Curt Doolittle

Source: Facebook

  • THE INEFFABLE? QUESTION:—“So the ineffable has no place?”— I find ineffabili

    THE INEFFABLE?

    QUESTION:—“So the ineffable has no place?”—

    I find ineffability to be an exceptional excuse fo preserving obscurantism and deceit. There is nothing inexplicable. There are things we merely are too ignorant to explain.

    As far as I know any human experience is conveyable by one means or another. The causal explanation of that experience is NOT THE SAME as the experience itself. But that does not mean that the causal explanation is not necessary and sufficient for the explanation of the experience. A recipe is necessary for a cake, but eating a cake is necessary for the experience of eating it. We may eat a cake without knowing how to make it by the recipe. But we cannot claim that the recipe for creating the experience of the cake is unknowable.

    Man is part of the universe and subject to the same constructions. There is nothing mysterious about it.

    The most serious problem we face is that the search system (system 1) and the action system (moving body parts) is insulated from our introspection. But that does not mean that we cannot use other tools and technology to perceive what occurs in our minds and bodies just as we use tools to observe what occurs in micro, and macro space outside of human scale.

    Our emotions are reactions to change in state of inventory (Property) thus informing us to act to acquire and defend inventory (property). There is nothing more to know I think. Or rather, psychology seems to be telling us only that we possess a lot of cognitive biasses to compel us to act optimistically in a hostile world where in we are largely ignorant.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine

    Source date (UTC): 2016-07-17 05:49:00 UTC

  • In programming as in all things, never do by indirection(externality) that which

    In programming as in all things, never do by indirection(externality) that which you can achieve by direction (construction).

    Someone told me last week that he wanted to hide and show content by changing the mathematical dimensions of the panel, rather than simply turning content on and off. It’s sort of like ‘lying’.

    This is an example of ‘doing the wrong thing’. It requires the preservation of states not logically connected in an environment where state is always conditional.

    Just hide and show stuff. It’s not complicated. Let the engine do its job and you do yours.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-07-17 05:35:00 UTC

  • MORE ON THE TEN COMMANDMENTS(lower class), NATURAL LAW(middle class), AND TRUTH,

    MORE ON THE TEN COMMANDMENTS(lower class), NATURAL LAW(middle class), AND TRUTH, GOODNESS, AND BEAUTY(aristocracy): OUR POLYTHEISM, ISN”T.

    We could also state the prohibitions in the ten commandments and natural law, as demands: truth, goodness, beauty.

    Again we see that Athens speaks to middle and upper classes while Jerusalem/Memphis/Babylon speaks to women and slaves.

    But b/c men are unequal perhaps we need to know both sides of the coin: the negative prohibitions and the positive demands.

    This is not so much polytheism as reminding each class of its priorities. The poor may not make commons but cannot harm.

    And the wealthy need not so much avoid harm as fail to construct commons, rather than engage in hyperconsumption.

    (Thank you for the opportunity to go through this subject since it’s so terribly important for all of us.)

    Source date (UTC): 2016-07-17 05:28:00 UTC

  • WHAT’S MISSING FROM THE TEN COMMANDMENTS? @curtdoolittle —“We could live only

    WHAT’S MISSING FROM THE TEN COMMANDMENTS?

    @curtdoolittle —“We could live only by 10 commandments refined.”–

    The 10 commandments did not tell us how to speak the truth, only that we should not lie, steal, kill. That is its failing.

    That the commandments (truths) were delivered to us by lies, does not help us either. Natural law says the same truthfully.

    That said, we may state the ten commandments as natural law discovered by empirical research using common law.

    But we must tell men how to speak truthfully for it is unnatural to them. Language evolved to negotiate, not speak truth

    Western man needs no lies. Truth is our weapon, not deceit. Even deceit with good intent produces negative externalities.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Philosophy of Aristocracy

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-07-17 05:19:00 UTC

  • MAYBE SOME PEOPLE CATCH ON = BUT OTHERS DONT: UNITY BY TRADE. (important) I have

    MAYBE SOME PEOPLE CATCH ON = BUT OTHERS DONT: UNITY BY TRADE.

    (important)

    I have to continue to crush the Rothbardian fallacy just like I have to continue to crush the neocon fallacy, and the postmodern fallacy. The socialist fallacy has been crushed. And we are in the process of crushing the Keynesian fallacy and the democratic fallacy.

    But to unite libertarians both artisanal, bourgeoisie and martial, I have to kill off the competing lies. Why? because the truth is uncomfortable for each of us. But it is only the truth that illustrates our common goals, and the high cost we must each pay to create liberty by the organized use of violence to deny it to others.

    And in that organization we must understand we must each sacrifice class perfection in order to achieve class maximum good: the artisan, the bourgeoisie, and the martial must limit their gains to that which imposes no cost upon the other two.

    To be an army we must obey the natural law discovered by warriors: impose no cost upon your brothers.

    We insure one another’s property. All of it. In every form. That which one expends his life’s efforts upon determines his investment in his property. The scale of that investment is not determined by his efforts, but by its value to others in providing incentives to change state of the universe from the current condition to one more favorable.

    So between effort and scale we know value exists. But even if we have difficulty measuring it other than by comparison, that value is never zero, and as such must be respected.

    This is the reciprocal exchange of insurance of property between warriors that creates the institution of property and if sufficiently rigorous, the condition of liberty.

