Successful cowardice is the rabbit’s vision of heroism. Not elimination of the threat.
Source date (UTC): 2016-05-28 06:09:00 UTC
Successful cowardice is the rabbit’s vision of heroism. Not elimination of the threat.
Source date (UTC): 2016-05-28 06:09:00 UTC
Your genes inform the elephant. As a rider on the elephant you’re not privy to the conversation, and have less control than you imagine.
Source date (UTC): 2016-05-28 04:21:00 UTC
You might unknowingly lie on behalf of your genes. And they might lie to obtain your compliance. But they’re perfectly pragmatic in purpose.
Source date (UTC): 2016-05-28 04:20:00 UTC
Moral intuitions tell you nothing other than how to pursue your reproductive strategy in the current circumstance as you understand it.
Source date (UTC): 2016-05-28 04:18:00 UTC
If you think or feel a condition is moral it’s the product of indoctrination. Sure, objective morality exists. But few humans practice it.
Source date (UTC): 2016-05-28 04:17:00 UTC
History is only a guide if you (a) know enough of it, and (b) don’t cherry pick it. Man’s rational thru history. Immorality can be rational.
Source date (UTC): 2016-05-28 04:15:00 UTC
Promise of hereafter(priests tithes), (church indulgences). Promise of socialism(vote). Promise of prosperity(academy diploma). All lies.
Source date (UTC): 2016-05-28 03:47:00 UTC
1) The Apostles, the Council of Nicaea, The Pulpit. 2) Boaz/Freud/Marx, The Frankfurt School, the Academy. Two false promises to deny truth.
Source date (UTC): 2016-05-28 03:42:00 UTC
THE FAILURE OF THE TRADITIONALISTS TO UNDERSTAND OUR OPTIONS.
At present we have traditionalists that don’t understand the content of their traditions, only that through mandatory indoctrination and ritual do we behave aristocratically – in the western tradition.
The Patriarchy for example, is popular primarily by appeal to traditional (aristocratic) aesthetics. Under the assumption that the church was the originator rather than the recipient and beneficiary of the aristocratic tradition.
The Traditionalists do the same. But the church is just a temple for the weak side of the aristocracy. It’s not that we don’t need our great temples, and that we don’t need our great artistic achievements, but that
My point is not to demean the church or advocate for atheism (individualsm) rather than a civic religion (familialism). Nor is it to deny that commercial empires have been as damaging for western civilization as has been our great wars, and our invasion by christian mysticism.
My point is that we can create a civic religion out of truthful content rather than lies. Why? We do not need to appeal to a fantastic utopia that may be the home of false gods.
WE MADE THAT UTOPIA EXISTENTIAL BY OUR ANCESTORS ACTIONS.
We need no gods. Only heroes. And we have legions of them.
Source date (UTC): 2016-05-28 03:25:00 UTC
WE ALREADY HAD THE SECOND COMING, AND IT WAS AS CATASTROPHICALLY TRAGIC FOR MANKIND AS THE FIRST TIME AROUND.
**What’s the difference between the Apostles, the Council of Nicaea, The Pulpit, and Boaz/Freud/Marx, The Frankfurt School, the Media? Nothing.***
The difference is one of technolgical sophistication. The great lies of Jewish and Christian Mysticism, and the great lies of Secular Pseudoscience.
They feared the truth of Jupiter, Aristotle and Roman Law. They feared the Truth of Darwin, Spencer, and Nietzche.
They created great lies to compensate.
The great lies in the hands of women and proles are as powerful as the great truths in the hands of the aristocracy.
Source date (UTC): 2016-05-28 03:18:00 UTC