Curt Doolittle

Source: Facebook

  • ДЛЯ моих новых друзей Я пишу пишу в аналитической философии под названием Proper

    ДЛЯ моих новых друзей

    Я пишу пишу в аналитической философии под названием Propertarianism. Целью данного языка является создание свободной от ценностей (нейтральный) инструмент для общения концептуальных, поведенческих, этических, моральных, социальных, правовых, политических, экономических, и группа конкурентных стратегий.

    Другими словами Propertarianism является формальным языком социальной науки.

    Цель этого языка заключается как предотвратить большие политические ошибки, ложь и обманы, и, чтобы помочь нам понять наши чувства и идеи в научном плане.

    Когда пишу здесь, я очень часто говорят вещи, которые являются истинными, но мы не хотим, чтобы быть правдой. Причина заключается в том, что я хочу, чтобы исправить ошибки, ложь и обманы в озарений – все они, в каждой культуре, которая была преобразована просветления (науки).

    Моя цель LIBERTY

    Под «свободой» я имею в виду «выбор». Но выбор зависит от манеры, этики, морали и достоинства. Не выбор зависит от принятия от других.

    Мое решение ПРАВИТЕЛЬСТВО РЫНОК

    Я против мажоритарного демократии. Но в пользу демократического производства обычных товаров и услуг – где граждане голосуют за достоянию, что они хотят, а не для коррумпированных политиков. Причины слишком сложны для этого поста. Но это не эмоциональный, но научная причина.

    НО ДЛЯ ПРАВИТЕЛЬСТВА РЫНКА НАМ НУЖНА ИСПЫТАНИЯ

    правдивости в области социальных наук

    Проблема в создании правительства, которое является честным, что мы не знаем, как проверить, если законы и законодательство были «истинно» и, следовательно, “научное”, и, следовательно, объективно этическим и моральным. Я произвел этот тест правдивости. Этот тест расширяет научный метод в социальных науках -И объединяет биологию, философию, мораль и право в единый логический метод. Этот метод называется «свидетельство истиной». И философия использования этого метода называется “testimonialism”. Слово для дачи показаний означает, что вы сделали экспертизу, чтобы убедиться, что вы говорили искренне (а не только честно), и что вы гарантия (гарантия), что вы сделали это усердие.

    Когда вы читаете или слышите мою критику – IT “S ВСЕГДА ПРОДЕМОНСТРИРУЙТЕ эти идеи.

    Все мои аргументы, так или иначе связаны с неспособностью просветления и неудач большинства демократии.

    Так что если я соблазняет вас Обратите внимание, что моя цель ОБИДЕТЬ ВАШ интуиций так что вы можете видеть возможность совсем другой мир.

    Тот, где правительства не могут участвовать в коррупции и обмана. Один, в котором мы производим общую собственность без представительных политических деятелей, открытых для коррупции.

    Я предпочитаю Критиковать OURSEVES. Причина, почему мы охотятся злые люди ЭТО ЧЕЛОВЕК В ЗЕРКАЛЕ НЕ завалили.

    С уважением

    Kypt Дулитл

    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-26 06:23:00 UTC

  • FOR MY NEW FRIENDS. THIS IS WHAT I DO. The subject of my writing is an analytic

    FOR MY NEW FRIENDS. THIS IS WHAT I DO.

    The subject of my writing is an analytic philosophy called Propertarianism, a tool for creating a value-free language for communicating conceptual, behavioral, moral, social, legal, political, economic, and group competitive strategies. In other words, Propertarianism is a formal language of social science.

    The purpose of this language is to both prevent the great political errors, lies, and deceptions, and to help us understand our feelings and ideas in scientific terms.

    Propertarianism is a way to say things which are true, but that many do not wish to be true. Every culture that has been transformed by an enlightenment (science) embodying errors, lies and deceptions that I want to correct.

    MY GOAL IS LIBERTY

    By ‘liberty’ I mean ‘choice’ — choice dependent upon manners, ethics, morals, and merit. Not choice dependent upon taking from others.

