http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/Papers.cfm?abstract_id=2511173http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/Papers.cfm?abstract_id=2511173


    Source date (UTC): 2015-12-05 17:29:00 UTC

  • A friend just turned me onto some work about the talmud as polylogical/polyethic

    A friend just turned me onto some work about the talmud as polylogical/polyethical meaning keeping “Two Sets Of Books”.

    I’ll try to read through it quickly. My concern is again not to criticize successful tactics, but to understand how to defeat this amazing technique that worked in both religious and pseudoscientific eras.

    I have it down. But the more I understand, the better I will get at it.

    We can demand due diligence of truthfulness by demand for warranty of due diligence:

    1) Identity

    2) Internal Consistency

    3) External Correspondence

    4) Existential Possibility

    5) Morality

    6) Full Accounting

    7) Parsimony

    These seven tests (so far) make it extremely difficult to lie. Almost impossible.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-12-05 16:10:00 UTC

  • #Libertarian #AltRight #NRx

    http://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/673238159040335873/photo/1?utm_source=fb&utm_medium=fb&utm_campaign=curtdoolittle&utm_content=673238159040335873#Conservative #Libertarian #AltRight #NRx https://t.co/KTkaVuKbSk


    Source date (UTC): 2015-12-05 15:31:00 UTC

  • FOLLOWUP TO: THE FAILED BOOK OF ATHENIAN TRUTH, THE SUCCESSFUL BOOK OF JERUSALEM

    FOLLOWUP TO: THE FAILED BOOK OF ATHENIAN TRUTH, THE SUCCESSFUL BOOK OF JERUSALEM’S LIES

    —Dr. Dolittle, you’re an ignorant anti-semite!!—

    Actually I’m not anti-anything, and I am probably the most knowledgeable person working today on the subject of Truth, and its consequences in Ethics, Morality, and Politics. Which I’m happy to demonstrate in any debate with anyone living at any time. And I probably know the very few people capable of debating me.

    Either statements are true, statements are false or statements are undecidable. Either you can attack the arguments that I put forward or you cant. No name calling will alter the truth or falsity of the statements. All it demonstrates is that you’re either ignorant or dishonest.

    The fact of the matter is that westerners discovered quite by accident, the technology of truth and it resulted in reason, science, medicine, technology and nearly all significant advancements made by mankind.

    The fact of the matter is that for some reason, probably necessity, the hebrews created very useful means of deception of simple people who wished for the world to be other than it is. Their first great lie was scriptural monotheism. Their second great lies were pseudoscience.

    The New England neo-puritans (my people, my ancestors, since my ancestors were norman and then puritans in the plymouth and new haven colonies,) evolved into the anti-slavery movement as a way of preparing the way for women’s suffrage. This is all well documented history. Sorry. The combination of the radical changes of the industrial revolution, the anglo, french, german, and jewish enlightenment failures, and the failure of western governments to successfully adapt rule of law and political processes that provide a means of constructing commons, could not adapt.

    While a good number of our greatest minds understood that a problem was in progress they failed at solving it. Poincaré, Russell, Mises, Hayek, Popper, Bridgman, Brouwer, all failed to solve the problem of the social sciences. And because they failed, the 20th century will be remembered both as a rapid economic expansion, and (as Hayek warned it would be) a century of mysticism. Or, given their lack of understanding of the reason for the success of the discipline of science, ‘the century of pseudoscience.’.

    These are just facts. Deal with reality. We don’t need more lies. We’ve destroyed western civilization with those lies.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-12-05 15:28:00 UTC

  • We outlawed lawn darts but not guns?–Salon —@Salon We are afraid infantilized

    –We outlawed lawn darts but not guns?–Salon

    —@Salon We are afraid infantilized progressives will hurt themselves with lawn darts. But they wouldn’t touch a ‘scary’ gun. See? Logical.—Curt


    Source date (UTC): 2015-12-05 15:27:00 UTC