How do you price the damage done by Freud and Boaz?
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-20 12:44:00 UTC
How do you price the damage done by Freud and Boaz?
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-20 12:44:00 UTC
How do you price the left’s destruction of the nearly universal nuclear family?
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-20 12:44:00 UTC
How do you price the damage that the left has done to rule of law?
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-20 12:43:00 UTC
Simple people who have not been converted by the academy into the cult of pseudoscientific state humanism think and say very few stupid things. Whereas the average idiot that’s been to university seems to say stupid things with pride, conviction, and frequency.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-20 12:26:00 UTC
Punish the wicked.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-20 11:55:00 UTC
Any religion not compatible with natural law is not in fact a religion, but a political competitor at war with western civilization.
You can possess no right to freedom of religion if the premise of your religion is other than natural law – since no such rights are possible.
(worth repeating)
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-20 11:37:00 UTC
REITERATION
I don’t do racism. I do classism. I do nationalism. I do testimonial truth. But as far as I know, there is nothing preventing any of the tribes or races from transcendence other than the suppression of the reproduction of their lower classes until the mean is above what we consider 106.
It may be, and likely is true, that europeans possess greater numbers with higher openness to experience and the helpful mix of existential (spatial) and verbal abilities.
But that does not prevent others from transcendence. It may require we domesticate the undomesticated people out of self defense. But that does not mean that they cannot be domesticated and helped to transcend the animal.
I love my people first. But I love mankind as well. As long as the transcendence of others is not a cost we must bear, it is an opportunity we can seize.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-20 11:30:00 UTC
Men have been domesticating each other since we first cooperated to take down an alpha.
It took a second great leap: property, to domesticate women.
And in one century they have undone ten thousand years of our labor.
Women are unconscious pandoras. A threat to civilization.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-20 11:15:00 UTC
Libertarians, and conservatives engage in wishful thinking. Meanwhile the parasites act.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-20 08:47:00 UTC
https://medium.com/@belisarius222/how-to-start-a-software-project-ad51373c1510#.t8pga6dzbLUG NUT DEVELOPMENT
I’ve Been building software since the 70’s.
In the late 80’s I use Agile before it had a name.
This “Lug Nut” development is how I do software development today.
“Just make it work. Refactor as soon as you figure out how.”
Make no unnecessary investments.
WHY HAVE WE ADOPTED THIS NEW METHODOLOGY?
The cost of development, the cost of complile time, the cost of publishing updates once problems are found, have eliminated the value of attempting to imitate engineering, and we have migrated to the process of publishing documents that constantly are subject to editorial revision.
I have said for decades that what we do is discourse to develop hypotheses and theories with our machines — that we do not practice engineering.
It was the cost of construction of our discourse that made us imitate engineering and construction methods. In the present, we no longer engineer, we function far more like a debating society trying to discover a solution, and constantly updating our text.
THE CUSTOMER PROBLEM
But while this method is particularly useful for product and internal development, the customer is your enemy and his own enemy if you do not manage his fantasies.
So this technique only possible (as is common) with experienced customers.
We must undestand that develoment has never beeen a problem.
The customers have always been the problem.
They want to obtain retail purchases, and control a production process, for what is essentially a program of research and development.
THE AUTHORING (DEVELOPER) PROBLEM
And meanwhile, the lazy, unintelligent, and unskilled developers that seduce ignorant customers into employing them far above their skill levels export this behavior to the world. And customers desperate to compete by saving money on research and development are taken advantage of by the vast hordes of frauds in this business hoping to find suckers to finance their personal development and then move on, leaving the customer with failure and disappointment.
ONE THING WE FAIL TO DO
Technologists have not professionalized the industry in order to protect customers from unqualified craftsmen and thereby raise their rates and eliminate this problem of expectations. There is no test like the Bar, or public accountancy.
What we do have is reputations. And we should be vicious in our recommendations of those who harm our industry with their behavior.
PUNISH THE WICKED TO DEFEND THE COMMONS.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-20 08:42:00 UTC