    MY SOLUTION IS MARKET GOVERNMENT

    I am against MAJORITARIAN democracy. But in favor of democratic production of common goods and services – where citizens vote for the commons that they want, not for corrupt politicians. The reasons are too complex for this post. But it is not an emotional, but scientific reason.

    MARKET GOVERNMENT NEEDS TESTS OF TRUTHFULNESS IN SOCIAL SCIENCES

    The problem in creating government that is honest is that we did not know how to test if laws and legislation were ‘true’ and therefore ‘scientific’, and therefore objectively ethical and moral. I produced this test of truthfulness. This test expands the scientific method into the social sciences -and unites biology, philosophy, morality and law into a single logical method. This method is called ‘testimonial truth’. And the philosophy of using this method is called ‘testimonialism’. The word to testify means that you have done diligence to ensure that you have spoken truthfully (not just honestly), and that you warranty (guarantee) that you have done that diligence.

    DEMONSTRATION OF THESE IDEAS

    All of my arguments demonstrate the failure of the enlightenment and the failures of majority democracy.

    IF I OFFEND YOU PLEASE UNDERSTAND THAT IT IS MY PURPOSE TO OFFEND YOUR INTUITIONS SO THAT YOU CAN SEE THE POSSIBILITY OF A VERY DIFFERENT WORLD.

    A world where governments are unable to engage in corruption and deceit. One in which we produce common property without representative politicians open to corruption.

    WE NEED TO CRITICIZE OURSELVES. THE REASON WE ARE PREYED UPON BY EVIL PEOPLE IS THE PERSON IN THE MIRROR HAS NOT STOPPED THEM.

    Sincerely

    Curt Doolittle

    (edited by D Frank Robinson )

    ————————————-original prior to edits————–

    FOR MY NEW FRIENDS

    I write write in an analytic philosophy called Propertarianism. The purpose of this language is to create a value-free (neutral) tool for communicating conceptual, behavioral, ethical, moral, social, legal, political, economic, and group competitive strategies.

    In other words Propertarianism is a formal language of social science.

    The purpose of this language is to both prevent the great political errors, lies, and deceptions, and to help us understand our feelings and ideas in scientific terms.

    When write here I very often say things that are true, but that we do not wish to be true. The reason is that I want to correct the errors, lies, and deceptions of the enlightenments – all of them, in every culture that has been transformed by an enlightenment (science).

    MY GOAL IS LIBERTY

    By ‘liberty’ I mean ‘choice’. But choice dependent upon manners, ethics, morals, and merit. Not choice dependent upon taking from others.

    MY SOLUTION IS MARKET GOVERNMENT

    I am against MAJORITY democracy. But in favor of Democratic production of common goods and services – where citizens vote for the commons that they want, not for corrupt politicians. The reasons are too complex for this post. But it is not an emotional, but scientific reason.

    BUT FOR MARKET GOVERNMENT WE NEED TESTS OF TRUTHFULNESS IN SOCIAL SCIENCES

    The problem in creating government that is honest is that we did not know how to test if laws and legislation were ‘true’ and therefore ‘scientific’, and therefore objectively ethical and moral. I produced this test of truthfulness. This test expands the scientific method into the social sciences -and unites biology, philosophy, morality and law into a single logical method. This method is called ‘testimonial truth’. And the philosophy of using this method is called ‘testimonialism’. The word to testify means that you have done diligence to ensure that you have spoken truthfully (not just honestly), and that you warranty (guarantee) that you have done that diligence.

    WHEN YOU READ OR HEAR MY CRITICISMS – IT”S ALWAYS TO DEMONSTRATE THESE IDEAS.

    All of my arguments are somehow connected with the failure of the enlightenment and the failures of majority democracy.

    SO IF I OFFEND YOU PLEASE UNDERSTAND THAT IT IS MY PURPOSE TO OFFEND YOUR INTUITIONS SO THAT YOU CAN SEE THE POSSIBILITY OF A VERY DIFFERENT WORLD.

    One where governments are unable to engage in corruption and deceit. One in which we produce common property without representative politicians open to corruption.

    I PREFER TO CRITICiZE OURSEVES. THE REASON WE ARE PREYED UPON BY EVIL PEOPLE IS THE PERSON IN THE MIRROR HAS NOT STOPPED THEM.

