—“One man can’t stand alone against the world. But a few in confederation can hold the looting hoards at bay indefinitely.”—- Eli Harman
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-04 04:15:00 UTC
—“One man can’t stand alone against the world. But a few in confederation can hold the looting hoards at bay indefinitely.”—- Eli Harman
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-04 04:15:00 UTC
OK. Wait. (I am completely incompetent at the moment). If they make 100ml straight gin (extra dry) martinis, and I have two of them. And a shot is about 25ml. That means I had 8 shots of gin, right?
OMFG. They’re trying to kill me. Really. It’s a fucking conspiracy.
Me and one Swedish guy. You know that means trouble! We started talking religion. OMFG. He says I”m not catholic. Don’t try to discuss religion when drunk. Especially with a swede or a german. It’s fucking hopeless. These people think psychology is meaningful. WTF am I supposed to do!
Igor, Ivan, Nassar … you will pay for this. You will. Seriously. You’re my FRIENDS and you get me DRUNK and you ENJOY IT.
It’s like… Hey! Lets wind up the Doolittle!
Sigh.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-02 17:36:00 UTC
Will someone please explain to me why the bartenders here get so much joy out of getting me drunk?
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-02 17:24:00 UTC
—“…elites must give up treason as a sacred value…”—
Eli, could you state this more clearly please? I’m not sure that it can’t be read both ways. Thanks.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-02 14:59:00 UTC
Genius
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-02 12:46:00 UTC
WE’RE THE NEW RIGHT NOW. OWN IT.
Lets just take over new-right and new-libertarians, rather than alt-right, and call the establishment the old right, and the old libertarians. The european new right is traditional but they rely on that insipid germanic and french sentimentality in search of a new christianity. americans are constitutionalists: rule of law. We may also be religous or social conservatives. But by and large what separates conservatives from progressives is rule of law versus populist will. Rules versus discretion. Property versus State.
( Ivan Ilakovac )
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-02 09:10:00 UTC
(CULTURAL OBSERVATIONS. ADAPTATION: When I first moved here Ukrainian and russian woman looked beautiful. Now that I have lived here over three years, Ukrainian and Russian women look usual , and the rest of the world’s women look hideous. lol.)
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-02 05:24:00 UTC
BUFFET’S LETTER TO SHAREHOLDERS? 31 PAGES. SEE?
See? It’s not just me. I always get crap for my long missives to shareholders, but the truth is – aside from investors with ADD – people read them and learn from them.
I also got crap from people thinking I manipulate the board when I ask for advice from the board. It isn’t true. I think pretty scientifically: if I cannot convince the board then I shouldn’t do it. If I can convince the board (even if it takes a lot of work) then I probably should do it. Although, this strategy backfires when you think the economy will collapse and take your business down with it, and you can’t convince your board that you’re right. And sure, it depends upon whether your board consists of professional executives or not. But, I don’t pitch to the board as if I’m asking their permission. I am not sure I have respect for the board process at all. In my experience, it’s been nothing other than a legally sanctioned venue for fucking common shareholders. I use the board for testing theories. Particularly acquisitions.
Buffet’s amazing. So is greenspan. I keep thinking that I could lose some of my higher faculties in the next decade. But then I look at other men of capacity and I realize that if you avoid alcohol and keep reasonably active and busy that you can be effective until 90’s. I kind of doubt that after 70 I’ll have the kind of insights that I’ve had in my 50’s – which, aside from my 20’s, has been my most intellectually fruitful period. But Hayek did great work late in life, and he is the mind I most closely associate with.
In the absence of knowledge all we can do is struggle onward. 🙂
Curt
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-02 04:16:00 UTC
OVERSING BETA RELEASE?
We are seeking a few (very few) additional beta sites. The minimum organization that we can afford to pay attention to is probably in the vicinity of 40-50 people. This is simply because it takes the same effort to support 40, or 100, as it does to support 5.
So if you know anyone who wants to try it – especially in contrast to using Jira, we’d be interested in talking to them.
OVERSING UPDATE
1) In February, we started full time effort on the Reporting Panel. The primary view uses “blocks” that you double-click on in order to drill down into them. The other view takes advantage of the horizontal workspace to show time periods. So the reporting view is a bit of a data explorer. Except that it’s not in a tree view as we usually see. There are a lot of reports that we need to make for financial purposes, but the panel provides all the basic data Q&A that users will want to see.
2) I’m about a third of the way through the first draft of the documentation. It’s in three parts: the ‘What’, which covers the basics. The “How” which uses of tutorial structure “how do to x”. The the Advanced section, which tells you how to apply it to your organization. I only need the first for beta. I expect to work through the second shortly. And the third will be something I incrementally fill out over the coming months.
3) The web site is far enough along that while it’s missing the videos, we can finish the presentations (sliders) this month, and simplify the message a bit.
OUTSTANDING ISSUES
While we certainly can release the beta this month (March), we still have these open issues:
0) Finish Reports (I can’t estimate this at all, but reports are a never-ending feature so it doesn’t matter.)
1) Permissions on Workflows (I just discovered this issue) (I suspect this will take a week to ten days?)