    And no other means exists by which to construct either.

    Liberty cannot be obtained by permission, only by construction.

    Curt Doolittle

    the Philosophy of Aristocracy

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine

    Source date (UTC): 2016-07-17 05:06:00 UTC

  • MORE ON THE GREAT SHIFT Haidt provided causal relation btw enlightenment Natural

    MORE ON THE GREAT SHIFT

    Haidt provided causal relation btw enlightenment Natural Law and contemporary natural law

    Political compromise btw gender/class moved from in-family to houses of govt.

    The problem then is monopoly majoritarianism instead of houses for classes: trades.

    But families in post-agrarian economies are unequal insurers of last resort

    Ironically perhaps: individualism destroyed the possibility of expanding democracy.

    Albeit this is too causally dense an explanation for communication via twitter.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-07-17 04:55:00 UTC

  • WHAT DOES FASCISM MEAN? TO: @jeffreyatucker on FASCISM Fascism is a technology b

    WHAT DOES FASCISM MEAN?

    TO: @jeffreyatucker on FASCISM

    Fascism is a technology by which a tribe, and nation, can marshall all economic resources to defeat universalist communism.

    Just as Napoleonic Total War mobilized all citizens for martial warfare, Fascism mobilizes the economy for economic war.

    Marxist Socialism attempts to mobilize all (universally) men for economic war against the middle and upper classes.

    So while you mean well, it is either and error or facetious to cast Fascism as a model rather than a weapon of warfare.

    Rothbardian Libertarianism cannot ‘admit’ that these are methods of war, because it would demonstrate RL disutility in war.

    And we are well aware by now that Rothbardian Libertarianism is an attempt to escape costs for all commons necessary or not.

    I think you are one of the best souls I have met in the community. But that does not mean you do not err out of cog. bias.

    Even the saints are not perfect.

    Fascism, Nationalism,Trade Policy are weapons of economic warfare. Violence has merely shifted into economics.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Philosophy of Aristocracy

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine

    Source date (UTC): 2016-07-17 04:46:00 UTC

  • Our only social science is natural law using the common law, just as physical la

    Our only social science is natural law using the common law, just as physical law uses empirical testing. Everything else is propaganda.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-07-17 04:40:00 UTC

  • YES, ROTHBARDIAN LIBERTARIANS ARE MARXISTS, BUT ARYAN LIBERTARIANS ARE JUST THE

    YES, ROTHBARDIAN LIBERTARIANS ARE MARXISTS, BUT ARYAN LIBERTARIANS ARE JUST THE OPPOSITE.

    ( important piece )

    I suppose it’s difficult for Rothbardian Libertines to face the harsh reality that their narrative relies upon the Jewish and Marxist fallacy that man was oppressed by his rulers rather than domesticated out of animal barbarism through constant culling of malcontents, parasites, and the unproductive.

    If you are a Rothbardian libertarian you must de facto be a Marxist, whether you ascribe to the socialist economic model or the libertine economic model is actually irrelevant.

    The economic model is merely a reflection of class reproductive needs, or demographic constituency – two terms which are synonyms reflecting only the difference between subjective desire and objective causality.

    The Jews gave us the comforting fallacy of victim hood in the forms of communism, libertinism, and neoconservatism.

    The aryans gave us the uncomfortable truths of nature worship hero worship, and the sacredness of family, Aristotelianism, sovereign rule of law between warrior heads of households, and heroism in the contribution to the commons as duty and status.

    The truth is uncomfortable but simple.

    Eradicate parasitism and save surpluses in the commons and you will, over the long term, defeat all opponents.

    The only source of Liberty is the organised application of violence to suppress all parasitism.

    First by centralising local rents as taxation necessary to create the moral order we call Liberty.

    Second by suppressing all rents from the central order, by incremental replacement with competitions – just as we suppressed local parasitism through competition.

    Then leaving nothing but rule of law, a market for commons prohibiting consumption, and a market for consumption prohibiting parasitism by the commons.

    This is the most rational, logical, scientific form of government available to man.

    Every other kind requires deceit.

    Which is why every other civilisation and every government within each civilisation relied upon deceit.

    The west discovered and benefitted from uncomfortable technologies of truth, testimony, sovereignty and property. Despite their high cost.

    We have exchanged the high normative cost of truth, testimony, sovereignty and property for the high material cost of taxation, loss of rule of law, loss of Liberty, loss of sovereignty, loss of family, loss of tribe and race, and loss of civilisation.

    In retrospect we have made very bad exchange.

    Thankfully with truth and violence we can correct it.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-07-17 04:07:00 UTC

  • ONLY AUTISTS, NARCISSISTS, AND THE ANTI SOCIAL CAN BE FOOLED BY ROTHBARDIANISM.

    ONLY AUTISTS, NARCISSISTS, AND THE ANTI SOCIAL CAN BE FOOLED BY ROTHBARDIANISM.

    It’s actually pretty obvious that the only person who could think like a rothbardian libertarian is an autistic or narcissist that has only limited understanding of himself, and no understanding of others, and near total buy-in of the Marxist view of history claiming man was oppressed.

    When the opposite is true: man was forcibly domesticated against the will of the majority of men and women. And our prosperity is largely the result of that domestication – of the underclasses – and those regions that failed to domesticate their underclasses through suppressing their reproduction remained in poverty, disease, violence thievery, corruption and disease.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-07-17 03:38:00 UTC