    Sincerely

    Curt Doolittle

    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-26 06:20:00 UTC

  • Islam was designed to provide a social structure for the intellectually limited

    Islam was designed to provide a social structure for the intellectually limited in a low trust civilization that could not be controlled by any other means thatn strict rules of observation – which is why the muslims always failed.

    They were little better than the mongols.

    The mongols had no writing ad could not produce a bureaucracy because of low trust.

    The Arabs had writing but could not produce a bureaucracy because of low trust.

    Religion is the most ‘base’ of social orders.

    Law the next

    Credit the next

    Truth the greatest.

    But it is only in retrospect this is obvious.

    #islam

    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-26 05:57:00 UTC

  • Philosophy is largely a subject about that which we cannot directly experience i

    Philosophy is largely a subject about that which we cannot directly experience in human nature, usually at scale.

    Finance like philosophy is a subject we cannot directly experience, but gives us facts about human nature at scale.

    There is a reason programmers and finance people think somewhat differently from engineers and physicists. Their subject is the mind of man, not the limits of the material universe.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-26 05:52:00 UTC

  • If we are conquered by the barbarians yet again, and it is achieved through the

    If we are conquered by the barbarians yet again, and it is achieved through the folly of our women, then what will we learn from this lesson?

    Our vanity.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-26 03:52:00 UTC

  • (from elsewhere) Being conquered by accounting, rule of law, guns germs and stee

    (from elsewhere)

    Being conquered by accounting, rule of law, guns germs and steel is something that must be learned from.

    I suppose you make the same statement about being conquered by the Indo-iranians, the Greeks, the mongols, and the muslims, right? In the past century, why did Indians import the thinking of the French and the Russians rather than the british and amerians?

    The question is, what did your people do wrong, such that they failed to invent such things and prevent conquest by so many others?

    Why have you failed for so much of history?

    You see, when you criticize the british, who certainly were parasitic, we see a long series of Indian failures to create sovereignty, for thousands of years.

    And when you criticize the British most, we think of Mao’s statement “If india had been a french colony, gandhi never would have been an old man.” The british could not abide by the immorality of their occupation, despite the profits. Who else has done that?

    What is troublesome is not that the British occupied the indian continent with so few men. But that the indian continent has always be conquered by others with superior technology using so few men.

    Why do Indians always fail?

    When you answer this question you will looking the mirror and question yourself, not that of others.

    All men are fools. Conquerors and Conquered alike.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-26 03:50:00 UTC

  • You can alter the operations of reason because we can inspect them and choose di

    You can alter the operations of reason because we can inspect them and choose differently. (System 2/Choice).

    You can only train the operations of intuition because we cannot inspect them. (System 1/Search).

    You probably cannot even develop an awareness of or modify the operations of your genetics. (System 0/Acquisition)

    I think this is the answer to a great many of questions of the mind.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-26 03:24:00 UTC

  • Why aren’t more philosophers entrepreneurs? There are many entrepreneurs and few

    Why aren’t more philosophers entrepreneurs? There are many entrepreneurs and few philosophers. Entrepreneurship and philosophy are time consuming activities. And honestly, contributing to philosophy is far harder than contributing to the economy via entrepreneurship. To combine entrepreneurship and philosphy requires selling books. Selling books for income requires writing books frequently. Philosophical problems are not solve with frequency, or in short time frames.

    Spinoza ground lenses and lived poorly and died young having the same asthma as I. I write software, live well and have outlived him despite the asthma. He spent his whole life writing a parsimonious two hundred pages.

    The university allows you to report your progress while teaching, to practice the art of lecture and distillation of ideas. And to capture the results of both in your books. And so the university provides the optimum environment for writing whatever you’re writing about.

    The question is wether writing in that environment leads you to conclusions and whether writing in the business environment leads you to different conclusions.

    It appears so.

    It also appears that it is far costlier and therefore less common to write philosophy while also working on entrepreneurship.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-26 03:18:00 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle shared a post

    Curt Doolittle shared a post.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-25 17:36:00 UTC

  • You’re not a snowflake. Just a flake

    You’re not a snowflake. Just a flake.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-25 14:41:00 UTC