2) Drag and Drop to move to Schedule State / Right Click to Schedule State (long standing issue. Always seems to get moved to lower priority. But it’s necessary.) We had quite a bit of debate over this because we don’t want the schedule state to be invasive or to add complexity since it isn’t necessary. So we decided on a compromise, and that is that we separate out the scheduling features into their own ‘block’ on the Tasks panel, and we don’t integrate the scheduling sub-phase into the Main Sequence: Backlog, To-Do(Active), Done.
3) Display Appointments on the Gantt Chart. (long standing issue) (It’s hard to know what resourcing needs your attention without this feature. We are saving this for last because we find working with this bit of source code time consuming.)
4) Cascading changes to the schedule when we delete dependencies are still not working correctly. I am not sure why this remains an issue.
5) Add the accounting,payroll,operational period properties and functions. This is technically the ‘last feature’, because all it does is allow you to configure the lifecycle of when you allow submissions of different financial activity, and when you post and close it. I have no estimate on this but I suspect it’s a three week effort at the outside. I’m worried that the number of transaction touch points is high, and that it’s hard to test, so that is why despite being fairly simple (creating events), I am cautious about time.
6) Minor Fixes to Forecasting and Responsibilities. (forecasts should be outer-joined on operational periods, so that we know what’s there and what’s missing) (responsibilities are your ‘inbox’ for workflow activity. and we need some minor tweaks to the table view.) Note: In the future, this panel will switch between email and responsibilities when we add email integration.)
7) Still missing ability to select for organizations and display Program Statistics in the Tasks Panel. All tasks roll up to parent tasks. And yes, we flatten the data so that we aren’t querying hierarchies all the time. That means that we can show just the Program, project, or deliverable ‘rows’ and that they will reflect the data underneath them without requiring that we display all rows. So, in the tasks view you can easily see a worldwide operation’s active programs and report on them without having to expose the detail of each program.
MINOR Pre-Release Work (While In Beta)
1) Integrating links to help into application.
2) Clean Build of DB/App – Builds and Instances ready to Launch.
3) Sample Workflows, org structures, projects.
4) Update languages: We should launch with:
– English
– Russian
– German
– Spanish
– French
– Italian
Although I suspect that the translations will need a LOT of editing.
SUBSTANTIVE WORK DURING BETA PHASE
1) Federation.
2) CSS / Less / Javascript optimization (this makes me crazy)
3) Finish updating via Websockets outside of Workspace Panels. (I am not even sure it matters outside of the workspace honestly, but I feel that for The user, consistency matters.) There are some current places where it isn’t right. And it still seems like the browser fails to detect that the server is not sending messages to its current context now and then.
Curt Doolittle
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-02 04:16:00 UTC
http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/2015/07/27/property-rights-and-obligations/DEFINITION: PROPERTY-IN-TOTO
(worth repeating)
in-toto: all. “in totality”. (latin).
I use property-in/en-toto as a synonym for Demonstrated Property.
Demonstrated Property being that which people act to secure, defend, retaliate against the imposition of costs upon.
Humans act to defend that which they bear costs to obtain.
1) Property-in/en-toto: all that humans act to defend.
2) Property (Norm): that which human groups evolve to insure one another against the impositions of costs upon.
3) Property Rights: that which we develop institutions to insure one another against the imposition of costs upon. Restitution in error or accident against private property. Restitution or punishment for intentional imposition of costs against private property. Punishment or fines for imposition of costs against common property. The most common of which is the export of risk upon others (drunk driving).
So property-in-toto refers to the scientific (empirical) definition of property as determined by the evidence of human behavior.
Why is this necessary? Well, the problem is that the rothbardians (Libertarians) have been espousing a definition of property called ‘intersubjectively-verifiable-property” meaning “physical things”. In other words, that the basis for law, the basis for a social order, “SHOULD BE” limited to physical things.
I’ve written quite a bit about intersubjectively verifiable property producing low trust societies with high demand for the authoritarian state. Whereas high trust societies do not generate demand for the authoritarian state – but they tolerate if not advocate mutual insurance (redistribution).
High trust societies do not rely upon a test of intersubjective verifiability, but upon RETALIATION. In other words, law evolved to ‘keep the peace” because keeping the peace (honestly) kept taxes flowing from the greater economic velocity. In other words, the nobility obtained taxes in exchange for creating order. (Which they then turned into rent seeking). But the side effect is that law that prohibits that which causes retaliation leaves voluntary cooperation as the only possible method of survival. Where voluntary cooperation means ‘production and trade’.
Note: in legal terminology it would be ‘in-toto”. When I started using the term i used the french “en” instead of english “in”. to cue the reader that it’s a new term. That was probably a mistake, since it’s descriptive as it is.
WHAT DO PEOPLE DEMONSTRATE AS THEIR PROPERTY:
http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/2015/07/27/property-rights-and-obligations/
HOW DO WE INCREMENTALLY SUPPRESS IMPOSITION OF COSTS UPON OTHERS?
https://www.facebook.com/TRSCDIncremental/posts/852912708120103
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-02 02:55:00 UTC